The first amazing thing about this report is that it comes from an official government Statistics Bureau in Scandinavia of all places. But then again, the Norwegians hate being lumped in with the conformist Swedes and socialist Danes.pdf
You don't need to read Norwegian to get the report. The link below takes you to the official English translation:
“To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?”
https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.
Unlike the Michael Mann cabal, the authors of this paper and their specialist associates show all their workings in extensive appendices. Their statistics are immaculate, and their conclusions conservative. It''s the right stuff.knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.”
A very brief summary of conclusions is at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
and a more measured piece, once the author overcomes his amazement at Scandinavians being so forward with the truth ("No Way, Norway!"), sets the perspective on this paper''s importance at
https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/
For those too slack or too mathematically handicapped to read the short article, here's the executive summary:
"The results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of
Enjoy!
Andre Jute
Funny how the hockey sticks disappear when you do honest statistics over relevant periods.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 11:13:30 PM UTC+1, Andre Jute wrote:DP1007.pdf
The first amazing thing about this report is that it comes from an official government Statistics Bureau in Scandinavia of all places. But then again, the Norwegians hate being lumped in with the conformist Swedes and socialist Danes.
You don't need to read Norwegian to get the report. The link below takes you to the official English translation:
“To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?”
https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/
knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.”Unlike the Michael Mann cabal, the authors of this paper and their specialist associates show all their workings in extensive appendices. Their statistics are immaculate, and their conclusions conservative. It''s the right stuff.
A very brief summary of conclusions is at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
and a more measured piece, once the author overcomes his amazement at Scandinavians being so forward with the truth ("No Way, Norway!"), sets the perspective on this paper''s importance at
https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/
For those too slack or too mathematically handicapped to read the short article, here's the executive summary:
"The results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of
Enjoy!
Andre Jute
Funny how the hockey sticks disappear when you do honest statistics over relevant periods.
The comments below the article at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
are knowledgeable and interesting. -- AJ
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:46:01 AM UTC-7, Doug Landau wrote:
<snip>
I guess not., But then I designed and programmed liquid and gas chromatographs which taught me how to understand spectrometry.Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:23:37 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:DP1007.pdf
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 11:13:30 PM UTC+1, Andre Jute wrote:
The first amazing thing about this report is that it comes from an official government Statistics Bureau in Scandinavia of all places. But then again, the Norwegians hate being lumped in with the conformist Swedes and socialist Danes.
You don't need to read Norwegian to get the report. The link below takes you to the official English translation:
“To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?”
https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/
knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.”Unlike the Michael Mann cabal, the authors of this paper and their specialist associates show all their workings in extensive appendices. Their statistics are immaculate, and their conclusions conservative. It''s the right stuff.
A very brief summary of conclusions is at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
and a more measured piece, once the author overcomes his amazement at Scandinavians being so forward with the truth ("No Way, Norway!"), sets the perspective on this paper''s importance at
https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/
For those too slack or too mathematically handicapped to read the short article, here's the executive summary:
"The results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of
through atmospheric gases is virtually identical for all gases. Once the heated air reaches the upper stratosphere and the air is too thin to conduct properly the air molecules receive solar rations both directly from the sun and as reflection from theEnjoy!
Andre Jute
Funny how the hockey sticks disappear when you do honest statistics over relevant periods.
The comments below the article at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
are knowledgeable and interesting. -- AJ
Those comments are ALL subverted short term temperature histories that do not properly show any correct data from the little ice age or the huge high temperatures which were world wide in the dust bowl years.
I must also repeat that there is a significant problem using computer models developed by people looking for government grants rather than expanding scientific knowledge.
The areas of absorption of CO2 is on the far tail end of the spectrum emitted from the sun. There is so little energy at this point that it is just barely above the average temperature of the sea.
Because of the density of Earth's atmosphere, virtually 100% of the radiation absorbed at ground level is emitted via conduction and NOT radiation. CO2 therefore, has nothing to do with the temperatures in the atmosphere since the conduction of heat
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 5:08:45 PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:DP1007.pdf
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:23:37 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 11:13:30 PM UTC+1, Andre Jute wrote:
The first amazing thing about this report is that it comes from an official government Statistics Bureau in Scandinavia of all places. But then again, the Norwegians hate being lumped in with the conformist Swedes and socialist Danes.
You don't need to read Norwegian to get the report. The link below takes you to the official English translation:
“To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?”
https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/
of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.”Unlike the Michael Mann cabal, the authors of this paper and their specialist associates show all their workings in extensive appendices. Their statistics are immaculate, and their conclusions conservative. It''s the right stuff.
A very brief summary of conclusions is at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
and a more measured piece, once the author overcomes his amazement at Scandinavians being so forward with the truth ("No Way, Norway!"), sets the perspective on this paper''s importance at
https://climatediscussionnexus.com/2023/10/04/no-way-norway/
For those too slack or too mathematically handicapped to read the short article, here's the executive summary:
"The results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level
through atmospheric gases is virtually identical for all gases. Once the heated air reaches the upper stratosphere and the air is too thin to conduct properly the air molecules receive solar rations both directly from the sun and as reflection from theEnjoy!
Andre Jute
Funny how the hockey sticks disappear when you do honest statistics over relevant periods.
The comments below the article at https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/10/a-new-report-throws-cold-water-on-man-made-global-warming-pseudoscience/
are knowledgeable and interesting. -- AJ
Those comments are ALL subverted short term temperature histories that do not properly show any correct data from the little ice age or the huge high temperatures which were world wide in the dust bowl years.
I must also repeat that there is a significant problem using computer models developed by people looking for government grants rather than expanding scientific knowledge.
The areas of absorption of CO2 is on the far tail end of the spectrum emitted from the sun. There is so little energy at this point that it is just barely above the average temperature of the sea.
Because of the density of Earth's atmosphere, virtually 100% of the radiation absorbed at ground level is emitted via conduction and NOT radiation. CO2 therefore, has nothing to do with the temperatures in the atmosphere since the conduction of heat
that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 5:46:01 PM UTC+1, Doug Landau wrote:like Michael Mann), and they were working with the official statistics, same as the global warmies -- but they weren't trying, as the global warmies did, to tell and protect a profitable lie. Or, in the words of Michael Mann, "Hide the decline."
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
What's your problem, Doug? That's a scientific paper, not a "story made up". Their workings are all there in appendices, the references check out, the statistics are sound (which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for the global warmie clowns
Andre Jute
CO2 is tree food. Global warmies are serial forest-killers.
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:04:27 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:like Michael Mann), and they were working with the official statistics, same as the global warmies -- but they weren't trying, as the global warmies did, to tell and protect a profitable lie. Or, in the words of Michael Mann, "Hide the decline."
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 5:46:01 PM UTC+1, Doug Landau wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
What's your problem, Doug? That's a scientific paper, not a "story made up". Their workings are all there in appendices, the references check out, the statistics are sound (which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for the global warmie clowns
Andre Jute
CO2 is tree food. Global warmies are serial forest-killers.
Doug is talking about MRS and MRSI or magnetic resonance spectroscopic brain imaging. While not the same thing as real Spectroscopy it can give you and idea of how it operates.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
Tell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
Tell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see therewere even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunichwere even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see there
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
Perhaps including a link to the source article, instead of just the
graph, would be more interesting: ><https://johnenglander.net/co2-levels-and-mass-extinction-events/>
"During past periods of abrupt change - the most recent one occurring >approximately 50 million years ago - it took roughly a million years
for CO2 to change by one hundred ppm. Thus it is now changing about
25,000 times faster than in known geologic history."
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.Tell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see there
and
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau <doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.Tell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see there
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunichwere even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see there
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
Perhaps including a link to the source article, instead of just the
graph, would be more interesting: ><https://johnenglander.net/co2-levels-and-mass-extinction-events/>
"During past periods of abrupt change - the most recent one occurring >approximately 50 million years ago - it took roughly a million years
for CO2 to change by one hundred ppm. Thus it is now changing about
25,000 times faster than in known geologic history."
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07 PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau <doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.Tell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can see
Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJhttps://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
On a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the Industrial
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07 PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. >>>>> https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can seeTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the Industrial
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
That's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06 PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07 PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. >>>>> https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why >>>>>
--
Cheers,
John B.
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can seeTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunichundigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per >>>>>>>> million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM. >>>>>>>> In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. >>>>>>>> https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why >>>>>>>>
--
Cheers,
John B.
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can seeTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same people
But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are
rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing
it?
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. >> >>>>> https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can seeTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same people that
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in your
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range. >>>>>> https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why >>>>>>
--
Cheers,
John B.
there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you can seeTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
That's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sure
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per >>>>>>>> million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM. >>>>>>>> In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why >>>>>>>>
--
Cheers,
John B.
see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you canTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same people
But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are"Magic!"
rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing
it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:50:55 AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote:your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per >>>>>>>> million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM. >>>>>>>> In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you canTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same people
the rest of the lowest common denominators. Congratulations.But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing"Magic!"
it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
At last you get something right, Franki-boy. When Scientology has more Science in it than Global Warming, there are only two alternative explanations left for the global warmies. Most chose lies, you choose magic. For once you're making more sense than
Andre Jute
Even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a rotten nut by sense of smell.
In the 1950's American nuclear submarines surfaced at the North Pole in entirely open water of three occasions.
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 8:54:43?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:50:55?AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> > On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote: >> > >>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >> > >>>>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found in
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM. >> > >>>>>>>> In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as you canTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
people that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders. >> > >Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same
than the rest of the lowest common denominators. Congratulations.At last you get something right, Franki-boy. When Scientology has more Science in it than Global Warming, there are only two alternative explanations left for the global warmies. Most chose lies, you choose magic. For once you're making more senseBut Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are"Magic!"
rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing
it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
grow in the Winter. But being stupid that would never occur to him. As for the rest of the glaciers above the the arctic circle and below the Antarctic circle NEVER see any sunlight summer or winter and the average temperatures there are -40 degrees.Andre Jute
Even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a rotten nut by sense of smell.
Well at least Krygowski is on the correct track. Dumb-ass Slocomb actually believes that the glaciers are shrinking. I guess he is unaware that it is summertime and the few glaciers know enough to get some sun can be expected to shrink in the Summer and
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:43:11 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunichin your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 8:54:43?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:50:55?AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: >> > >>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug Landau
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:So what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per >> > >>>>>>>> million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
can see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as youTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond the
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
people that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sureThat's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that up?
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same
than the rest of the lowest common denominators. Congratulations.At last you get something right, Franki-boy. When Scientology has more Science in it than Global Warming, there are only two alternative explanations left for the global warmies. Most chose lies, you choose magic. For once you're making more sense"Magic!"
But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are
rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing >> > > it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
and grow in the Winter. But being stupid that would never occur to him. As for the rest of the glaciers above the the arctic circle and below the Antarctic circle NEVER see any sunlight summer or winter and the average temperatures there are -40 degrees.Andre Jute
Even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a rotten nut by sense of smell.
Well at least Krygowski is on the correct track. Dumb-ass Slocomb actually believes that the glaciers are shrinking. I guess he is unaware that it is summertime and the few glaciers know enough to get some sun can be expected to shrink in the Summer
Re glacier: See https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/big-thaw
which says in part, "When President Taft created Glacier National Park
in 1910, it was home to an estimated 150 glaciers. Since then the
number has decreased to fewer than 30, and most of those remaining
have shrunk in area by two-thirds. Fagre predicts that within 30 years
most if not all of the park's namesake glaciers will disappear."
And as for open water at north pole. Yes there is, at times, open
water in the Aortic Ocean. Called "leads". You can read all about them
at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_(sea_ice)
Care to provide us with more examples of your ignorance?
--
Cheers,
John B.
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 2:06:47 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:in your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:43:11 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 8:54:43?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:50:55?AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
can see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as youTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
the Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
up?That's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that
people that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sure
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same
than the rest of the lowest common denominators. Congratulations.At last you get something right, Franki-boy. When Scientology has more Science in it than Global Warming, there are only two alternative explanations left for the global warmies. Most chose lies, you choose magic. For once you're making more sense"Magic!"
But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are >> > > rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing >> > > it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
and grow in the Winter. But being stupid that would never occur to him. As for the rest of the glaciers above the the arctic circle and below the Antarctic circle NEVER see any sunlight summer or winter and the average temperatures there are -40 degrees.Andre Jute
Even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a rotten nut by sense of smell.
Well at least Krygowski is on the correct track. Dumb-ass Slocomb actually believes that the glaciers are shrinking. I guess he is unaware that it is summertime and the few glaciers know enough to get some sun can be expected to shrink in the Summer
Stupid is as stupid does.Re glacier: See https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/big-thaw
which says in part, "When President Taft created Glacier National Park
in 1910, it was home to an estimated 150 glaciers. Since then the
number has decreased to fewer than 30, and most of those remaining
have shrunk in area by two-thirds. Fagre predicts that within 30 years most if not all of the park's namesake glaciers will disappear."
And as for open water at north pole. Yes there is, at times, open
water in the Aortic Ocean. Called "leads". You can read all about them
at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_(sea_ice)
Care to provide us with more examples of your ignorance?
--
Cheers,
John B.
Are you malicious or merely a stupid peasant, Slow Johnn?. There are, and have always been, glaciers disappearing while other shot up elsewhere. That is the nature of glaciers, you moron.
Mr Kunich says sometimes a submarine can surface at the North Pole, and you find a link that says there is sometimes open water at the North Pole, and then call him a liar in your very next sentence. You're totally lacking in sophistication, aren't you?
Andre Jute
I bet Slow Johnny Slowcomb tortured cats and other small animals as a child. He lacks the moral foundation to grasp it is wrong.
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/706.png
This is the USS Skate and the USS Sharkfin at the north pole.
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. Sothat proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,
Doug is talking about MRS and MRSI or magnetic resonance spectroscopic brain imaging. While not the same thing as real Spectroscopy it can give you and idea of how it operates.
Doug is talking about MRS and MRSI or magnetic resonancespectroscopic brain imaging. While not the same thing as real
Spectroscopy it can give you and idea of how it operates.
MRI is a real form of spectroscopy
Technically spectroscopy is in the light spectrum. MRI is far above that and rather than isolating frequencies of light looks at chemical reactions to X-ray frequencies. Same thing but used in a different manner. Chromatography looks at the frequenciesDoug is talking about MRS and MRSI or magnetic resonance spectroscopic brain imaging. While not the same thing as real Spectroscopy it can give you and idea of how it operates.MRI is a real form of spectroscopy
Doug Landau <doug....@gmail.com> writes:Essentially it is all spectroscopy but used in different manners. Chromatography is the visible spectrum of light. CO2 doesn't absorb visible light and virtually ALL of the energy in Sunlight is in the Ultra-Violet and visible light spectrum.
Doug is talking about MRS and MRSI or magnetic resonancespectroscopic brain imaging. While not the same thing as real
Spectroscopy it can give you and idea of how it operates.
MRI is a real form of spectroscopyTrue. What is "real spectroscopy"? Mass spectroscopy? Raman
spectroscopy? Electron energy loss spectroscopy?
--
that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
The important thing here is 420.
On 10/26/2023 6:07 PM, Doug Landau wrote:that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
The important thing here is 420.Hitler's birthday? What?
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 2:06:47 AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:in your undigested googblebug, detracts nothing from what Mr Kunich said.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:43:11 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 8:54:43?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 3:50:55?AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/24/2023 6:43 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 9:24:02?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/24/2023 10:04 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 4:13:06?PM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:39:07?PM UTC+1, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:44:14?AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 1:12:41?AM UTC+1, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT), Doug LandauSo what, Slow Johnny. Mr Kunich merely said there were some trees growing even in ice ages, with the implication from his text, which you missed altogether, that CO2 was always plant food. Averages over centuries, which is what you found
<doug....@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>Poor old Tommy he's got it wrong yet again.
Over and over the question arises as to why ANYONE would be afraid of CO2 which is a fertilizer especially knowing that during the last full Ice Age that CO2 was more than 4 times what it is today?
Tom. You are just not the kind of guy that that story was made up to tell to.
During ice ages CO2 levels were in the region of 200 parts per
million. Today the C02 level is in the neighborhood of 400 PPM.
In the inter glacier periods the CO2 level was in the 280 PPM range.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
more details
https://new.nsf.gov/news/scientists-solve-long-standing-mystery-why
--
Cheers,
John B.
can see there were even Ice Ages with CO2 levels over 5,000 ppm. When you're a stupid driver of street sweepers it isn't particularly bright to think you have a clue about anything.On a good day Slocomb ALMOST reaches the level of moron. The last Ice age started about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago The chart here shows the time of extinction events. These events were caused by Ice Ages and as youTell us, does you obsession with Mr Kunich really make you as vicious and stupid as you seem?
Unsigned so as not to encourage a posturing fool.
the Industrial Revolution would show that man has nothing to do with CO2 levels. -- AJOn a historic scale, as in that image, Climate Warming looks really pisswilly. These hacks who created the Global Warming scare story were particularly poorly educated, but even they knew the looking back only a few hundred years beyond
https://www.johnenglander.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CO2%20550my%20Extinction%20Chart%20from%20Ward.jpg
up?That's the entire point but morons are standing in line to claim the Michael Moore misinformation despite we the emails between n him and his crew deciding to counterfeit the records. What sort of ass doesn't have the ability to look that
people that believe with religious fervor in global warming and open borders.Acolytes of the Global Warming religious sect will say, sure
Moore lied about the data because actual support for his
thesis cannot be found, but 'he speaks to a larger truth'
which means it's a lie.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the small rise in CO2 has done anything. But the same people that are presently protesting over at Stanford that the Israeli's are killing HAMAS when it was HAMAS that started it, are the same
than the rest of the lowest common denominators. Congratulations.At last you get something right, Franki-boy. When Scientology has more Science in it than Global Warming, there are only two alternative explanations left for the global warmies. Most chose lies, you choose magic. For once you're making more sense"Magic!"
But Tommy, the glaciers are getting smaller, the ocean levels are >> > > rising, and perhaps it isn't CO2 levels. So tell us what is causing >> > > it?
--
- Frank Krygowski
and grow in the Winter. But being stupid that would never occur to him. As for the rest of the glaciers above the the arctic circle and below the Antarctic circle NEVER see any sunlight summer or winter and the average temperatures there are -40 degrees.Andre Jute
Even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a rotten nut by sense of smell.
Well at least Krygowski is on the correct track. Dumb-ass Slocomb actually believes that the glaciers are shrinking. I guess he is unaware that it is summertime and the few glaciers know enough to get some sun can be expected to shrink in the Summer
Stupid is as stupid does.Re glacier: See https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/big-thaw
which says in part, "When President Taft created Glacier National Park
in 1910, it was home to an estimated 150 glaciers. Since then the
number has decreased to fewer than 30, and most of those remaining
have shrunk in area by two-thirds. Fagre predicts that within 30 years most if not all of the park's namesake glaciers will disappear."
And as for open water at north pole. Yes there is, at times, open
water in the Aortic Ocean. Called "leads". You can read all about them
at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_(sea_ice)
Care to provide us with more examples of your ignorance?
--
Cheers,
John B.
Are you malicious or merely a stupid peasant, Slow Johnn?. There are, and have always been, glaciers disappearing while other shot up elsewhere. That is the nature of glaciers, you moron.
Mr Kunich says sometimes a submarine can surface at the North Pole, and you find a link that says there is sometimes open water at the North Pole, and then call him a liar in your very next sentence. You're totally lacking in sophistication, aren't you?
Andre Jute
I bet Slow Johnny Slowcomb tortured cats and other small animals as a child. He lacks the moral foundation to grasp it is wrong.
On 10/26/2023 6:07 PM, Doug Landau wrote:that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
The important thing here is 420.Hitler's birthday? What?
On the way across that Arctic Ocean the USS Skate surfaced a number of times to test the ice thickness and gauge whether surfacing at the North Pole would be practical. That is where most of those pictures of submarines surrounded by ice come from. TheACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Chromatography is the visible spectrum of light.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom KunichThe ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
On the way across that Arctic Ocean the USS Skate surfaced a number of times to test the ice thickness and gauge whether surfacing at the North Pole would be practical. That is where most of those pictures of submarines surrounded by ice come from.
Nice photo. Perhaps some background might be worthwhile. It seems
that the North Pole was mostly ice free during some years and ice
bound during other years:
"Ice at the North Pole in 1958 and 1959 - not so thick" <https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/>
The web site belongs to Anthony Watts, who's beliefs on climate change
are similar to yours:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)>
One might suspect that his opinions are swayed by his sponsor, the
Heartland Institute.
Pick a Fact Check site: <https://www.google.com/search?q=fact+check+anthony+watts>
Depending on the source, the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050. Pick your favorite source and article:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_sea_ice_decline> <https://www.google.com/search?q=north+pole+ice+free>
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On the way across that Arctic Ocean the USS Skate surfaced a number of times to test the ice thickness and gauge whether surfacing at the North Pole would be practical. That is where most of those pictures of submarines surrounded by ice come from.
Nice photo. Perhaps some background might be worthwhile. It seems
that the North Pole was mostly ice free during some years and ice
bound during other years:
"Ice at the North Pole in 1958 and 1959 - not so thick" <https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/>
The web site belongs to Anthony Watts, who's beliefs on climate change
are similar to yours: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)>
One might suspect that his opinions are swayed by his sponsor, the Heartland Institute.
Pick a Fact Check site: <https://www.google.com/search?q=fact+check+anthony+watts>
Depending on the source, the North Pole is expected to be ice free in summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050. Pick your favorite source and article:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_sea_ice_decline> <https://www.google.com/search?q=north+pole+ice+free>
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:32 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
Hopefully, the ground will not rise to meet the snow per Tom's
submarine description. However, if it happens, please take some
ACTUAL photos.
38F now in Santa Cruz CA. It's not cold enough yet to snow, but it's
trying. NWS has issued fire and high wind warnings of 20 to 30 mph
for Saturday and Sunday which will likely be accompanied by power
outages. Meanwhile, my steel wood burner is partly disassembled and
awaiting time for me to flux weld a crack and other repairs. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/LLYM5DPaHAUMhM8z5>
What else can go wrong?
On 10/27/2023 9:41 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:32 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
Hopefully, the ground will not rise to meet the snow per Tom's
submarine description. However, if it happens, please take some
ACTUAL photos.
38F now in Santa Cruz CA. It's not cold enough yet to snow, but it's trying. NWS has issued fire and high wind warnings of 20 to 30 mph
for Saturday and Sunday which will likely be accompanied by power
outages. Meanwhile, my steel wood burner is partly disassembled and awaiting time for me to flux weld a crack and other repairs. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/LLYM5DPaHAUMhM8z5>
What else can go wrong?
Zombie apocalypse.Which is precisely what Liebermann is attempting to convince people he is an expert on. Where precisely did I claim that the land was going to rise? Just another example of Liebermann lying because he believes he might gain from it.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:32 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
Hopefully, the ground will not rise to meet the snow per Tom's
submarine description. However, if it happens, please take some
ACTUAL photos.
38F now in Santa Cruz CA. It's not cold enough yet to snow, but it's
trying. NWS has issued fire and high wind warnings of 20 to 30 mph
for Saturday and Sunday which will likely be accompanied by power
outages. Meanwhile, my steel wood burner is partly disassembled and
awaiting time for me to flux weld a crack and other repairs. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/LLYM5DPaHAUMhM8z5>
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 8:12:15?AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 10/27/2023 9:41 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:32 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >> >Zombie apocalypse.
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
Hopefully, the ground will not rise to meet the snow per Tom's
submarine description. However, if it happens, please take some
ACTUAL photos.
38F now in Santa Cruz CA. It's not cold enough yet to snow, but it's
trying. NWS has issued fire and high wind warnings of 20 to 30 mph
for Saturday and Sunday which will likely be accompanied by power
outages. Meanwhile, my steel wood burner is partly disassembled and
awaiting time for me to flux weld a crack and other repairs.
<https://photos.app.goo.gl/LLYM5DPaHAUMhM8z5>
What else can go wrong?
Where precisely did I claim that the land was going to rise?
Just another example of Liebermann lying because he believes he might gain from it.
Uh.. pisswilly?
that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
The important thing here is 420.
On 10/26/2023 6:07 PM, Doug Landau wrote:that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging somone,
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then. So
The important thing here is 420.Hitler's birthday? What?
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
My problem??? With your article?? I liked it, myself.
The idea of man-made global warming is pure hubris. A flea, doing the backstroke down the river, crying "rIse the drawbridge"
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 5:17:14 PM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:So that proves that Global Warming is real! It was always there, as you can see in the many historic heat peaks from hundreds of thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution." If I said something as confused as that, you'd know I was ragging
On 10/26/2023 6:07 PM, Doug Landau wrote:
The way I read the comments there, those posters were making satirical and sarcastic comments about the beliefs of the global warmies. Sorta like, "Yeahbut, whaddaya expect when you go back 420 thousand years? There weren't any people back then.
Hey. Do you know what's at the bottom of the English Channel, and underneath Greenland ice?The important thing here is 420.Hitler's birthday? What?
Stone walls. Built by stoned stoneworkers.
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On the way across that Arctic Ocean the USS Skate surfaced a number of times to test the ice thickness and gauge whether surfacing at the North Pole would be practical. That is where most of those pictures of submarines surrounded by ice come from.
Nice photo. Perhaps some background might be worthwhile. It seems
that the North Pole was mostly ice free during some years and ice
bound during other years:
"Ice at the North Pole in 1958 and 1959 - not so thick" <https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/>
The web site belongs to Anthony Watts, who's beliefs on climate change
are similar to yours: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)>
One might suspect that his opinions are swayed by his sponsor, the Heartland Institute.
Pick a Fact Check site: <https://www.google.com/search?q=fact+check+anthony+watts>
Depending on the source, the North Pole is expected to be ice free in summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050. Pick your favorite source and article:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_sea_ice_decline> <https://www.google.com/search?q=north+pole+ice+free>
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
--
Andrew Muzi
a...@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> writes:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:22:32 -0500, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 10/26/2023 8:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
<cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
The ACTUAL photo of the North Pole surfacing us here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/402650022935117832/
Incidentally, the North Pole did not surface. It was the various
submarines that were photographed after surfacing.
"the North Pole is expected to be ice free in
summer somewhere between 2030 and 2050."
And I'm told first snow here will be Tuesday. Or not.
Hopefully, the ground will not rise to meet the snow per Tom's
submarine description. However, if it happens, please take some
ACTUAL photos.
38F now in Santa Cruz CA. It's not cold enough yet to snow, but it's trying. NWS has issued fire and high wind warnings of 20 to 30 mphA balmy 78F here in yankee land. Nice day for a ride. We're supposed
for Saturday and Sunday which will likely be accompanied by power
outages. Meanwhile, my steel wood burner is partly disassembled and awaiting time for me to flux weld a crack and other repairs. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/LLYM5DPaHAUMhM8z5>
to have frost next week, which seems plausible.
One trouble with climate doomers is that they rely on numerical
predictions that have never demonstrated any skill in prediction at all. Short term weather forecasters do make skilled predictions, although
they are clearly not perfect. As some sage once said, "Prediction is
hard, especially about the future."
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 299 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 79:47:00 |
| Calls: | 6,696 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,229 |
| Messages: | 5,347,656 |
