• "You're not doing it right"

    From AMuzi@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 11 12:51:21 2023
    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Oct 11 11:20:45 2023
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "

    Sports has progressed from a public spectacle of lethal carnage to
    something less lethal. We have a way to go before we can make the
    various contact sports into something less lethal.

    This article was indicated as a source for the above article: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753523002734>
    Click on the black PDF button near the top of the page for a more
    readable format.

    The article is typical of the "Nobody follows the rules. Therefore,
    more rules are needed" mentality.

    Table 1 show a list of recent cycling mechanical failures. Most are
    "handlebar failure" and two are "steerer tube failure". I suppose it
    might be useful to strengthen the handlebars before applying
    additional safety measures.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    Marxist? I'm not sure which political label might be appropriate for
    those who believe that ANYTHING is justifiable if it can "save just
    one life". The ultimate expression of a safe sport is baseball, where
    the perfect game, a shutout, is where nothing interesting happens.
    Hopefully, cycling will not follow the same beaten path.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Rider@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Oct 11 15:30:30 2023
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:


    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    Well. what can we expect when the government, the media, education
    cabal, the medication peddlers, and more are telling us how awful our
    lives will be if we don't follow their instructions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Oct 11 12:49:25 2023
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 10:51:26 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    a...@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    As it turns out, we have people preying for another Gulag Archipelago so that they can force you to do as they please or kill you for not doing so. Frank is the perfect example of this. While at a distance I have plenty of time to cool down - things said
    like this in my presence could solicit a rather painful warning that we are free to do as we please.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Krygowski@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Oct 11 17:13:32 2023
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!"
    will change nothing.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.

    --
    - Frank Krygowski

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Oct 11 21:50:38 2023
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/ >>
    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!"
    will change nothing.

    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.

    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to Roger Meriman on Wed Oct 11 15:37:28 2023
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they knew that it could cause cancer and shorten
    their lifespans. I have no doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't be noticeably effected.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 05:50:55 2023
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 21:50:38 GMT, Roger Meriman <roger@sarlet.com>
    wrote:

    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:



    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!"
    will change nothing.

    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isnt needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >they arent following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one >of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, Im fine and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie cant for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.

    Indeed doesnt sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman


    Well, the solution seems obvious. Simply install a speed control on
    all racing bicycles that will restrict the maximum speed to, oh say, 5
    mph.

    Which may sound illogical but no more so then the original "report".
    --
    Cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 07:12:34 2023
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:


    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    What is a "Marxist expert"?

    Someone who advocates paying people not to work? To enjoy a government furnished retirement? To pay unwed women to have children? To,
    essentially provide free collage for some people?
    --
    Cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Oct 11 20:10:32 2023
    On 10/11/2023 4:13 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/ >>
    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the
    realm of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the
    notion that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't
    mean they made any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim
    through it all the way. But the authors seem to think that
    bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound vehicle, typical speed ~25
    mph) should have the same "safety" bureaucracy as Formula 1
    racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. And this is
    based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want
    handlebar failures. Instituting a "safety culture" that says
    "No more handlebar failures!" will change nothing.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You
    shouldn't overuse trigger words.


    'penetrates the corporate world... pursuit of ... profits'

    It's a common faux analysis and misplaced cause (of
    everything Marxist authors dislike) to besmirch any aspect
    of free markets.

    And typically unrelated to the supposed evils or failures,
    as usual.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Wed Oct 11 20:15:08 2023
    On 10/11/2023 7:12 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:


    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/ >>
    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    What is a "Marxist expert"?

    Someone who advocates paying people not to work? To enjoy a government furnished retirement? To pay unwed women to have children? To,
    essentially provide free collage for some people?

    Well, yes,

    "Ye shall know them by their works."
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 09:37:54 2023
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:15:08 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 10/11/2023 7:12 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:


    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    What is a "Marxist expert"?

    Someone who advocates paying people not to work? To enjoy a government
    furnished retirement? To pay unwed women to have children? To,
    essentially provide free collage for some people?

    Well, yes,

    "Ye shall know them by their works."

    The Articles of Confederation, Article 2:
    " Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and
    every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this
    Confederation expressly delegated."

    --
    Cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Thu Oct 12 10:00:27 2023
    Tom Kunich <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!"
    will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though >> as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >> they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have >> a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI
    road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no
    doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John B.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 17:48:44 2023
    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:00:27 GMT, Roger Meriman <roger@sarlet.com>
    wrote:

    Tom Kunich <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41?PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isnt needed though >>> as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >>> they arent following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one >>> of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, Im fine and >>> so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie cant for example have >>> a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesnt sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI
    road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no
    doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. >Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg youd need to make >some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do >work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The "lightest" bike seems to be one built by a German guy named Gunter
    Mai who logged over 20,000km on the machine for a couple years and it
    weighed at around 3.2kg. He has now built a lighter one weighing 2.7
    kg. (:-)
    10 speed cassette, double chain ring, total 20 speed https://antranik.org/worlds-lightest-road-bike-at-2-7kg/
    (:-)
    --
    Cheers,

    John B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Thu Oct 12 11:55:00 2023
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:00:27 GMT, Roger Meriman <roger@sarlet.com>
    wrote:

    Tom Kunich <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41?PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote: >>>> Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>>>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>>>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>>>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >>>> they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI
    road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they >>> knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no
    doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't >>> be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. >> Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make >> some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do >> work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The "lightest" bike seems to be one built by a German guy named Gunter
    Mai who logged over 20,000km on the machine for a couple years and it
    weighed at around 3.2kg. He has now built a lighter one weighing 2.7
    kg. (:-)
    10 speed cassette, double chain ring, total 20 speed https://antranik.org/worlds-lightest-road-bike-at-2-7kg/
    (:-)

    Most of the hill climb bikes tend to be under the UCI limit but not by
    much, get a few headline 4kg but would seem performance trumps absolute
    weight.

    Note UCI doesn’t run these events.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From funkmasterxx@hotmail.com@21:1/5 to Roger Meriman on Thu Oct 12 04:46:56 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From funkmasterxx@hotmail.com@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 05:02:49 2023
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 1:51:26 PM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!
    --

    there's a lot wrong with that article, but little of it (if anything) smacks of Marxism. Not even your poorly parsed edit 'penetrates the corporate world... pursuit of ... profits'.

    I realize you advocate for a completely anarchistic society, but advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the interest of safety isn't indicative of anything other than advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the
    interest of safety. From reading your posts over the years, it's easy to conclude that you might applaud the complete banning of any sanctioning body for competitive cycling. Indeed, there was a movement many years ago (and championed by domestic pro
    cyclist Adam Myerson) to "burn it down". Sure - lets completely eliminate any setting of standards within the the sport and allow for the pursuit of performance and profit at any cost. What could go wrong?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB1LuCUovW4

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to funkma...@hotmail.com on Thu Oct 12 11:55:00 2023
    funkma...@hotmail.com <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote: >>>> Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>>>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>>>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>>>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >>>> they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI
    road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they >>> knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no
    doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't >>> be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. >> Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make >> some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do >> work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.

    If anything I’d expect weight to climb as XC races are becoming more technical at least I’m told!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Thu Oct 12 07:57:10 2023
    On 10/11/2023 9:37 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:15:08 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 10/11/2023 7:12 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:51:21 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:


    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    What is a "Marxist expert"?

    Someone who advocates paying people not to work? To enjoy a government
    furnished retirement? To pay unwed women to have children? To,
    essentially provide free collage for some people?

    Well, yes,

    "Ye shall know them by their works."

    The Articles of Confederation, Article 2:
    " Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and
    every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this
    Confederation expressly delegated."


    Right. States are sovereign and are, as they ought to be,
    the 'laboratories of democracy'.

    https://www.northamerican.com/migration-map

    And people vote on policy with their feet.

    Federalizing such policies is beyond the Constitution's
    scope, as you correctly noted. More explicitly:

    https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-10/
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to funkma...@hotmail.com on Thu Oct 12 08:00:47 2023
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote: >>>> Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>>>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>>>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>>>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly >>>> they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI
    road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they >>> knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no
    doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't >>> be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. >> Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make >> some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do >> work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.

    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to funkma...@hotmail.com on Thu Oct 12 08:02:52 2023
    On 10/12/2023 7:02 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 1:51:26 PM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/ >>
    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!
    --

    there's a lot wrong with that article, but little of it (if anything) smacks of Marxism. Not even your poorly parsed edit 'penetrates the corporate world... pursuit of ... profits'.

    I realize you advocate for a completely anarchistic society, but advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the interest of safety isn't indicative of anything other than advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the
    interest of safety. From reading your posts over the years, it's easy to conclude that you might applaud the complete banning of any sanctioning body for competitive cycling. Indeed, there was a movement many years ago (and championed by domestic pro
    cyclist Adam Myerson) to "burn it down". Sure - lets completely eliminate any setting of standards within the the sport and allow for the pursuit of performance and profit at any cost. What could go wrong?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB1LuCUovW4

    Extrapolating from rider injuries to corporate profits is a
    leap of fanaticism not logic. No entity's shareholders want
    rider injuries in pro racing and in fact they are bad for
    business.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 07:03:38 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:51 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport >>> they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level.
    Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they >> are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.
    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    a...@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    At one time Flunky used to have the ability to read. I suppose that disappeared when he claimed to be an engineer. I said that a sub 15 kg full suspension 29er COULD be built, not that it presently was being built. Even my Ridley is 8 kg because I wouldn'
    t pay for superlight parts. I could save a full kilogram in wheels and tires alone. But I prefer reliability and braking to a kg which I couldn't feel. I did have a Look KG 685 that was 16 lbs with heavy wheels and tire and a Chorus group in a 58 cm so
    plainly building superlight bikes is easy now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 13:41:12 2023
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote: >>> Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote: >>>>> Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made >>>>>> any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the >>>>>> way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird. >>>>>>
    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures. >>>>>> Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they >>>> knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't >>>> be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level. >>> Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do >>> work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.

    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,

    Those disks look like they would warp just if you looked at them the wrong
    way! Be fine on fire roads and similar and for 2015 sort of gravel type
    bike stuff the london 2012 XC mountain bike course is very much rideable by
    a gravel bike bar perhaps some of the drop offs!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 07:08:29 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:02:57 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 7:02 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 1:51:26 PM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm
    of sports and penetrates the corporate world: the notion
    that safety can take a back seat in the pursuit of
    performance or profit. "


    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!
    --

    there's a lot wrong with that article, but little of it (if anything) smacks of Marxism. Not even your poorly parsed edit 'penetrates the corporate world... pursuit of ... profits'.

    I realize you advocate for a completely anarchistic society, but advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the interest of safety isn't indicative of anything other than advocating for an organization to follow its own rules in the
    interest of safety. From reading your posts over the years, it's easy to conclude that you might applaud the complete banning of any sanctioning body for competitive cycling. Indeed, there was a movement many years ago (and championed by domestic pro
    cyclist Adam Myerson) to "burn it down". Sure - lets completely eliminate any setting of standards within the the sport and allow for the pursuit of performance and profit at any cost. What could go wrong?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB1LuCUovW4
    Extrapolating from rider injuries to corporate profits is a
    leap of fanaticism not logic. No entity's shareholders want
    rider injuries in pro racing and in fact they are bad for
    business.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    a...@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    My friend the cop who lives in Phoenix tells me that many team mechanics winter there and they've told him that they have a car that follows the broom wagon and picks up all of the carbon fiber failures so that they are not photographed. So yes it must
    be very bad for business.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Krygowski@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 13:57:53 2023
    On 10/12/2023 9:00 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote: >>> Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman
    wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of
    sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can
    take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they >>>>>> made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it
    all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15
    pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200
    mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's
    weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar
    failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar
    failures!"
    will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed >>>>> though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol
    clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own
    choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m
    fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for
    example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though
    they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport
    they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health
    won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro
    level.
    Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they
    are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to
    make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes
    that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete
    bullshit.

    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,

    Still, the FS one is over 17 pounds. Is someone selling one under 15
    pounds?

    Not that I'm interested in one. Stupid light, chasing diminishing
    returns, etc. etc.

    --
    - Frank Krygowski

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Krygowski@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 13:48:29 2023
    On 10/11/2023 9:10 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 4:13 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "
    ...

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.


    'penetrates the corporate world... pursuit of ... profits'

    It's a common faux analysis and misplaced cause (of everything Marxist authors dislike) to besmirch any aspect of free markets.

    Sorry, Andrew, while I disagree with the slant of the article under
    discussion, I just don't believe that "free markets" should be _totally_
    free. Profit-making companies have a long, long history of putting
    profits above safety, and of externalizing their problems, letting
    others deal with them.

    As I've mentioned, before I was born, my grandfather was killed in an industrial accident that OSHA would have prevented, had it existed. I
    would have liked to meet him.

    But that company and its allies in the industry also made the local
    river into an industrial sewer. It's been almost 50 years that their
    pollution has been stopped, and it's only recently that the river has
    resumed some appearance of normality. But people are still warned not to
    eat many fish, and not to stand where they'll sink into the industrial
    waste muck just under the surface.

    Other examples abound. Companies need at least some reasonable regulation.

    --
    - Frank Krygowski

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Krygowski@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Thu Oct 12 14:02:09 2023
    On 10/12/2023 10:08 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:

    My friend the cop who lives in Phoenix tells me that many team mechanics winter there and they've told him that they have a car that follows the broom wagon and picks up all of the carbon fiber failures so that they are not photographed.
    :-) Ah, such imagination! Tom, why haven't you added fantasy novels and
    movie scripts to your long list of purported achievements?

    --
    - Frank Krygowski

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Meriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Thu Oct 12 18:09:17 2023
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 9:00 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote: >>>> Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman
    wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of >>>>>>>> sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can >>>>>>>> take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they >>>>>>> made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it >>>>>>> all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 >>>>>>> pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 >>>>>>> mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's >>>>>>> weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar
    failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar
    failures!"
    will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed >>>>>> though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol >>>>>> clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own
    choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m >>>>>> fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for
    example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>>>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though >>>>> they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>>>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport >>>>> they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health
    won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro
    level.
    Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they >>>> are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to >>>> make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes
    that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete
    bullshit.

    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe:
    https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,

    Still, the FS one is over 17 pounds. Is someone selling one under 15
    pounds?

    Not that I'm interested in one. Stupid light, chasing diminishing
    returns, etc. etc.

    Very unlikely to be faster or perform better, even within the uk hill climb doesn’t seem to go that low, particularly the folks who win!

    Full suspension MTB light weight rotors and tires are asking for trouble,
    in terms of performance ie grip/braking let alone durability.

    Need to be used in quite narrow type of areas/terrain.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From funkmasterxx@hotmail.com@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Oct 12 13:25:49 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 9:00:51 AM UTC-4, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports >>>>>> and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a >>>>>> back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound >>>>> vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph. >>>>> And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!" >>>>> will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't >>>>> overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport >>> they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level.
    Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they >> are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.
    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    "while Gustav has got the bike down as low as 7.33kg with the same light and sketchy wheel setup as on the hardtail, the complete build here uses some DT Swiss rims & Dugast tubulars for a more race-ready 7.86kg (17.33lb) complete weight."

    Tom wrote "Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI road limit"
    The UCI road limit is 15 pounds (6.8 Kg)

    7.33 > 6.8

    Note the date on that,

    and?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From funkmasterxx@hotmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Thu Oct 12 13:32:36 2023
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 10:03:40 AM UTC-4, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:51 AM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/12/2023 6:46 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 12, 2023 at 6:00:31 AM UTC-4, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Tom Kunich <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 2:50:41 PM UTC-7, Roger Meriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 1:51 PM, AMuzi wrote:

    https://cyclingindustry.news/elite-cycling-has-a-safety-problem-says-report/

    "study unearths a systemic issue that goes beyond the realm of sports
    and penetrates the corporate world: the notion that safety can take a
    back seat in the pursuit of performance or profit. "

    Well, someone found a way to get published. That doesn't mean they made
    any sense.

    The paper didn't hold my interest enough to even skim through it all the
    way. But the authors seem to think that bicycle racing (on a ~15 pound
    vehicle, typical speed ~25 mph) should have the same "safety"
    bureaucracy as Formula 1 racing, with 1800 pound cars hitting 200 mph.
    And this is based on five incidents of handlebar failure? That's weird.

    ISTM that neither the rider, mechanics or teams want handlebar failures.
    Instituting a "safety culture" that says "No more handlebar failures!"
    will change nothing.
    Indeed I suspect that the UCI weight limit for example isn’t needed though
    as evidenced by Stefan Kung while they have a head injury protocol clearly
    they aren’t following it, athletes will not stop of their own choice as one
    of the symptoms of concussion is the desire to keep going, “I’m fine” and
    so on.

    Nature of road cycling does make it challenging, ie can’t for example have
    a substitute while they are assessed.

    O deliver us from 'experts' especially Marxist experts!

    I don't believe that fits Marx's definition of Marxism. You shouldn't
    overuse trigger words.
    Indeed doesn’t sound remotely Marxis

    Roger Merriman

    Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI >>> road limit. Never doubt the foolishness of a pro with visions of
    grandeur. EVERYONE that could afford it was taking drugs even though they
    knew that it could cause cancer and shorten their lifespans. I have no >>> doubt that they are still doping but with the present health passport >>> they have to be very careful perhaps to the point that their health won't
    be noticeably effected.

    Road bikes, absolutely could and can be sub 7 kg at least at the pro level.
    Though with the more focus on aero not sure how close to the limit they >> are.

    I suspect for a XC MTB even a hardtail to reach sub 7kg you’d need to make
    some performance compromises.

    Bit like some of the kit at hill climb bikes, ie ultralight brakes that do
    work but not effectively and so on.

    Roger Merriman

    The claim that someone is selling a 29er FS under 15 lbs is complete bullshit.
    Well, possible if perhaps not optimal for intended use maybe: https://bikerumor.com/bfs2018-the-worlds-lightest-29er-mountain-bikes-are-a-scott-spark-scale/

    Note the date on that,
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    a...@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971
    At one time Flunky used to have the ability to read. I suppose that disappeared when he claimed to be an engineer.

    Funny coming from someone who doesn't remember what he wrote a few hours ago

    I said that a sub 15 kg full suspension 29er COULD be built, not that it presently was being built.

    No, you wrote "Right now they can make full suspension 29ers that weigh under the UCI road limit. "

    The UCI road limit is 15 pounds (6.8 Kg)

    No one, not even from the link Andrew provided, is making a FS 29r under 15 pounds.

    You're still a fucking idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)