1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AVIATION.SOARING

  • New design with unobstructed view cockpit.

    From Gonzalo Garcia-Atance@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 09:39:55 2023
    Hey, guys! I've been thinking about this idea and I'm wondering if it's worth pursuing. So, our gliders have this reclined position where our legs, feet, and the instrument panel are smack in the middle of our field of view. But what if we had a glider
    with a more upright sitting position and a glass cockpit that would let us see well below us as we fly over amazing sights like mountain tops, ridges, clouds, and even wildlife? Some powered aircraft, like the Edgley Optica and the Seabird Seeker, have
    this amazing view, and I just think it would be incredible to have the same experience in a glider.
    If your club had a glider with this cockpit with amazing views and an open class wingspan for keeping a decent performance, would you be interested in flying it? Do you think you would enjoy flying it more than a conventional high-performance glider?
    Thanks, looking forward to hearing your opinions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Galloway@21:1/5 to Gonzalo Garcia-Atance on Wed Mar 22 11:08:02 2023
    On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 16:39:57 UTC, Gonzalo Garcia-Atance wrote:
    Hey, guys! I've been thinking about this idea and I'm wondering if it's worth pursuing. So, our gliders have this reclined position where our legs, feet, and the instrument panel are smack in the middle of our field of view. But what if we had a glider
    with a more upright sitting position and a glass cockpit that would let us see well below us as we fly over amazing sights like mountain tops, ridges, clouds, and even wildlife? Some powered aircraft, like the Edgley Optica and the Seabird Seeker, have
    this amazing view, and I just think it would be incredible to have the same experience in a glider.
    If your club had a glider with this cockpit with amazing views and an open class wingspan for keeping a decent performance, would you be interested in flying it? Do you think you would enjoy flying it more than a conventional high-performance glider?
    Thanks, looking forward to hearing your opinions.

    No thanks. I prefer a cockpit with crash protection up to CS-22 standard.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gonzalo Garcia-Atance@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 12:01:59 2023
    El miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2023 a las 18:08:04 UTC, John Galloway escribió:
    On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 16:39:57 UTC, Gonzalo Garcia-Atance wrote:
    Hey, guys! I've been thinking about this idea and I'm wondering if it's worth pursuing. So, our gliders have this reclined position where our legs, feet, and the instrument panel are smack in the middle of our field of view. But what if we had a
    glider with a more upright sitting position and a glass cockpit that would let us see well below us as we fly over amazing sights like mountain tops, ridges, clouds, and even wildlife? Some powered aircraft, like the Edgley Optica and the Seabird Seeker,
    have this amazing view, and I just think it would be incredible to have the same experience in a glider.
    If your club had a glider with this cockpit with amazing views and an open class wingspan for keeping a decent performance, would you be interested in flying it? Do you think you would enjoy flying it more than a conventional high-performance glider?
    Thanks, looking forward to hearing your opinions.
    No thanks. I prefer a cockpit with crash protection up to CS-22 standard.
    I do not see why it should not be even more save than a conventional reclined pilot position, as you can put more distance between your vertebrae and the exterior of the fuselage.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 11:17:59 2023
    No, because it would probably be pretty ugly, and the all-around view would make it obvious to your buddies that YOU were flying it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Remde@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 13:59:10 2023
    Hi Gonzalo,

    You may find this interesting. It is a prototype/concept made by Glasflügel. I don't know if it actually flew. I posted a page from the book Glasflugel on my Soaring News Facebook page. You can see it using the link below.
    https://www.facebook.com/CumulusSoaring/posts/pfbid0hAnrF9GEx3Bk5LUiHCqgUnUUE8tNvskz5Np8hWx7jMvrYxERaDuNkuTP8Wuf6pP7l

    From the book Glasflügel
    https://www.cumulus-soaring.com/store/glasflugel-book

    Best Regards,

    Paul Remde
    Cumulus Soaring, Inc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 16:26:09 2023
    I do not see why it should not be even more save than a conventional reclined pilot position, as you can put more distance between your vertebrae and the exterior of the fuselage.

    Because Plexiglass has no structural integrity. It will shatter on impact, leaving many sharp fragments to interfere with your skin's ability to keep the blood on the inside of your little pink body. Carbon Fiber, Kevlar and even fiberglass can absorb
    some if not all crash forces. Sitting inside a clear eggshell isn't what I want to deal with if I am in a situation where I might get smacked with a planet. Distance from the exterior of the aircraft to the vertebra is immaterial. Plenty of other body
    parts will hit first.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gonzalo Garcia-Atance@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 22 16:36:04 2023
    El miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2023 a las 23:26:11 UTC, Mark Mocho escribió:
    I do not see why it should not be even more save than a conventional reclined pilot position, as you can put more distance between your vertebrae and the exterior of the fuselage.
    Because Plexiglass has no structural integrity. It will shatter on impact, leaving many sharp fragments to interfere with your skin's ability to keep the blood on the inside of your little pink body. Carbon Fiber, Kevlar and even fiberglass can absorb
    some if not all crash forces. Sitting inside a clear eggshell isn't what I want to deal with if I am in a situation where I might get smacked with a planet. Distance from the exterior of the aircraft to the vertebra is immaterial. Plenty of other body
    parts will hit first.
    Thats an interesting point I was not considering... thanks very much. I supouse the Plexiglas can be supported by a frame all around the edge. But anyway I will have a look into this. I have been thinking about this glider for more than a decade now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicholas Kennedy@21:1/5 to Ramy on Thu Mar 23 17:37:38 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 6:30:13 PM UTC-6, Ramy wrote:
    Coming from hang gliding like many of us, I sure miss the view below. Maybe that’s why I am circling too much. would love to have better visibility if it could be achieved without compromising safety much.
    I wouldn’t mind compromising a point or two on glide. DGs have better visibility than most other gliders.

    Ramy
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-7, Gonzalo Garcia-Atance wrote:
    El miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2023 a las 23:26:11 UTC, Mark Mocho escribió:
    I do not see why it should not be even more save than a conventional reclined pilot position, as you can put more distance between your vertebrae and the exterior of the fuselage.
    Because Plexiglass has no structural integrity. It will shatter on impact, leaving many sharp fragments to interfere with your skin's ability to keep the blood on the inside of your little pink body. Carbon Fiber, Kevlar and even fiberglass can
    absorb some if not all crash forces. Sitting inside a clear eggshell isn't what I want to deal with if I am in a situation where I might get smacked with a planet. Distance from the exterior of the aircraft to the vertebra is immaterial. Plenty of other
    body parts will hit first.
    Thats an interesting point I was not considering... thanks very much. I supouse the Plexiglas can be supported by a frame all around the edge. But anyway I will have a look into this. I have been thinking about this glider for more than a decade now..
    .


    Sawzall!
    Nick
    T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to Gonzalo Garcia-Atance on Thu Mar 23 17:30:11 2023
    Coming from hang gliding like many of us, I sure miss the view below. Maybe that’s why I am circling too much. would love to have better visibility if it could be achieved without compromising safety much.
    I wouldn’t mind compromising a point or two on glide. DGs have better visibility than most other gliders.

    Ramy

    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:36:06 PM UTC-7, Gonzalo Garcia-Atance wrote:
    El miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2023 a las 23:26:11 UTC, Mark Mocho escribió:
    I do not see why it should not be even more save than a conventional reclined pilot position, as you can put more distance between your vertebrae and the exterior of the fuselage.
    Because Plexiglass has no structural integrity. It will shatter on impact, leaving many sharp fragments to interfere with your skin's ability to keep the blood on the inside of your little pink body. Carbon Fiber, Kevlar and even fiberglass can
    absorb some if not all crash forces. Sitting inside a clear eggshell isn't what I want to deal with if I am in a situation where I might get smacked with a planet. Distance from the exterior of the aircraft to the vertebra is immaterial. Plenty of other
    body parts will hit first.
    Thats an interesting point I was not considering... thanks very much. I supouse the Plexiglas can be supported by a frame all around the edge. But anyway I will have a look into this. I have been thinking about this glider for more than a decade now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 23 17:43:34 2023
    I think that changing the pilot position to something like the upright seat in the SGS 2-33 would increase the frontal area and "wetted" surface of the correspondingly larger fuselage would cost a LOT more than "a point or two" of glide. And a big bubble
    and a 2-33 fuselage shape would look pretty ridiculous with a set of 21-meter wings. I agree that the loss of the all-around view we enjoyed in hang gliders is sorely missed, but my knees are grateful for the upgrade to landing on a wheel.

    I considered adding wheels to my hang glider control bar, but quickly found out that it put my face at the precise height of some particularly annoying cactus happily defending their home space against intruders.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 23 17:48:24 2023
    Changing the pilot position to something like the upright seat in the SGS 2-33 will increase the frontal area and "wetted" surface of the correspondingly larger fuselage and would cost a LOT more than "a point or two" of glide. And a big bubble and a 2-
    33 fuselage shape would look pretty ridiculous with a set of 21-meter wings. I agree that the loss of the all-around view we enjoyed in hang gliders is sorely missed, but my knees are grateful for the upgrade to landing on a wheel.

    I considered adding wheels to my hang glider control bar, but quickly found out that it put my face at the precise height of some particularly annoying cactus happily defending their home space against intruders.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Ramy on Thu Mar 23 20:56:31 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:30:13 PM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
    Coming from hang gliding like many of us, I sure miss the view below. Maybe that’s why I am circling too much. would love to have better visibility if it could be achieved without compromising safety much.
    I wouldn’t mind compromising a point or two on glide. DGs have better visibility than most other gliders.

    Ramy
    About 15 years ago, I experimented with a camera mounted on the bottom of fuselage, approximately underneath my knees, pointed down and forward at about 45 degrees. The display on the panel. It was somewhat useful, and now cameras and displays are so
    much better, it'd be worth trying again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt Herron Jr.@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Thu Mar 23 22:43:06 2023
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 8:56:33 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:30:13 PM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
    Coming from hang gliding like many of us, I sure miss the view below. Maybe that’s why I am circling too much. would love to have better visibility if it could be achieved without compromising safety much.
    I wouldn’t mind compromising a point or two on glide. DGs have better visibility than most other gliders.

    Ramy
    About 15 years ago, I experimented with a camera mounted on the bottom of fuselage, approximately underneath my knees, pointed down and forward at about 45 degrees. The display on the panel. It was somewhat useful, and now cameras and displays are so
    much better, it'd be worth trying again.
    Tweak a Condor glider to have more plex, and fly around with it. See if you like it. I use a head tracker, and sometimes find myself sticking my head "through" the canopy to look below me for traffic, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 02:48:57 2023
    Tweak a Condor glider to have more plex, and fly around with it. See if you like it. I use a head tracker, and sometimes find myself sticking my head "through" the canopy to look below me for traffic, etc.

    And you don't even muss your hair in the non-existent slipstream.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bumper@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 11:36:49 2023
    Eric beat me to the suggestion of a camera, flush mount, almost no drag, the downside is it'd add one more thing to detract from see and avoid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicholas Kennedy@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 18:15:19 2023
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=VRh4YVoT&id=EB782D3CB8B43724F3F9E234D7567A8487F8D22A&thid=OIP.VRh4YVoTiQn0tRXpPF0NAAEsDh&mediaurl=https%3A%2F%2Fth.bing.com%2Fth%2Fid%2FR.551878615a138909f4b515e93c5d0d00%3Frik%3DKtL4h4R6Vtc04g%26riu%
    3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fi.ytimg.com%252fvi%252fjoOj7_VMTfg%252f0.jpg%26ehk%3DcdYQ5rrCcbMnOOeaSoTNvuTx%252b40F6STweiRMtRsc%252fus%253d%26risl%3D%26pid%3DImgRaw%26r%3D0&exph=360&expw=480&q=Glider+GAPA&simid=608024506101546749&form=IRPRST&ck=
    153106D13A409F4A8D65A46DC116F20D&selectedindex=15&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0&vt=0&sim=11

    The GAPA has pretty good visibility
    Nick
    T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 24 18:56:49 2023
    Nick- In our hang gliders, visibility in all directions was one of the best things about the sport. However, as speeds got higher, landings got to be more challenging and there came a time that the tradeoff between performance and safety became an issue.
    Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention "AGE." After about 35, you simply can't bounce as well without denting or breaking something and recovering with a few beers and a joint to fly again tomorrow.

    The open-air concept for visibility is desirable, but if you want higher performance, you have to accept the increased risk of less structural protection coupled with higher landing speeds. On a runway, a wheel is a great thing. Out in the desert, or
    trees, or whatever miserable outlanding area you are stuck with, that wheel doesn't get to do its job before some solid obstruction changes the course of your life.

    I'll take the wheel and minimal protection afforded by my 38-year-old glider cockpit over a hang glider or paraglider today, but I definitely miss my "immortal" life of 30 years ago. Hang gliding was, by far, the most fun I ever had. And it lasted for 28
    years before my knees forced me into sailplanes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicholas Kennedy@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 25 07:43:31 2023
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=ySEr4gX%2f&id=FBCD5EEB471DE9CFDE2D51B77ADA6F416D858A89&thid=OIP.ySEr4gX_eISfItWHrSk43AHaFj&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fi.ytimg.com%2fvi%2fi-nuBQ66N_8%2fhqdefault.jpg&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%
    2fid%2fR.c9212be205ff78849f22d587ad2938dc%3frik%3diYqFbUFv2nq3UQ%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=360&expw=480&q=super+floater+ultralight+glider&simid=608047162050156131&FORM=IRPRST&ck=CB7A531E27254E6F8D6EB7BAD45B1598&selectedIndex=18&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0

    Only 15/1 but great visibility
    You sit in front of the wing so you can look up too.
    I looked in my logbook last night; back in April 12th 2001 I got to fly one of these at the Wallaby Ranch Hang Gliding club in FLA just SW of Seminole. 4.2 hr flight!
    A friend owned it and knowing I was a glider pilot he asked me if I'd like to take it up.

    It was a nice Cu filled sky and I had a good time, it flew great - well balanced, just kinda slow of course.
    It had a BRS and HG instruments.
    Chilly up at base and hard to pee without a catheter and hose setup. My friend dressed me a motorcycle rain suit which helped alot at base.
    Used my full-face HG helmet
    But a total blast for local flying .
    Took a little getting used too, being so exposed.
    There were alot of Hang Gliding buddies up to thermal with and glide around with that day.
    Super Floater= Super Fun!
    Nick
    T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 25 08:24:52 2023
    Don't know if it was the same one, but I flew the Super floater at Wallaby in 2000. Not as great a flight as you had, but still fun. Back then, I wasn't worried about crashworthiness considering I was normally flying a pure hang glider, but when I got
    into sailplanes, the tripling of the landing speed made me more conscious of the potential for injury or worse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Wedgwood@21:1/5 to Matt Herron Jr. on Sat Mar 25 08:23:34 2023
    On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 5:43:08 AM UTC, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:

    Tweak a Condor glider ... etc

    I'll make it if I get 500 deposits of 10€

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Nicholas Kennedy on Sat Mar 25 12:20:05 2023
    On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 6:15:21 PM UTC-7, Nicholas Kennedy wrote:
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=VRh4YVoT&id=EB782D3CB8B43724F3F9E234D7567A8487F8D22A&thid=OIP.VRh4YVoTiQn0tRXpPF0NAAEsDh&mediaurl=https%3A%2F%2Fth.bing.com%2Fth%2Fid%2FR.551878615a138909f4b515e93c5d0d00%3Frik%3DKtL4h4R6Vtc04g%
    26riu%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fi.ytimg.com%252fvi%252fjoOj7_VMTfg%252f0.jpg%26ehk%3DcdYQ5rrCcbMnOOeaSoTNvuTx%252b40F6STweiRMtRsc%252fus%253d%26risl%3D%26pid%3DImgRaw%26r%3D0&exph=360&expw=480&q=Glider+GAPA&simid=608024506101546749&form=IRPRST&ck=
    153106D13A409F4A8D65A46DC116F20D&selectedindex=15&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0&vt=0&sim=11

    The GAPA has pretty good visibility
    Nick
    T
    I flew one many years ago. It has so much visibility, it is not possible to make the seat belt tight enough to banish the feeling you are about to slide sideways off the seat to your certain death. But, I liked it after a while.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Byars@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 25 17:52:07 2023
    Here you go, problem solved:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh6NZ7-D8LM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Danewid@21:1/5 to Paul Remde on Sun Mar 26 04:56:31 2023
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 9:59:12 PM UTC+1, Paul Remde wrote:
    Hi Gonzalo,

    You may find this interesting. It is a prototype/concept made by Glasflügel. I don't know if it actually flew. I posted a page from the book Glasflugel on my Soaring News Facebook page. You can see it using the link below.
    https://www.facebook.com/CumulusSoaring/posts/pfbid0hAnrF9GEx3Bk5LUiHCqgUnUUE8tNvskz5Np8hWx7jMvrYxERaDuNkuTP8Wuf6pP7l

    From the book Glasflügel https://www.cumulus-soaring.com/store/glasflugel-book

    Best Regards,

    Paul Remde
    Cumulus Soaring, Inc.

    It was a mock up only

    /Robert

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Manley@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 26 06:19:37 2023
    Condor has a couple options for the view you seek.
    1) The SG-38 primary glider available here (https://www.cumulus-soaring.com/store/condor2-sg38) for $13
    2) Cntl + F1 toggles the cockpit view, including completely eliminating it, in any Condor glider - the ultimate birds-eye view from high performance gliders, allows you to sit up-right, and is perfectly safe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Manley@21:1/5 to Scott Manley on Sun Mar 26 06:37:56 2023
    On Sunday, March 26, 2023 at 9:19:39 AM UTC-4, Scott Manley wrote:
    Condor has a couple options for the view you seek.
    1) The SG-38 primary glider available here (https://www.cumulus-soaring.com/store/condor2-sg38) for $13
    2) Cntl + F1 toggles the cockpit view, including completely eliminating it, in any Condor glider - the ultimate birds-eye view from high performance gliders, allows you to sit up-right, and is perfectly safe.
    And one more,
    A VR headset lets you put your head outside the canopy (as mentioned with Track IR above), looking over the canopy rail. Better yet, VR lets you completely step outside the glider while in flight (I suspect Track IR might as well). A couple years back
    I had Condor + VR set up at the Reno convention. While in mid-flight, I would pause the simulation and have the pilot physically stand up. Now virtually standing in a glider cockpit thousands of feet AGL, I would have them turn around and look at the
    tail of the aircraft. I would then ask the pilot to take two steps to the left, i.e., step out the cockpit into open space. I had a few folks who refused to take those two steps. Their brains and survival instincts simply would not allow it. For those
    of you who end up trying this, you may be surprised (and somewhat dismayed) when you look back into the cockpit after stepping out of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to Gonzalo Garcia-Atance on Tue Apr 4 19:57:47 2023
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 9:39:57 AM UTC-7, Gonzalo Garcia-Atance wrote:
    Hey, guys! I've been thinking about this idea and I'm wondering if it's worth pursuing. So, our gliders have this reclined position where our legs, feet, and the instrument panel are smack in the middle of our field of view. But what if we had a glider
    with a more upright sitting position and a glass cockpit that would let us see well below us as we fly over amazing sights like mountain tops, ridges, clouds, and even wildlife? Some powered aircraft, like the Edgley Optica and the Seabird Seeker, have
    this amazing view, and I just think it would be incredible to have the same experience in a glider.
    If your club had a glider with this cockpit with amazing views and an open class wingspan for keeping a decent performance, would you be interested in flying it? Do you think you would enjoy flying it more than a conventional high-performance glider?
    Thanks, looking forward to hearing your opinions.

    We already have the most visibility of any other aircraft out there. Making the seating more upright adds to the wetted area, worsening glide performance (and what manufacturer will consider doing that?). It also degrades your tolerance of g-loads.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)