• Chanllenging yourself? Know by your landouts...

    From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 24 13:39:26 2022
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Mon Oct 24 14:47:57 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so challenging
    about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late for dinner
    button. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Foster@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Mon Oct 24 14:55:43 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:48:09 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so challenging
    about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late for dinner
    button. Old Bob, The Purist

    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it as a
    pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to johngf...@gmail.com on Mon Oct 24 15:03:18 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:55:45 PM UTC-4, johngf...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:48:09 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so
    challenging about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late
    for dinner button. Old Bob, The Purist
    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it as
    a pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.
    John, you must be a motorglider guy, tell me it isn't so! The biggest challenge any glider pilot can have is getting back home with no power. Yes, you guys, assuming you are one, do not have that engine as a decoration, but as a means to get back, us
    purist do not have that ability. Be my guest, come on down and fly with me, I will buy you fuel and food. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Foster@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Mon Oct 24 16:29:12 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:03:20 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:55:45 PM UTC-4, johngf...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:48:09 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so
    challenging about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late
    for dinner button. Old Bob, The Purist
    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it
    as a pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.
    John, you must be a motorglider guy, tell me it isn't so! The biggest challenge any glider pilot can have is getting back home with no power. Yes, you guys, assuming you are one, do not have that engine as a decoration, but as a means to get back, us
    purist do not have that ability. Be my guest, come on down and fly with me, I will buy you fuel and food. Old Bob, The Purist

    I'm not a motor glider pilot. I fly a 1966 Bolkow Phoebus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to johngf...@gmail.com on Mon Oct 24 17:44:58 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 7:29:14 PM UTC-4, johngf...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:03:20 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:55:45 PM UTC-4, johngf...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:48:09 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so
    challenging about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late
    for dinner button. Old Bob, The Purist
    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat
    it as a pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.
    John, you must be a motorglider guy, tell me it isn't so! The biggest challenge any glider pilot can have is getting back home with no power. Yes, you guys, assuming you are one, do not have that engine as a decoration, but as a means to get back, us
    purist do not have that ability. Be my guest, come on down and fly with me, I will buy you fuel and food. Old Bob, The Purist
    I'm not a motor glider pilot. I fly a 1966 Bolkow Phoebus.
    Glad to hear that you are a purist, no shame at all, actually you should be very proud. When a purist completes a flight and returns back home it is an accomplishment not like a motorglider, making a flight and having to use the engine to get back home,
    then talking about what a great accomplishment it was. Actually it was a failure, the pilot had to be rescued by the motor, a PURIST does not have that luxury, we play the cards that we have been dealt. Flying a motorglider is like living the life of a
    drag queen, it just is not what it is, put lipstick on that pig, it is still a pig! Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Mon Oct 24 21:06:26 2022
    On 10/24/2022 2:47 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so challenging
    about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late for dinner
    button. Old Bob, The Purist

    I summarized inaccurately what I said in the previous thread, which was (summarizing)
    "never needing a retrieve (motor, tow, ground, whatever) suggests the pilots are not
    challenging really challenging themselves". The type of glider the pilot flies is not
    relevant to my suggestion or Adam Woolley's article.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 25 08:49:41 2022
    On 10/24/2022 3:03 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:55:45 PM UTC-4, johngf...@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
    John, you must be a motorglider guy, tell me it isn't so! The biggest challenge any glider pilot can have is getting back home with no power. Yes, you guys, assuming you are one, do not have that engine as a decoration, but as a means to get back, us
    purist do not have that ability. Be my guest, come on down and fly with me, I will buy you fuel and food. Old Bob, The Purist

    Getting back home without a retrieve is YOUR biggest challenge. That's the task you set
    for yourself, the task you attempt, but it's not the task many of us set for ourselves; in
    fact, you admire greatly a pilot that never got back to the airport without a retrieve:
    Henry Combs! Hundreds of flights over the years that were at least 500km from his airport,
    and many more that were shorter.

    There are other tasks where getting home without a retrieve is not a requirement, and
    these tasks can be great fun:

    * maximizing your OLC score
    * Record flying
    * Almost any Badge flight
    * flying where the conditions are best

    Read Adam's article again. He talks about how "getting home" as the priority can limit
    your growth (and pleasure) as a glider pilot. You are an ideal candidate for stretching
    you goals, as you have lots club members willing to retrieve you by ground, and towplanes
    that can do it by air.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 25 09:04:10 2022
    On 10/24/2022 5:44 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
    John, you must be a motorglider guy, tell me it isn't so! The biggest challenge any glider pilot can have is getting back home with no power. Yes, you guys, assuming you are one, do not have that engine as a decoration, but as a means to get back, us
    purist do not have that ability. Be my guest, come on down and fly with me, I will buy you fuel and food. Old Bob, The Purist
    I'm not a motor glider pilot. I fly a 1966 Bolkow Phoebus.
    Glad to hear that you are a purist, no shame at all, actually you should be very proud. When a purist completes a flight and returns back home it is an accomplishment not like a motorglider, making a flight and having to use the engine to get back home,
    then talking about what a great accomplishment it was. Actually it was a failure, the pilot had to be rescued by the motor, a PURIST does not have that luxury, we play the cards that we have been dealt. Flying a motorglider is like living the life of a
    drag queen, it just is not what it is, put lipstick on that pig, it is still a pig! Old Bob, The Purist

    Some pilots will drive hours to the airport, fly, then drive hours to return home.
    Sometimes, I'll motor for 15-20 minutes to where the lift is, fly, then motor through dead
    air for 15-20 minutes to get home. I will sometimes brag about the great flight I had,
    while the towed gliders never left their tiedowns.

    Is it better to be a Purist on the ground, or the motorglider pilot in 5 kt lift, 8000' AGL?

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 25 09:12:46 2022
    On 10/24/2022 5:44 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    When a purist completes a flight and returns back home it is an accomplishment not like
    a motorglider, making a flight and having to use the engine to get back home, then talking
    about what a great accomplishment it was. Actually it was a failure, the pilot had to be
    rescued by the motor, a PURIST does not have that luxury, we play the cards that we have
    been dealt.

    Do you think Gordon Boettger was a failure on Saturday?

    https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3.0/gliding/flightinfo.html?dsId=9230275

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Oct 25 11:01:15 2022
    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 12:12:49 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/24/2022 5:44 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    When a purist completes a flight and returns back home it is an accomplishment not like
    a motorglider, making a flight and having to use the engine to get back home, then talking
    about what a great accomplishment it was. Actually it was a failure, the pilot had to be
    rescued by the motor, a PURIST does not have that luxury, we play the cards that we have
    been dealt.
    Do you think Gordon Boettger was a failure on Saturday?

    https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3.0/gliding/flightinfo.html?dsId=9230275
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Good flight, but failed to make it home without power assistance, Failure! OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom BravoMike@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 25 14:10:28 2022

    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it as
    a pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.

    "There should be no difference in the decision making" etc.

    But there is a difference and denying it doesn't change the fact that
    there is a difference.

    Tom BravoMike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom BravoMike@21:1/5 to Tom BravoMike on Tue Oct 25 15:14:11 2022
    On 2022-10-25 14:10, Tom BravoMike wrote:

    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots
    rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back
    home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT
    rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it as a pure glider when
    deciding on where and how to make it back home.  There should be no
    difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a
    motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.

    "There should be no difference in the decision making" etc.

    But there is a difference and denying it doesn't change the fact that
    there is a difference.

    Tom BravoMike

    "Of course, always make sure you've got somewhere to land. (...) I must
    admit having an engine does let you push yourself a bit more than you
    would otherwise, I think".

    A first-hand experience from a pilot, a quote from 26:20 and 26:36

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYXeMpQB2l0

    Tom BravoMike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to John Foster on Tue Oct 25 13:21:20 2022
    On 10/24/2022 2:55 PM, John Foster wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:48:09 PM UTC-6, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, what challenge is there to motorgliding? You are a MG guy, most MG guys and gals do not fly at the same risk level as up PURIST! OK, there you go again, trying to tell the glider world that getting home is not challenging! What is so challenging
    about pressing the start button? I guess getting home for dinner presents more challenges than flying without the get me out of here propeller or turbine. Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be late for dinner
    button. Old Bob, The Purist

    Bob, it appears you have the mistaken idea that motorglider pilots rely on the ability to "relight" the motor in the air to get back home, thus reducing their risk, when in fact the training is to NOT rely on the motor to start, and thus to treat it as
    a pure glider when deciding on where and how to make it back home. There should be no difference in the decision making process between a pure glider and a motor glider when it comes to where and how far away to fly.
    There should not be difference in the amount of safety risk an MG or towed pilot accepts,
    as "Fly safely" should be #1 priority.

    There actually is a difference in the type and amount of soaring risk a typical MG pilot
    will accept, compared to flying a towed glider: generally, the motorglider pilot is more
    likely to accept the soaring risk ("sporting risk" in Woolley's article) of a needing his
    motor to get home than a towed pilot is to accept the risk of tow or ground retrieve.


    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 25 13:30:24 2022
    On 10/24/2022 2:47 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    ... Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be
    late for dinner button. Old Bob, The Purist

    Nonsense! And you've proven it with 5 years of flying, and no retrieves. How much can you
    be challenging yourself, if you always succeed, year after year? If getting home is the
    goal, all a pilot has to do is stay close enough to home, to returning is never in doubt.

    There's nothing inherently wrong with making "getting home" your soaring goal, but it's
    not a challenging goal. I flew towed gliders for 2500 hours - I know how to make them
    work. I can fly my motorglider so I never need the engine to get home, but WOW! what a
    waste soaring opportunities that would be!

    Motorgliders: more soaring, better soaring.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Oct 25 14:55:40 2022
    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 4:30:28 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/24/2022 2:47 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    ... Getting home in a pure glider is much more challenging than pressing that don't be
    late for dinner button. Old Bob, The Purist
    Nonsense! And you've proven it with 5 years of flying, and no retrieves. How much can you
    be challenging yourself, if you always succeed, year after year? If getting home is the
    goal, all a pilot has to do is stay close enough to home, to returning is never in doubt.

    There's nothing inherently wrong with making "getting home" your soaring goal, but it's
    not a challenging goal. I flew towed gliders for 2500 hours - I know how to make them
    work. I can fly my motorglider so I never need the engine to get home, but WOW! what a
    waste soaring opportunities that would be!

    Motorgliders: more soaring, better soaring.
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, I have been flying gliders for 45 plus years, and I have landed out many times, once in a prison yard, that was a good one! What you are missing is the fundamental goal for glider pilots, getting back to the takeoff location, is that not what even
    the contest guys are judged on? I don't have to boast about my hours, although they exceed yours by many. Getting home is the goal, anything less is a failure, if it were a grading scale the get home would be 100% and the failure to get back with
    sustainer or propulsion would be 60%, Please don't try and discount the success of pure flight. Anybody can get home with a Drag Queen, it is simple to understand. Now I just wait for the Moron from Moriarty or DH, or Airport Bum to opine on the
    subject. Unfortunately I have had retrieves, you just overlook them. I have a huge appreciation for pure flight, it is the pinnacle of glider flight. I spent most of my day in surgery today, I feel good, and hope to fly either tomorrow or Thursday, I
    will have a good flight and make it back home, nothing to be ashamed of, say you? Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 25 16:45:58 2022
    On 10/25/2022 2:55 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Getting home is the goal, anything less is a failure, if it were a grading scale the get home would be 100% and the > failure to get back with sustainer or propulsion would be 60%, Please don't try and discount the success of pure > flight. Anybody can
    get home with a Drag Queen,

    One last (maybe) time:

    *ANYONE* can get home in a towed glider by doing what you do: stay close enough to home so
    that success is certain. It doesn't take many hours in a towed glider to figure that out!

    Getting home by soaring is YOUR top priority goal, but it's not mine, or that of most (not
    all) MG pilots; after all, most MG pilots started as towed pilots, so they learned how to
    get a glider home reliably without power long before they got a MG. They use an engine
    because they have an engine; if they didn't have an engine, they'd stay closer to home
    than they do in a MG.

    Gordon Boettger's flight on Saturday far exceeds any flight you or I have made in the last
    5 years. If that flight is a failure, most of us are failures, towed or powered. He flew
    until the weather stopped him, while you and I land before the day is done. I wish I'd
    been in the back seat of that Arcus J!

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Oct 25 20:28:28 2022
    Very well said Eric. While I can understand the purist thing that OBTP fixates on, it has nothing to do with getting back home. Getting back home is a bonus in pure or MG, but shouldn’t be the main goal. It contradicts the idea of xc soaring in which
    the goal is to try to fly as far or as fast as possible beyond glide range or guaranteed return. In fact I am not sure if most of the flights that OBTP posts to OLC are XC flights, only those he got outside of glide range are XC flights. In some places
    you can fly 500km OLC distance without ever getting out of glide. Those are not pure XC. And what about straight out flights? They are all failures according to OBTP.
    That said, I consider my last flight a failure not only because I didn’t made it home, but because I failed my expectations and failed to make it to a place from which a retrieve will be easier.

    Ramy

    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/25/2022 2:55 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Getting home is the goal, anything less is a failure, if it were a grading scale the get home would be 100% and the > failure to get back with sustainer or propulsion would be 60%, Please don't try and discount the success of pure > flight. Anybody
    can get home with a Drag Queen,
    One last (maybe) time:

    *ANYONE* can get home in a towed glider by doing what you do: stay close enough to home so
    that success is certain. It doesn't take many hours in a towed glider to figure that out!

    Getting home by soaring is YOUR top priority goal, but it's not mine, or that of most (not
    all) MG pilots; after all, most MG pilots started as towed pilots, so they learned how to
    get a glider home reliably without power long before they got a MG. They use an engine
    because they have an engine; if they didn't have an engine, they'd stay closer to home
    than they do in a MG.

    Gordon Boettger's flight on Saturday far exceeds any flight you or I have made in the last
    5 years. If that flight is a failure, most of us are failures, towed or powered. He flew
    until the weather stopped him, while you and I land before the day is done. I wish I'd
    been in the back seat of that Arcus J!
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ramy on Wed Oct 26 00:13:15 2022
    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 11:28:31 PM UTC-4, Ramy wrote:
    Very well said Eric. While I can understand the purist thing that OBTP fixates on, it has nothing to do with getting back home. Getting back home is a bonus in pure or MG, but shouldn’t be the main goal. It contradicts the idea of xc soaring in which
    the goal is to try to fly as far or as fast as possible beyond glide range or guaranteed return. In fact I am not sure if most of the flights that OBTP posts to OLC are XC flights, only those he got outside of glide range are XC flights. In some places
    you can fly 500km OLC distance without ever getting out of glide. Those are not pure XC. And what about straight out flights? They are all failures according to OBTP.
    That said, I consider my last flight a failure not only because I didn’t made it home, but because I failed my expectations and failed to make it to a place from which a retrieve will be easier.

    Ramy
    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/25/2022 2:55 PM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Getting home is the goal, anything less is a failure, if it were a grading scale the get home would be 100% and the > failure to get back with sustainer or propulsion would be 60%, Please don't try and discount the success of pure > flight. Anybody
    can get home with a Drag Queen,
    One last (maybe) time:

    *ANYONE* can get home in a towed glider by doing what you do: stay close enough to home so
    that success is certain. It doesn't take many hours in a towed glider to figure that out!

    Getting home by soaring is YOUR top priority goal, but it's not mine, or that of most (not
    all) MG pilots; after all, most MG pilots started as towed pilots, so they learned how to
    get a glider home reliably without power long before they got a MG. They use an engine
    because they have an engine; if they didn't have an engine, they'd stay closer to home
    than they do in a MG.

    Gordon Boettger's flight on Saturday far exceeds any flight you or I have made in the last
    5 years. If that flight is a failure, most of us are failures, towed or powered. He flew
    until the weather stopped him, while you and I land before the day is done. I wish I'd
    been in the back seat of that Arcus J!
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    NO! Straight out flights are not failures, I love straight out flights, they are a flight with a goal in mind. If someone said that they were going to get a silver badge like the old days then you had to land at a destination 30 plus miles away, and when
    you completed that task you had a successful flight, if not, your flight failed to meet the goal. The Boettger flight was very good, I guess if you asked him he would have preferred to complete that flight without assistance of power, I think it would
    have even been more of a successful flight. If I set out to achieve something and I do not complete my goal then I have in my opinion failed. I have no problem with self launch gliders, as long as they are used for that purpose and not as an assist to
    complete a flight
    As a very young guy I was trying to fly my first 300K triangle in Florida with my Std. Cirrus. This was long before the electronic assistance of GPS and moving maps, we moved the sectionals that we cut into squares and stored in the side pocket. The
    camera was used to verify the turnpoints and the barograph recorded the flight. I flew all day, I could not make it back to my takeoff location and ended up landing in the playground of a state prison near Arcadia, Florida. The flight was a failure by my
    standards, and the Warden was pissed, I did not meet my goal. I don't feel like everyone that participates gets a trophy!
    Eric, as far as the area that I and a few others fly here in South Florida it is not as friendly terrain as you often depict. There are areas here where you would never want to land out, snake and gator infested swamp with coral rock would not make for a
    happy day, we do not have those 15K AGL conditions, sometimes we are lucky to get 3000 AGL. My last flight was I described to you the IAN aftermath flight, I wanted to fly as deep as I could into the affected area and return home without busting the TFR'
    s that restricted flights, that was my goal, I completed my goal and at times there was absolutely no place to land, maybe I should send you the pictures, you might have a new found respect to getting back home. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stuart Venters@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Wed Oct 26 10:02:46 2022
    On 10/24/22 15:39, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    Nice writeup on fear and risk in soaring.

    Three kinds of risk.
    Risk of safety (life, limb, and glider)
    Risk of retrieve inconvienience. (Needing a tow, trailer, or motor)
    Risk of an ok score for a better one. (Willingness to leave the pack.)

    The MG stuff hits the second risk dead center, but in a contest with
    retrieve infrastructure, this seems small compared to the others.
    (Anything the gets more folks in the air is ok with me, but it may be
    fun to think of those using the M in MG at the top of the retrieve list.)

    We have seen pilots that will not head out by themselves, but will
    follow someone else into a sketchy situation, without recognizing a risk
    they have not seen before. Given this risk framework, how does one
    learn to use it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Thu Oct 27 13:42:39 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, I had surgery on Tuesday, hopefully successful and I took the day off to make R look good. I flew today and made it back home again! Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Thu Oct 27 14:39:41 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    I guess I don't challenge myself because I don't land out very often.
    In the last 30 years or so I have landed out once during my personal practice flying.
    I fly almost exclusively crewless since Dianne would rather stay home and garden than sit at the airport waiting for me.
    I have had land outs in contests sometimes.
    My longest contest streak was 64 completions in a row, including 4 nationals and 2 worlds. My definition there is if everybody lands out it doesn't go on the count.
    This year I had 2 field landings and one motor retrieve in 38 contest flights . Pretty poor by my standards.
    It seems to me that everyone should fly in a manner that suits them and not feel like they should be measured by someone else's definitions.
    Sometimes I'm flying with a motor. Other times not.
    I fly the same whether with a motor or without.
    FWIW
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 27 15:58:25 2022
    On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:46:57 PM UTC-4, R wrote:
    I don’t know Bobby…..looks like Eileen thermaling techniques…..I’m going with you flew over the airport making a kitty furball and she went out on course to give you something to brag about.
    What a wife….

    R
    I finally stopped the bleeding, decided to go and I had a Kotex and rubber band just in case, too bad you were shooting. You had a much better day yesterday, I did make it back home in spite of the TFR. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 27 15:46:55 2022
    I don’t know Bobby…..looks like Eileen thermaling techniques…..I’m going with you flew over the airport making a kitty furball and she went out on course to give you something to brag about.
    What a wife….

    R

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Thu Oct 27 18:02:11 2022
    Nice flight today OBTP!

    Ramy

    On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:58:26 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:46:57 PM UTC-4, R wrote:
    I don’t know Bobby…..looks like Eileen thermaling techniques…..I’m going with you flew over the airport making a kitty furball and she went out on course to give you something to brag about.
    What a wife….

    R
    I finally stopped the bleeding, decided to go and I had a Kotex and rubber band just in case, too bad you were shooting. You had a much better day yesterday, I did make it back home in spite of the TFR. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Fri Oct 28 10:17:15 2022
    On 10/26/2022 12:13 AM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 11:28:31 PM UTC-4, Ramy wrote:
    Very well said Eric. While I can understand the purist thing that OBTP fixates on, it has nothing to do with getting back home. Getting back home is a bonus in pure or MG, but shouldn’t be the main goal. It contradicts the idea of xc soaring in
    which the goal is to try to fly as far or as fast as possible beyond glide range or guaranteed return. In fact I am not sure if most of the flights that OBTP posts to OLC are XC flights, only those he got outside of glide range are XC flights. In some
    places you can fly 500km OLC distance without ever getting out of glide. Those are not pure XC. And what about straight out flights? They are all failures according to OBTP.
    That said, I consider my last flight a failure not only because I didn’t made it home, but because I failed my expectations and failed to make it to a place from which a retrieve will be easier.

    Ramy
    ...
    NO! Straight out flights are not failures, I love straight out flights, they are a flight with a goal in mind. If someone said that they were going to get a silver badge like the old days then you had to land at a destination 30 plus miles away, and
    when you completed that task you had a successful flight, if not, your flight failed to meet the goal. The Boettger flight was very good, I guess if you asked him he would have preferred to complete that flight without assistance of power, I think it
    would have even been more of a successful flight. If I set out to achieve something and I do not complete my goal then I have in my opinion failed. I have no problem with self launch gliders, as long as they are used for that purpose and not as an assist
    to complete a flight
    As a very young guy I was trying to fly my first 300K triangle in Florida with my Std. Cirrus. This was long before the electronic assistance of GPS and moving maps, we moved the sectionals that we cut into squares and stored in the side pocket. The
    camera was used to verify the turnpoints and the barograph recorded the flight. I flew all day, I could not make it back to my takeoff location and ended up landing in the playground of a state prison near Arcadia, Florida. The flight was a failure by my
    standards, and the Warden was pissed, I did not meet my goal. I don't feel like everyone that participates gets a trophy!
    Eric, as far as the area that I and a few others fly here in South Florida it is not as friendly terrain as you often depict. There are areas here where you would never want to land out, snake and gator infested swamp with coral rock would not make for
    a happy day, we do not have those 15K AGL conditions, sometimes we are lucky to get 3000 AGL. My last flight was I described to you the IAN aftermath flight, I wanted to fly as deep as I could into the affected area and return home without busting the
    TFR's that restricted flights, that was my goal, I completed my goal and at times there was absolutely no place to land, maybe I should send you the pictures, you might have a new found respect to getting back home. Old Bob, The Purist

    I'm pleased see a bit of nuance in your views about self-selected tasks. Straight out
    flights have been some of my most memorable flights, and about half of them were with
    towed gliders.

    I believe you do not understand Gordon's goal for the day. Here's what he said:

    "Forecast was for high surface winds all day and for frontal passage through the Minden
    area so I didn't expect to make it back without the engine."

    That's right, he went flying, even though he knew you'd call the flight a failure, because
    his goal was to "SEIZE THE DAY"! And, wow!, did he ever! He flew higher, faster, and
    farther than you and I ever have. He met HIS goal, not yours. How could you pass up such a
    magical day, just because you wouldn't make it hone? When did convenience become more
    important than adventure?

    I still think you should post the flight report you sent me. You can do that on RAS_Prime,
    which allows pictures.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Fri Oct 28 15:03:36 2022
    On 10/27/2022 2:39 PM, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    I guess I don't challenge myself because I don't land out very often.
    In the last 30 years or so I have landed out once during my personal practice flying.
    I fly almost exclusively crewless since Dianne would rather stay home and garden than sit at the airport waiting for me.
    I have had land outs in contests sometimes.
    My longest contest streak was 64 completions in a row, including 4 nationals and 2 worlds. My definition there is if everybody lands out it doesn't go on the count.
    This year I had 2 field landings and one motor retrieve in 38 contest flights . Pretty poor by my standards.
    It seems to me that everyone should fly in a manner that suits them and not feel like they should be measured by someone else's definitions.
    Sometimes I'm flying with a motor. Other times not.
    I fly the same whether with a motor or without.
    FWIW
    UH

    I believe, as you do, that people should fly in a manner that suits them. What I tried to
    suggest, and Adam Woolley wrote, was that without an occasional failure to soar home, you
    may not know what you are capable of. In other words, you might be suited to better
    flights than you are currently experiencing. He talked about being a solid 3rd place
    finisher, but found taking some extra sporting risk, he could be a winner.

    You've flown enough (particularly contest flying) that you may be one of those pilots that
    really does know where the edges of his competence are without pushing bit harder and
    needing a retrieve/restart. I still suggest you push a bit harder when you are flying a MG
    on non-contest flight. They allow you to be bolder without the irritation of a retrieve,
    and maybe you'll discover a recalibration is needed.

    I'm not trying to measure people; instead, I'm encouraging them to measure themselves.
    It's easy to unconsciously constrain your flying so you always make it, not realizing what
    you are missing. Motorglider pilots have little excuse to be so cautious they always get
    home without using the motor, but a lot of them can not shake the habits and "moral
    values" they learned from years of flying towed gliders before moving to a MG.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Sat Oct 29 02:20:58 2022
    On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 6:03:40 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/27/2022 2:39 PM, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:39:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    About a year ago, I suggested pilots that always make it back to their airport were not
    challenging themselves. A short article by Adam Woolley makes the same point, but more
    effectively:

    https://mailchi.mp/wingsandwheels/overcoming-fear?e=4223526f26

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    I guess I don't challenge myself because I don't land out very often.
    In the last 30 years or so I have landed out once during my personal practice flying.
    I fly almost exclusively crewless since Dianne would rather stay home and garden than sit at the airport waiting for me.
    I have had land outs in contests sometimes.
    My longest contest streak was 64 completions in a row, including 4 nationals and 2 worlds. My definition there is if everybody lands out it doesn't go on the count.
    This year I had 2 field landings and one motor retrieve in 38 contest flights . Pretty poor by my standards.
    It seems to me that everyone should fly in a manner that suits them and not feel like they should be measured by someone else's definitions.
    Sometimes I'm flying with a motor. Other times not.
    I fly the same whether with a motor or without.
    FWIW
    UH
    I believe, as you do, that people should fly in a manner that suits them. What I tried to
    suggest, and Adam Woolley wrote, was that without an occasional failure to soar home, you
    may not know what you are capable of. In other words, you might be suited to better
    flights than you are currently experiencing. He talked about being a solid 3rd place
    finisher, but found taking some extra sporting risk, he could be a winner.

    You've flown enough (particularly contest flying) that you may be one of those pilots that
    really does know where the edges of his competence are without pushing bit harder and
    needing a retrieve/restart. I still suggest you push a bit harder when you are flying a MG
    on non-contest flight. They allow you to be bolder without the irritation of a retrieve,
    and maybe you'll discover a recalibration is needed.

    I'm not trying to measure people; instead, I'm encouraging them to measure themselves.
    It's easy to unconsciously constrain your flying so you always make it, not realizing what
    you are missing. Motorglider pilots have little excuse to be so cautious they always get
    home without using the motor, but a lot of them can not shake the habits and "moral
    values" they learned from years of flying towed gliders before moving to a MG.
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    It is not a matter of measuring people I know and have flown with individuals that are much more talented than myself and have superior equipment. My goal was and is to do the best I can with what I have, never be ashamed of how you do and complete your
    task. Take my wife for example, she is a functional glider pilot, function by my definition means doing the same old thing over and over and never getting out of her comfort zone, flying around the gliderport and boring holes in the sky, her nickname is ,
    "ETCH A SKETCH". I take nothing away from her ability, she flies her 24 and 27 as well as anyone. At the end of the day she looks forward to logging her flight and talking about how much fun she had. A few years ago she landed out in a overgrown area
    short of the runway, did a great job of picking her spot and slowing it down. Even today the farmer keeps that area cleared of overgrowth just in case she needs it again.
    I am glad that you admitted that the motorglider allows you to be bolder, that has been my personal opinion all along. I must admit, I have inquired about a couple of motorgliders lately, thinking that maybe she would be more comfortable knowing that
    she had that safety cushion to rely on, yet she has informed me that she would prefer a 18 meter pure ship, it confirms the moral value. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sat Oct 29 06:53:24 2022
    On 10/29/2022 2:20 AM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    I am glad that you admitted that the motorglider allows you to be bolder, that has been my personal opinion all along.

    I didn't "admit" that; instead, I've been proclaiming it for years! It's a major feature
    of a motorglider. More accurately, though, an MG doesn't "allow" you to be bolder, but it
    does encourage it, just as having an eager and willing crew will. Towed pilots like Ramy,
    for example, are bolder than many motorglider pilots, so flying a towed glider is not an
    excuse for avoiding sporting risk. There are good personal reasons for avoiding sporting
    risk, and I would never denigrate an Etch-a-Sketch pilot. If you are enjoying your flying,
    you are doing it right.

    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Mon Oct 31 16:00:00 2022
    On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:53:30 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On 10/29/2022 2:20 AM, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    I am glad that you admitted that the motorglider allows you to be bolder, that has been my personal opinion all along.
    I didn't "admit" that; instead, I've been proclaiming it for years! It's a major feature
    of a motorglider. More accurately, though, an MG doesn't "allow" you to be bolder, but it
    does encourage it, just as having an eager and willing crew will. Towed pilots like Ramy,
    for example, are bolder than many motorglider pilots, so flying a towed glider is not an
    excuse for avoiding sporting risk. There are good personal reasons for avoiding sporting
    risk, and I would never denigrate an Etch-a-Sketch pilot. If you are enjoying your flying,
    you are doing it right.
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Eric, hope you are doing well, I made it back home again yesterday, at one point I thought it was the end of the day for me, that would have been a failure. Eileen is planning on visiting a glider factory this week, hope she doesn't spend too much money.
    Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)