• Uvalde, TX

    From FZ@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 18:30:29 2022
    Uvalde, the place loaded with so many great memories for hundreds of glider pilots. Town of great hospitality to gliding community, site of the world's best soaring, and now suddenly.... the capital of school shootings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 27 06:10:14 2022
    Not going to make an excuse for this guy, there is no excuse for a mass shooting but it is quite apparent he was bullied in school and had no direction at home. Bullies are ubiquitous, I've encountered them in the corporate and work a day world. They
    are usually cowards trying to elevate themselves in their own eyes and impacting others negatively, they get off on that. It is when you give in to the bully at any level that society loses. Interdict the bully at the earliest level.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat May 28 15:07:33 2022
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 6:10:16 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Not going to make an excuse for this guy, there is no excuse for a mass shooting but it is quite apparent he was bullied in school and had no direction at home. Bullies are ubiquitous, I've encountered them in the corporate and work a day world. They
    are usually cowards trying to elevate themselves in their own eyes and impacting others negatively, they get off on that. It is when you give in to the bully at any level that society loses. Interdict the bully at the earliest level.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    I recently read a book called Mindhunter by Mark Douglas (he consulted on the movie Silence of the Lambs) that is based on hundreds of interviews with mass and serial killers (https://www.amazon.com/Mindhunter-Inside-Elite-Serial-Netflix/dp/1787460614/
    ref=asc_df_1787460614/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312721411869&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=17685029275225828507&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9033822&hvtargid=pla-387220026715&psc=1). Their goal was to develop a database
    of these people that could be used to profile unknown subjects (UNSUBs) so that police could narrow down their search of the perps. The bottom line is that this type of criminal's mind is wired differently than normal people. They can lead what outwardly
    looks like a normal life, even be married and have a family, but they are always on the prowl for new victims. One of the characteristics of a mass or serial killer is (but certainly not always or even the majority of them) a speech impediment. Salvador
    Ramos had clearly built up an extreme amount of anger, but this was not displayed overtly (https://www.timesofisrael.com/mother-of-18-year-old-texas-school-shooter-says-he-wasnt-a-violent-person/).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 29 00:42:30 2022
    On Saturday, May 28, 2022 at 3:07:35 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
    On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 6:10:16 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Not going to make an excuse for this guy, there is no excuse for a mass shooting but it is quite apparent he was bullied in school and had no direction at home. Bullies are ubiquitous, I've encountered them in the corporate and work a day world. They
    are usually cowards trying to elevate themselves in their own eyes and impacting others negatively, they get off on that. It is when you give in to the bully at any level that society loses. Interdict the bully at the earliest level.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    I recently read a book called Mindhunter by Mark Douglas (he consulted on the movie Silence of the Lambs) that is based on hundreds of interviews with mass and serial killers (https://www.amazon.com/Mindhunter-Inside-Elite-Serial-Netflix/dp/1787460614/
    ref=asc_df_1787460614/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312721411869&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=17685029275225828507&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9033822&hvtargid=pla-387220026715&psc=1). Their goal was to develop a database
    of these people that could be used to profile unknown subjects (UNSUBs) so that police could narrow down their search of the perps. The bottom line is that this type of criminal's mind is wired differently than normal people. They can lead what outwardly
    looks like a normal life, even be married and have a family, but they are always on the prowl for new victims. One of the characteristics of a mass or serial killer is (but certainly not always or even the majority of them) a speech impediment. Salvador
    Ramos had clearly built up an extreme amount of anger, but this was not displayed overtly (https://www.timesofisrael.com/mother-of-18-year-old-texas-school-shooter-says-he-wasnt-a-violent-person/).

    There're bullied kids with mental problems and built up anger in countries all over the world, yet those countries don't have these frequent mass killings like this latest massacre in Texas. Speaking as a multiple gun owner, what makes our bullied kids
    with mental issues so exceptional isn't their amount of pent up anger, it's easy access to the exponential proliferation of small arms

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 29 06:06:14 2022
    Yes, we are a gun culture and our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms. There are those who would like to see this right terminated permanently but with the proliferation of violent crimes being committed with no significant punishment
    metered out by the courts, just a slap on the wrist it is becoming more evident that you will be responsible for your own protection. The Supreme Court has even said that the police are not obligated to protect you.

    Right now I don't need an assault rifle, I don't need a high capacity magazine but in the event that something happens where I would need such a device I would want one. Right now I don't need a fire extinguisher but if I have a fire I would like to
    have one available. I have actually had a house fire, was in a hotel for 9 months and 3 weeks recently courtesy of State Farm while my house was being repaired. I had a fire extinguisher which was inadequate for the size of the fire. I am now back in
    my house with two BIG fire extinguishers placed strategically. Chances of being hit by lightning which would start another fire are small but I choose to have a more adequate capacity to respond.

    These shootings can almost always have the Swiss cheese model applied. Somewhere the ball is dropped, somewhere someone, something gets thru the holes. Stop the bullying, identify those who are bullied and can't or won't fight back on the spot and help
    them,. Lock the damn school door, don't prop it open, have a school resource officer ON THE SPOT, not out galavanting around. Arm those teachers who wish to be armed and are willing to be properly trained. If one of the teachers who was killed had the
    capacity to fight back, things most likely would have been different.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sun May 29 09:06:01 2022
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since
    the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J

    On 5/29/22 07:06, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Yes, we are a gun culture and our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms. There are those who would like to see this right terminated permanently but with the proliferation of violent crimes being committed with no significant punishment
    metered out by the courts, just a slap on the wrist it is becoming more evident that you will be responsible for your own protection. The Supreme Court has even said that the police are not obligated to protect you.

    Right now I don't need an assault rifle, I don't need a high capacity magazine but in the event that something happens where I would need such a device I would want one. Right now I don't need a fire extinguisher but if I have a fire I would like to
    have one available. I have actually had a house fire, was in a hotel for 9 months and 3 weeks recently courtesy of State Farm while my house was being repaired. I had a fire extinguisher which was inadequate for the size of the fire. I am now back in
    my house with two BIG fire extinguishers placed strategically. Chances of being hit by lightning which would start another fire are small but I choose to have a more adequate capacity to respond.

    These shootings can almost always have the Swiss cheese model applied. Somewhere the ball is dropped, somewhere someone, something gets thru the holes. Stop the bullying, identify those who are bullied and can't or won't fight back on the spot and
    help them,. Lock the damn school door, don't prop it open, have a school resource officer ON THE SPOT, not out galavanting around. Arm those teachers who wish to be armed and are willing to be properly trained. If one of the teachers who was killed
    had the capacity to fight back, things most likely would have been different.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Sun May 29 09:21:30 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 8:06:07 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since
    the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J
    On 5/29/22 07:06, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Yes, we are a gun culture and our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms. There are those who would like to see this right terminated permanently but with the proliferation of violent crimes being committed with no significant punishment
    metered out by the courts, just a slap on the wrist it is becoming more evident that you will be responsible for your own protection. The Supreme Court has even said that the police are not obligated to protect you.

    Right now I don't need an assault rifle, I don't need a high capacity magazine but in the event that something happens where I would need such a device I would want one. Right now I don't need a fire extinguisher but if I have a fire I would like to
    have one available. I have actually had a house fire, was in a hotel for 9 months and 3 weeks recently courtesy of State Farm while my house was being repaired. I had a fire extinguisher which was inadequate for the size of the fire. I am now back in my
    house with two BIG fire extinguishers placed strategically. Chances of being hit by lightning which would start another fire are small but I choose to have a more adequate capacity to respond.

    These shootings can almost always have the Swiss cheese model applied. Somewhere the ball is dropped, somewhere someone, something gets thru the holes. Stop the bullying, identify those who are bullied and can't or won't fight back on the spot and
    help them,. Lock the damn school door, don't prop it open, have a school resource officer ON THE SPOT, not out galavanting around. Arm those teachers who wish to be armed and are willing to be properly trained. If one of the teachers who was killed had
    the capacity to fight back, things most likely would have been different.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    The thing that struck me in reading Mindhunter is that most killings done by serial killers don't involve a firearm. If Ramos was denied his weapon of choice, the Daniel Defense DDM4 V7 rifle, he had a backup: his grandmother's pickup truck.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Sun May 29 13:38:43 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since
    the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J

    Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.
    The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody."

    Hope you are getting a break on your fire insurance with that sprinkler system.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 29 21:43:04 2022
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of small
    arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter van Schoonhoven@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Mon May 30 04:43:34 2022
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.

    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon May 30 09:53:07 2022
    Probably getting a break on insurance, but it's still expensive given
    that I live in forested mountains in New Mexico, where the feds
    intentionally started the largest wild fire in the country (prescribed
    burn).

    Dan
    5J

    On 5/29/22 14:38, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since
    the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J

    Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.
    The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody."

    Hope you are getting a break on your fire insurance with that sprinkler system.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to pvansch...@gmail.com on Tue May 31 05:43:00 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.

    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada
    yada. This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the
    2nd Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police failed to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so, go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Tue May 31 05:46:01 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 11:53:13 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Probably getting a break on insurance, but it's still expensive given
    that I live in forested mountains in New Mexico, where the feds intentionally started the largest wild fire in the country (prescribed burn).

    Dan
    5J
    On 5/29/22 14:38, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since >> the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J

    Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.
    The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody."

    Hope you are getting a break on your fire insurance with that sprinkler system.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Look at your insurance policy and make sure you have more than adequate "Alternative Living Expenses." I was in a hotel for almost 10 months recently while repairs were being made to my house. Supply chain problems, worker shortages, it was nice though,
    having someone changing the sheets and cleaning the bathroom. I now have an essentially new house inside.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swinkelj@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 31 08:27:01 2022
    Op dinsdag 31 mei 2022 om 14:46:03 UTC+2 schreef waltco...@aol.com:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 11:53:13 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Probably getting a break on insurance, but it's still expensive given
    that I live in forested mountains in New Mexico, where the feds intentionally started the largest wild fire in the country (prescribed burn).

    Dan
    5J
    On 5/29/22 14:38, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 11:06:07 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Fire extinguisher? My house is equipped with a sprinkler system and
    I'm happy to say that it's never been required, yet...

    I guess I should hire a mercenary army for my personal protection since >> the police won't do it.

    Dan
    5J

    Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.
    The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody."

    Hope you are getting a break on your fire insurance with that sprinkler system.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Look at your insurance policy and make sure you have more than adequate "Alternative Living Expenses." I was in a hotel for almost 10 months recently while repairs were being made to my house. Supply chain problems, worker shortages, it was nice though,
    having someone changing the sheets and cleaning the bathroom. I now have an essentially new house inside.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Fortunately I live in Europe. No guns, no school massacres.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Richard Livingston on Tue May 31 11:07:56 2022
    Dear Everyone,

    There seems to be a feeling that the US Constitution grants rights to
    the citizens and that these rights can be revoked.

    In fact, the Constitution only enumerates what are natural rights of all peoples and prohibits the government from infringing upon those rights.

    Maybe if you had listened in school...

    Dan
    5J

    On 5/31/22 10:24, Richard Livingston wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 7:43:02 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada
    yada. This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police faidbgTempeoled to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so,
    go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Dear Walt,

    This is obviously off topic for this group, but since you posted I am compelled to offer some counter arguments:

    1: At the time the 2nd amendment was written it took about 1 minute to reload a gun. Modern semi-automatic rifles can fire a dozen or more bullets per minute. These are much different weapons than existed back then. I'm certain our founders would
    be horrified at what modern guns can do, and are doing.

    2: Guns may not kill people, but people kill people. Guns are multipliers, they multiply how many people one person can kill. Was 1 person per minute, now is a dozen per minute. Much different than back then.

    3: The 2nd amendment refers to a "well regulated militia". In what universe is what we have in the USA a "well regulated milita"?

    4: We already regulate many things that are dangerous if not regulated. You need a license (and training and pass a test) to drive a car or fly a plane. You must be over 21 to buy beer in most states. Civilians are not allowed to own large caliber
    guns, bombs, etc. Why is it that an AR-15 and similar high capacity semi-automatic weapons can be purchased at a gun show with no licensing or background checks, by 18 year olds?

    5: The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect.

    6: You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge.

    7: Some people (not you, that I know of) argue that any one thing won't solve the problem: Outlawing assault weapons, stricter background checks, closing the gun show loophole, requiring universal licensing, etc each by themselves won't make much
    impact. That is true, but collectively they can make a big difference. Australia strongly revised their gun laws a decade or so ago after a mass shooting and have not had a similar event since. Switzerland has a high gun ownership rate, but tightly
    regulated, and do not have the mass shootings we have here. It is possible to very significantly reduce (but probably not eliminate) mass shootings and much of the other gun violence that is making the USA so dangerous right now, but we need to start
    valuing the lives of our children and neighbors more than our guns.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Tue May 31 09:24:16 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 7:43:02 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada yada.
    This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police faidbgTempeoled to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so, go
    figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Dear Walt,

    This is obviously off topic for this group, but since you posted I am compelled to offer some counter arguments:

    1: At the time the 2nd amendment was written it took about 1 minute to reload a gun. Modern semi-automatic rifles can fire a dozen or more bullets per minute. These are much different weapons than existed back then. I'm certain our founders would be
    horrified at what modern guns can do, and are doing.

    2: Guns may not kill people, but people kill people. Guns are multipliers, they multiply how many people one person can kill. Was 1 person per minute, now is a dozen per minute. Much different than back then.

    3: The 2nd amendment refers to a "well regulated militia". In what universe is what we have in the USA a "well regulated milita"?

    4: We already regulate many things that are dangerous if not regulated. You need a license (and training and pass a test) to drive a car or fly a plane. You must be over 21 to buy beer in most states. Civilians are not allowed to own large caliber
    guns, bombs, etc. Why is it that an AR-15 and similar high capacity semi-automatic weapons can be purchased at a gun show with no licensing or background checks, by 18 year olds?

    5: The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect.

    6: You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge.

    7: Some people (not you, that I know of) argue that any one thing won't solve the problem: Outlawing assault weapons, stricter background checks, closing the gun show loophole, requiring universal licensing, etc each by themselves won't make much
    impact. That is true, but collectively they can make a big difference. Australia strongly revised their gun laws a decade or so ago after a mass shooting and have not had a similar event since. Switzerland has a high gun ownership rate, but tightly
    regulated, and do not have the mass shootings we have here. It is possible to very significantly reduce (but probably not eliminate) mass shootings and much of the other gun violence that is making the USA so dangerous right now, but we need to start
    valuing the lives of our children and neighbors more than our guns.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sandy Osterman@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Tue May 31 11:00:31 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 10:08:04 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Dear Everyone,

    There seems to be a feeling that the US Constitution grants rights to
    the citizens and that these rights can be revoked.

    In fact, the Constitution only enumerates what are natural rights of all peoples and prohibits the government from infringing upon those rights.

    Maybe if you had listened in school...

    Dan
    5J
    On 5/31/22 10:24, Richard Livingston wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 7:43:02 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own
    operable Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada
    yada. This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police faidbgTempeoled to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so,
    go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Dear Walt,

    This is obviously off topic for this group, but since you posted I am compelled to offer some counter arguments:

    1: At the time the 2nd amendment was written it took about 1 minute to reload a gun. Modern semi-automatic rifles can fire a dozen or more bullets per minute. These are much different weapons than existed back then. I'm certain our founders would be
    horrified at what modern guns can do, and are doing.

    2: Guns may not kill people, but people kill people. Guns are multipliers, they multiply how many people one person can kill. Was 1 person per minute, now is a dozen per minute. Much different than back then.

    3: The 2nd amendment refers to a "well regulated militia". In what universe is what we have in the USA a "well regulated milita"?

    4: We already regulate many things that are dangerous if not regulated. You need a license (and training and pass a test) to drive a car or fly a plane. You must be over 21 to buy beer in most states. Civilians are not allowed to own large caliber
    guns, bombs, etc. Why is it that an AR-15 and similar high capacity semi-automatic weapons can be purchased at a gun show with no licensing or background checks, by 18 year olds?

    5: The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect.

    6: You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge.

    7: Some people (not you, that I know of) argue that any one thing won't solve the problem: Outlawing assault weapons, stricter background checks, closing the gun show loophole, requiring universal licensing, etc each by themselves won't make much
    impact. That is true, but collectively they can make a big difference. Australia strongly revised their gun laws a decade or so ago after a mass shooting and have not had a similar event since. Switzerland has a high gun ownership rate, but tightly
    regulated, and do not have the mass shootings we have here. It is possible to very significantly reduce (but probably not eliminate) mass shootings and much of the other gun violence that is making the USA so dangerous right now, but we need to start
    valuing the lives of our children and neighbors more than our guns.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 31 11:32:36 2022
    Dale-
    Using your argument that the advances in technology as applied to firearms are not what the Founding Fathers envisioned and should therefore be sufficient reason to restrict the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, let's apply the same argument
    to the First Amendment.
    At the time the Constitution was written, the "free press" and "freedom of speech" were enacted one page at a time by a manual printing press that had an output of at most, one or two pages per minute, and speech was directly from the speaker to the
    listener.

    If you are willing to give up radio, television, the internet and mass printing of publications, along with rants by self-styled "experts" of every stripe on "social media," I will go along with reverting to single shot black powder firearms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bumper@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 31 12:24:23 2022
    By what passes for "logic" here, we should also be restricting vehicle use, as cars, like guns, can be used as deadly weapons to kill and maim multiple people (as was done at the Christmas parade in Wisconsin). If you don't include gun related suicide,
    vehicle related deaths outnumber those that are gun related. Maybe we should be charging all car owners a tax to compensate accident and drunk driver victims. While we're at it, don't forget to raise the taxes on booze, 28% of vehicle deaths are alcohol
    related. Guns and vehicles don't cause deaths, it's people who do that.

    The underlying problem is the breakdown of the family in our society. Welfare is the enabler, rewarding people to have kids with little to no family structure . . . they grow up on the street.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob W.@21:1/5 to swinkelj on Tue May 31 13:15:48 2022
    On 5/31/22 09:27, swinkelj wrote:
    Op dinsdag 31 mei 2022 om 14:46:03 UTC+2 schreef waltco...@aol.com:
    <...brevity snip...>

    Fortunately I live in Europe. No guns, no school massacres.

    All well & good, but... https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-history.html

    One of the joys of soaring (in my book, anyway) is physics holds people accountable - always (and sometimes, forever, for those paying
    insufficient attention or over-thinning their personal margins).

    Let's be aware and careful "out there!"

    Bob W.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 3C@21:1/5 to bumper on Tue May 31 15:06:05 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 2:24:25 PM UTC-5, bumper wrote:
    By what passes for "logic" here, we should also be restricting vehicle use, as cars, like guns, can be used as deadly weapons to kill and maim multiple people (as was done at the Christmas parade in Wisconsin). If you don't include gun related suicide,
    vehicle related deaths outnumber those that are gun related. Maybe we should be charging all car owners a tax to compensate accident and drunk driver victims. While we're at it, don't forget to raise the taxes on booze, 28% of vehicle deaths are alcohol
    related. Guns and vehicles don't cause deaths, it's people who do that.

    The underlying problem is the breakdown of the family in our society. Welfare is the enabler, rewarding people to have kids with little to no family structure . . . they grow up on the street.

    Vehicle use is subject to restrictions. Driver's licenses, vehicle safety inspections, registration all constrain vehicle availability and use. A tax to compensate car accident victims isn't needed as the insurance required to register a car (at least in
    Texas) provides that compensation. People get compensated while insurance companies & lawyers make money.

    I need to go find a good thermal and take it to cloud base.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From s.bralla.ret@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 31 18:10:57 2022
    I have to ask, are the Buffalo and Uvalde shooters members of the "well regulated militia"? If so the "well regulated" part isn't working so well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to richali...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 1 05:17:59 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:24:18 PM UTC-4, richali...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 7:43:02 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation
    of small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own
    operable Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada
    yada. This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police faidbgTempeoled to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so,
    go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Dear Walt,

    This is obviously off topic for this group, but since you posted I am compelled to offer some counter arguments:

    1: At the time the 2nd amendment was written it took about 1 minute to reload a gun. Modern semi-automatic rifles can fire a dozen or more bullets per minute. These are much different weapons than existed back then. I'm certain our founders would be
    horrified at what modern guns can do, and are doing.

    2: Guns may not kill people, but people kill people. Guns are multipliers, they multiply how many people one person can kill. Was 1 person per minute, now is a dozen per minute. Much different than back then.

    3: The 2nd amendment refers to a "well regulated militia". In what universe is what we have in the USA a "well regulated milita"?

    4: We already regulate many things that are dangerous if not regulated. You need a license (and training and pass a test) to drive a car or fly a plane. You must be over 21 to buy beer in most states. Civilians are not allowed to own large caliber guns,
    bombs, etc. Why is it that an AR-15 and similar high capacity semi-automatic weapons can be purchased at a gun show with no licensing or background checks, by 18 year olds?

    5: The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect.

    6: You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge.

    7: Some people (not you, that I know of) argue that any one thing won't solve the problem: Outlawing assault weapons, stricter background checks, closing the gun show loophole, requiring universal licensing, etc each by themselves won't make much
    impact. That is true, but collectively they can make a big difference. Australia strongly revised their gun laws a decade or so ago after a mass shooting and have not had a similar event since. Switzerland has a high gun ownership rate, but tightly
    regulated, and do not have the mass shootings we have here. It is possible to very significantly reduce (but probably not eliminate) mass shootings and much of the other gun violence that is making the USA so dangerous right now, but we need to start
    valuing the lives of our children and neighbors more than our guns.

    Rich L.

    1. I believe if our founding fathers could have envisioned the goings on today, the lean towards socialism/communism and the lawlessness in the streets they would have been even more in favor off an armed citizenry. They would however not have
    permitted for a moment the lawlessness going on, the looting, burning and rioting with no recourse. People would be in jail or shot by the authorities or citizens.

    2. Yes, people kill people with guns, with cars while driving impaired by alcohol, with home made explosives. If people want to kill people they will find a way. First it will be the AR15, next the mini 14 and at some point your musket. Government
    makes little to no effort to improve things, as they have stated time and time again, never let a good crisis go to waste.

    3. As I stated before without an armed citizenry a militia can't be assembled. There are now and always have been nut cases who do not fit into the equation.

    4. The Constitution gives us the right to keep and bear arms, not to drink alcohol or drive a car or fly an airplane which are privileges, not rights. Personally I would be fine with a higher age requirement on purchase of firearms of any kind, the
    brain of a recent high school graduate is not sufficiently developed. Some never are. Statistics show that previous assault weapon bans have not produced any tangible results.
    We are going to have to agree to disagree on many points.

    5. "The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect." Explain then the reason murder and gun crimes in
    environments with extremely limited gun laws are lower. States that liberally allow licensure for concealed carry showed a reduction in gun related crimes. A cause is a reaction, the effect is the result. Failure to effectively punish gun crimes
    results in gun crimes rising precipitously. I befriended a Pharmacist in Brooklyn, NY during my last corporate gig. He had applied for a permit to PURCHASE a firearm to keep in his home and has been denied several times. Seems encountering a burglar
    in his home who was armed was not a good enough reason for approval for the permit. So a law abiding citizen is denied but a criminal can skirt the law, doesn't care.

    6. "You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge." So virtually ignoring the enforcement (which is exactly what is going on in many municipalities) is the thing to do?
    While it is not an excuse for the massacre at Robb Elementary, there were more shootings and fatalities in Chicago last month with little to no response from the authorities.

    7. Australia did not have the same Constitutional rights afforded U.S. Citizens making such bans more easily accomplishable. What it also accomplished was to disarm the law abiding Australian citizen. Do you think criminals turned in their guns? Do
    you think guns would not be available on the black market? Murder rates were already declining prior to the NFA of Australia. I had a statistics class in college and the prof said he could make any set of numbers mean anything he wished, so much for
    statistics. I worked for a Swiss company for 26 years. Swiss soldiers at the time kept their fully automatic service weapons in their homes. Switzerland also has a more homogenous population and crimes are not easily ignored, do the crime, do the time.
    Not so in the USA.

    There are not easy answers to any of these questions but it is clear that enforcement is being ignored. Yes, guns in Chicago are bought elsewhere, quite often stolen and traded on the streets. Banning guns in America at any level would not have much
    effect on criminality. They would come in from Mexico illegally as does fentanyl and other illegal drugs.

    Biden now wants to claim the 5.56mm/.223 is a HIGH caliber projectile. Not so. 7.62x39 is larger as is .308. He is now talking about banning 9mm because it is a "high caliber." What then about 10mm, .40S&W, .45 ACP, .44 magnum, 454 Casull, .50 AE?
    Biden speaks out his demented behind.

    I fully agree that there are loopholes in the law. I would hesitate to sell a gun to someone I didn't know and in many cases to people I know. I looked at a Colt Combat Commander (probably a 5K$ gun) at an estate sale in a gated community. There was
    an armed security guard on duty due to the value of many of the items for sale. I ran the serial number on Hotguns.com and it was stolen. Surprised that a fine, upstanding, wealthy member of the community would have left such an item behind after his
    death. Did he steal it or buy it not knowing? Who knows but most criminals do not go to the local gun dealer and fill out the yellow sheet, now done online.

    A good friend of mine was killed by a drunk driver. No one though to blame Mercedes Benz, the maker of the car that killed him. There was no outcry at Bacardi Rum, the alcohol used to intoxicate the driver. Yes, the purpose of a car is not to kill but
    the purpose of alcohol is to dull our senses. (I quit drinking after flying a 13-14 hour mission over northern Laos with a hangover.).

    We are going to have to agree to disagree on many issues my friend.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Wed Jun 1 17:15:02 2022
    On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 8:18:01 AM UTC-4, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:24:18 PM UTC-4, richali...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 7:43:02 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation
    of small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own
    operable Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should
    be required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada
    yada. This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle
    but semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police faidbgTempeoled to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so,
    go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Dear Walt,

    This is obviously off topic for this group, but since you posted I am compelled to offer some counter arguments:

    1: At the time the 2nd amendment was written it took about 1 minute to reload a gun. Modern semi-automatic rifles can fire a dozen or more bullets per minute. These are much different weapons than existed back then. I'm certain our founders would be
    horrified at what modern guns can do, and are doing.

    2: Guns may not kill people, but people kill people. Guns are multipliers, they multiply how many people one person can kill. Was 1 person per minute, now is a dozen per minute. Much different than back then.

    3: The 2nd amendment refers to a "well regulated militia". In what universe is what we have in the USA a "well regulated milita"?

    4: We already regulate many things that are dangerous if not regulated. You need a license (and training and pass a test) to drive a car or fly a plane. You must be over 21 to buy beer in most states. Civilians are not allowed to own large caliber
    guns, bombs, etc. Why is it that an AR-15 and similar high capacity semi-automatic weapons can be purchased at a gun show with no licensing or background checks, by 18 year olds?

    5: The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect.

    6: You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge.

    7: Some people (not you, that I know of) argue that any one thing won't solve the problem: Outlawing assault weapons, stricter background checks, closing the gun show loophole, requiring universal licensing, etc each by themselves won't make much
    impact. That is true, but collectively they can make a big difference. Australia strongly revised their gun laws a decade or so ago after a mass shooting and have not had a similar event since. Switzerland has a high gun ownership rate, but tightly
    regulated, and do not have the mass shootings we have here. It is possible to very significantly reduce (but probably not eliminate) mass shootings and much of the other gun violence that is making the USA so dangerous right now, but we need to start
    valuing the lives of our children and neighbors more than our guns.

    Rich L.
    1. I believe if our founding fathers could have envisioned the goings on today, the lean towards socialism/communism and the lawlessness in the streets they would have been even more in favor off an armed citizenry. They would however not have
    permitted for a moment the lawlessness going on, the looting, burning and rioting with no recourse. People would be in jail or shot by the authorities or citizens.

    2. Yes, people kill people with guns, with cars while driving impaired by alcohol, with home made explosives. If people want to kill people they will find a way. First it will be the AR15, next the mini 14 and at some point your musket. Government
    makes little to no effort to improve things, as they have stated time and time again, never let a good crisis go to waste.

    3. As I stated before without an armed citizenry a militia can't be assembled. There are now and always have been nut cases who do not fit into the equation.

    4. The Constitution gives us the right to keep and bear arms, not to drink alcohol or drive a car or fly an airplane which are privileges, not rights. Personally I would be fine with a higher age requirement on purchase of firearms of any kind, the
    brain of a recent high school graduate is not sufficiently developed. Some never are. Statistics show that previous assault weapon bans have not produced any tangible results.
    We are going to have to agree to disagree on many points.

    5. "The reason murder rates are so high in locations with very restrictive gun laws is due to too many guns too freely available, not due to the strict gun laws. You are confusing cause and effect." Explain then the reason murder and gun crimes in
    environments with extremely limited gun laws are lower. States that liberally allow licensure for concealed carry showed a reduction in gun related crimes. A cause is a reaction, the effect is the result. Failure to effectively punish gun crimes results
    in gun crimes rising precipitously. I befriended a Pharmacist in Brooklyn, NY during my last corporate gig. He had applied for a permit to PURCHASE a firearm to keep in his home and has been denied several times. Seems encountering a burglar in his home
    who was armed was not a good enough reason for approval for the permit. So a law abiding citizen is denied but a criminal can skirt the law, doesn't care.

    6. "You say the gun laws need to be enforced better. There are so many guns out there that that is like draining a lake with a sponge." So virtually ignoring the enforcement (which is exactly what is going on in many municipalities) is the thing to do?
    While it is not an excuse for the massacre at Robb Elementary, there were more shootings and fatalities in Chicago last month with little to no response from the authorities.

    7. Australia did not have the same Constitutional rights afforded U.S. Citizens making such bans more easily accomplishable. What it also accomplished was to disarm the law abiding Australian citizen. Do you think criminals turned in their guns? Do
    you think guns would not be available on the black market? Murder rates were already declining prior to the NFA of Australia. I had a statistics class in college and the prof said he could make any set of numbers mean anything he wished, so much for
    statistics. I worked for a Swiss company for 26 years. Swiss soldiers at the time kept their fully automatic service weapons in their homes. Switzerland also has a more homogenous population and crimes are not easily ignored, do the crime, do the time.
    Not so in the USA.

    There are not easy answers to any of these questions but it is clear that enforcement is being ignored. Yes, guns in Chicago are bought elsewhere, quite often stolen and traded on the streets. Banning guns in America at any level would not have much
    effect on criminality. They would come in from Mexico illegally as does fentanyl and other illegal drugs.

    Biden now wants to claim the 5.56mm/.223 is a HIGH caliber projectile. Not so. 7.62x39 is larger as is .308. He is now talking about banning 9mm because it is a "high caliber." What then about 10mm, .40S&W, .45 ACP, .44 magnum, 454 Casull, .50 AE?
    Biden speaks out his demented behind.

    I fully agree that there are loopholes in the law. I would hesitate to sell a gun to someone I didn't know and in many cases to people I know. I looked at a Colt Combat Commander (probably a 5K$ gun) at an estate sale in a gated community. There was an
    armed security guard on duty due to the value of many of the items for sale. I ran the serial number on Hotguns.com and it was stolen. Surprised that a fine, upstanding, wealthy member of the community would have left such an item behind after his death.
    Did he steal it or buy it not knowing? Who knows but most criminals do not go to the local gun dealer and fill out the yellow sheet, now done online.

    A good friend of mine was killed by a drunk driver. No one though to blame Mercedes Benz, the maker of the car that killed him. There was no outcry at Bacardi Rum, the alcohol used to intoxicate the driver. Yes, the purpose of a car is not to kill but
    the purpose of alcohol is to dull our senses. (I quit drinking after flying a 13-14 hour mission over northern Laos with a hangover.).

    We are goin g to have to agree to disagree on many issues my friend.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Excellent points that clearly define some of the problems that lead up to such tragic events. As this event unfolded I surfed the media to gather information and facts. Within three hours of the shooting there were people being interviewed on networks
    blaming the Republicans for what happened, truly a skewed outlook from many crazy progressives.
    what you have been told are the details of the immediate family of the shooter, mother a crackhead, a dysfunctional upbringing, lack of education, and no direction toward the future. We see this all over the place, it is a breakdown of society, no
    accountability for ones actions, no punishment for acts of crime, this is just a few of societies problems. Recently I spoke at a school class about aviation, my assessment of the class was like inmates running the asylum, even the school was reluctant
    to punish for behavior problems, and certainly the parents obviously don't either.
    Will it ever get better? Walt, nice facts! I will be down for a while, keep up the good work, I will make sure that I have my ipad at my side. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to pvansch...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 1 20:08:31 2022
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:43:36 AM UTC-7, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.

    You are sadly ignorant of the Heller decision which covers the argument you made in great detail. This decision, by the way, is 14 years old.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Wed Jun 1 20:28:38 2022
    On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 5:43:02 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 7:43:36 AM UTC-4, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    Ah Kimo Sabe, you speak like a Democrat. When asked "who sir are the Militia?" George Mason answered, "All of the people." Subsequent descriptions were "all able bodied men over 17 years of age, citizens or those wishing to be citizens," yada yada yada.
    This would seem to restrict ownership for females which would cause a riot these days. Bottom line is you can't muster a militia unless the citizenry is armed. Your comments about taxing and requiring technology are quite telling. BTW, when the 2nd
    Amendment was written the average citizen had a rifle superior to that of the average soldier. The soldier's rifle was built by the lowest bidder while the citizen's was built by a local gunsmith whose reputation depended on the satisfaction of the
    locals.

    "Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people?" Well the term "need' is quite subjective. The AR15 is an assault weapon only because the liberal left wishes to believe AR means Assault Rifle. It means Armalite Rifle but
    semantics aside it is a semi automatic rifle, mechanically not unlike many other rifles these days. Considering the goings on in the recent past with riots and burning and looting which went unchecked by the local police in many geographies it makes
    sense to be able to defend yourself at a distance and with as few reloads as possible. JMHO.

    Depending on who you ask there are 400 to 2000 gun laws on the books throughout the country. In the most restrictive of environments you find the most shootings on a weekly basis, go figure. We have enough laws, what we need is enforcement.

    Biden now thinks that a .223 is HIGH CALIBER. It is 3 one thousandths of an inch bigger than the most common plinker, the .22. The 7.62x39 and the 308 are larger. He also said he want to ban the 9mm. WHY? the .40S&W is larger as is the .44, the .45,
    the .454 and .50. He is speaking out his demented external anal sphincter. The liberal left (socialist communists) really want the country disarmed. When that happens we can all kiss it goodby.

    Every once in a while a nut case slips thru the cracks, horribly unfortunate and impossible to say anything that would appease the families affected by his actions. Do we do psychological analysis of every gun purchaser? How about doing the same to
    aircraft mechanics, brain scan them for brain tumors too, not a bad idea? Aircraft mechanic is the occupation of most serial killers, look it up.

    Schools were supposed to be hardened against such incidents and the ball was dropped in this case so we blame the gun, the manufacturer. The police failed to respond adequately but the Supreme Court has held that they have no duty to do so, go figure.

    The world is becoming a more dangerous place day by day. Food prices are thru the roof, shortages are predicted, gas is thru the roof, baby formula is in short supply and if the Democrats win the midterm you will be lining up for toilet paper.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    This is the mark of a stupid person; bullet caliber is much less important than the kinetic energy of the projectile, which is what makes some rifles so much more destructive than handguns. AR-15 5.7
    mm rounds travel at typically 3,000 ft/s vs 1,300 for 9 mm. They have an energy of around 1,800 J vs 500 J. The bottom line: the caliber is MEANINGLESS! The big advantage of 9 mm handguns is that they are far easier to conceal than a rifle of any sort.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.223_Remington https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9%C3%9719mm_Parabellum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 2 05:44:48 2022
    On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:43:36 AM UTC-7, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    You are sadly ignorant of the Heller decision which covers the argument you made in great detail. This decision, by the way, is 14 years old.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller


    True but the problem with Supreme Court decisions is that depending on the current make up of the court, previous rulings can be overturned. The current POTUS wishes to STACK THE COURT, add more justices to favor his point of view creating a majority
    and change the law. Thus no ruling is ever permanent, take ROWE V WADE, a prime example.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Thu Jun 2 20:44:46 2022
    On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:44:50 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:43:36 AM UTC-7, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation
    of small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own
    operable Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    You are sadly ignorant of the Heller decision which covers the argument you made in great detail. This decision, by the way, is 14 years old.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
    True but the problem with Supreme Court decisions is that depending on the current make up of the court, previous rulings can be overturned. The current POTUS wishes to STACK THE COURT, add more justices to favor his point of view creating a majority
    and change the law. Thus no ruling is ever permanent, take ROWE V WADE, a prime example.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    The Left continually wants to talk about muzzle loaders and their rate of fire, but they prefer to refer to "militias" as our present day National Guard. As already pointed out, militias were all able bodied men back in the eighteenth century. So, the
    Founders were saying that ALL able-bodied men needed to be armed so that they would be an effective fighting force wherever the need arose. As can be seen in Ukraine, it may be difficult to say when this need may arise. Also, we are HEAVILY regulated
    already when it comes to firearms. Those that don't own them may be unaware of this, but there are thousands of laws on the books NOW that regulates their use. Just go to your own state code and search for "firearms" and you will see a plethora of laws
    concerning their use. The sad truth is that we don't need more laws regulating guns, we just need to have the EXISTING laws ENFORCED! For example, Hunter Biden lied on his BATFE form 4473, which is a felony (https://www.nraila.org/articles/20210405/
    hunter-biden-incident-shows-that-gun-laws-are-for-the-little-people). But laws like this are for you and me, not for the privileged.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RossFW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 2 22:51:40 2022
    On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:08:33 PM UTC+10, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:43:36 AM UTC-7, pvansch...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, May 29, 2022 at 9:43:06 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    Yes, thankfully our Constitution gives us a right to keep and bear arms, but there are those who're unable to distinguish between limits and termination. Massacres like this will continue to increase with the continued exponential proliferation of
    small arms. On the bright side Daniel Defense published a pop-up statement on its homepage sending “thoughts and prayers” to the community of Uvalde.
    Here is the text of the second amendment:

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    All the guns in circulation are not part of a well regulated militia. They are in the hands of some sensible gun owners and a lot of random unregulated individuals, one of whom goes crazy every few months. We regulate that people can not own operable
    Sherman tanks, 50 caliber machine guns that were once installed in warbirds, and lots of other weapons of war. Nobody needs an assault weapon for anything other than killing many people.

    Just like we tax the heck out of tobacco to help defray the costs to society that the tobacco inflicts; we should tax the heck out of guns and ammunition. Some of the money would compensate victims and families. And the gun manufacturers should be
    required to add technology to guns just like we do to cars to make them safer. Both these ideas would be more effective than yet more thoughts and prayers, which clearly do nothing at all.
    You are sadly ignorant of the Heller decision which covers the argument you made in great detail. This decision, by the way, is 14 years old.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    And of course, no SC decision can ever be overturned, right??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 3 01:53:33 2022
    ...So, the Founders were saying that ALL able-bodied men needed to be armed so that they would be an effective fighting force wherever the need arose. As can be seen in Ukraine, it may be difficult to say when this need may arise...

    This has got to be the most fantastical of all the reasons why we should ignore the growing number of these massacres. Put forth by folks who watched the movie, 'Red Dawn' too many times when they were impressionable teenagers. ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rakel@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Fri Jun 3 04:38:22 2022
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 4:53:35 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    ...So, the Founders were saying that ALL able-bodied men needed to be armed ....


    Legally insane people should not have guns because they are not responsible for what they are doing. There is a certain amount of personal responsibility involved with gun ownership. Felons and drug addicts have shown a total disregard for the lives of
    others and themselves. Keep guns away form those people as well.

    I think that responsible, law abiding men and women should have all the guns they want, for whatever lawful purpose they wish. Underage boys and girls need adult supervision and proper training.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Rakel on Fri Jun 3 06:03:53 2022
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 7:38:24 AM UTC-4, Rakel wrote:
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 4:53:35 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    ...So, the Founders were saying that ALL able-bodied men needed to be armed ....


    Legally insane people should not have guns because they are not responsible for what they are doing. There is a certain amount of personal responsibility involved with gun ownership. Felons and drug addicts have shown a total disregard for the lives of
    others and themselves. Keep guns away form those people as well.

    I think that responsible, law abiding men and women should have all the guns they want, for whatever lawful purpose they wish. Underage boys and girls need adult supervision and proper training.

    Interpretation can be misleading at times, "able bodied" would in my opinion exclude anyone with diminished mental capacity. Two people can read the same paragraph and come away with a different perspective to some degree based on their predilection.
    Village idiots were not uncommon back in early America, the locals most likely knew who they were and kept an eye on them without worry about the court finding them in violation of their rights.

    Felons are by law not allowed to buy or even POSESS a firearm, a drug addict convicted of such an offense would fall into this category. Personally I would be in favor of raising the age to buy any firearm to 21. JMHO.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat Jun 4 13:09:46 2022
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 9:03:56 AM UTC-4, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 7:38:24 AM UTC-4, Rakel wrote:
    On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 4:53:35 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    ...So, the Founders were saying that ALL able-bodied men needed to be armed ....


    Legally insane people should not have guns because they are not responsible for what they are doing. There is a certain amount of personal responsibility involved with gun ownership. Felons and drug addicts have shown a total disregard for the lives
    of others and themselves. Keep guns away form those people as well.

    I think that responsible, law abiding men and women should have all the guns they want, for whatever lawful purpose they wish. Underage boys and girls need adult supervision and proper training.
    Interpretation can be misleading at times, "able bodied" would in my opinion exclude anyone with diminished mental capacity. Two people can read the same paragraph and come away with a different perspective to some degree based on their predilection.
    Village idiots were not uncommon back in early America, the locals most likely knew who they were and kept an eye on them without worry about the court finding them in violation of their rights.

    Felons are by law not allowed to buy or even POSESS a firearm, a drug addict convicted of such an offense would fall into this category. Personally I would be in favor of raising the age to buy any firearm to 21. JMHO.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.
    I think that's a bit much, but for semi-autos I agree. We need to enforce existing laws first - many dealers have been in gross violation yet ATF does nothing. Make gun owners very accountable when their weapons get into other's hands.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bumper@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 4 22:49:18 2022
    At 14 years, I'd put my .22 rifle in a canvas bag my mother made for me, and tie it to my bicycle to go shooting. What has changed since then is the family unit has been eroded and broken for many minorities and poor. Their children get little to no
    parental guidance and are not taught moral and acceptable behavior. 75% of black babies are born to unwed mothers, welfare is the enabler and a cancer on our society, it enables young girls to get pregnant and get a place of their own. It was that way
    when I was a cop in Oakland in the 70's and has only gotten worse. Most of their kids are raised on the street, with drug dealers and pimps their heroes sporting fat rolls of cash. When the government was doing the "Train them for a job" program, I went
    to take a report at a welding trade school. There was the instructor, and not one student. He said he couldn't get them to show up most of the time. Total waste of money. What we have here is a breakdown in the very foundation of our country. People are
    the problem, not guns. As an aside, I never had to shoot anyone in the 10 years I was on OPD. Lost a few police friends to gun violence by bad guys, and but for some luck and good awareness, survived the planned killing of me by 4 robbery suspects in a
    car I stopped alone when I was on motors. When I later heard the general description of the robbery vehicle on the radio, I gave them enough extra info they were able to stake out a house and arrest the bad guys. One of them, who was in the back seat
    when I stopped them, told the investigator they were planning to kill me if I gave them the chance.

    Absent straightening out our country and getting back on track (which will take years if ever), we need armed security and far better safety measures in our schools.

    bumper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 5 03:35:36 2022
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to Jacksonville
    after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90 percent
    of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to andy l on Sun Jun 5 05:34:57 2022
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 6:35:38 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to Jacksonville
    after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90
    percent of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."

    There is no easy answer to this question but unlike many other countries the USA has a Constitution where the right to keep and bear arms is spelled out.

    As I have stated in the past, I do not need a fire extinguisher RIGHT NOW but I have in the past and the one I had was inadequate to do the job. I now have two and they are of a much larger capacity. Should someone have the right to tell me I don’t
    need such capacity? Not the same thing you say? I beg to differ. When the need comes to defend myself I want to make the decision as to the method myself, not to have a bureaucrat do it for me.

    In the UK one is not allowed to apply for a gun purchase permit if the reason is self defense. In the USA the right to self defense is clear. You have the right to use deadly force when your life is in danger or you are in danger of seriously bodily
    harm, except of course in cities like New York where only the criminal has the advantage. Gun laws vary from state to state and some times from municipality to municipality however the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment to the United
    States Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense ... the liberal left hates this.

    I will say that I think an 18 year old should not be permitted to buy a firearm, just my personal opinion. I don’t think they should be allowed to drink alcohol either, again a personal opinion. Twenty one or twenty five would be a better age unless
    they have been in the military with proper training. I had a .22 rifle at age 12, a bolt action model and I received some good safety training and marksmanship training from my dad, and I knew if I screwed up it would be my ass. I lived out in the
    country where most of my childhood friends also had a rifle or access to one. I am in favor of COMMON SENSE gun laws but to me that does not mean confiscation or banning of certain types. Just my constitutionally protected opinion.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sun Jun 5 13:28:22 2022
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 5:34:58 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 6:35:38 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to
    Jacksonville after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90
    percent of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."
    There is no easy answer to this question but unlike many other countries the USA has a Constitution where the right to keep and bear arms is spelled out.

    As I have stated in the past, I do not need a fire extinguisher RIGHT NOW but I have in the past and the one I had was inadequate to do the job. I now have two and they are of a much larger capacity. Should someone have the right to tell me I don’t
    need such capacity? Not the same thing you say? I beg to differ. When the need comes to defend myself I want to make the decision as to the method myself, not to have a bureaucrat do it for me.

    In the UK one is not allowed to apply for a gun purchase permit if the reason is self defense. In the USA the right to self defense is clear. You have the right to use deadly force when your life is in danger or you are in danger of seriously bodily
    harm, except of course in cities like New York where only the criminal has the advantage. Gun laws vary from state to state and some times from municipality to municipality however the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment to the United
    States Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense ... the liberal left hates this.

    I will say that I think an 18 year old should not be permitted to buy a firearm, just my personal opinion. I don’t think they should be allowed to drink alcohol either, again a personal opinion. Twenty one or twenty five would be a better age unless
    they have been in the military with proper training. I had a .22 rifle at age 12, a bolt action model and I received some good safety training and marksmanship training from my dad, and I knew if I screwed up it would be my ass. I lived out in the
    country where most of my childhood friends also had a rifle or access to one. I am in favor of COMMON SENSE gun laws but to me that does not mean confiscation or banning of certain types. Just my constitutionally protected opinion.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    A peculiar form of insanity seems to be sweeping the nation, where the police are regarded as the problem instead of part of the solution. Seattle, for example, has recently announced that they are no longer going to investigate adult sexual assaults.
    Your read that right: forget it if you a woman in Seattle and are sexually assaulted. This is a direct result of their bizarre Defund the Police movement. So, what impact do you think this will have on perverts motivated to commit these type of crimes?
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-police-stopped-investigating-new-adult-sexual-assaults

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to andy l on Sun Jun 5 14:01:02 2022
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:35:38 AM UTC-7, andy l wrote:
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to Jacksonville
    after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90
    percent of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."



    "...I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter..."

    Well said andi I. You put your finger on the bottom line why these massacres, happen here and not in other western nations, the huge number of and easy access to guns. But the truth is that the vast majority of Americans DO want to do something about
    it, it's only a relatively small percentage of hardcore extremists and their leaders who continue to block sensible reform.

    And most of those who blame mental illness and the breakdown of the family unit (both factors) have no interest in proposing policies and providing resources that would help reduce these issues. Let alone address the rise in the hate and racism that
    have motivated these recent massacres, like the replacement and other conspiracy theories. I believe this will be the motivation behind the majority of massacres in the coming months and years, until the vast majority who want to do something grows
    large enough to make the changes that will actually save lives.

    Some believe our Constitution came down from heaven written in stone, but America can and have made the changes to meet the needs that time, science and knowledge has shown the majority of Americans what's required for, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
    Happiness".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Sun Jun 5 19:05:30 2022
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 2:01:05 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:35:38 AM UTC-7, andy l wrote:
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to
    Jacksonville after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90
    percent of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."
    "...I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter..."

    Well said andi I. You put your finger on the bottom line why these massacres, happen here and not in other western nations, the huge number of and easy access to guns. But the truth is that the vast majority of Americans DO want to do something about
    it, it's only a relatively small percentage of hardcore extremists and their leaders who continue to block sensible reform.

    And most of those who blame mental illness and the breakdown of the family unit (both factors) have no interest in proposing policies and providing resources that would help reduce these issues. Let alone address the rise in the hate and racism that
    have motivated these recent massacres, like the replacement and other conspiracy theories. I believe this will be the motivation behind the majority of massacres in the coming months and years, until the vast majority who want to do something grows large
    enough to make the changes that will actually save lives.

    Some believe our Constitution came down from heaven written in stone, but America can and have made the changes to meet the needs that time, science and knowledge has shown the majority of Americans what's required for, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit
    of Happiness".

    Mass murders won't even make into the Top 100 causes of death. If you denied the insane access to what is erroneously called "assault rifles" (not likely as you are talking about mass confiscation of ALL rifles) they would, simply, switch to handguns.
    And if you went whole hog and confiscated EVERY firearm (which is blatantly unconstitutional) they would switch to a car, pickup or truck (which has happened, not here, but in Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-ramming_attack).

    Typical of liberals, they look at an inanimate object as the problem when it is the person. If you study serial killers they rarely use firearms to kill their victims. What would REALLY help is the STRICT enforcement of EXISTING gun laws, like straw
    buyers and people who lie on their gun application form (like Hunter Biden). Criminals caught with illegal firearms typically have the gun enhancement charge pled down.

    All approaches at gun control impact law-abiding citizens the most severely. Criminal don't follow the law because, after all, they are criminals. There are hundreds of thousands of instances of defensive gun use each year in the USA, but most are
    unknown because it may only involve showing the gun to the criminal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Godfrey@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 6 07:43:11 2022
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:05:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 2:01:05 PM UTC-7, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:35:38 AM UTC-7, andy l wrote:
    I was in Uvalde in 1991. I remember again the son in the family that owned the motel describing to us possibly naive visitors how simple it was to buy a gun. I also remember occasionally listening to the radio while driving the trailer to
    Jacksonville after the comp, hearing news reports of shootings in nearby places I saw on road signs, such as Biloxi.

    I see plenty of argument, some of it surely tenuous or dubious, such as the solution to having too many guns is get even more, or blame the victims, or anyone who wants to do anything must be left wing nutters, or threatens our historic
    Constitution.

    I just found a Newsweek article written on the occasion of a mass shooting in Plymouth England, the first such incident in this country for about a decade. In the same time the USA had hundreds or even thousands, according to counting by different
    monitoring groups.

    We had an infamous shooting in 1996 in a school in Dunblane, home town of the tennis player Andy Murray, who was present. The country did something about it.

    I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter.

    Sure, I don't understand. This may attract some replies saying so.

    Instead, look in the mirror: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

    One excerpt:

    "Compared to 22 other high-income nations, the U.S. gun-related homicide rate is 25 times higher.[16] Although it has half the population of the other 22 nations combined, among those 22 nations studied, the U.S. had 82 percent of gun deaths, 90
    percent of all women killed with guns, 91 percent of children under 14 and 92 percent of young people between ages 15 and 24 killed with guns, with guns being the leading cause of death for children."
    "...I won't dare to tell you what to do about this in your country. Too many of you seem to want to do nothing at all, except come up with very highly assertive excuses why you don't have any interest or responsibility in the matter..."

    Well said andi I. You put your finger on the bottom line why these massacres, happen here and not in other western nations, the huge number of and easy access to guns. But the truth is that the vast majority of Americans DO want to do something about
    it, it's only a relatively small percentage of hardcore extremists and their leaders who continue to block sensible reform.

    And most of those who blame mental illness and the breakdown of the family unit (both factors) have no interest in proposing policies and providing resources that would help reduce these issues. Let alone address the rise in the hate and racism that
    have motivated these recent massacres, like the replacement and other conspiracy theories. I believe this will be the motivation behind the majority of massacres in the coming months and years, until the vast majority who want to do something grows large
    enough to make the changes that will actually save lives.

    Some believe our Constitution came down from heaven written in stone, but America can and have made the changes to meet the needs that time, science and knowledge has shown the majority of Americans what's required for, "Life, Liberty and the pursuit
    of Happiness".
    Mass murders won't even make into the Top 100 causes of death. If you denied the insane access to what is erroneously called "assault rifles" (not likely as you are talking about mass confiscation of ALL rifles) they would, simply, switch to handguns.
    And if you went whole hog and confiscated EVERY firearm (which is blatantly unconstitutional) they would switch to a car, pickup or truck (which has happened, not here, but in Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-ramming_attack).

    Typical of liberals, they look at an inanimate object as the problem when it is the person. If you study serial killers they rarely use firearms to kill their victims. What would REALLY help is the STRICT enforcement of EXISTING gun laws, like straw
    buyers and people who lie on their gun application form (like Hunter Biden). Criminals caught with illegal firearms typically have the gun enhancement charge pled down.

    All approaches at gun control impact law-abiding citizens the most severely. Criminal don't follow the law because, after all, they are criminals. There are hundreds of thousands of instances of defensive gun use each year in the USA, but most are
    unknown because it may only involve showing the gun to the criminal.
    Such certainty about what "would' happen. Awesome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dale bush@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 6 16:18:56 2022
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:30:31 PM UTC-7, FZ wrote:
    Uvalde, the place loaded with so many great memories for hundreds of glider pilots. Town of great hospitality to gliding community, site of the world's best soaring, and now suddenly.... the capital of school shootings.

    My take,
    Envision a straight line graph with a fist sized stone on the far left and a thermonuclear bomb on the far right. Each category of lethal weapon is placed on the graph according to its relative lethality. The least lethal to the left progressing
    toward the most lethal on the right.

    The second amendment (literally interpreted) suggests American citizens can own any weapon they please. But few among us actually believe the average citizen should own a shoulder launched anti aircraft rocket, or an armed F 18. Where do you personally
    draw the vertical line on this grey scale of weaponry?

    I’m guessing most of us, conservatives included, would draw it somewhere just left of hand grenades, but right of handguns and hunting rifles. In this narrow band between hunting rifles and hand grenades lives a small subset of weapons designed for
    military use — specifically for efficiently killing people (the AR-15 and its counterparts). These weapons fire high velocity bullets possessing enough kinetic energy to literally blow holes in people. They are capable of rapid fire, possess large
    magazines, and are readily available in your neighborhood.

    The majority of us, who favor some form of gun control, don’t want your 9mm or your deer rifle. Hell, Im a notorious liberal and I keep a 12 gage for protection. We want to keep guns out of the hands of felons and the insane, and we want to close the
    gun show loophole and require background checks. And yes, we want to ban military style weapons designed expressly to kill humans.

    Over and over again, I’ve heard the same arguments justifying a man’s need for an assault rifle. These arguments apply just as readily to hand grenades, rocket launchers and thermonuclear weapons. None of us really believe that the second amendment
    is sacrosanct. It just a matter of where we draw the line.

    I’ve read that many of the Uvalde children were literally blown to pieces and unrecognizable.

    Dale Bush

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bumper@21:1/5 to twofiv...@gmail.com on Mon Jun 6 23:28:01 2022
    On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 4:18:58 PM UTC-7, twofiv...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:30:31 PM UTC-7, FZ wrote:
    Uvalde, the place loaded with so many great memories for hundreds of glider pilots. Town of great hospitality to gliding community, site of the world's best soaring, and now suddenly.... the capital of school shootings.

    My take,
    Envision a straight line graph with a fist sized stone on the far left and a thermonuclear bomb on the far right. Each category of lethal weapon is placed on the graph according to its relative lethality. The least lethal to the left progressing toward
    the most lethal on the right.

    The second amendment (literally interpreted) suggests American citizens can own any weapon they please. But few among us actually believe the average citizen should own a shoulder launched anti aircraft rocket, or an armed F 18. Where do you personally
    draw the vertical line on this grey scale of weaponry?

    I’m guessing most of us, conservatives included, would draw it somewhere just left of hand grenades, but right of handguns and hunting rifles. In this narrow band between hunting rifles and hand grenades lives a small subset of weapons designed for
    military use — specifically for efficiently killing people (the AR-15 and its counterparts). These weapons fire high velocity bullets possessing enough kinetic energy to literally blow holes in people. They are capaite of rapid fire, possess large
    magazines, and are readily available in your neighborhood.

    The majority of us, who favor some form of gun control, don’t want your 9mm or your deer rifle. Hell, Im a notorious liberal and I keep a 12 gage for protection. We want to keep guns out of the hands of felons and the insane, and we want to close the
    gun show loophole and require background checks. And yes, we want to ban military style weapons designed expressly to kill humans.

    Over and over again, I’ve heard the same arguments justifying a man’s need for an assault rifle. These arguments apply just as readily to hand grenades, rocket launchers and thermonuclear weapons. None of us really believe that the second amendment
    is sacrosanct. It just a matter of where we draw the line.

    I’ve read that many of the Uvalde children were literally blown to pieces and unrecognizable.

    Dale Bush

    Dale,

    An AR15 is not an assault rifle, it is a semi-automatic rifle patterned after the M16 or M4 which ARE assault rifles, it is also illegal for civilians to own AR's unless made prior to 1986 and then you need a tax stamp for it. They are so rare and hard
    to get that the price is around $25K or more. The difference being the M16 and M4 can fire full-auto or burst. You speak of the deadly 5.56 round "blowing holes", many hunting rounds have more velocity, bullet weight and energy, and can take down bigger
    game than the 5.56 mm. The 5.56 is much weaker than the 30-06 used in WWII, but the 5.56 round being lighter and smaller, soldiers can carry more rounds with them. For civilians, at least those that live in rural areas without closely spaced houses, the
    AR makes a very good home defense weapon, easy to handle, low recoil, etc. BTW, a .22 short will "blow a hole in you", your shotgun will make a much bigger hole of course.

    As I said before, the problem isn't guns, it's people. Oh, and pistols are used in nearly two thirds of US firearm murders.

    bumper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Micha Schmidt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 7 00:05:19 2022
    Great reading this thread as a non American :)

    This dude hits the nail on the head.

    Part 1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0

    Part 2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9UFyNy-rw4

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Byars@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 7 06:29:16 2022
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to gfbwi...@gmail.com on Tue Jun 7 12:08:54 2022
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 9:29:18 AM UTC-4, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.

    Possibly a view from the LEFT?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to bumper on Tue Jun 7 14:12:26 2022
    On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-7, bumper wrote:
    On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 4:18:58 PM UTC-7, twofiv...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:30:31 PM UTC-7, FZ wrote:
    Uvalde, the place loaded with so many great memories for hundreds of glider pilots. Town of great hospitality to gliding community, site of the world's best soaring, and now suddenly.... the capital of school shootings.

    My take,
    Envision a straight line graph with a fist sized stone on the far left and a thermonuclear bomb on the far right. Each category of lethal weapon is placed on the graph according to its relative lethality. The least lethal to the left progressing
    toward the most lethal on the right.

    The second amendment (literally interpreted) suggests American citizens can own any weapon they please. But few among us actually believe the average citizen should own a shoulder launched anti aircraft rocket, or an armed F 18. Where do you
    personally draw the vertical line on this grey scale of weaponry?

    I’m guessing most of us, conservatives included, would draw it somewhere just left of hand grenades, but right of handguns and hunting rifles. In this narrow band between hunting rifles and hand grenades lives a small subset of weapons designed for
    military use — specifically for efficiently killing people (the AR-15 and its counterparts). These weapons fire high velocity bullets possessing enough kinetic energy to literally blow holes in people. They are capaite of rapid fire, possess large
    magazines, and are readily available in your neighborhood.

    The majority of us, who favor some form of gun control, don’t want your 9mm or your deer rifle. Hell, Im a notorious liberal and I keep a 12 gage for protection. We want to keep guns out of the hands of felons and the insane, and we want to close
    the gun show loophole and require background checks. And yes, we want to ban military style weapons designed expressly to kill humans.

    Over and over again, I’ve heard the same arguments justifying a man’s need for an assault rifle. These arguments apply just as readily to hand grenades, rocket launchers and thermonuclear weapons. None of us really believe that the second
    amendment is sacrosanct. It just a matter of where we draw the line.

    I’ve read that many of the Uvalde children were literally blown to pieces and unrecognizable.

    Dale Bush
    Dale,

    An AR15 is not an assault rifle, it is a semi-automatic rifle patterned after the M16 or M4 which ARE assault rifles, it is also illegal for civilians to own AR's unless made prior to 1986 and then you need a tax stamp for it. They are so rare and hard
    to get that the price is around $25K or more. The difference being the M16 and M4 can fire full-auto or burst. You speak of the deadly 5.56 round "blowing holes", many hunting rounds have more velocity, bullet weight and energy, and can take down bigger
    game than the 5.56 mm. The 5.56 is much weaker than the 30-06 used in WWII, but the 5.56 round being lighter and smaller, soldiers can carry more rounds with them. For civilians, at least those that live in rural areas without closely spaced houses, the
    AR makes a very good home defense weapon, easy to handle, low recoil, etc. BTW, a .22 short will "blow a hole in you", your shotgun will make a much bigger hole of course.

    As I said before, the problem isn't guns, it's people. Oh, and pistols are used in nearly two thirds of US firearm murders.

    bumper

    As its been pointed out over and over again, every other industrialized, civilized western democracies do not have these massacres. Are their citizens less deranged then Americans? Do Americans suffer from so much more mental illness? Can their
    children run faster or hide better? No, the difference is the huge number of and easy access to weapons. And what are the two responses from the right, either ignore the killings or incredibly arm more people and add to the existing number of weapons
    in circulation.

    The hardcore need to get past their paranoid delusion that background checks, limiting the purchase of AR15's to 21 years olds and their magazines to 10 rounds, means that the government is coming to take everyone's guns away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rakel@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Tue Jun 7 17:18:45 2022
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:12:27 PM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:

    As its been pointed out over and over again, every other industrialized, civilized western democracies do not have these massacres. Are their citizens less deranged then Americans? Do Americans suffer from so much more mental illness? Can their
    children run faster or hide better? No, the difference is the huge number of and easy access to weapons. ...


    Another difference is that many other industrialized, civilized western democracies have some sort of public health care with easy acess to mental health services. Thhis is more important than any other factor, in my opinion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rakel@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Tue Jun 7 17:26:08 2022
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:12:27 PM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:

    As its been pointed out over and over again, every other industrialized, civilized western democracies do not have these massacres. Are their citizens less deranged then Americans? Do Americans suffer from so much more mental illness? Can their
    children run faster or hide better? No, the difference is the huge number of and easy access to weapons. And what are the two responses from the right, either ignore the killings or incredibly arm more people and add to the existing number of weapons in
    circulation.

    The hardcore need to get past their paranoid delusion that background checks, limiting the purchase of AR15's to 21 years olds and their magazines to 10 rounds, means that the government is coming to take everyone's guns away.

    Another difference is that many other industrialized, civilized western democracies have some sort of public health care with easy acess to mental health services. This is more important than any other factor, in my opinion. We have just as many legally
    insane people here in the US as are in other places, but in other countries, they get the mental help they need.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Byars@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 7 17:32:52 2022
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.
    Possibly a view from the LEFT?

    No, a view from someone who thinks this newsgroup should be about soaring and soaring related topics. Not gun control, take that elsewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to gfbwi...@gmail.com on Tue Jun 7 18:16:00 2022
    With very few exception the vast responds on this thread don’t surprise me when seeing other posts from the same folks. Anyway, to me it only makes me feel better being on the right side of history and live among open minded folks.
    Very well said Andy and few others. The rest, I wish you keep your opinions to yourself and talk about soaring instead. Indeed it is getting worse than the Monkey-Penis worshiper. I think I can guess his opinion. He sure enjoys his first amendment, at
    least that one doesn’t result in so many deaths.

    Ramy

    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:32:54 PM UTC-7, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.
    Possibly a view from the LEFT?
    No, a view from someone who thinks this newsgroup should be about soaring and soaring related topics. Not gun control, take that elsewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Tue Jun 7 19:30:06 2022
    You could move to one of those countries...

    Dan
    5J

    On 6/7/22 15:12, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-7, bumper wrote:
    On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 4:18:58 PM UTC-7, twofiv...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 6:30:31 PM UTC-7, FZ wrote:
    Uvalde, the place loaded with so many great memories for hundreds of glider pilots. Town of great hospitality to gliding community, site of the world's best soaring, and now suddenly.... the capital of school shootings.

    My take,
    Envision a straight line graph with a fist sized stone on the far left and a thermonuclear bomb on the far right. Each category of lethal weapon is placed on the graph according to its relative lethality. The least lethal to the left progressing
    toward the most lethal on the right.

    The second amendment (literally interpreted) suggests American citizens can own any weapon they please. But few among us actually believe the average citizen should own a shoulder launched anti aircraft rocket, or an armed F 18. Where do you
    personally draw the vertical line on this grey scale of weaponry?

    I’m guessing most of us, conservatives included, would draw it somewhere just left of hand grenades, but right of handguns and hunting rifles. In this narrow band between hunting rifles and hand grenades lives a small subset of weapons designed for
    military use — specifically for efficiently killing people (the AR-15 and its counterparts). These weapons fire high velocity bullets possessing enough kinetic energy to literally blow holes in people. They are capaite of rapid fire, possess large
    magazines, and are readily available in your neighborhood.

    The majority of us, who favor some form of gun control, don’t want your 9mm or your deer rifle. Hell, Im a notorious liberal and I keep a 12 gage for protection. We want to keep guns out of the hands of felons and the insane, and we want to close
    the gun show loophole and require background checks. And yes, we want to ban military style weapons designed expressly to kill humans.

    Over and over again, I’ve heard the same arguments justifying a man’s need for an assault rifle. These arguments apply just as readily to hand grenades, rocket launchers and thermonuclear weapons. None of us really believe that the second
    amendment is sacrosanct. It just a matter of where we draw the line.

    I’ve read that many of the Uvalde children were literally blown to pieces and unrecognizable.

    Dale Bush
    Dale,

    An AR15 is not an assault rifle, it is a semi-automatic rifle patterned after the M16 or M4 which ARE assault rifles, it is also illegal for civilians to own AR's unless made prior to 1986 and then you need a tax stamp for it. They are so rare and
    hard to get that the price is around $25K or more. The difference being the M16 and M4 can fire full-auto or burst. You speak of the deadly 5.56 round "blowing holes", many hunting rounds have more velocity, bullet weight and energy, and can take down
    bigger game than the 5.56 mm. The 5.56 is much weaker than the 30-06 used in WWII, but the 5.56 round being lighter and smaller, soldiers can carry more rounds with them. For civilians, at least those that live in rural areas without closely spaced
    houses, the AR makes a very good home defense weapon, easy to handle, low recoil, etc. BTW, a .22 short will "blow a hole in you", your shotgun will make a much bigger hole of course.

    As I said before, the problem isn't guns, it's people. Oh, and pistols are used in nearly two thirds of US firearm murders.

    bumper

    As its been pointed out over and over again, every other industrialized, civilized western democracies do not have these massacres. Are their citizens less deranged then Americans? Do Americans suffer from so much more mental illness? Can their
    children run faster or hide better? No, the difference is the huge number of and easy access to weapons. And what are the two responses from the right, either ignore the killings or incredibly arm more people and add to the existing number of weapons
    in circulation.

    The hardcore need to get past their paranoid delusion that background checks, limiting the purchase of AR15's to 21 years olds and their magazines to 10 rounds, means that the government is coming to take everyone's guns away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From s.bralla.ret@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 7 19:54:12 2022
    I need an Ar-15 to protect me from the government when they come to take my AR-15 away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to s.bral...@gmail.com on Tue Jun 7 20:44:42 2022
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 7:54:14 PM UTC-7, s.bral...@gmail.com wrote:
    I need an Ar-15 to protect me from the government when they come to take my AR-15 away.

    We are getting some sanctimonious bullshit here, like massacres ONLY occur in America:
    https://www.cbsnews.com/feature/massacre-in-norway/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Whiteley@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 7 22:38:31 2022
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 9:44:54 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 7:54:14 PM UTC-7, s.bral...@gmail.com wrote:
    I need an Ar-15 to protect me from the government when they come to take my AR-15 away.
    We are getting some sanctimonious bullshit here, like massacres ONLY occur in America:
    https://www.cbsnews.com/feature/massacre-in-norway/
    https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/gunmen-kill-worshippers-during-church-service-nigeria-media-2022-06-05/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 8 05:46:58 2022
    1. If you don't like a post, DON'T READ IT.

    2. There are no words that will ease the pain of the families of those killed in any shooting incident.

    3. As we watch our country become more and more destabilized by unchecked immigration, people who will need to be housed, fed, clothed, cared for medically and their children educated one must ask from where will the money come to do these things? Why
    are our poor, homeless and veterans ignored?

    4. As we watch looting, rioting, burning and killing which goes unpunished, who will protect us when these actions come to our neighborhoods? The Supreme Court has already said the police have no duty to protect anyone other than those in custody, YOU
    are on your own. Do you want to be reloading your musket after every shot?

    5. If you believe that any weapon issued to the military should be banned for civilian possession or usage, know that the 12 gauge shotgun has been issued and used by the military since its inception. The .38 caliber (S&W Military and Police) REVOLVER
    was my issued weapon during the Vietnam War.

    6. Live is hard and then you die.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Byars@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 8 06:24:12 2022
    1. If you don't like a post, DON'T READ IT.

    If the information is not soaring related, DON'T POST IT.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to gfbwi...@gmail.com on Wed Jun 8 07:17:48 2022
    On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 6:24:13 AM UTC-7, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    1. If you don't like a post, DON'T READ IT.
    If the information is not soaring related, DON'T POST IT.



    I believe those of us who have heard an AK-47 fired in anger would agree that assault rifles belong on the battle field, not in the classroom, doctor’s office, grocery store, church, Walmart………….the list goes on and on!
    Yes, some citizens were treated very badly at Ruby Ridge and Waco, but those tragedies are being repeated almost daily in the land of the free and home of the armed citizenry!
    ENOUGH……….
    JJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kinsell@21:1/5 to Ramy on Wed Jun 8 16:37:40 2022
    You mean like open-minded folks who think men can have babies, and
    there's 63 genders now? Who think that destroying cities in "mostly
    peaceful riots" is OK, and that legalized shoplifting by gangs in CA is
    just dandy? Like teaching little white kids that they're evil racists
    just because they're white?

    Sounds like you aren't on the right side of history, you're on the LEFT.





    On 6/7/22 19:16, Ramy wrote:
    With very few exception the vast responds on this thread don’t surprise me when seeing other posts from the same folks. Anyway, to me it only makes me feel better being on the right side of history and live among open minded folks.
    Very well said Andy and few others. The rest, I wish you keep your opinions to yourself and talk about soaring instead. Indeed it is getting worse than the Monkey-Penis worshiper. I think I can guess his opinion. He sure enjoys his first amendment, at
    least that one doesn’t result in so many deaths.

    Ramy

    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:32:54 PM UTC-7, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.
    Possibly a view from the LEFT?
    No, a view from someone who thinks this newsgroup should be about soaring and soaring related topics. Not gun control, take that elsewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to kinsell on Wed Jun 8 20:17:58 2022
    You are confused, or spending too much time on facebook. I don’t know any person that fits your description. Yet I know many open minded folks. Now to make it more soaring related, will be interesting to compare the type of flying that liberals folks
    are doing vs conservative folks. I’ll see if I can talk the OLC guys into adding a party affiliation to OLC ;)

    Ramy

    On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 3:38:14 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
    You mean like open-minded folks who think men can have babies, and
    there's 63 genders now? Who think that destroying cities in "mostly
    peaceful riots" is OK, and that legalized shoplifting by gangs in CA is
    just dandy? Like teaching little white kids that they're evil racists
    just because they're white?

    Sounds like you aren't on the right side of history, you're on the LEFT.
    On 6/7/22 19:16, Ramy wrote:
    With very few exception the vast responds on this thread don’t surprise me when seeing other posts from the same folks. Anyway, to me it only makes me feel better being on the right side of history and live among open minded folks.
    Very well said Andy and few others. The rest, I wish you keep your opinions to yourself and talk about soaring instead. Indeed it is getting worse than the Monkey-Penis worshiper. I think I can guess his opinion. He sure enjoys his first amendment,
    at least that one doesn’t result in so many deaths.

    Ramy

    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:32:54 PM UTC-7, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.
    Possibly a view from the LEFT?
    No, a view from someone who thinks this newsgroup should be about soaring and soaring related topics. Not gun control, take that elsewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ramy on Thu Jun 9 03:45:32 2022
    On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:18:01 PM UTC-4, Ramy wrote:
    You are confused, or spending too much time on facebook. I don’t know any person that fits your description. Yet I know many open minded folks. Now to make it more soaring related, will be interesting to compare the type of flying that liberals folks
    are doing vs conservative folks. I’ll see if I can talk the OLC guys into adding a party affiliation to OLC ;)

    Ramy
    On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 3:38:14 PM UTC-7, kinsell wrote:
    You mean like open-minded folks who think men can have babies, and
    there's 63 genders now? Who think that destroying cities in "mostly peaceful riots" is OK, and that legalized shoplifting by gangs in CA is just dandy? Like teaching little white kids that they're evil racists
    just because they're white?

    Sounds like you aren't on the right side of history, you're on the LEFT. On 6/7/22 19:16, Ramy wrote:
    With very few exception the vast responds on this thread don’t surprise me when seeing other posts from the same folks. Anyway, to me it only makes me feel better being on the right side of history and live among open minded folks.
    Very well said Andy and few others. The rest, I wish you keep your opinions to yourself and talk about soaring instead. Indeed it is getting worse than the Monkey-Penis worshiper. I think I can guess his opinion. He sure enjoys his first amendment,
    at least that one doesn’t result in so many deaths.

    Ramy

    On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 5:32:54 PM UTC-7, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    This thread is worse than the Monkey-Sun-Penis one. And has NOTHING to do with soaring.
    Possibly a view from the LEFT?
    No, a view from someone who thinks this newsgroup should be about soaring and soaring related topics. Not gun control, take that elsewhere.
    Can't we all just get along? Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Byars@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 9 04:55:42 2022
    Can't we all just get along? Old Bob, The Purist

    Or better yet, move this conversation to talk.politics.guns. This group is for soaring topics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to gfbwi...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 9 11:05:53 2022
    On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 7:55:44 AM UTC-4, gfbwi...@gmail.com wrote:
    Can't we all just get along? Old Bob, The Purist
    Or better yet, move this conversation to talk.politics.guns. This group is for soaring topics.
    Hey gfbwi, soaring topics are really not at the top of the food chain lately, most want to discuss their AK47 and banana clips. The soaring season is coming into full swing out west and there is no mention of good flights or reports of harrowing landouts.
    Maybe it is time for a controversial soaring topic that rattles the dishes in the motor homes parked at Moriarity, or yet get the wonderful ladies of the WSPA all riled up. Now I am feeling better, even did a few tows this morning and just waiting for
    the VIEW to come on the screen so that I can enjoy my popcorn and cold beer. AS far as the conservatives vs the liberals in sailplane flights I am betting on the independents, they seem to stay in the groove much better. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob W.@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Thu Jun 9 13:55:41 2022
    On 6/9/22 12:05, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 7:55:44 AM UTC-4, gfbwi...@gmail.com
    wrote:
    Can't we all just get along? Old Bob, The Purist
    Or better yet, move this conversation to talk.politics.guns. This
    group is for soaring topics.
    Hey gfbwi, soaring topics are really not at the top of the food
    chain late...
    <rubbish assertion snipped>
    ...The soaring season is coming into full swing out west and there is
    no mention of good flights...
    https://chessintheair.com/epic-first-ever-1000km-declared-fai-triangle-in-colorado/

    Bob W.

    P.S. Just because it's not on RAS means it isn't happening? I suppose
    there's cage-rattling, and there's actually informing oneself about
    genuine soaring accomplishments.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ASM@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 9 19:51:32 2022
    Fortunately I live in Europe. No guns, no school massacres.

    This kind of comments are pissing me off. Typical situation where a European is pretending to be better than the American. I suggest in all fairness to your ignorance, that you educate yourself about the subject before you make yourself a complete
    jackass again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swinkelj@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 10 08:01:31 2022
    Op vrijdag 10 juni 2022 om 04:51:34 UTC+2 schreef ASM:
    Fortunately I live in Europe. No guns, no school massacres.

    This kind of comments are pissing me off. Typical situation where a European is pretending to be better than the American. I suggest in all fairness to your ignorance, that you educate yourself about the subject before you make yourself a complete
    jackass again.
    I am not pretending to be better. I just illustrate the situation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ASM@21:1/5 to swinkelj on Sat Jun 11 12:23:02 2022
    On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 8:01:33 AM UTC-7, swinkelj wrote:
    Op vrijdag 10 juni 2022 om 04:51:34 UTC+2 schreef ASM:
    Fortunately I live in Europe. No guns, no school massacres.

    This kind of comments are pissing me off. Typical situation where a European is pretending to be better than the American. I suggest in all fairness to your ignorance, that you educate yourself about the subject before you make yourself a complete
    jackass again.
    I am not pretending to be better. I just illustrate the situation.

    Wrong again. Before you illustrate anything make sure that your facts are true.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to ASM on Sat Jun 11 12:38:36 2022
    Some of us Europeans have learned a few details

    700 mass shootings (of 4 or more people being shot) a year, 20,000 deaths from non-suicide use of guns. That 2 a day average is sustained, and there have been over 30 more incidents since the one in Uvalde

    About as many guns in your country as people, but three-quarters don't own any.

    The last and indeed only mass shooting in a UK school was over 25 years ago. We average about 1 mass shooting per decade.

    Someone on here tried diversion by saying ramming attacks with vehicles is an emerging European phenomenon, which doesn't happen in USA, but Colorado, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, New York, Wisconsin, Maryland, Nevada, California, and others are in
    that country, and so were the Twin Towers, and so is the US Capitol in Washington DC.

    Whatever happens to solve all this waste of life and national productivity, or doesn't, it's up to you folks, and we outsiders might indeed be mystified by some of it. Taking rhetorical sideswipes at separate subjects or independent observers elsewhere
    isn't going to help you.

    On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 03:51:34 UTC+1, ASM wrote:

    This kind of comments are pissing me off. Typical situation where a European is pretending to be better than the American. I suggest in all fairness to your ignorance, that you educate yourself about the subject before you make yourself a complete
    jackass again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 11 17:23:15 2022
    Yes, there are more mass shootings in the USA than Europe, quite unfortunate but that being said I support the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment. Schools are supposed to be hardened and SROs are supposed to be present, the Uvalde situation should not
    have happened and would not have if the SRO was doing his job.

    Of course Europe sees mass shootings too and when you do they are DOOSIES. Anders Breivik I believe was his name? Killed 77 people in Norway and got 21 years in prison. And then attackers in France killed 130 people including 90 at the Bataclan
    theatre. Another 416 people were injured, almost 100 critically. Seven of the attackers were also killed. Then there were the Madrid train bombings of 2004, and don't forget the attacks on Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish supermarket in Paris that
    killed 17 people. If someone wants to kill masses of people he will find a way.

    Europe seems to import their crazies, we grow our own thank you. Most of our "mass" shooting are of the smaller categories, I think mass means 4 or more. Most of these are workplace violence, disgruntled workers who feel they were treated wrongly.

    What I find amusing about the European system of permitting firearms is that in some countries "self defense" is not a legitimate reason for wanting a gun, I can think of no better a reason for wanting a firearm. As it is often said, God made man and
    Sam Colt made them all equal.

    Be careful out there my friends, it's becoming a dangerous world.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kirk.stant@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat Jun 11 18:57:45 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 7:23:17 PM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Yes, there are more mass shootings in the USA than Europe, quite unfortunate but that being said I support the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment. Schools are supposed to be hardened and SROs are supposed to be present, the Uvalde situation should not
    have happened and would not have if the SRO was doing his job.

    Of course Europe sees mass shootings too and when you do they are DOOSIES. Anders Breivik I believe was his name? Killed 77 people in Norway and got 21 years in prison. And then attackers in France killed 130 people including 90 at the Bataclan theatre.
    Another 416 people were injured, almost 100 critically. Seven of the attackers were also killed. Then there were the Madrid train bombings of 2004, and don't forget the attacks on Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish supermarket in Paris that killed 17
    people. If someone wants to kill masses of people he will find a way.

    Europe seems to import their crazies, we grow our own thank you. Most of our "mass" shooting are of the smaller categories, I think mass means 4 or more. Most of these are workplace violence, disgruntled workers who feel they were treated wrongly.

    What I find amusing about the European system of permitting firearms is that in some countries "self defense" is not a legitimate reason for wanting a gun, I can think of no better a reason for wanting a firearm. As it is often said, God made man and
    Sam Colt made them all equal.

    Be careful out there my friends, it's becoming a dangerous world.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    Just ban ammunition; then you can play with all the ARs & AKs you want (watch out for bayonet pokes in the eye!). 2A talks about arms, not ammunition - when written there was no self contained cased ammo - you had to roll your own. And it stresses
    regulation - so how about some training required before purchase & use, oh, kinda like a car or motorcycle? NRA used to do that kind of stuff IN SCHOOLS before they went over to the dark side.

    Better yet, regulate the shit out of ammunition, and ID tag all bullets, cases, and powder so you know when, where, and who bought the ammo. That might help with all the pistol crime in the cities, which kill way more than school shootings (but of course
    mainly minorities, so less coverage...). You can run away with your gun, but good luck getting back all your bullets!

    And I like guns - got a bunch of them in the house, been shooting all my life! And I totally understand owning a custom AR or a trick AK or a nice C&R Garand.

    Kirk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat Jun 11 23:40:09 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 5:23:17 PM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    "...but that being said I support the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment..."

    What gets me are comments like this, implying that you can't support the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment, background checks, making 30 round magazines illegal and other sane limits at the same time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to andy l on Sun Jun 12 03:41:40 2022
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 3:38:38 PM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    Some of us Europeans have learned a few details

    700 mass shootings (of 4 or more people being shot) a year, 20,000 deaths from non-suicide use of guns. That 2 a day average is sustained, and there have been over 30 more incidents since the one in Uvalde

    About as many guns in your country as people, but three-quarters don't own any.

    The last and indeed only mass shooting in a UK school was over 25 years ago. We average about 1 mass shooting per decade.

    Someone on here tried diversion by saying ramming attacks with vehicles is an emerging European phenomenon, which doesn't happen in USA, but Colorado, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, New York, Wisconsin, Maryland, Nevada, California, and others are in
    that country, and so were the Twin Towers, and so is the US Capitol in Washington DC.

    Whatever happens to solve all this waste of life and national productivity, or doesn't, it's up to you folks, and we outsiders might indeed be mystified by some of it. Taking rhetorical sideswipes at separate subjects or independent observers elsewhere
    isn't going to help you.
    On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 03:51:34 UTC+1, ASM wrote:

    This kind of comments are pissing me off. Typical situation where a European is pretending to be better than the American. I suggest in all fairness to your ignorance, that you educate yourself about the subject before you make yourself a complete
    jackass again.

    Andy, you speak about the waste of life, yet say nothing about 600K plus per year in abortions, doesn't that rob the country of national productivity? Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Sun Jun 12 06:03:30 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 2:40:11 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 5:23:17 PM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    "...but that being said I support the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment..."

    What gets me are comments like this, implying that you can't support the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment, background checks, making 30 round magazines illegal and other sane limits at the same time.


    I am fine with background checks, been thru many myself and recall if you will that Hunter Biden LIED on his application, a crime, which he got away with. I wonder WHY? Personally I don't care for 30 round magazines in any rifle due to the difficulty
    of going prone with one. A 10 or 20 is favorable and the liberal left want the 20 banned too. So you have a few 10 round mags and reloading takes 2-3 seconds if you are slow, at some point they will want those banned if they can't get the platform
    banned. The problem is at what point do you stop allowing your rights to be usurped? They want your AR15, your AK47 and all variants and at some point the liberal left will realize that the shotgun with one pull of the trigger can take out multiple
    opponents. My choice for home defense is a Mossberg 500A with #4 buck. (#4 SHOT is not the same BTW). Slugs are good too but require more precise aiming.

    One thing that makes most belligerent countries hesitant to attempt a land take over of the USA is the unquestioned ability of the citizenry to respond with significant resistance. Switzerland makes every male citizen a soldier and this has stood the
    test of time for them quite well. If Russia ever decides to cross the border into Europe, (thus far their attempts at the Ukraine have not gone very well) Europeans will be yelling for the Americans and will gladly see them arrive with all their
    terrible ASSAULT RIFLES, civilian version or military grade. Yes, the next major conflict will result in nuclear destruction but there will still be survivors on both sides and ground warfare will become the norm.

    Trump was right in insisting that European countries hold up their end of NATO with 2 percent of their GDP going to defense, many of whom were not doing so. It should not be a burden placed on the American service man and taxpayer to bail out Europe if
    Europe isn't willing to bear the majority of the burden.

    Someone in a previous post mentioned the sound of the AK47. I have heard that sound and the .38 Aircrew Revolver I was issued didn't make me feel secure at all. I've been on the ground at two airbases in S Vietnam which came under attack and when the
    sapper comes thru the wire I want to be able to reach out and touch him at a distance, not wait until he is 35 yards away.

    There are not easy answers folks, but instead of taking away rights guaranteed under the Constitution it seems a better idea to take precautionary measures to stop the perp at the gate. These measure are known and have been implemented at many schools
    throughout the country.

    Now, who thinks wrestling is phony?

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 12 06:17:21 2022
    Now, who thinks wrestling is phony?

    What?? Wrestling is phony? Say it ain't so! It's on TV, it HAS to be real!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to Mark Mocho on Sun Jun 12 07:03:44 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 6:17:23 AM UTC-7, Mark Mocho wrote:
    Now, who thinks wrestling is phony?
    What?? Wrestling is phony? Say it ain't so! It's on TV, it HAS to be real!








    Well said Andy 1, some of us come under the broad category of Weapon Worshippers! They are very loud and live in fear of loosing their right to own weapons. Many, I’m sure have a loaded AR-15 behind the front door, ready for the day that Hillary comes
    to take their guns away………..and giving her what she’s got coming !!!

    As I see it, these guys are not the problem, the real problem is the availability of weapons to any deranged 18 year old who can walk into a gun store and buy anything he wants………and the only questions asked are, would you like a banana clip with
    that AR-15? Seven clips? Sure, son, how about 1000 rounds of ammo? Have you seen our new line of body armor?
    And the slaughter goes on, and on, and on, with little or nothing done about it!
    ,JJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt Herron Jr.@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 12 09:36:57 2022
    Follow the money.

    The sharp rise in gun sales several decades ago was driven by a shift in marketing by gun manufacturers. For example, Beretta issued you a "Man Card" when you purchased one of their guns. Selling guns is a huge business, making lots of folks lots of
    money. The gun lobby and NRA, etc. rose in power, not to protect the 2nd amendment, but to protect the profits made off gun sales.

    How do we turn the equation around? The first simple step is to require liability insurance for owning a gun. Insurance companies that choose to participate (and there will be many because of the huge market and the money to be made) will structure
    rates on how dangerous a particular weapon is, and on how much training the owner is willing to take. They will start to offer discounts for gun safes and gun locks, or belonging to a gun club that teaches gun safety. They will pour money into gun
    safety programs and messaging as well. And they will protect owners from liability in the event of an accident, lawful defense of the homestead, etc. Anything statistically more likely to cause a claim will cost more to insure. Maybe that's open carry,
    or having kids in the house, or maybe not- but facts will be used to make those decisions because money is involved. They will require you to have insurance before you can take possession of a gun, and how long that takes will be driven by the
    purchasers motivation to complete the application and pay the fee. Insurance companies will go after gun sellers that do not comply with the insurance law, and hold them accountable.

    Notice that I have not mentioned one thing about gun laws or restricting ownership, or how many guns you can have, or what type of gun you can buy, or requiring a license. Notice also that this structure is very similar to other activities or devices
    that are inherently dangerous, like owning and driving a car, or flying a plane.

    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.

    Matt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From swinkelj@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 12 10:24:15 2022
    Op zondag 12 juni 2022 om 02:23:17 UTC+2 schreef waltco...@aol.com:
    Yes, there are more mass shootings in the USA than Europe, quite unfortunate but that being said I support the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment. Schools are supposed to be hardened and SROs are supposed to be present, the Uvalde situation should not
    have happened and would not have if the SRO was doing his job.

    Of course Europe sees mass shootings too and when you do they are DOOSIES. Anders Breivik I believe was his name? Killed 77 people in Norway and got 21 years in prison. And then attackers in France killed 130 people including 90 at the Bataclan theatre.
    Another 416 people were injured, almost 100 critically. Seven of the attackers were also killed. Then there were the Madrid train bombings of 2004, and don't forget the attacks on Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish supermarket in Paris that killed 17
    people. If someone wants to kill masses of people he will find a way.

    Europe seems to import their crazies, we grow our own thank you. Most of our "mass" shooting are of the smaller categories, I think mass means 4 or more. Most of these are workplace violence, disgruntled workers who feel they were treated wrongly.

    What I find amusing about the European system of permitting firearms is that in some countries "self defense" is not a legitimate reason for wanting a gun, I can think of no better a reason for wanting a firearm. As it is often said, God made man and
    Sam Colt made them all equal.

    Be careful out there my friends, it's becoming a dangerous world.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-us-gun-violence-world-comparison/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Matt Herron Jr. on Sun Jun 12 13:00:54 2022
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents
    will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J

    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Sun Jun 12 14:05:06 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents
    will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.



    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a gun
    and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Sun Jun 12 14:42:41 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:05:08 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents
    will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.
    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a gun
    and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ
    Not a great idea JJ, the facts speak for themselves. The NRA consist of 5 million DUES PAYING members, the NRA developed and implemented the best gun safety programs in the country today. All of the certified gun ranges and shooting courses that I have
    ever been involved with are all NRA certified with NRA certified instructors. Also, the NRA has the largest child safety program in the world for shooting. I would venture to say that none of these idiots that shoot up innocent people are NRA members or
    NRA certified. Prior to 1970 the NRA was a non- political organization and remained so until the liberal left tried to impose gun laws that were aimed at banning firearms. The NRA was the first civil rights organization in the United States,
    Now getting insurance companies involved in gun safety or firearms control is ludicrous, maybe there should be a outreach of civic organizations developing neighborhood gun safety classes in cities like Chicago and New Orleans, Detroit, LA, Baltimore,
    Atlanta, Houston and I could go on and on.
    Our 14 year old AVA Shelly who recently did her solo flight is a national shooting champion, and she is a member of the NRA! Also, a straight A student now visiting the Naval Academy with big plans for the future. I too have many guns, including an AK47,
    many pistols and long guns as well. I guess you think that this makes me some type of criminal that needs to be verified for gun ownership by some insurance company. .Contrary to what the lefties think, guns are not the problem, it is the idiots that do
    stupid things and you will never stop these idiots from doing their intended dirty deeds.
    I am very much in favor of raising the legal age for gun purchasing and ownership, maybe we can raise the voting age as well, last time I looked the Democrats wanted to lower the voting age to 16 with no ID.
    You want to fix this problem, fix the people first that is the problem. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Sun Jun 12 17:29:46 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:05:08 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents
    will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.
    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a gun
    and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ

    Make it a felony to own a gun and not have insurance? Interesting. I'm sure insurance premiums would be quite high and people living paycheck to paycheck might be precluded from owning a means of self defense. Right now many are finding it hard to
    pay for gas and groceries.

    I believe someone in a previous post suggested that the 2nd Amendment didn't cover ammunition? I'm quite confident that when the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment it was understood that the right to keep and bear arms would include the means to
    make the weapon effective, ergo ammunition.

    Personally I'd like to see the age to purchase any weapon raised to 21 or 25 and also to drink alcohol and vote. I'm a big proponent of training too, I've watched irresponsible adults with a new rifle or pistol or AR15 on the range not realize that
    they still have one in the chamber after they drop the magazine or not understanding that the rules require that you keep the muzzle pointed DOWN RANGE at all times. I had military training on the M16 and while not the same weapon the AF15 operates
    quite similarly. It is however NOT an ASSAULT RIFLE.

    There are no easy answers but usurping rights of American Citizens is not the way to go. Have you noticed that when the AK47 raises its ugly head in Europe it's in the hands of terrorists?

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt Herron Jr.@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sun Jun 12 19:16:50 2022
    Dan & Walt,

    The NRA is just doing what it was designed to do, including promoting gun safety, etc. as you point out. Perhaps they should offer legal liability protection to every NRA member that owns a gun for free. I would totally support that. It won't happen
    though. Why? Liability for the consequences of owning a gun would be too expensive for them to cover for free, because it is a huge liability. A liability that is currently ignored. In fact, the NRA does the exact opposite, coming to the legal
    defense of gun manufacturers that are sued for liable.

    As for gun insurance being too expensive for those that can't afford gas, the free market will settle on a price that is APPROPRIATE for the coverage. You don't get to drive a car without insurance, even though it is a hardship as well. Take the bus
    until you can. Pick some other means of self defense like pepper spray until you can afford the gun+insurance. And no, no one assumes you are a criminal because you own lots of guns, but everyone, including the good guys should be liable for that
    ownership.

    Matt

    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:29:48 PM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:05:08 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.
    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a
    gun and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ
    Make it a felony to own a gun and not have insurance? Interesting. I'm sure insurance premiums would be quite high and people living paycheck to paycheck might be precluded from owning a means of self defense. Right now many are finding it hard to pay
    for gas and groceries.

    I believe someone in a previous post suggested that the 2nd Amendment didn't cover ammunition? I'm quite confident that when the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment it was understood that the right to keep and bear arms would include the means to
    make the weapon effective, ergo ammunition.

    Personally I'd like to see the age to purchase any weapon raised to 21 or 25 and also to drink alcohol and vote. I'm a big proponent of training too, I've watched irresponsible adults with a new rifle or pistol or AR15 on the range not realize that
    they still have one in the chamber after they drop the magazine or not understanding that the rules require that you keep the muzzle pointed DOWN RANGE at all times. I had military training on the M16 and while not the same weapon the AF15 operates quite
    similarly. It is however NOT an ASSAULT RIFLE.

    There are no easy answers but usurping rights of American Citizens is not the way to go. Have you noticed that when the AK47 raises its ugly head in Europe it's in the hands of terrorists?
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ASM@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sun Jun 12 23:11:21 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 2:42:43 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:05:08 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.
    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a
    gun and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ
    Not a great idea JJ, the facts speak for themselves. The NRA consist of 5 million DUES PAYING members, the NRA developed and implemented the best gun safety programs in the country today. All of the certified gun ranges and shooting courses that I have
    ever been involved with are all NRA certified with NRA certified instructors. Also, the NRA has the largest child safety program in the world for shooting. I would venture to say that none of these idiots that shoot up innocent people are NRA members or
    NRA certified. Prior to 1970 the NRA was a non- political organization and remained so until the liberal left tried to impose gun laws that were aimed at banning firearms. The NRA was the first civil rights organization in the United States,
    Now getting insurance companies involved in gun safety or firearms control is ludicrous, maybe there should be a outreach of civic organizations developing neighborhood gun safety classes in cities like Chicago and New Orleans, Detroit, LA, Baltimore,
    Atlanta, Houston and I could go on and on.
    Our 14 year old AVA Shelly who recently did her solo flight is a national shooting champion, and she is a member of the NRA! Also, a straight A student now visiting the Naval Academy with big plans for the future. I too have many guns, including an
    AK47, many pistols and long guns as well. I guess you think that this makes me some type of criminal that needs to be verified for gun ownership by some insurance company. .Contrary to what the lefties think, guns are not the problem, it is the idiots
    that do stupid things and you will never stop these idiots from doing their intended dirty deeds.
    I am very much in favor of raising the legal age for gun purchasing and ownership, maybe we can raise the voting age as well, last time I looked the Democrats wanted to lower the voting age to 16 with no ID.
    You want to fix this problem, fix the people first that is the problem. Old Bob, The Purist


    https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/mass-shootings-by-country Nothing is as obvious as some other posts would indicate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Matt Herron Jr. on Mon Jun 13 04:43:18 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 10:16:52 PM UTC-4, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    Dan & Walt,

    The NRA is just doing what it was designed to do, including promoting gun safety, etc. as you point out. Perhaps they should offer legal liability protection to every NRA member that owns a gun for free. I would totally support that. It won't happen
    though. Why? Liability for the consequences of owning a gun would be too expensive for them to cover for free, because it is a huge liability. A liability that is currently ignored. In fact, the NRA does the exact opposite, coming to the legal defense of
    gun manufacturers that are sued for liable.

    As for gun insurance being too expensive for those that can't afford gas, the free market will settle on a price that is APPROPRIATE for the coverage. You don't get to drive a car without insurance, even though it is a hardship as well. Take the bus
    until you can. Pick some other means of self defense like pepper spray until you can afford the gun+insurance. And no, no one assumes you are a criminal because you own lots of guns, but everyone, including the good guys should be liable for that
    ownership.

    Matt

    Liable for ownership? What am I missing here? We are all responsible for our individual actions, insurance our not. Not sure what mass purchase of liability insurance would do to stem the tide of mass shootings. Do you think these school shooters
    would be buying liability insurance? How about the gang bangers who shoot each other daily in Chicago, NY, LA and other cesspool, Democratic run cities?

    As for the NRA coming to the defense of gun manufacturers, manufacture of guns is a legally permitted industry. Is the auto industry sued each time a car kills someone? How about the booze industry? How about both of those industries when a drunk
    driver kills a family? No liability insurance would pay off for an intentional act like murder, mass or otherwise.

    I'm not a member of the NRA and I would wager to say that gang bangers and school shooters are not either. For much of my life I have been an avid target shooter, hunted some but don't care for getting up before dawn to sit in a tree stand. Was
    qualified as Expert Marksman in the Air Force with the M16 and .38 aircrew revolver. What I would like to see is some training required for purchase of a firearm if you have not previous military training which is 90 percent of the buying public. This
    however might be considered an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon Jun 13 06:35:58 2022
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 4:43:20 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 10:16:52 PM UTC-4, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    Dan & Walt,

    The NRA is just doing what it was designed to do, including promoting gun safety, etc. as you point out. Perhaps they should offer legal liability protection to every NRA member that owns a gun for free. I would totally support that. It won't happen
    though. Why? Liability for the consequences of owning a gun would be too expensive for them to cover for free, because it is a huge liability. A liability that is currently ignored. In fact, the NRA does the exact opposite, coming to the legal defense of
    gun manufacturers that are sued for liable.

    As for gun insurance being too expensive for those that can't afford gas, the free market will settle on a price that is APPROPRIATE for the coverage. You don't get to drive a car without insurance, even though it is a hardship as well. Take the bus
    until you can. Pick some other means of self defense like pepper spray until you can afford the gun+insurance. And no, no one assumes you are a criminal because you own lots of guns, but everyone, including the good guys should be liable for that
    ownership.

    Matt
    Liable for ownership? What am I missing here? We are all responsible for our individual actions, insurance our not. Not sure what mass purchase of liability insurance would do to stem the tide of mass shootings. Do you think these school shooters would
    be buying liability insurance? How about the gang bangers who shoot each other daily in Chicago, NY, LA and other cesspool, Democratic run cities?

    As for the NRA coming to the defense of gun manufacturers, manufacture of guns is a legally permitted industry. Is the auto industry sued each time a car kills someone? How about the booze industry? How about both of those industries when a drunk
    driver kills a family? No liability insurance would pay off for an intentional act like murder, mass or otherwise.

    I'm not a member of the NRA and I would wager to say that gang bangers and school shooters are not either. For much of my life I have been an avid target shooter, hunted some but don't care for getting up before dawn to sit in a tree stand. Was
    qualified as Expert Marksman in the Air Force with the M16 and .38 aircrew revolver. What I would like to see is some training required for purchase of a firearm if you have not previous military training which is 90 percent of the buying public. This
    however might be considered an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot




    Well, let’s see now, Matt comes up with a way for most gun owners to keep all their guns and the second amendment cloud doesn’t like it? Didn’t see that coming! Come on guys, the SSA requires liability insurance to fly your glider in their events,
    even the AMA provides liability insurance for me when flying model airplanes! Not sure exactly what the gun insurance would cover, but I’d bet a homeowner with no kids and a gun safe wouldn’t break the bank to purchase gun ownership liability
    insurance. Any insurance guys out there give us an idea what could be covered and how much?
    JJ

    PS, the AR-15 isn’t a an assault rifle, but it damned sure uses assault rifle ammunition that tumbles and breaks up when hitting soft tissue!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon Jun 13 07:08:13 2022
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 8:03:32 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 2:40:11 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    ...
    One thing that makes most belligerent countries hesitant to attempt a land take over of the USA is the unquestioned ability of the citizenry to respond with significant resistance.
    ...
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Really? You don't think nuclear missiles and a military that is larger than the next 10 largest militaries in the world combined don't have something to do with that?

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Mon Jun 13 15:10:40 2022
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 2:30:41 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Gee, Matt, to follow your logic I must assume that there are no
    uninsured motorists on the road. There can't be because the law
    requires liability insurance to register a car.

    So I guess you believe that the same people who drive without insurance
    will actually buy insurance to own a firearm. You would just punish law abiding citizens with such stupid suggestions.

    Regardless of how effective this idea is, I'm not following your logic here. People will always break the law and drive (or own a weapon) without insurance. Are you claiming that's a reason not to pass requirements and limits? Do you believe that
    requiring people to have liability insurance to drive is punishment?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 13 15:07:51 2022
    Link to the top of that article, rather than the other one coming to halfway down

    https://www.businessinsider.com/switzerland-gun-laws-rates-of-gun-deaths-2018-2?r=US&IR=T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon Jun 13 15:00:31 2022
    Why on earth do the NRA and others keep touting Switzerland as an example, when the circumstances are so different?

    Switzerland has less than one mass shooting per decade. The murder rate is nearly zero. The number of guns is decreasing.

    Find out a bit more about their regulatory systems and citizens having far more self-discipline than yours, instead of the lame apologies the problem is too difficult and there is nothing you can do.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/switzerland-gun-laws-rates-of-gun-deaths-2018-2?r=US&IR=T#gun-sellers-follow-strict-licensing-procedures-7

    On Sunday, 12 June 2022 at 14:03:32 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    One thing that makes most belligerent countries hesitant to attempt a land take over of the USA is the unquestioned ability of the citizenry to respond with significant resistance. Switzerland makes every male citizen a soldier and this has stood the
    test of time for them quite well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Matt Herron Jr. on Mon Jun 13 15:30:37 2022
    Gee, Matt, to follow your logic I must assume that there are no
    uninsured motorists on the road. There can't be because the law
    requires liability insurance to register a car.

    So I guess you believe that the same people who drive without insurance
    will actually buy insurance to own a firearm. You would just punish law abiding citizens with such stupid suggestions.

    Dan
    5J

    On 6/12/22 20:16, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    Dan & Walt,

    The NRA is just doing what it was designed to do, including promoting gun safety, etc. as you point out. Perhaps they should offer legal liability protection to every NRA member that owns a gun for free. I would totally support that. It won't happen
    though. Why? Liability for the consequences of owning a gun would be too expensive for them to cover for free, because it is a huge liability. A liability that is currently ignored. In fact, the NRA does the exact opposite, coming to the legal
    defense of gun manufacturers that are sued for liable.

    As for gun insurance being too expensive for those that can't afford gas, the free market will settle on a price that is APPROPRIATE for the coverage. You don't get to drive a car without insurance, even though it is a hardship as well. Take the bus
    until you can. Pick some other means of self defense like pepper spray until you can afford the gun+insurance. And no, no one assumes you are a criminal because you own lots of guns, but everyone, including the good guys should be liable for that
    ownership.

    Matt

    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:29:48 PM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 5:05:08 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    I guarantee you that the demented douche bag that shoots at innocents
    will not have insurance.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/12/22 10:36, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
    In short, if you make it profitable to increase gun safety, reduce mass shootings, etc., it will happen. Follow the money. Everyone else does.
    That’s a great idea, Matt, but it would have to be implemented at the State level…………. No way that would get past our NRA owned Senate! Make a gun buyer show he’s got gun ownership insurance before he can buy! Make it a felony to own a
    gun and not have insurance…………….I’ll bet half our 400 million guns would be turned in rather than the possibility of being found guilty of uninsured gun ownership!
    JJ
    Make it a felony to own a gun and not have insurance? Interesting. I'm sure insurance premiums would be quite high and people living paycheck to paycheck might be precluded from owning a means of self defense. Right now many are finding it hard to pay
    for gas and groceries.

    I believe someone in a previous post suggested that the 2nd Amendment didn't cover ammunition? I'm quite confident that when the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment it was understood that the right to keep and bear arms would include the means to
    make the weapon effective, ergo ammunition.

    Personally I'd like to see the age to purchase any weapon raised to 21 or 25 and also to drink alcohol and vote. I'm a big proponent of training too, I've watched irresponsible adults with a new rifle or pistol or AR15 on the range not realize that
    they still have one in the chamber after they drop the magazine or not understanding that the rules require that you keep the muzzle pointed DOWN RANGE at all times. I had military training on the M16 and while not the same weapon the AF15 operates quite
    similarly. It is however NOT an ASSAULT RIFLE.

    There are no easy answers but usurping rights of American Citizens is not the way to go. Have you noticed that when the AK47 raises its ugly head in Europe it's in the hands of terrorists?
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Mon Jun 13 17:46:46 2022
    Don't follow my logic?

    What is so difficult to understand? Do you really think that the
    requirement for liability insurance would prevent someone from shooting
    up the work place, mall, school, church, etc., if he got that idea into
    his head?

    I can see that there is no benefit to continuing this discussion so I'll
    bow out.

    Dan
    5J

    On 6/13/22 16:10, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 2:30:41 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Gee, Matt, to follow your logic I must assume that there are no
    uninsured motorists on the road. There can't be because the law
    requires liability insurance to register a car.

    So I guess you believe that the same people who drive without insurance
    will actually buy insurance to own a firearm. You would just punish law
    abiding citizens with such stupid suggestions.

    Regardless of how effective this idea is, I'm not following your logic here. People will always break the law and drive (or own a weapon) without insurance. Are you claiming that's a reason not to pass requirements and limits? Do you believe that
    requiring people to have liability insurance to drive is punishment?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Tue Jun 14 02:57:39 2022
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 4:46:52 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Don't follow my logic?

    What is so difficult to understand? Do you really think that the
    requirement for liability insurance would prevent someone from shooting
    up the work place, mall, school, church, etc., if he got that idea into
    his head?

    I can see that there is no benefit to continuing this discussion so I'll
    bow out.

    Dan
    5J

    I pointing out the illogic of the ridiculous argument I've heard from more than a few extreme gun advocates, that we can't add new restrictions like limits on magazine capacities and age limits for example because criminals won't comply with them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Tue Jun 14 04:38:07 2022
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 7:46:52 PM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Don't follow my logic?

    What is so difficult to understand? Do you really think that the
    requirement for liability insurance would prevent someone from shooting
    up the work place, mall, school, church, etc., if he got that idea into
    his head?

    I can see that there is no benefit to continuing this discussion so I'll
    bow out.

    Dan
    5J
    On 6/13/22 16:10, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 2:30:41 PM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    Gee, Matt, to follow your logic I must assume that there are no
    uninsured motorists on the road. There can't be because the law
    requires liability insurance to register a car.

    So I guess you believe that the same people who drive without insurance >> will actually buy insurance to own a firearm. You would just punish law >> abiding citizens with such stupid suggestions.

    Regardless of how effective this idea is, I'm not following your logic here. People will always break the law and drive (or own a weapon) without insurance. Are you claiming that's a reason not to pass requirements and limits? Do you believe that
    requiring people to have liability insurance to drive is punishment?
    I too Dan have decided to digress from this thread, some ideas are interesting and others are the same old BS. Yet the cause of such horrible acts of violence is seldom discussed. The lefties will use any means possible to blame anything but the cause,
    they want to blame the NRA, gun Mfg's, ammo Mfg's. If people would look into the private lives of the attackers families they might find the probable cause.
    Until the next good topic of discussion comes along I will close by saying that I still carry my concealed weapon in my ASW27 and Eileen also a permit holder carries one with her in the ASW24, you never know when you will encounter a CRAZY! Old Bob, The
    Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to richali...@gmail.com on Tue Jun 14 06:08:11 2022
    On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 10:08:15 AM UTC-4, richali...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 8:03:32 AM UTC-5, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 12, 2022 at 2:40:11 AM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    ...
    One thing that makes most belligerent countries hesitant to attempt a land take over of the USA is the unquestioned ability of the citizenry to respond with significant resistance.
    ...
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Really? You don't think nuclear missiles and a military that is larger than the next 10 largest militaries in the world combined don't have something to do with that?

    Rich L.

    I believe you have been misinformed as to the size of our military. The latest Defense White Paper shows China with over 2 million men in uniform while the USA has 1.35 million. China has a larger number of soldiers, sailors and airmen and combined
    with Russia they greatly outnumber us. Our advantage is in technology which is stolen wholesale by the Chinese. Where we do outstrip them is in spending and I hope we are getting all for which we are paying. In addition our logistics and training
    appears superior.

    The nuclear missile deterrent means nothing to a deranged madman in charge of a country with no checks and balances but it is intuitively understood that a physical invasion of the territory of the USA would be futile considering the numbers of citizens
    with the means to resist such a force. There will be survivors on both sides after a nuclear attack. The purpose of war for an aggressor in general is to acquire land and resources.

    Have a nice day.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 14 06:19:29 2022
    It is amazing how both sides of any argument/discussion can feel they are right. The bottom line is the 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms, or keep an armed bear or bare our behinds as many of us have done.

    Biden likes to say that Americans are in favor of sensible gun laws but he doesn't point out exactly what those laws might be. In the end I am sure his purpose is to disarm the entire populace. We are lucky we have a Constitution.

    I carry a 2 million dollar blanket policy in addition to my house insurance (have you ever read the exclusions and limitations on these policies?) and have a policy with CCW SAFE which provides legal assistance in case one needs to defend ones self with
    a firearm. Coming from a family of lawyers these policies were strongly suggested to me.

    I believe I have made my position abundantly clear. I still think wrestling is phony.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Tue Jun 14 16:55:33 2022
    On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 6:19:31 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    It is amazing how both sides of any argument/discussion can feel they are right. The bottom line is the 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms, or keep an armed bear or bare our behinds as many of us have done.

    Biden likes to say that Americans are in favor of sensible gun laws but he doesn't point out exactly what those laws might be. In the end I am sure his purpose is to disarm the entire populace. We are lucky we have a Constitution.

    I carry a 2 million dollar blanket policy in addition to my house insurance (have you ever read the exclusions and limitations on these policies?) and have a policy with CCW SAFE which provides legal assistance in case one needs to defend ones self
    with a firearm. Coming from a family of lawyers these policies were strongly suggested to me.

    I believe I have made my position abundantly clear. I still think wrestling is phony.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    I agree, everyone's positions on the limits of the 2nd are pretty much set in stone. Biden is just reflecting Americans long stymied desire for sensible gun laws and his proposals have been quite clear. Look at what he's actually proposing, not
    paranoid fantasies put forth by gun manufactures, their lobbyists, FOX news and the NRA. There're extremists on both sides, some who want an outright ban on all guns and others who want the right to carry full auto long guns. Neither will ever happen.
    This is my last post on this thread. We are lucky we have a Constitution and very lucky we have the means to amend it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Wed Jun 15 04:57:57 2022
    On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 7:55:35 PM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 14, 2022 at 6:19:31 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    It is amazing how both sides of any argument/discussion can feel they are right. The bottom line is the 2nd Amendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms, or keep an armed bear or bare our behinds as many of us have done.

    Biden likes to say that Americans are in favor of sensible gun laws but he doesn't point out exactly what those laws might be. In the end I am sure his purpose is to disarm the entire populace. We are lucky we have a Constitution.

    I carry a 2 million dollar blanket policy in addition to my house insurance (have you ever read the exclusions and limitations on these policies?) and have a policy with CCW SAFE which provides legal assistance in case one needs to defend ones self
    with a firearm. Coming from a family of lawyers these policies were strongly suggested to me.

    I believe I have made my position abundantly clear. I still think wrestling is phony.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    I agree, everyone's positions on the limits of the 2nd are pretty much set in stone. Biden is just reflecting Americans long stymied desire for sensible gun laws and his proposals have been quite clear. Look at what he's actually proposing, not
    paranoid fantasies put forth by gun manufactures, their lobbyists, FOX news and the NRA. There're extremists on both sides, some who want an outright ban on all guns and others who want the right to carry full auto long guns. Neither will ever happen.
    This is my last post on this thread. We are lucky we have a Constitution and very lucky we have the means to amend it.

    Biden's "proposals" have been to ban "assault rifles" without adequately defining the term. In the eyes of the liberal left an assault rifle is an assault rifle because they say it is. It's a scary looking rifle I heard one pundit say. They also want
    to ban "high capacity" magazines, defined as any magazine holding more than 10 rounds which would make many commonly owned handguns illegal which is what happened in the People's Republic of California. Don't think for a moment that confiscation isn't on
    their list. Beto O'Rourke has plainly said that was HIS goal.

    I'm fine with background checks and after having run a few on friends I was considering selling a gun to (Instant Checkmate or Been Verified) I opted not to do so. You would be surprised at those whom you know in your social circle who are wife beaters
    and substance abusers among other things. Even GLIDER PILOTS.

    Wait until they find out that a 12 gauge shotgun can take out 3-4 people with one pull of the trigger, it will be on the list.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Goldman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 15 07:23:12 2022

    I'm fine with background checks and after having run a few on friends I was considering selling a gun to (Instant Checkmate or Been Verified) I opted not to do so. You would be surprised at those whom you know in your social circle who are wife beaters
    and substance abusers among other things. Even GLIDER PILOTS.

    We need more people with your opinions in the Republican congress !
    Both parties should agree to what you suggested

    Dan G

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?John_DeRosa_OHM_=E2=84=A6@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 15 09:14:52 2022
    God knows that this will fall on deaf ears but ...
    the Uvalde tragedy and gun control discussions have only
    the very barest of associations with soaring
    and doesn't belong here on RAS. Try rec.guns instead.

    My 0.02. EOL

    John (OHM)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 16 17:59:03 2022
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 10:14:54 AM UTC-6, John DeRosa OHM Ω http://aviation.derosaweb.net wrote:
    God knows that this will fall on deaf ears but ...
    the Uvalde tragedy and gun control discussions have only
    the very barest of associations with soaring
    and doesn't belong here on RAS. Try rec.guns instead.

    My 0.02. EOL

    John (OHM)

    We are all humans with emotions - expressing them is better than acting upon them.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ASM@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 24 21:19:05 2022
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:59:07 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 10:14:54 AM UTC-6, John DeRosa OHM Ω http://aviation.derosaweb.net wrote:
    God knows that this will fall on deaf ears but ...
    the Uvalde tragedy and gun control discussions have only
    the very barest of associations with soaring
    and doesn't belong here on RAS. Try rec.guns instead.

    My 0.02. EOL

    John (OHM)
    We are all humans with emotions - expressing them is better than acting upon them.

    Tom

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-25/norwegian-police-say-2-killed-in-mass-shooting-in-oslo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to ASM on Sat Jun 25 05:36:17 2022
    On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 12:19:09 AM UTC-4, ASM wrote:
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:59:07 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 10:14:54 AM UTC-6, John DeRosa OHM Ω http://aviation.derosaweb.net wrote:
    God knows that this will fall on deaf ears but ...
    the Uvalde tragedy and gun control discussions have only
    the very barest of associations with soaring
    and doesn't belong here on RAS. Try rec.guns instead.

    My 0.02. EOL

    John (OHM)
    We are all humans with emotions - expressing them is better than acting upon them.

    Tom
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-25/norwegian-police-say-2-killed-in-mass-shooting-in-oslo


    Well John DeRosa OHM, apparently you have met too much resistance but there is a lot of gliding/soaring in Norway I sure. Yes, we have more mass shootings in the USofA compared to European countries and other geographical areas, unfortunate to say the
    least. If there is one common thread among these actions it would most likely be mental illness. Mental illness knows no boundaries, exists in every ethnicity, country, state, whatever and always will. Even in a weapons restricted environment if one
    want to find a way to cause mass casualties, one will. Add religious indoctrination to mental illness and you have a very potent problem.

    I have many friends in Europe, mostly in Sweden and Switzerland and they tell me that unchecked mass migration seems to be the driving culprit. We are experiencing the same situation here in the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's only a
    matter of time until we see the end result of a clash of cultures. When those who come here and see what the haves have and they, the have nots have not, well you can decide for yourself. We have done an amazing job cultivating our own nut cases and
    don't need any help importing same.

    Keep your eyes open, your back to the wall and always have an exit strategy. Anyone who spent the evening in a cafe in Saigon in the 60s and 70s will understand.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat Jun 25 12:06:45 2022
    On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 8:36:21 AM UTC-4, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 12:19:09 AM UTC-4, ASM wrote:
    On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:59:07 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
    On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 10:14:54 AM UTC-6, John DeRosa OHM Ω http://aviation.derosaweb.net wrote:
    God knows that this will fall on deaf ears but ...
    the Uvalde tragedy and gun control discussions have only
    the very barest of associations with soaring
    and doesn't belong here on RAS. Try rec.guns instead.

    My 0.02. EOL

    John (OHM)
    We are all humans with emotions - expressing them is better than acting upon them.

    Tom
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-25/norwegian-police-say-2-killed-in-mass-shooting-in-oslo


    Well John DeRosa OHM, apparently you have met too much resistance but there is a lot of gliding/soaring in Norway I sure. Yes, we have more mass shootings in the USofA compared to European countries and other geographical areas, unfortunate to say the
    least. If there is one common thread among these actions it would most likely be mental illness. Mental illness knows no boundaries, exists in every ethnicity, country, state, whatever and always will. Even in a weapons restricted environment if one want
    to find a way to cause mass casualties, one will. Add religious indoctrination to mental illness and you have a very potent problem.

    I have many friends in Europe, mostly in Sweden and Switzerland and they tell me that unchecked mass migration seems to be the driving culprit. We are experiencing the same situation here in the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's only
    a matter of time until we see the end result of a clash of cultures. When those who come here and see what the haves have and they, the have nots have not, well you can decide for yourself. We have done an amazing job cultivating our own nut cases and
    don't need any help importing same.

    Keep your eyes open, your back to the wall and always have an exit strategy. Anyone who spent the evening in a cafe in Saigon in the 60s and 70s will understand.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Walt, explaining things to liberals never works, they have a different look at reality. Only yesterday Roe vs Wade was overturned and the liberal medial has gone ballistic primarily because they do not understand the constitution. Yes, Norway has been
    invaded by illegal migration of people primarily from Arabic countries, once a country of 7 million has seen an influx of fanatics. I visit Norway, go to Oslo and then head North of the Arctic Circle to Narvik and beyond, a great place of beauty. Old Bob,
    The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Sat Jun 25 23:04:59 2022
    The territory now known as United States of America has hundreds of years of history of immigration from the rest of the world. It is not unknown for its surviving indigenous peoples to occasionally satirically joke that America discovered Columbus, and
    he was lost..

    Can you truly be suggesting that all this migration has created and concentrated the murderous problems you have there, more than exist in the countries your ancestors departed from? What might be a solution to this, send them all home? Where to?

    On Saturday, 25 June 2022 at 13:36:21 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Well John DeRosa OHM, apparently you have met too much resistance but there is a lot of gliding/soaring in Norway I sure. Yes, we have more mass shootings in the USofA compared to European countries and other geographical areas, unfortunate to say the
    least. If there is one common thread among these actions it would most likely be mental illness. Mental illness knows no boundaries, exists in every ethnicity, country, state, whatever and always will. Even in a weapons restricted environment if one want
    to find a way to cause mass casualties, one will. Add religious indoctrination to mental illness and you have a very potent problem.

    I have many friends in Europe, mostly in Sweden and Switzerland and they tell me that unchecked mass migration seems to be the driving culprit. We are experiencing the same situation here in the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's only
    a matter of time until we see the end result of a clash of cultures. When those who come here and see what the haves have and they, the have nots have not, well you can decide for yourself. We have done an amazing job cultivating our own nut cases and
    don't need any help importing same.

    Keep your eyes open, your back to the wall and always have an exit strategy. Anyone who spent the evening in a cafe in Saigon in the 60s and 70s will understand.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to andy l on Sun Jun 26 05:30:10 2022
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 2:05:03 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    The territory now known as United States of America has hundreds of years of history of immigration from the rest of the world. It is not unknown for its surviving indigenous peoples to occasionally satirically joke that America discovered Columbus,
    and he was lost..

    Can you truly be suggesting that all this migration has created and concentrated the murderous problems you have there, more than exist in the countries your ancestors departed from? What might be a solution to this, send them all home? Where to?
    On Saturday, 25 June 2022 at 13:36:21 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Well John DeRosa OHM, apparently you have met too much resistance but there is a lot of gliding/soaring in Norway I sure. Yes, we have more mass shootings in the USofA compared to European countries and other geographical areas, unfortunate to say
    the least. If there is one common thread among these actions it would most likely be mental illness. Mental illness knows no boundaries, exists in every ethnicity, country, state, whatever and always will. Even in a weapons restricted environment if one
    want to find a way to cause mass casualties, one will. Add religious indoctrination to mental illness and you have a very potent problem.

    I have many friends in Europe, mostly in Sweden and Switzerland and they tell me that unchecked mass migration seems to be the driving culprit. We are experiencing the same situation here in the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's
    only a matter of time until we see the end result of a clash of cultures. When those who come here and see what the haves have and they, the have nots have not, well you can decide for yourself. We have done an amazing job cultivating our own nut cases
    and don't need any help importing same.

    Keep your eyes open, your back to the wall and always have an exit strategy. Anyone who spent the evening in a cafe in Saigon in the 60s and 70s will understand.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    There was a time when immigrants came here legally, presented themselves at the proper port of entry, identified themselves and where they were going. They also had to be examined medically to see if they were harboring any diseases that might
    disqualify them from entry, many did so and were turned away to return to their country of origin. During this time there were no government programs to house, feed, clothe, educate and give them medical care. My grandfather showed up speaking English
    and with a skill which got him a job the first day. My grandmother did the same, a trained nurse from Ireland.

    Today we are accepting hundreds of thousands if not millions of unknowns from all over the world who are flooding across the southern border. IF they are caught they are given a court date for their immigration hearing the VAST majority of which will not
    show up. They are not political refugees, they are economic refugees and it is we, the taxpayer of the USofA who is left to foot the bill.

    We also have STUDENTS who arrive on a student visa but don't go to school, work off the books, violate our laws, thumb their noses at the rest of us and get away with it. When you start ignoring the law you cease to be a nation of laws. When chaos is
    the order of the day there will be no order.

    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse than
    the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Danewid@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 26 07:38:24 2022
    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse than
    the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Hi guys

    A glider pilot since 53 years, 4 500 gliding hours, I was born and have lived all my life in Malmö. What are you talking about Walt????? Obviously you have not been here.

    Malmö is a nice city, 350 000 inhabitants, from 178 countries, so it is an international city, only 20 minutes from Copenhagen, Denmark, which is even nicer. I suppose you have not been here, so actually you do not have the slightest idea what you are
    talking about.

    You are welcome to visit us and see what it is like. While you are here I can offer you a ride in my ASG 32 Mi and a beer afterwards.

    /Robert

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to robert....@gmail.com on Sun Jun 26 14:45:51 2022
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 7:38:27 AM UTC-7, robert....@gmail.com wrote:
    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse
    than the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Hi guys

    A glider pilot since 53 years, 4 500 gliding hours, I was born and have lived all my life in Malmö. What are you talking about Walt????? Obviously you have not been here.

    Malmö is a nice city, 350 000 inhabitants, from 178 countries, so it is an international city, only 20 minutes from Copenhagen, Denmark, which is even nicer. I suppose you have not been here, so actually you do not have the slightest idea what you are
    talking about.

    You are welcome to visit us and see what it is like. While you are here I can offer you a ride in my ASG 32 Mi and a beer afterwards.

    /Robert

    Well as it seems the subject has morphed from massacres and sensible limits on guns to politics, I'll make another comment.
    Many conservatives tend to be, by various degrees, xenophobic who view Europe and most of the rest of the world for that matter as shit holes. For the far right, America is the only garden spot and that only includes our mostly white interior, all our
    coastal cities and most states where all those immigrants of color live, they're shit holes too. I kid because I care ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to robert....@gmail.com on Mon Jun 27 05:14:16 2022
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 10:38:27 AM UTC-4, robert....@gmail.com wrote:
    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse
    than the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Hi guys

    A glider pilot since 53 years, 4 500 gliding hours, I was born and have lived all my life in Malmö. What are you talking about Walt????? Obviously you have not been here.

    Malmö is a nice city, 350 000 inhabitants, from 178 countries, so it is an international city, only 20 minutes from Copenhagen, Denmark, which is even nicer. I suppose you have not been here, so actually you do not have the slightest idea what you are
    talking about.

    You are welcome to visit us and see what it is like. While you are here I can offer you a ride in my ASG 32 Mi and a beer afterwards.

    /Robert

    Thank you Robert for the invitation but I have been to Sweden albeit 50 years ago when I befriended a Swede who worked at the American Embassy. He is now a retired member of your military and government who moved to Malmo to engage in his hobby of
    sailing. It is his comments to me which color my perception of Malmo along with several articles about riots and no go zones. Of course the chamber of commerce and politicians wish to gloss over the problems which is their job.

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said "For years European authorities have denied any problem with Muslim immigration, but now crisis is exploding and is getting worse, with the number of so called “no-
    go” areas in Sweden rising." Is she making this up?

    As recently as April 28th Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said " Sweden has failed to integrate the vast numbers of immigrants it has taken in over the past two decades, leading to parallel societies and gang violence." She has begun a number of
    initiatives to combat organized crime.

    Amnesty International has been critical of Sweden's tightening of policies, claiming it is causing human suffering and making integration even harder for immigrants. So I guess Amnesty International's answer is to step back and do nothing to quell the
    lawlessness? Bad idea.

    In 2015, Swedes took immense pride in the country’s decision to accept 163,000 refugees, most from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. “ Europe takes in refugees, Europe doesn’t build walls.” was the heroic rhetoric of an all-but-vanished Sweden. The
    Social Democrats now deploy the harsh language only far-right nativists of the Sweden Democrats party used in 2015. Indeed, a social democratic organ recently noted with satisfaction that since “all major parties today stand for a restrictive migration
    policy with a strong focus on law and order,” the refugee issue is no longer a political liability. So, when it was a political liability it was just fine?

    I'm fine with immigration but it must be controlled. Immigrants must assimilate, must integrate themselves into the society into which they have come.

    Believe me, we have our own shitholes here in the USofA. New York, Chicago, Portland, San Francisco and Los Angeles among them, aided by do nothing politicians and District Attorneys who are soft on crime.

    I'm sure there are some nice areas of Malmo as there are nice areas everywhere but nice areas become not so nice as permissiveness becomes the law of the land.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Danewid@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon Jun 27 08:40:56 2022
    On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 2:14:20 PM UTC+2, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 10:38:27 AM UTC-4, robert....@gmail.com wrote:
    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse
    than the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Hi guys

    A glider pilot since 53 years, 4 500 gliding hours, I was born and have lived all my life in Malmö. What are you talking about Walt????? Obviously you have not been here.

    Malmö is a nice city, 350 000 inhabitants, from 178 countries, so it is an international city, only 20 minutes from Copenhagen, Denmark, which is even nicer. I suppose you have not been here, so actually you do not have the slightest idea what you
    are talking about.

    You are welcome to visit us and see what it is like. While you are here I can offer you a ride in my ASG 32 Mi and a beer afterwards.

    /Robert
    Thank you Robert for the invitation but I have been to Sweden albeit 50 years ago when I befriended a Swede who worked at the American Embassy. He is now a retired member of your military and government who moved to Malmo to engage in his hobby of
    sailing. It is his comments to me which color my perception of Malmo along with several articles about riots and no go zones. Of course the chamber of commerce and politicians wish to gloss over the problems which is their job.

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said "For years European authorities have denied any problem with Muslim immigration, but now crisis is exploding and is getting worse, with the number of so called “no-
    go” areas in Sweden rising." Is she making this up?

    As recently as April 28th Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said " Sweden has failed to integrate the vast numbers of immigrants it has taken in over the past two decades, leading to parallel societies and gang violence." She has begun a number of
    initiatives to combat organized crime.

    Amnesty International has been critical of Sweden's tightening of policies, claiming it is causing human suffering and making integration even harder for immigrants. So I guess Amnesty International's answer is to step back and do nothing to quell the
    lawlessness? Bad idea.

    In 2015, Swedes took immense pride in the country’s decision to accept 163,000 refugees, most from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. “ Europe takes in refugees, Europe doesn’t build walls.” was the heroic rhetoric of an all-but-vanished Sweden. The
    Social Democrats now deploy the harsh language only far-right nativists of the Sweden Democrats party used in 2015. Indeed, a social democratic organ recently noted with satisfaction that since “all major parties today stand for a restrictive migration
    policy with a strong focus on law and order,” the refugee issue is no longer a political liability. So, when it was a political liability it was just fine?

    I'm fine with immigration but it must be controlled. Immigrants must assimilate, must integrate themselves into the society into which they have come.

    Believe me, we have our own shitholes here in the USofA. New York, Chicago, Portland, San Francisco and Los Angeles among them, aided by do nothing politicians and District Attorneys who are soft on crime.

    I'm sure there are some nice areas of Malmo as there are nice areas everywhere but nice areas become not so nice as permissiveness becomes the law of the land.
    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow Pilot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot

    Walt, I agree with what you write, but you explicitely named Malmö in a concept that is not true. BTW, there are no no-go-zones in Malmö, there are no no-go-zones at all in Sweden. I do not think that you have them in USA?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Mon Jun 27 10:02:49 2022
    Is this place going to become a haven for promoting far right extremism and hatred of Islam?

    I hadn't heard of that small non-news organisation, so I looked it up.

    I can't say I've heard of all the named contributors, but the Briton Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, with the more populist pseudonym Tommy Robinson, was formerly a member of one of our tiny neo-fascist parties. These people fall out with each other quite
    frequently, so he then set up his own organisation. He has a criminal record far longer than most people's arms, for fraud (including illegal entry to the USA with false documents), violence, drugs, and other offences, including contempt of court.

    He doesn't speak for our country, only a few hundred extremists.

    I'd take a wild guess some of the other diatribes published there might be similar. Certainly there are biographies of Carlqvist alleging she is a white supremacist promoting hatred of Islam.

    So to answer your question, is she making this up, quite possibly yes.

    Try some more balanced reporting.


    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Thank you Robert for the invitation but I have been to Sweden albeit 50 years ago when I befriended a Swede who worked at the American Embassy. He is now a retired member of your military and government who moved to Malmo to engage in his hobby of
    sailing. It is his comments to me which color my perception of Malmo along with several articles about riots and no go zones. Of course the chamber of commerce and politicians wish to gloss over the problems which is their job.

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said "For years European authorities have denied any problem with Muslim immigration, but now crisis is exploding and is getting worse, with the number of so called “no-
    go” areas in Sweden rising." Is she making this up?


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From andy l@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 27 21:17:08 2022
    To briefly add to my previous post. Walt, this is not a newspaper.

    One of its websites has disappeared, and the other shows no new articles since December 2013. A Facebook page has a few links to articles elsewhere as recently as 2015 or 2016. A different small UK neo-fascist party they were quoting hasn't existed since
    2012, when it failed to submit an annual registration form and £25 fee to our Electoral Commission.

    As per my previous comment, try some more balanced reporting.

    These displacement mechanisms, talking about exaggerated or non-existent problems elsewhere in the world, aren't going to solve gun issues in your country.

    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said ...


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to andy l on Tue Jun 28 04:58:13 2022
    On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 1:02:53 PM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    Is this place going to become a haven for promoting far right extremism and hatred of Islam?

    I hadn't heard of that small non-news organisation, so I looked it up.

    I can't say I've heard of all the named contributors, but the Briton Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, with the more populist pseudonym Tommy Robinson, was formerly a member of one of our tiny neo-fascist parties. These people fall out with each other quite
    frequently, so he then set up his own organisation. He has a criminal record far longer than most people's arms, for fraud (including illegal entry to the USA with false documents), violence, drugs, and other offences, including contempt of court.

    He doesn't speak for our country, only a few hundred extremists.

    I'd take a wild guess some of the other diatribes published there might be similar. Certainly there are biographies of Carlqvist alleging she is a white supremacist promoting hatred of Islam.

    So to answer your question, is she making this up, quite possibly yes.

    Try some more balanced reporting.
    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    Thank you Robert for the invitation but I have been to Sweden albeit 50 years ago when I befriended a Swede who worked at the American Embassy. He is now a retired member of your military and government who moved to Malmo to engage in his hobby of
    sailing. It is his comments to me which color my perception of Malmo along with several articles about riots and no go zones. Of course the chamber of commerce and politicians wish to gloss over the problems which is their job.

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said "For years European authorities have denied any problem with Muslim immigration, but now crisis is exploding and is getting worse, with the number of so called “
    no-go” areas in Sweden rising." Is she making this up?


    So you are denying that there have been riots throughout Sweden perpetrated by immigrants who were offended at one level or another? Was the comments from Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson " Sweden has failed to integrate the vast numbers of
    immigrants it has taken in over the past two decades, leading to parallel societies and gang violence." Might it not be that it is not Sweden that has failed but the immigrants themselves?

    I am not anti anything other than anti those who wish to disturb the peace because their beliefs are not held by the rest of the population. I'm fine with freedom of religion and believing anything you wish to believe but acting on certain beliefs which
    are contrary to the laws of the land in which you now reside is going over the line. Have you read the Koran? I have. Muslims are by Koranic law required to obey the laws of the land in which they reside. Then again there are Bible verses that are
    frequently ignored by Christians.

    I had a close Muslim friend who learned to fly and would be alive today had he followed Walt's 1st, 2nd and 3rd rule of flying. " You never have to get anywhere so badly that you kill yourself getting there."

    So there are "biographies of Carlqvist ALLEGING she is a white supremacist promoting hatred of Islam." Alleging? She may well be but I need more than an allegation to influence me. I disagree with any level of supremacist, white, black or zebra
    striped. Has no one ever said anything about you that was not true?

    My position quite simply is that if you immigrate anywhere, do it legally and peacefully. One's definition of a shithole may differ from that of another, same with a no go zone. When the police have to escort an emergency vehicle into any neighborhood
    it does not look good.

    Walt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Tom Desjardins on Tue Jun 28 04:42:39 2022
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 5:45:55 PM UTC-4, Tom Desjardins wrote:
    On Sunday, June 26, 2022 at 7:38:27 AM UTC-7, robert....@gmail.com wrote:
    Europe has become a shit hole, ask any Swede who lives in Malmo. The Prime Minister has acknowledge that immigration has failed, there are parallels societies in conflict with each other. I have a personal friend who will tell you that it is worse
    than the authorities acknowledge. Recently more than 100 police were injured in riots with immigrant gangs. London is experiencing similar problems as do many other European cities. The Supreme Court of the USofA has said that OUR police have no duty to
    protect American citizens, only those in custody.

    Walt Connelly
    Former Tow PIlot
    Now Happy Helicopter Pilot
    Hi guys

    A glider pilot since 53 years, 4 500 gliding hours, I was born and have lived all my life in Malmö. What are you talking about Walt????? Obviously you have not been here.

    Malmö is a nice city, 350 000 inhabitants, from 178 countries, so it is an international city, only 20 minutes from Copenhagen, Denmark, which is even nicer. I suppose you have not been here, so actually you do not have the slightest idea what you
    are talking about.

    You are welcome to visit us and see what it is like. While you are here I can offer you a ride in my ASG 32 Mi and a beer afterwards.

    /Robert
    Well as it seems the subject has morphed from massacres and sensible limits on guns to politics, I'll make another comment.
    Many conservatives tend to be, by various degrees, xenophobic who view Europe and most of the rest of the world for that matter as shit holes. For the far right, America is the only garden spot and that only includes our mostly white interior, all our
    coastal cities and most states where all those immigrants of color live, they're shit holes too. I kid because I care ;)

    It appears that anyone who expect those who immigrate to a new country to follow the laws is xenophobic. I reject that idea completely. I am not a conservative, I am a moderate, a true moderate. Obey the rules or get the hell out of Dodge. Nothing
    left to say regarding this issue.

    Walt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to andy l on Tue Jun 28 05:29:25 2022
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 12:17:11 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    To briefly add to my previous post. Walt, this is not a newspaper.

    One of its websites has disappeared, and the other shows no new articles since December 2013. A Facebook page has a few links to articles elsewhere as recently as 2015 or 2016. A different small UK neo-fascist party they were quoting hasn't existed
    since 2012, when it failed to submit an annual registration form and £25 fee to our Electoral Commission.

    As per my previous comment, try some more balanced reporting.

    These displacement mechanisms, talking about exaggerated or non-existent problems elsewhere in the world, aren't going to solve gun issues in your country.
    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said ...

    Andy, we do not have gun issues, we have people issues and illegal immigration issues, just yesterday a truck was found parked with 40 something dead illegals that were entering this country illegally. So, I guess you would say that we have a truck
    problem in this country? The gun laws in this country are designed around responsible owners not some nutcase that commits terrible acts. We have a legal problem, soft on crime progressive DA's, defund the POPO crazies and liberal agendas that do nothing
    but create problems. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Mon Jul 4 01:59:47 2022
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 8:29:29 AM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 12:17:11 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    To briefly add to my previous post. Walt, this is not a newspaper.

    One of its websites has disappeared, and the other shows no new articles since December 2013. A Facebook page has a few links to articles elsewhere as recently as 2015 or 2016. A different small UK neo-fascist party they were quoting hasn't existed
    since 2012, when it failed to submit an annual registration form and £25 fee to our Electoral Commission.

    As per my previous comment, try some more balanced reporting.

    These displacement mechanisms, talking about exaggerated or non-existent problems elsewhere in the world, aren't going to solve gun issues in your country.
    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said ...

    Andy, we do not have gun issues, we have people issues and illegal immigration issues, just yesterday a truck was found parked with 40 something dead illegals that were entering this country illegally. So, I guess you would say that we have a truck
    problem in this country? The gun laws in this country are designed around responsible owners not some nutcase that commits terrible acts. We have a legal problem, soft on crime progressive DA's, defund the POPO crazies and liberal agendas that do nothing
    but create problems. OBTP


    Europe has their crazies too. "Ethnic Dane?" https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62030919
    Of course the authorities will sweep this under the rug, nothing to see here, move on. These things don't happen in Europe, everyone gets along just fine and our immigrants are peaceful and happy.


    Walt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Per Givskov@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 4 10:29:07 2022
    mandag den 4. juli 2022 kl. 10.59.49 UTC+2 skrev waltco...@aol.com:
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 8:29:29 AM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 12:17:11 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    To briefly add to my previous post. Walt, this is not a newspaper.

    One of its websites has disappeared, and the other shows no new articles since December 2013. A Facebook page has a few links to articles elsewhere as recently as 2015 or 2016. A different small UK neo-fascist party they were quoting hasn't existed
    since 2012, when it failed to submit an annual registration form and £25 fee to our Electoral Commission.

    As per my previous comment, try some more balanced reporting.

    These displacement mechanisms, talking about exaggerated or non-existent problems elsewhere in the world, aren't going to solve gun issues in your country.
    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said ...

    Andy, we do not have gun issues, we have people issues and illegal immigration issues, just yesterday a truck was found parked with 40 something dead illegals that were entering this country illegally. So, I guess you would say that we have a truck
    problem in this country? The gun laws in this country are designed around responsible owners not some nutcase that commits terrible acts. We have a legal problem, soft on crime progressive DA's, defund the POPO crazies and liberal agendas that do nothing
    but create problems. OBTP
    Europe has their crazies too. "Ethnic Dane?" https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62030919
    Of course the authorities will sweep this under the rug, nothing to see here, move on. These things don't happen in Europe, everyone gets along just fine and our immigrants are peaceful and happy.


    Walt

    Unfortunately we do from time to time. And it's well known here that the psychiatric hospitals are underfunded. The Hells Angels and likes we do seem to have gotten kicked into the corner.
    You've got no clue what the authorities will do about this. We do live in a country where noone thinks it's necessary to possess weapons in order to defend themselves. We've got trust among people.
    You're referring to a british media for christ sake - WTF. Take your whataboutism elsewhere and show some respect.

    Br - A danish citizen - who for decades liked to read soaring related discussions for here. But recently filtered a lot of contributers out - your're the latest in line

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to per.gi...@gmail.com on Mon Jul 4 13:34:26 2022
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 10:29:09 AM UTC-7, per.gi...@gmail.com wrote:
    mandag den 4. juli 2022 kl. 10.59.49 UTC+2 skrev waltco...@aol.com:
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 8:29:29 AM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 12:17:11 AM UTC-4, andy l wrote:
    To briefly add to my previous post. Walt, this is not a newspaper.

    One of its websites has disappeared, and the other shows no new articles since December 2013. A Facebook page has a few links to articles elsewhere as recently as 2015 or 2016. A different small UK neo-fascist party they were quoting hasn't
    existed since 2012, when it failed to submit an annual registration form and £25 fee to our Electoral Commission.

    As per my previous comment, try some more balanced reporting.

    These displacement mechanisms, talking about exaggerated or non-existent problems elsewhere in the world, aren't going to solve gun issues in your country.
    On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 13:14:20 UTC+1, waltco...@aol.com wrote:

    Ingrid Carlqvist, editor-in-chief of Swedish newspaper Dispatch International has said ...

    Andy, we do not have gun issues, we have people issues and illegal immigration issues, just yesterday a truck was found parked with 40 something dead illegals that were entering this country illegally. So, I guess you would say that we have a truck
    problem in this country? The gun laws in this country are designed around responsible owners not some nutcase that commits terrible acts. We have a legal problem, soft on crime progressive DA's, defund the POPO crazies and liberal agendas that do nothing
    but create problems. OBTP
    Europe has their crazies too. "Ethnic Dane?" https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62030919
    Of course the authorities will sweep this under the rug, nothing to see here, move on. These things don't happen in Europe, everyone gets along just fine and our immigrants are peaceful and happy.


    Walt
    Unfortunately we do from time to time. And it's well known here that the psychiatric hospitals are underfunded. The Hells Angels and likes we do seem to have gotten kicked into the corner.
    You've got no clue what the authorities will do about this. We do live in a country where noone thinks it's necessary to possess weapons in order to defend themselves. We've got trust among people.
    You're referring to a british media for christ sake - WTF. Take your whataboutism elsewhere and show some respect.

    Br - A danish citizen - who for decades liked to read soaring related discussions for here. But recently filtered a lot of contributers out - your're the latest in line

    "From time to time" is the operative phrase. Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear
    proposals from conservatives of why we need to harden parades and arm clowns...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GliderCZ@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 4 15:09:58 2022
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<

    We already arm clowns.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 4 15:18:59 2022
    We already arm clowns.

    And we elect them, too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GliderCZ@21:1/5 to Mark Mocho on Mon Jul 4 16:41:58 2022
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 3:19:01 PM UTC-7, Mark Mocho wrote:
    We already arm clowns.

    And we elect them, too.

    Correlation isn't necessarily causation, but in this case...maybe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to GliderCZ on Thu Jul 7 05:55:16 2022
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.

    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no right
    to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in his
    possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such respect
    for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until last
    year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of the
    biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Thu Jul 7 06:39:42 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no right to
    drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in his
    possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such respect
    for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until last
    year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of the
    biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt


    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Thu Jul 7 12:01:38 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no right
    to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in his
    possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such respect
    for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until
    last year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of
    the biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt
    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!
    JJ the liberal, may I as you only one question? Does a human with a heartbeat deserve to die being sucked from the mothers womb, over 600K were killed last year alone, seems pale in comparison, say you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Thu Jul 7 15:29:46 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 12:01:42 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need
    to harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no
    right to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in
    his possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such
    respect for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until
    last year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of
    the biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt
    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!
    JJ the liberal, may I as you only one question? Does a human with a heartbeat deserve to die being sucked from the mothers womb, over 600K were killed last year alone, seems pale in comparison, say you.




    I’m completely neutral on the abortion issue, but allow me to ask you a question………….who do you think will end up supporting many of the unwanted kids that low income mothers are forced to carry to term?

    We the people, that’s who!

    JJ the realist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Thu Jul 7 15:55:02 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 6:29:48 PM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 12:01:42 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we
    need to harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no
    right to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in
    his possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such
    respect for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until
    last year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of
    the biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt
    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!
    JJ the liberal, may I as you only one question? Does a human with a heartbeat deserve to die being sucked from the mothers womb, over 600K were killed last year alone, seems pale in comparison, say you.
    I’m completely neutral on the abortion issue, but allow me to ask you a question………….who do you think will end up supporting many of the unwanted kids that low income mothers are forced to carry to term?

    We the people, that’s who!

    JJ the realist
    No JJ, that is not the point, the best question would be why are they carrying them. My point is that abortion is being used as a contraceptive. Don't be mistaken, I am not anti abortion, I am anti abortion for convenience, especially with such
    widespread contraception is available. I was listening to the governor of VA, state that abortion should be available after the child is born, I think he used 24 hours as a benchmark and then let the mother decide if the child should be terminated.
    Sorry if I did not make my position clear early on, but I do not see much difference between the two mass killings. We are supporting illegals at the estimated cost of 400 billion a year. Something to think about, 90 billion a year is spent on illegals
    for Welfare, 22 Billion on Medicare, 22 billion on food assistance, 12 billion on primary schooling for illegals, 17 billion on anchor babies, 2.5 billion on Medicaid for illegals. There are only 135 million taxpayers in this country, the total cost for
    illegals is about 2500 bucks for each taxpayer, oh well. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Thu Jul 7 16:40:46 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no right
    to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in his
    possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such respect
    for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until
    last year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of
    the biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt
    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!

    +1
    UH the moderate

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to johnsin...@yahoo.com on Fri Jul 8 07:36:40 2022
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-4, johnsin...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 5:55:18 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 6:10:00 PM UTC-4, GliderCZ wrote:
    Trying to equate massacres in Europe and in the US is disingenuous at best. Today's 4th of July massacre is yet another example of why we need to make some major changes. I won't be surprised to hear proposals from conservatives of why we need to
    harden parades and arm clowns...<<
    We already arm clowns.
    For the record I'm a moderate, I have conservative and liberal leans. We don't ban alcohol because some fool goes out and drives drunk and kills people, we punish him and in my opinion far too leniently. Same with reckless driving. There is no right
    to drink or own an automobile in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. The 4th of July shooter had a permit to buy a gun from the state even after having had a run in with the police at which time they confiscated numerous knives and a sword in his
    possession. His parents apparently facilitated the purchase of some of his weapons knowing their sun was a nucking fut case. Same thing with the Sandy Hook shooter, his irresponsible mother bought his rifle. She knew him well, enough said.

    A massacre is a massacre. The Denmark shooter was known to the authorities as having mental issues and yet he managed to acquire a rifle. IN EUROPE? In an environment we are told it is most difficult to obtain a gun? Of course they have such respect
    for each other that this one committed murder. They call him an ETHNIC dane.

    The argument that no one needs an assault rifle is off base based simply on the word "needs." While my weapon of choice for home protection is a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 buck, others may well favor an AR15. I didn't need a fire extinguisher until
    last year when my house was hit by lightning and a fire started in a bedroom on the other side. The door was shut and the fire fully ablaze by the time I realized it. My puny fire extinguisher was insufficient to knock down the blaze. I now have two of
    the biggest extinguishers I could find.

    Walt
    Nice little speech, Walt and I’d agree that you have a right to own any fire extinguisher you wish to purchase, but not a word about how to prevent the next massacre!

    Allow me ask “Walt the moderate”, a few questions……

    Do the people of this country have a right to attend a 4th of July celebration without being slaughtered?

    How about little kids in school?

    In Church?

    In the Doctors office?

    In Wal Mart?

    What does “Walt the moderate” think should be done?

    JJ the moderate!

    The people of this country have a right to all of your suggestions. What should be done? Instead of punishing the entire population and those who might own an AR15, the authorities need to take action against those who are known nut cases and insure
    they can't buy or obtain firearms. Nicholas Cruz in the South Florida school shooting was well known to the authorities. The July 4th shooter was equally well known but NOTHING was done. He obtained a permit to purchase a firearm after the police
    identified him as a problem and took KNIVES and a sword away from him. The authorities dropped the ball, plain, pure and simple. In the S Florida case and in the Uvalde case the LEOs on site additionally failed in their duties to move in and neutralize
    the assailant. Unfortunately our Supreme Court has said that law enforcement officers have NO DUTY to protect you, only those in their custody. Such rulings only make it more sensible that people have the ability to defend themselves. The night club
    shooter in Orlando was well known to the FBI and the authorities. Again the ball was dropped.

    You will never be able to stop all such atrocities and taking "assault" (a subjective definition) weapons from law abiding citizens will only disarm them, those most unlikely to do such crimes. The criminal will not turn in his weapon. They will
    always find a way to cause the havoc their demented mind conjures up. Timothy McVeigh used a rental truck, fuel oil and fertilizer to kill 168 people and injure some 500.

    There are no easy answers but much could have been done and was not done in many of the previous cases. Is your right to drink a beer or drive a car taken away because someone else F--Ked up?

    I would imagine your fix would be to confiscate all AR15s? Or maybe just all 20 and 30 round magazines? Do you really think that is an accomplishable goal? And where would it end? A good hunter with a scoped hunting rifle can do much damage, at some
    point they will want your Remington model 7. My choice for home defense is a 12 gauge with #4 buck. When do they come for that? It is not out of the question.

    I have mixed feeling about age limitations on purchase of a weapon. If you can serve in the military and go to war at 18, if you can vote, drink, would it make sense to raise the age? Personally I would have no problem with that and would like to see
    the drinking and voting age raised to 21 which it was when I was a youngster.

    Illinois Governor Pritzker suggested that the founding fathers never meant for citizens to have "assault" weapons. REALLY? The average citizen owned a rifle superior to that of the typical soldier in 1791 when the 2nd Amendment was written. WHY? The
    citizen would commission a local gunsmith to make his rifle and that gunsmith's reputation locally was dependent on the satisfaction of the local population with his work. The average soldier's rifle was made by the lowest bidder. The Governor is
    being a typical politician.

    We have all said and done stupid things but those who continually do so are identifiable. They need help and restrictions placed on them. JMHO.

    Walt the Moderate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 8 08:19:31 2022
    Current estimates put the total number of firearms in the US at 430,000,000. Remember that 429,900,000 were NOT used in any form of criminal activity, and a reasonable number were used by private citizens to deter or prevent criminal activity.

    If the argument about advances in technology from 1791 to today are going to be applied to the Second Amendment, then would we be also required to apply those same arguments to the First Amendment? I can see giving up semi-automatics and high-capacity
    magazines if you will agree to give up radio, television, the internet and mass publication of print media. Go right back to hand-written documents like the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, along with single-shot black powder muskets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From waltconnelly@aol.com@21:1/5 to Mark Mocho on Fri Jul 8 09:55:50 2022
    On Friday, July 8, 2022 at 11:19:33 AM UTC-4, Mark Mocho wrote:
    Current estimates put the total number of firearms in the US at 430,000,000. Remember that 429,900,000 were NOT used in any form of criminal activity, and a reasonable number were used by private citizens to deter or prevent criminal activity.

    If the argument about advances in technology from 1791 to today are going to be applied to the Second Amendment, then would we be also required to apply those same arguments to the First Amendment? I can see giving up semi-automatics and high-capacity
    magazines if you will agree to give up radio, television, the internet and mass publication of print media. Go right back to hand-written documents like the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, along with single-shot black powder muskets.

    What did I say in my last post? When are they going to come for my shot gun?

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/crude-homemade-shotgun-used-to-assassinate-former-japanese-prime-minister-shinzo-abe

    Former Japanese Prime Minister shot with homemade SHOTGUN. If the demented mind wants you it will find a way.

    Walt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Mocho@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 13 19:37:16 2022
    Stopping mass shootings by banning all guns would be about as effective as stopping all automobile deaths by banning all cars.

    When cars are outlawed, only outlaws will have cars.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to waltco...@aol.com on Wed Jul 13 19:27:03 2022
    On Friday, July 8, 2022 at 9:55:51 AM UTC-7, waltco...@aol.com wrote:
    On Friday, July 8, 2022 at 11:19:33 AM UTC-4, Mark Mocho wrote:
    Current estimates put the total number of firearms in the US at 430,000,000. Remember that 429,900,000 were NOT used in any form of criminal activity, and a reasonable number were used by private citizens to deter or prevent criminal activity.

    If the argument about advances in technology from 1791 to today are going to be applied to the Second Amendment, then would we be also required to apply those same arguments to the First Amendment? I can see giving up semi-automatics and high-
    capacity magazines if you will agree to give up radio, television, the internet and mass publication of print media. Go right back to hand-written documents like the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, along with single-shot black powder
    muskets.
    What did I say in my last post? When are they going to come for my shot gun?

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/crude-homemade-shotgun-used-to-assassinate-former-japanese-prime-minister-shinzo-abe

    Former Japanese Prime Minister shot with homemade SHOTGUN. If the demented mind wants you it will find a way.

    Walt

    Stopping mass shootings by banning all guns would be about as effective as stopping all automobile deaths by banning all cars.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)