• 2022 early season crashes

    From Darren Braun@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 07:36:10 2022
    2 incidents and 1 fatality this week in Jacksonville.

    https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2022/04/16/jfrd-at-least-1-dead-after-aircraft-goes-down-in-woods-near-herlong-airport/

    https://www.asias.faa.gov/apex/f?p=100:93:::NO:::

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bluejet941@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Darren Braun on Sun Apr 17 09:10:58 2022
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 10:36:12 AM UTC-4, Darren Braun wrote:
    2 incidents and 1 fatality this week in Jacksonville.

    https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2022/04/16/jfrd-at-least-1-dead-after-aircraft-goes-down-in-woods-near-herlong-airport/

    https://www.asias.faa.gov/apex/f?p=100:93:::NO:::

    I spoke with a senior club member in Jacksonville this morning. The NTSB is on site today to check the control integrity and hookups. I'm pretty sure we all have an immediate assumption as to what happened and how it could have been prevented.

    We should note that his releasing at a low altitude could very well have saved the tow pilot from an unrecoverable kiting upset.

    RIP

    PA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to bluej...@gmail.com on Sun Apr 17 10:30:20 2022
    Tragic as always!
    But always encouraging to hear “experts” ensuring us how safe gliding I’m fact is, and how rare accidents are.
    After all, we fly low and slow, and don’t carry fuel, so what could possibly go wrong?

    Ramy


    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 9:10:59 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 10:36:12 AM UTC-4, Darren Braun wrote:
    2 incidents and 1 fatality this week in Jacksonville.

    https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2022/04/16/jfrd-at-least-1-dead-after-aircraft-goes-down-in-woods-near-herlong-airport/

    https://www.asias.faa.gov/apex/f?p=100:93:::NO:::
    I spoke with a senior club member in Jacksonville this morning. The NTSB is on site today to check the control integrity and hookups. I'm pretty sure we all have an immediate assumption as to what happened and how it could have been prevented.

    We should note that his releasing at a low altitude could very well have saved the tow pilot from an unrecoverable kiting upset.

    RIP

    PA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Desjardins@21:1/5 to Ramy on Sun Apr 17 14:36:53 2022
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 10:30:22 AM UTC-7, Ramy wrote:
    Tragic as always!
    But always encouraging to hear “experts” ensuring us how safe gliding I’m fact is, and how rare accidents are.
    After all, we fly low and slow, and don’t carry fuel, so what could possibly go wrong?

    Ramy
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 9:10:59 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 10:36:12 AM UTC-4, Darren Braun wrote:
    2 incidents and 1 fatality this week in Jacksonville.

    https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2022/04/16/jfrd-at-least-1-dead-after-aircraft-goes-down-in-woods-near-herlong-airport/

    https://www.asias.faa.gov/apex/f?p=100:93:::NO:::
    I spoke with a senior club member in Jacksonville this morning. The NTSB is on site today to check the control integrity and hookups. I'm pretty sure we all have an immediate assumption as to what happened and how it could have been prevented.

    We should note that his releasing at a low altitude could very well have saved the tow pilot from an unrecoverable kiting upset.

    RIP

    PA

    Probably missed a control check prior to launch or a failure under pressure just afterwards. Can you imagine the police lieutenant describing the pilot as a white male...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bluejet941@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 18 11:24:27 2022
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations:

    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to bluej...@gmail.com on Tue Apr 19 20:44:58 2022
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations:

    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.

    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called positive
    control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 20 08:02:17 2022
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations:

    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called positive
    control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators.
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AS@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Thu Apr 21 12:41:26 2022
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations:

    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called positive
    control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators. UH

    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli
    'AS'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ramy@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 21 17:13:26 2022
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations:

    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators. UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli
    'AS'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Ramy on Fri Apr 22 07:05:46 2022
    I agree. When I went looking for my first glider in 1976, I already knew I wanted
    automatic elevator hookup, because an unconnected elevator was a prime cause of accidents
    then. Eventually, all new gliders had automatic hookups of all controls, and that source
    of accidents is almost zero now. A motor is a potential source of problems, but I can't
    think of ones that cause safety problems if you skip an item on the preflight checklist.

    On 4/21/2022 5:13 PM, Ramy wrote:
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations: >>>>>
    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators. >>> UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli
    'AS'


    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation"
    https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Fri Apr 22 07:12:03 2022
    On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 7:05:51 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    I agree. When I went looking for my first glider in 1976, I already knew I wanted
    automatic elevator hookup, because an unconnected elevator was a prime cause of accidents
    then. Eventually, all new gliders had automatic hookups of all controls, and that source
    of accidents is almost zero now. A motor is a potential source of problems, but I can't
    think of ones that cause safety problems if you skip an item on the preflight checklist.
    On 4/21/2022 5:13 PM, Ramy wrote:
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations: >>>>>
    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators.
    UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli
    'AS'
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications

    Gliders with manual control hookups don't get retired, they are just sold to someone else.

    Tom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 22 11:04:28 2022
    On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 7:12:05 AM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
    On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 7:05:51 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    I agree. When I went looking for my first glider in 1976, I already knew I wanted
    automatic elevator hookup, because an unconnected elevator was a prime cause of accidents
    then. Eventually, all new gliders had automatic hookups of all controls, and that source
    of accidents is almost zero now. A motor is a potential source of problems, but I can't
    think of ones that cause safety problems if you skip an item on the preflight checklist.
    On 4/21/2022 5:13 PM, Ramy wrote:
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations: >>>>>
    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help. >>> I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators.
    UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ? >>
    Uli
    'AS'
    --
    Eric Greenwell - USA
    - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorgliders/publications
    Gliders with manual control hookups don't get retired, they are just sold to someone else.

    Tom





    I used something physical to prevent disconnected controls. When I had a 301 Libelle, I kept (stored) the aileron pins on the stick. If I was going to try and fly without connecting the ailerons, I had to see and feel them in my right hand because I kept
    them on the stick (hanging over the brake handle)!

    When I got an ASW-20, I secured a long red streamer to a piece of 1” plastic hose that was kept over the disconnected elevator pushrod.. with marker pen, I wrote “7 pins connected” on the flag. After the ship was assembled and all controls
    connected, I would hang the flag over the elevator mount in the trailer………..where it would remind me to place the flag back over the elevator pushrod after disassembly ( ready for the next cycle)!

    When 4 of us bought an ASH-25, I had stopped using a flag and twice, I failed to connect an outboard aileron, because of distractions…………….haven’t found a way to prevent someone talking to me while I’m assembling my bird?
    Eternal Vigilance,
    JJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Marotta@21:1/5 to Ramy on Fri Apr 22 12:58:18 2022
    What's more important, getting airborne as quickly as possible or coming
    back in one piece? I'm not in as big a hurry as I once was.

    Dan
    5J

    On 4/21/22 18:13, Ramy wrote:
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations: >>>>>
    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators. >>> UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli
    'AS'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Sinclair@21:1/5 to Dan Marotta on Fri Apr 22 14:01:00 2022
    On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 11:58:21 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
    What's more important, getting airborne as quickly as possible or coming back in one piece? I'm not in as big a hurry as I once was.

    Dan
    5J
    On 4/21/22 18:13, Ramy wrote:
    If something can be forgotten, it will be forgotten. No checklists will prevent it, since checklists are normally the first thing that get forgotten.
    We need to design systems as fool proof as possible, with a very low likelihood that something critical can be forgotten. Modern gliders are pretty close to it. Not sure about motorgliders.

    Ramy

    On Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 12:41:28 PM UTC-7, AS wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 11:02:20 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 11:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:24:28 AM UTC-7, bluej...@gmail.com wrote:
    A valuable question was asked in the ASW19 Owners group. "What is the difference between a Positive Control Check and a Critical Assembly Check?"

    From the FAA Glider Handbook - Ch 6 Preflight and Ground Operations: >>>>>
    "Many manufacturers provide a critical assembly checklist
    (CAC) to be completed after assembly, which is the preferred
    method of ensuring a proper assembly has been completed.
    When provided by the manufacturer, it is mandatory. A
    positive control check (PCC) is not a CAC, but an additional
    means of verification. If a CAC is provided, it must be used
    as is any other checklist a manufacturer provides. A PCC is
    not regulatory, but it is a good idea whether or not you just
    completed the required CAC."

    I found some valuable links worth looking at:

    https://www.lescsoaring.com/docs/ControlChecks.pdf

    https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/glider_handbook/gfh_appendix_A.pdf

    Make good decisions!

    Paul A.
    If this turns out to be a disconnected elevator, what is puzzling is a simple visual check of the Hotellier connection would have discovered the error. On my DG400 I always did a positive pull test on the Hotellier connections as a so-called
    positive control check did not confirm that the connector was properly seated on the ball and the plunger was in the proper position. I also safetied the plunger, which it doesn't sound like that happened.

    Tom
    A visual confirmation that the safety pin is in is a very big help.
    I have found 2 on the line "ready to launch" with non connected elevators.
    UH
    Of course knowing where the safety pin goes is also kind'a important. We found a club ship fully assembled with the safety pins in the big hole on the backside of the wedge, effectively preventing the wedge to close properly!
    How did that saying about the idiot-proofing a design go again .... ?

    Uli




    'AS'






    Good advice, Dan……….rushing to get in the air cost Clem Bowman his life. He slid the stab onto the fin but couldn’t lock it because he’d given his wife the little red knob to start putting water in the wings. That little item never got fixed
    and the stab slid off on takeoff. Line crew transmitted, “RELEASE, RELEASE, RELEASE on the briefed airport frequency (122.8) , but Clem was too rushed to go to pilots meeting and was on 123.3………….. the ship went into extreme lot tow position,
    but the tow pilot was able to manage the pitch up caused by the extreme low tow situation! At about 1000 feet, Clem released and almost completed an outside loop, but not quite!
    RIP Clem…………Don’t rush!
    JJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)