XPost: alt.economics
On 3/19/2022 8:53 AM, a425couple wrote:
on Diplomacy & Warfare ·
George Miller 19m
Did you know Russia used hypersonic missiles in Ukraine for the first
time? How effective are these missiles? --
The truth is that Russia is a very poor country. They often develop prototypes of weapons systems and then try to market them to other
countries. If they can get overseas sales they can then fund to actually produce these weapons systems. They certainly don’t have the funds to maintain advanced weapons systems and train soldiers in their use.
As the Russo-Ukraine war has demonstrated, the Russian military is in terrible condition. They have very few of the high-tech weapons ----
---------------------
and a repeat, very informative!
view it at:
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-the-94-trillion-world-economy-in-one-chart/
More opinions
along same idea --
Truth About Russia ·
Answered by
Mats Andersson
Tue
How plausible are the western media claims that Putin has gone mad, the invasion has been stopped by Ukrainian fighters and the implication that
soon they will be driven back to Russia?
Originally Answered: How plausible are the western media claims that
Putin has gone mad, the invasion has been stopped by Ukrainian fighters
and the implication that soon they will be driven back to Russia? It
seems less than believable to me. Ukraine is likely doomed.
1.
Putin is not “mad”. He is acting rationally, but on information that has been supplied to him by people who are telling him what he wants to
hear. And we’re not talking ordinary sycophants here: those are people
whose main qualification is that they are good at telling him what he
wants to hear.
The end result is, predictably, that he invaded Ukraine relying on a map
of Mordor. It’s the trap every dictator builds for themselves. It’s why democracies will always, in the long run, outperform dictatorships, even
the comparatively “soft” dictatorship Putin was running up until he end
of February: democracy contains error-checking mechanisms that always
adjust it due reality.
And this is, of course, why Putin has been acting a bit odd lately: he
is under enormous pressure, since he’s failing on all fronts, and he
knows he’ll be deposed—and probably later assassinated—unless he succeeds. And by now, he has become aware of how badly deceived he has
been by his people—the people that he actually demanded that they should
tell him lies. There is simply no way from where he is to a
non-disastrous end result, and he’s slowly realising it.
But “mad”? No. Just so woefully misinformed that he might as well have been.
2.
The invasion is indeed going badly. A huge part of this is fierce
resistance by the Ukrainians; it seems they were less than happy with
Putin’s announcement that they don’t actually exist. Another part is the faulty information mentioned above. Specifically, it seems clear now
that Putin had been fed total lies about the state of the Russian
military: in all likelihood, huge amounts of money had been lost in
corruption, and then, all equipment was reported as in perfect working
order although it hadn’t been maintained for ages or possibly never even existed in the first place. Since no one expected that the equipment was
ever going to be used, who would ever notice?
Another part is that the Russian military doesn’t actually seem to be
any good at what they do. Western observers are stunned at the abysmal communications—including the fact that they can listen in to the communications at all. And this is right funny. I was one of the
Listeners in the Swedish Army in the mid-1980s, and it seems like the
Russian encryption protocols and procedures are way behind what we had
back then. Our instructions were based on the assumption that the
Soviets could do whatever we could do, but a bit better; this was
obviously not so. The Russian tactics are equally abysmal. And worst of
all, their logistics suck—and wars are won and lost on logistics. Their logistics are so totally crap that even I could do it better, and I’m a fucking translator. They’re running out of food, for the love of Mary,
Jesus and the donkey he rode in on. Their soldiers are reduced to
pillaging supermarkets.
Another huge factor is morale. The Ukrainians are fighting for their
very survival; Putin has announced clearly that he doesn’t accept that
there is such a thing as Ukrainians. The Russians, on the other hand,
were either told that they would be hailed as liberators, or told that
they ere going on an exercise. It’s rather harrowing to instead be
attacked with weapons by all and sundry, and be verbally abused by grandmothers. Even the street signs all read “Fuck off”. And on a more philosophical level, ever Russian soldier is now asking themselves this:
If they are Russians, why are we killing them?
If they are not Russians, why are we here in the first place?
3.
No one is claiming that they will “soon be driven back to Russia”. What
is happening, what will likely happen sooner rather than later, is the
same thing as happened to Germany in WWI. Their troops were still all
outside the 1914 borders, and yet, they had to surrender unconditionally.
Why? Economics. The German economy had collapsed by the summer of 1918,
hunger was spreading, they could no longer feed or equip the troops, and
they had the choice between surrendering in something resembling good
order, or have everyone starve and a Communist revolution on top of
that. They surrendered with the total collapse of their troops imminent.
Similarly, Russia is now rapidly becoming as isolated as North Korea.
They have fewer flights into the country than they had at the peak of
the Cold War, and they are flying domestically with aircraft that should
be grounded due to lack of safety certification, and which they will be
unable to service and maintain in days or weeks. They are going to
default on the sovereign debt tomorrow, as I type this, and they only
way they will be able to pay state salaries and pensions will be by
printing money, causing an already bad inflation to spiral out of
control, eradicating savings. Companies are closing down all over, and
by next pay day, people will start to run out of money.
In contrast, Ukraine is having money flood in from sympathetic
governments, and their military is being equipped by friendly countries.
As they said in a US election campaign:
“It’s the economy, stupid.”
23.6K viewsView 1,087 upvotesView 1 shareSubmission accepted by
Dimitri Vulis
54 comments from
Martin Spamer
and more
Maurizio Mailano
· Thu
Good analysis
Still I am not that sure of
“It’s why democracies will always, in the long run, outperform dictatorships, even the comparatively “soft” dictatorship Putin was
running up until he end of February: democracy contains error-checking mechanisms that always adjust it due reality”
China is the perfect example of learning from the mistakes Russia did.
The “democratic” phase that Russia experienced in the 90s was, de facto,
a nightmare that no Russians (except maybe todays oligarchs) want to
face again. Freedom w/o a strong gov led to anarchy and astonishing
level of corruption.
What matters most is the economy and/or the perception of being wealthy.
In this respect, Chinese have a big advantage over western (especially European) countries. While here young people know that they will not
have any of the economic benefits (welfare, secured jobs, …. ) their
parents had, this is still true in China. Democracy in its purest
declination can lead to immobility, with politicians more interested in pleasing voters rather than deciding (taking the risk of not being
re-elected). “Dictatorship” (or if you like countries driven by only one Party) can decide in one-night closing up entire Provinces if they think
this is the right choice (see pandemic containment).
THe real problem of Russia is its “old-style” economy (oil/gas, minerals and food products and raw materials for their production) while China
export tech, is the industry of the world and (top of all) it owns a
huge part of western Bonds bought with the very same money we gave them
to buy products we delocalized there.
The real problem of Russia is not that it is a soft dictatorship
(definitely more democratic than Gulf nations and, sorry for the Chinese friends, of China), but in having spoiled their economy so that lot of
people still think that they had a better life (and self-esteem) during
soviet age than today.
Angela Birch
· Tue
This reminds me of the USSRs failure in Afghanistan which contributed to
the dissolution of the USSR
Roger Kinnard
· Tue
Things were going fine until Putin decided to invade. I expected him to
merely recognize Donbas.
Most of the money for modernizing the army was stolen, but Putin is a
thief and should have understood what was happening.
Zina Zahn
· Wed
Conmen never believe they are capable of being conned as well, lol.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)