• a Quora - about us taking totally wrong friendly tack on Russia after 1

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 23 10:15:37 2024
    XPost: soc.history.war.misc, or.politics, seattle.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, sci.military.naval

    Tomaž Vargazon
    Follow
    Practicing atheist Jan 18

    Are people of EU not afraid of cornered Russia going berserk like
    Germany did after WWI? Russia constantly complains about NATO expansion,
    why not let them be?
    Well yes, we are. That’s exactly the reason for the current predicament.

    Russia (orange) and NATO (green). Sweden is practicing their submarine
    skills on this map.

    For years, decades even, the EU did everything humanly possible and then
    some to make Russia feel at peace and secure. We made sure they could
    sell their gas to EU, build pipelines and entangle their economy with
    our own. We didn’t criticise Russia for their antics in Chechnya. We
    turned a blind eye to Russian internal politics altogether. We allowed
    Russian propaganda channels to run amok in the west and didn’t create
    our own to compete for Russian audience. We rejected membership to NATO
    for Ukraine and Georgia, even though both pleaded quite desperately to
    get in.

    As a nice thank you, Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, Ukraine in 2014 and
    in 2022, they’re threatning us nuclear war and Russian television speaks openly about expanding the war to NATO member states, taking the Baltics
    and invading Poland.

    It was a mistake to treat Russia as a partner. We screwed up in 1991 and
    the years that followed. What we should have done is treat them like a
    beaten dog and clamp down on them with an iron fist. No sales of
    energents, without major concessions: no public television in Russia,
    all TV programming will be done by Western TV stations (including public
    ones) that will run Russian languague programs. No wars either, if an
    area wants to walk free you can send in the police but not the army, or
    else your aid programs stop. Nuclear disarnament, EU can’t be in range
    of more Russian weapons than EU countries can land on Russia, etc.

    Had we done so Russia would be a friend now. Alas, we can but learn from
    our mistakes.

    108.2K views
    View 2,485 upvotes
    View 14 shares
    1 of 18 answers
    353 comments from
    Werner Janik
    and more

    Werner Janik
    · Jan 18
    Good comment thanks. I am also one of these silly guys who believed in a peaceful coexistence with Russia and was dreaming of a Russian
    integration into a greater Europe for the good of all of us.

    What an illusion!

    Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon
    Profile photo for G Watts
    G Watts
    · Jan 18
    Myself as well. I was a real Russophile. Russia must be de-fanged and
    isolated - Putin has started the process and is doing a great job from
    that context/perspective.

    Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon
    Profile photo for Werner Janik
    Profile photo for David North
    David North
    · Fri
    This is the danger of human nature. Men like Putin can appear at any
    time in nations that are weak, compromised, immoral or struggling.

    We severely underestimate the individual human factor too much when
    analyzing geopolitics. In nations where single leaders have excessive
    control, all the predictions and forecasts based on economics,
    geography, trade, population, etc. can be completely upended by a
    single, obsessed and amoral person with delusions of grandeur.

    Most of us don’t think like homicidal psychopaths and would find the
    sort of thinking they have distressing and unimaginable. Yet for them,
    it is “just another day”.

    Pathological killers come in two flavors: those who are born that way
    due to vagaries of brain development coupled with childhood experiences
    and those who simply choose to act like them. For both, it is a
    narcissistic lack of empathy coupled with a love of self over all that
    make them internally almost the same.

    Profile photo for Mally Duck
    Mally Duck
    · Fri
    Just like Hamas, they attack but play the victim. Don't stop til these terrorists are neutered.


    Profile photo for Nic Harvard
    Nic Harvard
    · Jan 18
    The (modern) western mental approach is that “war is an extension of diplomacy”

    This is not the case in Africa, most of Asia, South America (somewhat)
    or Eastern Europe (somewhat)

    War, in their mind, has no rules.

    Lies, propaganda, pillage, rape, despoiling or attacking the civilian population, ethic cleansing via deportation, cultural and linguistic suppression, or even outright murder are simply tools of war.

    “Haha, our lads gave them a good pasting! And they cannot even complain!
    They are all dead or hiding. Job well done. Now let’s split the loot.”

    This mode of behaviour has been frowned apon in civilised countries
    since the 17th century.

    And when in conflict with an entity who thinks like this, you have to
    play by their (lack of) rules or else they think they are winning.

    Witness the current Gaza mess.

    I believe that it was Churchill who said “The Hun is either at your feet
    or at your throat”

    They need to KNOW they are beaten.

    The first modern example of two relatively industrial nations which
    shows this being applied effectively was, interestingly enough, probably
    the Boer War, which he covered as a journalist/observer/military
    correspondent.

    Cary Mcdonald
    · Sat
    And Trump was derided and laughed at in 2017 when he openly told Germany
    at the United Nations that they were nuts to be dependent on Russia for
    gas. Even in the US media today, they try to paint Trump as a Russian tool.


    Profile photo for David North
    David North
    · Fri
    It’s human nature to instinctively think people are mostly “like you”
    and a lot of progressive ideology has this as it’s foundational principle.

    It’s not until you finally meet those people who are not only unlike you
    but who are really unlike you that it starts to shake people’s dearly
    held perspectives.

    Two of the largest and most predatory countries in the world today are
    where they are precisely because everyone tried to “nice” them into becoming good countries.

    Profile photo for Werner Janik
    Profile photo for Paul Brawley
    Paul Brawley
    · Jan 18
    I had thought the same.

    Profile photo for Paul Vincent
    Paul Vincent
    · Sat
    It may yet come about once Nazi Russia is defeated.

    Profile photo for Antonio Defilippo
    Antonio Defilippo
    · Sun
    your comment is spot on.The illusion is not Russia but infact the war
    mongering U.S.A

    along with the faithfully little lapdog the U.K.and sovereign less E.U.


    Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon
    Tomaž Vargazon
    · 2h
    Me too, but I wouldn't call it silly. After all, Germany and Japan were,
    if anything, worse and look at them now.

    Nations can change, then can be turned upside down within a single
    lifetime. We’ve seen it happen, we did it to some. It is absolutely
    possible for a nation to change for the better or for the worse. We just believed Russia would turn out better than it did.

    That wasn't stupid. Overly optimistic maybe, but not silly. If you
    simply expect the worst you make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. You're
    often right then. Yay you.

    Profile photo for Jarkko Holkkunen
    Jarkko Holkkunen
    · Jan 18
    It starts to look like the only long-term path is to chop Russia up into smaller countries.

    Profile photo for Chris Cottrell
    Chris Cottrell
    · Jan 18
    Absolutely Jarkko, though it should not be the west that does the
    chopping up; but the peoples of the Russian Federation seeking self determination - as people did in the Baltic States in the 80s.

    Perhaps the free world could help by publicly offering western support
    to any states that do break off from the Russian Federation.

    Bradley Betts
    · Jan 18
    Problem is, we tried the Iron Fist approach with Germany after WW1 and
    the resentment it caused led pretty directly to WW2. While I agree that
    we let Russia get away with more than we should have, I can see why
    western powers tried a friendlier approach in the 1990s.

    It’s easy to say, with the advantage of hindsight, that that was the
    wrong approach. But I think it was a reasonable approach at the time,
    given recent history.

    Profile photo for Ivor Somrak
    Ivor Somrak
    · Jan 18
    It was a half-assed, exploitative approach. The “friendliness” was
    directed at Russian oligarchs selling away resources on the cheap and
    pocketing the money. Russian people, in the meantime, had a very bad
    day. Nobody really gave a shit about that, back then.

    That’s why it didn’t work. Made friends with the wrong people, for the wrong reasons.


    Profile photo for Zacharias Luber
    Zacharias Luber
    · Thu
    But irrelevant. The west neither had the responsibility nor the power to control inner workings in Russia.

    Profile photo for Gordon Stewart
    Gordon Stewart
    · Sat
    Literally did in the 1990s. We decided their elections and whether they
    get IMF money or not. The place was a basket case with no economy and everything looted left and right.

    Thing is, too many people still have daydreams of delusions of grandeur
    that we can reestablish the decade of humiliation of Russia or even the
    century of humiliation of China. It's just not happening, times have
    changed, but attitudes lagged behind.

    Profile photo for Nic Harvard
    Nic Harvard
    · Jan 18
    No

    No one used an iron fist there.

    That was exactly the problem.

    The Germans were convinced that they hadn’t been beaten.

    Allowing them to surrender under conditions which were not enforced was
    THE cause of WW2.

    Rob Oliver
    With few clothes 😁
    Profile photo for Ivor Somrak
    Ivor Somrak
    · Jan 18
    What we should have done is treat them like a beaten dog and clamp down
    on them with an iron fist.

    You and what army? You always seem to forget about the nukes. USSR fell
    apart, but the core was very much intact and very much able to ram that
    iron fist up the ass of anyone who tried anything.

    The rest is just pure fantasy. As usual.

    Profile photo for Tomaž Vargazon
    Tomaž Vargazon
    · Jan 18
    Yeah, nukes. Cute. When Lithuania declared independence of the USSR, the Kremlin wanted to send in the arms. Western world told them thus: “look, it’s your country, do what you want. But do you remember that $100
    billion we promised you so you wouldn’t starve? That’s off the table if
    you do anything.”

    The USSR fell a few short months later. You probably don’t realize just
    how hopelessly weak and mismanaged Russia was at the time. The country
    with the largest agricultural potential in the world couldn’t even feed itself.

    But nukes!!!!11 Yeah. Cute.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)