XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

from https://www.newsweek.com/speaker-mccarthy-certainly-got-this-one-right-opinion-1799540
rsci.military.naval
Speaker McCarthy Certainly Got This One Right | Opinion
MARK GOLDFEDER , DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL JEWISH ADVOCACY CENTER
ON 5/10/23 AT 3:52 PM EDT

Pause

Unmute
Current Time 0:26
/
Duration 0:36


Quality
Fullscreen

Israel 'Catastrophe' Event Hosted by Rashida Tlaib Canceled

ISRAEL
PALESTINIANS
ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT

On Tuesday evening House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) canceled an event
that Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) was set to host today at the U.S. Capitol
with the purpose of mainstreaming her antisemitic historical revisionist
views. Tlaib may yet find another (less prestigious) venue and, of
course, she has the right to say whatever she wants, however abhorrent,
about Jews and the Jewish State. But the public should hold her
accountable for the lies she is now spreading; they have been used to
justify the murders of Americans and Israelis.

Tlaib's "Nakbah Day" commemoration was designed to "educate members of
Congress and their staff" with a falsified Middle East narrative. But
the modern history of Israel is not lost in the shrouds of time, and
there are clear contemporaneous records that give the lie to Tlaib's words.

In 1922, the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine officially
established an area in the Middle East to be a national home for the
Jewish People and entrusted it to Great Britain. Jewish people came from
around the world to buy and cultivate land to further expand the
existing Jewish communities that had remained in Israel as a continuous presence since Biblical times. As Winston Churchill, then secretary of
state for the colonies, explained,

Event Canceled
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) speaks during a news conference about the
Justice For All Act outside the U.S. Capitol March 9, in Washington, DC.
DREW ANGERER/GETTY IMAGES
SUBSCRIBE NOW FROM JUST $1 >
"When it is asked what is meant by the development of the Jewish
National Home in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the
imposition of a Jewish nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine...
but the further development of the existing Jewish community... [I]n
order that this community should have the best prospect of free
development... it is essential that it should know that it is in
Palestine as of right and not on sufferance. That is the reason why it
is necessary that the existence of a Jewish National Home in Palestine
should be internationally guaranteed, and that it should be formally
recognized to rest upon ancient historic connection."

Britain was allowed to change the terms in the territory east of the
Jordan: it did so, and gave 77 percent of the original area to what is
now Jordan. When the United Nations was formed, it proposed a partition
plan for the remaining 23 percent: Resolution 181 would have created two states, an independent Israel and an independent Palestine. The Jewish community accepted those terms, and declared the State of Israel. The
Arab community refused, and launched a genocidal war that they then lost.

Over time, Palestinians developed the "Nakba" myth, in which the
would-be ethnic-cleansing Arab armies (who had failed in their stated
mission to kill all the Jews) are reimagined as the helpless victims of
a horrible catastrophe (or "nakba," in Arabic). The Nakbah legend—that
the Jews came in and violently expelled the majority of Arabs from their homes—fuels much of modern anti-Zionism. And it is also worth noting
that the 'Nakbah' commemoration is not even ostensibly about any kind of settlement or post-1967 occupation claims: this is nakedly a
demonstration against Israel's very existence.

READ MORE
What's Legitimate Criticism of Israel Vs. Antisemitism?
Your Tax Dollars Are Being Used to Teach Hate
Military Aid to Israel Offers Valuable Returns
SIGN UP FOR NEWSWEEK’S EMAIL UPDATES >
It is important to correct the record, for two reasons:

First, because truth matters. Primary sources from around the world
describe how the vast majority of Arabs who left their homes did so
either voluntarily, or under orders from the invading Arab armies—not
from the Israelis.

Just read the Jordanian daily Ad Difaa (September 6, 1954), for example:
"The Arab governments told us: Get out so that we can get in. So, we got
out, but they did not get in." Or just look at the UN Security Council
Official Records (Third Year N. 62, April 23, 1948, p. 14), in which
Jamal Bey Husseini, representative of the Arab Higher Committee,
explained that "The Arabs did not want to submit to a truce . . . they
rather preferred to abandon their homes, their belongings and everything
they possessed in the world and leave the town. This is in fact what
they did."

Oddly enough, and almost as if to reinforce what the real disaster was,
the official 'Nakbah Day' is May 15—the anniversary of the day on which
the armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq all invaded Israel
in their doomed attempt to destroy it.

The second reason to correct the record is because this lie in
particular has deadly consequences for both Americans and Israelis.

In March 1976, in a column for Falastin a-Thaura (the PLO's weekly),
Mahmoud Abbas noted that "The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect
the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned
them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw
them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live."

Then 'Nakbah Day' was invented by Yasser Arafat in 1998, and by 2011
Abbas' memory had faded in direct proportion to its rising popularity.
Abbas, now president of the Palestinian Authority, rewrote history in a
New York Times op-ed claiming that "Zionist forces expelled Palestinian
Arabs to ensure a decisive Jewish majority in the future state of
Israel, and Arab armies intervened." But even that was not enough.

Just last year, in 2022, Abbas used the annual commemoration of the
nakba—the same events Tlaib was to be marking at the Capitol—as an
excuse to reaffirm his government's ongoing commitment to "pay for
slay," the Palestinian Authority policy under which terrorists who kill
Israeli or American citizens are celebrated as heroes and financially
rewarded.

Of course, it was a disaster for the Arabs to reject the U.N.'s
Partition Plan; ignore the Jewish people's legitimate and indigenous
claims; and resort to deadly violence. But that does not mean there
cannot be hope for a better future. The continuing disaster is the
'leadership' of people like Abbas and Tlaib who engage in the same delegitimization and denial that led to the mistakes of 1948, and think
that this time, somehow, their results might be different. Hopefully
that will change, but in the meantime kudos to the speaker for not
letting Tlaib share her ahistorical, antisemitic views under the false imprimatur and borrowed respectability of a congressional event.

Dr. Mark Goldfeder, Esq. is director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)