• A Quora - How did Moskva sink?

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 10 07:09:35 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    DMaybe all true, maybe not.

    ennis Carroll
    23h
    Hard to believe they would leave the ship in that condition and the let
    the report out.

    Profile photo for Alex Mann
    Alex Mann
    Historian (2017–present)6mo
    How did Moskva sink?
    We are going to talk for a minute about modern warships and how they
    work. I know this is a lot of technical jargon but there is a reason I
    am being this detailed. Once you see the full picture, it’s jaw-dropping.

    Moskva was a rare ship- a powerful warship crammed with every type of
    weapon you could need. It was the Flagship of the Black Sea Fleet and
    the pride of the Russian Navy.


    Now with any big ship, the biggest threat is anti-ship missiles. These
    missiles can really do a number on ships and the bigger the target the
    easier it is to hit.

    So the Moskva had a 3-layered anti-air defense system. This is as
    advanced if not more advance than what many modern US Warships have. It
    went like this

    1st layer: S-300F: These are long-range surface-to-air missiles that can intercept aircraft or missiles and destroy them


    2nd Layer: 9K33 OSA: These are short range surface to air missiles to
    provide defense if the S-300 fails


    3rd layer: AK-630: These are Rotary cannons that fill the air with
    bullets kinda like the Vulcan on US ships


    On top of this, the Moskva had a large 130 mm auto-cannon,
    anti-submarine missiles, and P-500 Bazalt anti-ship missiles. This ship
    was loaded with more weaponry than any other ship on the seas.

    So what happened? Well in summary the ship was sighted by drones and 2
    Neptune anti-ship missiles were fired at the Moskva. They hit the ship
    and the resulting damage eventually sank her. Pretty simple right?
    Russia just claimed there was a normal fire but the pictures we see of
    the ship make it clear what happened. Random fires don’t sink
    uber-expensive modern warships.


    This leaves 2 questions.

    How did these missiles penetrate the 3-layer defense system? Seriously
    this system is designed from the ground up to specifically counter NATO munitions- which the Neptune 100% is
    Why did damage control fail? The Moskva had state-of-the-art damage
    control systems. On modern ships, these systems can allow damaged ships
    to continue fighting and functioning or limp back to port. The Moskva
    was built to take hits like this and keep rolling so what happened?
    For a while, this was a mystery but not anymore. You see 14 days before
    the Ukraine invasion an inspection of the Moskva was carried out by the
    Russian government and a report was filed. This is where things get amazing.

    That S-300 missile system? Well, the radar system it depended on to work interfered with communications and was turned off meaning they didn’t work. That 9KSS missile system? It hadn’t been working for months and was
    totally non-functional
    How about those AK-630 mini-guns? Well, 5 of the 6 had been stripped for
    parts, leaving only 1 functional.
    That complex “3-layer defense system” was completely offline.

    Ok so what about damage control?

    Most of the safety equipment had been stolen and sold on the black
    market. What little remained was locked up by the captain and thus
    unavailable in an emergency
    Of the 500 required fire extinguishers- only 50 remained
    Most water-tight doors either leaked or were jammed open
    The control systems either didn’t work or didn’t indicate their status
    to the bridge
    So not only were the defense weapons busted- damage control was busted
    too. That’s not even everything.

    The steering system was jammed, 2 of the 4 engines were past their life
    cycle and didn’t work, and the power generators didn’t work. Oh and that cool looking 130 mm gun? Hydraulic leak- NON-FUNCTIONAL.

    No US Navy ship would EVER be in such a sorry state let alone sent into
    combat barely functional. The fact Russia sent the Moskva out to war in
    this state is telling. Everything Russia has looks tough but beneath
    that exterior, you find greed and incompetence.

    So what sank the Moskva? Well, it’s the same thing that sunk the Kursk,
    blew up Chornobyl, and allowed Stalin to take power- greed,
    incompetence, and arrogance.

    179.7K views8.6K upvotes98 shares348 comments
    6.9K views
    View 48 upvotes
    1 comment from
    Antonius Budianto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DAN@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 11 20:27:24 2023
    pretty enlightening. And dovetailing with what we already know about the Putin-managed degeneration of mother Russia.

    Thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith Willshaw@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 16 17:53:51 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 10/04/2023 15:09, a425couple wrote:
    DMaybe all true, maybe not.

    ennis Carroll
     23h
    Hard to believe they would leave the ship in that condition and the let
    the report out.

    Profile photo for Alex Mann
    Alex Mann
    Historian (2017–present)6mo
    How did Moskva sink?
    We are going to talk for a minute about modern warships and how they
    work. I know this is a lot of technical jargon but there is a reason I
    am being this detailed. Once you see the full picture, it’s jaw-dropping.

    Moskva was a rare ship- a powerful warship crammed with every type of
    weapon you could need. It was the Flagship of the Black Sea Fleet and
    the pride of the Russian Navy.


    Now with any big ship, the biggest threat is anti-ship missiles. These missiles can really do a number on ships and the bigger the target the
    easier it is to hit.

    So the Moskva had a 3-layered anti-air defense system. This is as
    advanced if not more advance than what many modern US Warships have. It
    went like this

    1st layer: S-300F: These are long-range surface-to-air missiles that can intercept aircraft or missiles and destroy them


    2nd Layer: 9K33 OSA: These are short range surface to air missiles to
    provide defense if the S-300 fails


    3rd layer: AK-630: These are Rotary cannons that fill the air with
    bullets kinda like the Vulcan on US ships


    On top of this, the Moskva had a large 130 mm auto-cannon,
    anti-submarine missiles, and P-500 Bazalt anti-ship missiles. This ship
    was loaded with more weaponry than any other ship on the seas.

    So what happened? Well in summary the ship was sighted by drones and 2 Neptune anti-ship missiles were fired at the Moskva. They hit the ship
    and the resulting damage eventually sank her. Pretty simple right?
    Russia just claimed there was a normal fire but the pictures we see of
    the ship make it clear what happened. Random fires don’t sink uber-expensive modern warships.


    This leaves 2 questions.

    How did these missiles penetrate the 3-layer defense system? Seriously
    this system is designed from the ground up to specifically counter NATO munitions- which the Neptune 100% is
    Why did damage control fail? The Moskva had state-of-the-art damage
    control systems. On modern ships, these systems can allow damaged ships
    to continue fighting and functioning or limp back to port. The Moskva
    was built to take hits like this and keep rolling so what happened?
    For a while, this was a mystery but not anymore. You see 14 days before
    the Ukraine invasion an inspection of the Moskva was carried out by the Russian government and a report was filed. This is where things get
    amazing.

    That S-300 missile system? Well, the radar system it depended on to work interfered with communications and was turned off meaning they didn’t work. That 9KSS missile system? It hadn’t been working for months and was
    totally non-functional
    How about those AK-630 mini-guns? Well, 5 of the 6 had been stripped for parts, leaving only 1 functional.
    That complex “3-layer defense system” was completely offline.

    Ok so what about damage control?

    Most of the safety equipment had been stolen and sold on the black
    market. What little remained was locked up by the captain and thus unavailable in an emergency
    Of the 500 required fire extinguishers- only 50 remained
    Most water-tight doors either leaked or were jammed open
    The control systems either didn’t work or didn’t indicate their status
    to the bridge
    So not only were the defense weapons busted- damage control was busted
    too. That’s not even everything.

    The steering system was jammed, 2 of the 4 engines were past their life
    cycle and didn’t work, and the power generators didn’t work. Oh and that cool looking 130 mm gun? Hydraulic leak- NON-FUNCTIONAL.

    No US Navy ship would EVER be in such a sorry state let alone sent into combat barely functional. The fact Russia sent the Moskva out to war in
    this state is telling. Everything Russia has looks tough but beneath
    that exterior, you find greed and incompetence.

    So what sank the Moskva? Well, it’s the same thing that sunk the Kursk, blew up Chornobyl, and allowed Stalin to take power- greed,
    incompetence, and arrogance.

    179.7K views8.6K upvotes98 shares348 comments
    6.9K views
    View 48 upvotes
    1 comment from
    Antonius Budianto

    In a simple phrase, incompetence at every level. The Russians have shown
    they can hit something static the size of a Tower Black and not much else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 16 18:52:33 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message news:u1h96v$2k47n$1@dont-email.me...

    In a simple phrase, incompetence at every level. The Russians have shown
    they can hit something static the size of a Tower Black and not much else.

    -------------------

    Victor Belenko's book describes the don't-give-a-$#!+ attitude that
    Communism created. Even as a labor camp POW Erich Hartmann had to work only half a day, like his guards.

    https://www.amazon.com/Mig-Pilot-Final-Escape-Belenko/dp/0380538687

    "In addition to an exciting escape story it reveals why the Soviet Union had
    to collapse of its own ineptitude, deceit, and corruption."

    I have a Soviet military manual that prohibits pounding on ammunition with a rock.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith Willshaw@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Apr 17 15:01:57 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 16/04/2023 23:52, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    ----------------

    Victor Belenko's book describes the don't-give-a-$#!+ attitude that
    Communism created. Even as a labor camp POW Erich Hartmann had to work
    only half a day, like his guards.

    https://www.amazon.com/Mig-Pilot-Final-Escape-Belenko/dp/0380538687

    "In addition to an exciting escape story it reveals why the Soviet Union
    had to collapse of its own ineptitude, deceit, and corruption."

    I have a Soviet military manual that prohibits pounding on ammunition
    with a rock.


    I made several work trips to the USSR as was and learned that this was
    very much a Russian problem. We had customers for our software in
    Czechslovakia and Hungary. They made the transition to the post Soviet
    reality with no problems but the Russians never did seem to grasp even
    the basic concepts of doing business. As for taking the initative they
    regarded that as insane. The Russians were running ancient copies of the
    Vax 11. The Czechs had the latest and greatest Silicon Graphics
    Workstations but then they made a profit and are still in business.

    The initial Russian attack on Kyiv was the most incompetent action seen
    since Il Duce sent his forces against the British in North Africa. The
    plan was simple, we drive into the capital city in lightly armoured
    vehicles in broad daylight, what could possibly go wrong ?

    Then they hit the road block and the troops on either side of the
    highway. It was like shooting tethered sheep and this was their special
    forces !

    Worse they found the vehicles they used didnt actually have military
    grade tyres and kevlar, they were just standard civilian trucks, the
    generals were sending invoices in for new mil spec equipment but what
    was given to the military were 20 year vehicles that had been sitting in
    a field.

    And then there was the genius who senf a Russian battalion into the
    Chernobyl exclusion zone and had them camp in the Red Zone which is
    probably the most radioactive zone outside a reactor core ! Within a
    week they had to medivac them all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 17 14:24:17 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message news:u1jjgn$32e3s$1@dont-email.me...
    ...
    The Russians were running ancient copies of the
    Vax 11. ...

    ---------------------
    In the 80's I was on the design team for automatic semiconductor wafer test equipment based on a VAX LSI-11. My part was designing and building the test and calibration fixtures for the analog measurement cards, plus programming
    the machine's self-test routines. There was one Russian émigré on the team, tasked with something on a wirewrap card that went into the LSI-11 card
    cage. The project wasn't very challenging digitally and all but the Russian designed circuits that worked well with little or no modification. His
    circuit kept needing extra components and tweaks that outgrew the wirewrap
    area and spilled onto a piece of perfboard that hung off the side by its wiring, insulated within a taped-on paper envelope. To him that was
    acceptable normal practice.

    I may have previously mentioned another Russian engineer who showed me how
    to align the lenses in their military optical equipment by bending the frame with his fingers until he liked the result.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Harding@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Apr 17 15:24:24 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    I spent quite a bit of time on Soviet fishing trawlers during the late
    1970's and early 80's. Their sonar, fishing net transducers and radios
    were really old school. Even still vacuum tubes in some gear. The good
    stuff went to the Soviet military.

    But while at UMass Computer Science Department, we had some really top
    notch Russian doctoral and post-doctoral students (one of whom is now a professor at a school in England I believe). This was of course after
    the demise of the USSR.

    The Russians have always had top notch theoreticians, especially in mathematics, physics, cosmology and computer science and more. Someone
    said the Russians could do great theory because they didn't have the infrastructure to do the engineering that might come from such
    theoretical research. Don't know if that is really true.

    I was always more impressed with Russian (Soviet) resolve more than
    anything. "Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking" seemed to say it all.

    Which makes me wary of confidently writing off the Russian effort in
    Ukraine!


    On 4/17/23 2:24 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Keith Willshaw"  wrote in message news:u1jjgn$32e3s$1@dont-email.me...
    ...
    The Russians were running ancient copies of the
    Vax 11. ...

    ---------------------
    In the 80's I was on the design team for automatic semiconductor wafer
    test equipment based on a VAX LSI-11. My part was designing and building
    the test and calibration fixtures for the analog murement cards, plus programming the machine's self-test routines. There was one Russian
    émigré on the team, tasked with something on a wirewrap card that went
    into the LSI-11 card cage. The project wasn't very challenging digitally
    and all but the Russian designed circuits that worked well with little
    or no modification. His circuit kept needing extra components and tweaks
    that outgrew the wirewrap area and spilled onto a piece of perfboard
    that hung off the side by its wiring, insulated within a taped-on paper envelope. To him that was acceptable normal practice.

    I may have previously mentioned another Russian engineer who showed me
    how to align the lenses in their military optical equipment by bending
    the frame with his fingers until he liked the result.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith Willshaw@21:1/5 to Stephen Harding on Tue Apr 18 12:54:43 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 17/04/2023 20:24, Stephen Harding wrote:
    I spent quite a bit of time on Soviet fishing trawlers during the late
    1970's and early 80's.  Their sonar, fishing net transducers and radios
    were really old school.  Even still vacuum tubes in some gear.  The good stuff went to the Soviet military.

    But while at UMass Computer Science Department, we had some really top
    notch Russian doctoral and post-doctoral students (one of whom is now a professor at a school in England I believe).  This was of course after
    the demise of the USSR.

    The Russians have always had top notch theoreticians, especially in mathematics, physics, cosmology and computer science and more.  Someone
    said the Russians could do great theory because they didn't have the infrastructure to do the engineering that might come from such
    theoretical research.  Don't know if that is really true.

    I was always more impressed with Russian (Soviet) resolve more than anything.  "Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking" seemed to say it all.

    Which makes me wary of confidently writing off the Russian effort in
    Ukraine!


    The problem with the Russian Army is a combination of their old
    weakness, the lack of a professional NCO corps and the new regime which
    is basically a kleptocracy. The Russian military does have NCO's but
    their role is basically just to ensure the rank and file does as they
    are told.

    In the 1980's I did a lot of work with the USSR in the oil and gas
    industry, their main problem was a system which was very hierarchical
    and positively discouraged initiative but was at least honest.

    One Soviet Engineer I got on really well with explained how that works.
    If you come up with a good idea your boss will take all the credit but
    if there are problems you will get all the blame. At the worst that you
    used to mean going to jail or being shot for economic sabotage but in
    more enlightened times working permanent night shifts at a tractor
    factory in Tomsk.

    A bigger problem they now have to deal with is that when Putin announced conscription the highest qualified young graduates simply left while the
    going was good. I worked with a Russian software engineer based in St Petersburg load his computers and server into the back of the car and
    left. He is now based in Helsinki. The way they operate conscription is
    insane, they just made a lost of everyone under the age of 40 and put
    them on the list. The result is that industrial production is falling so
    fast that they are buying munitions and weapons from North Korea and
    Iran. This was made worse because all the consumer goods they were
    making such as Renault cars have closed as they can no longer import the
    engine management systems so its back to old designsfrom Lada

    The only places they can sell oil to are China and India at a price
    which means they are losing money.

    Another example is the English Language paper The Moscow Times, they
    now operate from Armenia having left Moscow to avoid censorship.

    I like Russians but I hate to see what the gangsters running the country
    I have done to it. I had a certain respect for the last Soviet leaders
    like Yeltsin but Putin spen most of his career in the KGB spying on
    students in Dresden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stickney@21:1/5 to Keith Willshaw on Thu Apr 20 06:01:51 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:54:43 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

    On 17/04/2023 20:24, Stephen Harding wrote:
    I spent quite a bit of time on Soviet fishing trawlers during the late
    1970's and early 80's.  Their sonar, fishing net transducers and radios
    were really old school.  Even still vacuum tubes in some gear.  The
    good stuff went to the Soviet military.

    But while at UMass Computer Science Department, we had some really top
    notch Russian doctoral and post-doctoral students (one of whom is now a
    professor at a school in England I believe).  This was of course after
    the demise of the USSR.

    The Russians have always had top notch theoreticians, especially in
    mathematics, physics, cosmology and computer science and more.  Someone
    said the Russians could do great theory because they didn't have the
    infrastructure to do the engineering that might come from such
    theoretical research.  Don't know if that is really true.

    I was always more impressed with Russian (Soviet) resolve more than
    anything.  "Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking" seemed to say it all.

    Which makes me wary of confidently writing off the Russian effort in
    Ukraine!


    The problem with the Russian Army is a combination of their old
    weakness, the lack of a professional NCO corps and the new regime which
    is basically a kleptocracy. The Russian military does have NCO's but
    their role is basically just to ensure the rank and file does as they
    are told.

    In the 1980's I did a lot of work with the USSR in the oil and gas
    industry, their main problem was a system which was very hierarchical
    and positively discouraged initiative but was at least honest.

    It's not like things were better in the Soviet Days - One of my people
    when I was running part of a project for the U.S. Navy has been the Air
    Warfare Officer for the Theodore Roosevelt's Carrier Battle Group. His
    ship was monitoring Soviet exercises in the Med, including the Kirov and
    the Slava (Later renamed Moskva) ended up in a port visit for repairs at
    teh same time that he was there. (May have been Alexandria) - He noted
    that not only was it the sorriest looking ship he'd ever encountered -
    more rust than paint - but that not two sailors wore the same uniform.
    They were all in a mix-and-mach of whatever was in the stores and sort of
    fit. He also noted that they had a lot of electronic deconfliction
    problems - various radars tuned so that they overlapped with another
    system, both same-ship and withing their flotilla. This led, during their exercises, to a lot of intra-ship radio comms screaming about how they
    couldn't tell whose blips were whose - as they picked up radar returns
    from the other ship's transmissions.
    I don't think it got better.
    I've seen Russian newsreel film of the Black Gang on Moskva, at the engine control consoles - shorts and no shirts. Any casualty, fire or steam
    leak, and those guys are a crispy critter or a pink mist.
    Keith, given what you've noticed with Russian Industrial Culture, and the general attitude of "My Carrot, Your Stick"m I have to wonder how many of
    their gas line and factory explosions, and transport accidents are
    deliberate action, or business as usual.

    --
    Peter Stickney
    Java Man knew nothing about coffee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to Peter Stickney on Thu Apr 20 19:05:35 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 4/19/23 23:01, Peter Stickney wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:54:43 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

    On 17/04/2023 20:24, Stephen Harding wrote:
    I spent quite a bit of time on Soviet fishing trawlers during the late
    1970's and early 80's.  Their sonar, fishing net transducers and radios >>> were really old school.  Even still vacuum tubes in some gear.  The
    good stuff went to the Soviet military.

    But while at UMass Computer Science Department, we had some really top
    notch Russian doctoral and post-doctoral students (one of whom is now a
    professor at a school in England I believe).  This was of course after
    the demise of the USSR.

    The Russians have always had top notch theoreticians, especially in
    mathematics, physics, cosmology and computer science and more.  Someone >>> said the Russians could do great theory because they didn't have the
    infrastructure to do the engineering that might come from such
    theoretical research.  Don't know if that is really true.

    I was always more impressed with Russian (Soviet) resolve more than
    anything.  "Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking" seemed to say it all. >>>
    Which makes me wary of confidently writing off the Russian effort in
    Ukraine!


    The problem with the Russian Army is a combination of their old
    weakness, the lack of a professional NCO corps and the new regime which
    is basically a kleptocracy. The Russian military does have NCO's but
    their role is basically just to ensure the rank and file does as they
    are told.

    In the 1980's I did a lot of work with the USSR in the oil and gas
    industry, their main problem was a system which was very hierarchical
    and positively discouraged initiative but was at least honest.

    It's not like things were better in the Soviet Days - One of my people
    when I was running part of a project for the U.S. Navy has been the Air Warfare Officer for the Theodore Roosevelt's Carrier Battle Group. His
    ship was monitoring Soviet exercises in the Med, including the Kirov and
    the Slava (Later renamed Moskva) ended up in a port visit for repairs at
    teh same time that he was there. (May have been Alexandria) - He noted
    that not only was it the sorriest looking ship he'd ever encountered -
    more rust than paint - but that not two sailors wore the same uniform.
    They were all in a mix-and-mach of whatever was in the stores and sort of fit. He also noted that they had a lot of electronic deconfliction
    problems - various radars tuned so that they overlapped with another
    system, both same-ship and withing their flotilla. This led, during their exercises, to a lot of intra-ship radio comms screaming about how they couldn't tell whose blips were whose - as they picked up radar returns
    from the other ship's transmissions.
    I don't think it got better.
    I've seen Russian newsreel film of the Black Gang on Moskva, at the engine control consoles - shorts and no shirts. Any casualty, fire or steam
    leak, and those guys are a crispy critter or a pink mist.
    Keith, given what you've noticed with Russian Industrial Culture, and the general attitude of "My Carrot, Your Stick"m I have to wonder how many of their gas line and factory explosions, and transport accidents are
    deliberate action, or business as usual.

    IMHO, fascinating discussion. Thank You!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Harding@21:1/5 to Keith Wills haw on Fri Apr 21 05:48:12 2023
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 4/18/23 7:54 AM, Keith Wills haw wrote:
    On 17/04/2023 20:24, Stephen Harding wrote:
    I spent quite a bit of time on Soviet fishing trawlers during the late
    1970's and early 80's.  Their sonar, fishing net transducers and
    radios were really old school.  Even still vacuum tubes in some gear.
    The good stuff went to the Soviet military.

    But while at UMass Computer Science Department, we had some really top
    notch Russian doctoral and post-doctoral students (one of whom is now
    a professor at a school in England I believe).  This was of course
    after the demise of the USSR.

    The Russians have always had top notch theoreticians, especially in
    mathematics, physics, cosmology and computer science and more.
    Someone said the Russians could do great theory because they didn't
    have the infrastructure to do the engineering that might come from
    such theoretical research.  Don't know if that is really true.

    I was always more impressed with Russian (Soviet) resolve more than
    anything.  "Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking" seemed to say it all.

    Which makes me wary of confidently writing off the Russian effort in
    Ukraine!


    The problem with the Russian Army is a combination of their old
    weakness, the lack of a professional NCO corps and the new regime which
    is basically a kleptocracy. The Russian military does have NCO's but
    their role is basically just to ensure the rank and file does as they
    are told.

    In the 1980's I did a lot of work with the USSR in the oil and gas
    industry, their main problem was a system which was very hierarchical
    and positively discouraged initiative but was at least honest.

    One Soviet Engineer I got on really well with explained how that works.
    If you come up with a good idea your boss will take all the credit but
    if there are problems you will get all the blame. At the worst that you
    used to mean going to jail or being shot for economic sabotage but in
    more enlightened times working permanent night shifts at a tractor
    factory in Tomsk.

    A bigger problem they now have to deal with is that when Putin announced conscription the highest qualified young graduates simply left while the going was good. I worked with a Russian software engineer based in St Petersburg load his computers and server into the back of the car and
    left. He is now based in Helsinki. The way they operate conscription is insane, they just made a lost of everyone under the age of 40 and put
    them on the list. The result is that industrial production is falling so
    fast that they are buying munitions and weapons from North Korea and
    Iran. This was made worse because all the consumer goods they were
    making such as Renault cars have closed as they can no longer import the engine management systems so its back to old designsfrom Lada

    The only places they can sell oil to are China anndia at a price
    which means they are losing money.

    Another example is the English Language paper The Moscow Times, they now operate from Armenia having left Moscow to avoid censorship.

    I like Russians but I hate to see what the gangsters running the country
    I have done to it. I had a certain respect for the last Soviet leaders
    like Yeltsin but Putin spen most of his career in the KGB spying on
    students in Dresden.


    I never saw the "pass the buck" behavior when I was aboard Soviet
    fishing trawlers, but I would have little opportunity to do so.

    I did note however that the large BERT trawlers had an essentially
    military chain of command, although the First Officer was actually the political officer and wasn't responsible for running the ship. He was
    sort of like a union shop steward who would act as an intermediary
    between deck and factory crew (the blue collar workers) and the officers
    (white collar). Some of them were quite good but others were constantly
    trying to score points against you or hiding as much as possible what
    the ship was doing, even when operating legally.

    Overall, a very secretive bunch. Even watching the movies they showed
    the crew at times, if they weren't WWII movies, were dark with
    characters constantly plotting against one another or listening behind a
    door. Seemed to do a lot of leering as well.

    But I felt that crew could easily come off that fishing trawler and
    become a destroyer crew in a moments notice.

    Given what we know about the current Russian Navy, seems a Midwestern
    farmer might do just as well!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)