[continued from previous message]
What difference does it make whether they were asked or
volunteered the information? The statement clearly shows that
the information was obtained from the offender.
All reliable researchers recognize that what the offender might
say is not nearly as important as what he does. If they did not
have homosexual (same-sex) desires, and very strongly, they
would not commit the serious crimes of having sex with underage
boys.
All of the restrictions the homosexualists want to put on
interpreting statistics, would practically make it impossible to
make a determination, which is their obvious purpose –
concealment of the facts. It would completely eliminate the main
body of available information, which is the statistics on the
people convicted on same-sex molestations. Going into all of the
silly requirements of Herek and the other homosexualists is not
relevant to the investigation and conviction of the crime of
pedophilia – therefore the records would not contain such
information.
----------------------------------------------------------
Contrary to the propaganda of Herek and his bunch, this
unequivocal statement is found on the website of The Sexual
Psychophysiology Laboratory, University of Texas[14 ] :
Recent evidence suggests that pedophilia may be associated with
homosexuality, mental retardation, and high maternal age.
Homosexuality in the general population is estimated at 2% while
homosexuality in pedophiles is estimated at up to 40%. [Emphasis
added]
When a Catholic Priest has sex with a young boy, his sexual
attraction to that boy is indeed great. It is so great that he
flings aside his deep religious vows and commits a felony along
with it. This is exactly what the homosexuals Kirk and Madsen
were talking about in their book, After the Ball, in their
discussion of how great the urge actually is. When discussing
how the failure to resist this same-sex attraction to boys was
the downfall of what they considered the great homosexuals of
history, they said:
When you find a given failing even in a community's best and
brightest, you suspect it's overwhelming prevalence among the
great unwashed. In this context, it's noteworthy that Alan
Turing, Oscar Wilde, and perhaps Leonardo da Vinci—each, in his
own time and unique vein, among the most brilliant minds the gay
community ever produced—all embroiled themselves in serious
legal trouble by carrying on indiscreetly with young men. Da
Vinci stood trial; Wilde was imprisoned, destroying his
personality and career; Turing chemically castrated by order of
the court, killed himself. [Emphasis added.]
[And remarking on the same propensities in so many homosexuals,
generally, they added:]
And on the clay feet of their betters, more humble gays continue
to bumble along.[15]
To the above they could have added another, the great poet, Walt
Whitman:
Although he is celebrated today as a gay poet, Walt Whitman
began his career as a teacher. In 1841 he was denounced from
the pulpit, tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail for
sexual involvement with his male students. (Reynolds, D. C.,
[1995], Walt Whitman's America: a cultural biography, New York:
Knoph.) ...[16]
Even with so much to lose, those "great gays" referred to above
gave in to their same-sex attractions to younger boys, and
suffered the consequences. The Catholic Priests and Scoutmasters
threw their vows and honor to the winds, and engaged in
something they knew they could be put in the penitentiary for.
Their same sex attraction to these young boys had to be
extremely great. It is no wonder that so many of the ones of the
more common homosexuals, who Kirk and Madsen called the "great
unwashed," "bumble along" giving in to the same propensities as
the greater ones.
Dr. Judith Reisman is one of the most widely known and widely
respected researchers on child sexual abuse. She states:
This author’s additional research in this area included a
content analysis of the biographies of 150 famous homosexuals
which yielded a rate of 67% involving man boy sex. It is
similarly typical that early abuse victims tend to similarly
victimize boys at about the same age of their own abuse.[17]
[Emphasis added]
The article by Dr. Timothy J. Dailey should all be carefully
read by those interested in this subject. The most important
parts were ignored completely by Dr. Herek. One of the key parts
he does not cover was about "Victims Turned Victimizers: The
Consequences of Homosexual Child Abuse," (pp. 11-12). It
contains a volume of information consistent with the last
sentence quoted above by Dr. Judith Resiman. These things not
only show relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia, but
bear on what many feel is one of the primary causes of
homosexuality in many boys. Dailey states:
The steadfast denial of the disturbing ties with pedophilia
within the homosexual movement is no purely academic matter.
Perhaps the most tragic aspect of the homosexual-pedophile
connection is the fact that men who sexually molest boys all too
often lead their victims into homosexuality and pedophilia. The
evidence indicates that a high percentage of homosexuals and
pedophiles were themselves sexually abused as children ... .
He gives six studies that irrefutably establish the basis of the
above statement.
Dailey's article also goes at length into the subjects of
Pedophilia in Gay Culture and The Historical Connection Between
Pedophilia and the Gay Rights Movement. (pp. 7-11) He presents
volumes of information on how the promotion of man-boy love has
been an integral part of the homosexual movement, and how they
have worked together to lower the age of consent laws, so that
homosexuals could legally prey on the young. He details much of
the "Gay Literature" that promotes the pedophile theme of man-
boy "love." Most of these things were also covered at length,
from different sources in As We Sodomize America, Relations With
Youth (pp. 52-77). Also Judith Reisman goes into this at length
in her article referred to above.
The following is from a special report of the Traditional Values
Coalition, entitled Exposed: The Next Phase of the Homosexual
Agenda:
In May, 2004, the NGLTF [National Gay Lesbian Task Force]
announced a new alliance with the Woodhull Freedom Foundation
(WFF), a sexual liberation group that seeks to abolish laws
against prostitution; overturn “age of consent” laws protecting
children from adult sexual predators ... .[18]
The following is from an article, Report: Pedophilia more common
among "gays," by writer Jon Dougherty:
The Journal of Homosexuality recently published a special double-
issue entitled, "Male Intergenerational Intimacy," containing
many articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as
loving relationships. One article said parents should look upon
the pedophile who loves their son "not as a rival or competitor,
not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy's
upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home."[19]
As an example of just how ridiculous these new would-be
definitions are, let us consider the brutal homosexual rape and
murder of little 13 year old Jesse Dirkhising, in Prairie Grove,
Arkansas, on September 26, 1999, by two homosexual "partners,"
David Don Carpenter and Joshua Brown, in their home.[20] He "was
brutally raped, tortured and murdered -- for fun, for thrills,
for the hell of it." He was raped at least six times by these
men over a period of several hours. First, under the idiotic
definitions of Herek and his bunch, these men could not be
considered pedophiles or child molesters, because the boy had
reached puberty. Secondly, even though the men admittedly lived
together as "lovers," the perpetrators could not even be
considered homosexuals under the new definitions of the
homosexualists, because two qualifications for this are not met:
They were not shown to have an exclusively homosexual adult
sexual orientation.
They were not shown to be men who were primarily sexually
attracted to other adult males.
Another sad thing about the rape and murder of this little 13
year old boy is how the media tried to downplay it, because the
two offenders were homosexuals, as related by the two articles
referred to.
A recent similar case involving the homosexual rape of a child
was reported in Media Blackout Homosexual Attack, Register of
Opinion (Official Publication of Public Advocate), August, 2009.
The article states:
On June 27, 2009 , police arrested Frank Lombard, the associate
director of Duke University's Center for Health Policy for
attempting to sell the body of his 5-year-old adopted son to an
undercover FBI agent posing as another child molester. An open
homosexual, Lombard lived with his "partner" Kenneth Shipp in
Durham North Carolina, where the two homosexuals allegedly
"raised" two adopted boys.
The federal sting operation that led to the arrest revealed that
Lombard ... had broadcast live video of himself on the internet
molesting a child on four separate occasions. Investigators
believe the boy to be his adopted son.
In conversations with undercover agents leading up to the
arrest, Lombard admitted to abusing the child since infancy,
allowing several others to do so as well, and sedating the child
with Benadryl to make the abuse "easier." ...
Even with such a high profile case and sensational crime,
however, all major media networks have suppressed the story. ...
"... We're looking at a child scarred for life. There are no
words for such wickedness."
Lombard , a striking example of the very real correlation
between homosexuality and pedophilia, awaits trial in
Washington, D.C.
For an online story of the above homosexual rapes by Lombard,
see the NewsBusters story.[21]
It cannot be denied, even under the restrictions of the
homosexualists, that Lombard was a pedophile. But, although this
fiend was clearly a homosexual, under these new "rules" of Herek
and his kind, he could not be classified as one for the same
reasons that the fiends who attacked little Jesse Dirkhising
could not be classified as homosexuals under their special rules.
The relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia is
established beyond any reasonable doubt, and those who don't
recognize it are either very misinformed, or are hiding from the
truth. The attempt to cover up these truths by the new
definitions of the homosexualists disintegrates on examination.
Allowing homosexuals to be in positions where they are in
constant contact with young people is both dangerous and
foolhardy, as has been well established by the incidents with
the Catholic Priests and in the Boy Scouts.
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality
[2] See the section, Relations With Youth, in the book, As we
sodomize America , pp. 52-70, on this website under books.
[3] As We Sodomize America , pp. 53-54. ../Import/As We Sodomize
America.docx
[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality#Psychology
[5] As We Sodomize America, supra, pp. 150-177.
[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
[7]
http
://psychology.ucdavis.edu:80/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
[8] As We Sodomize America, supra, pp. 52-77, 541-545.
[9] Ibid.
[10] See the article, Liberal Revisionists Present False History
and Moral Decay, under Articles on this website.
[11] Homosexuality and Child Abuse, by Timothy J. Dailey, PhD.
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/DaileyHomosexualAbuse.htm
[12] As we Sodomize America, supra, pp. 137, 143.
[13]
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/pro-gay-bias-in- study-of-pedophilia/
[14]
http:
//hom
epage
.psy.
utexa
s.edu
/homepage/group/MestonLAB/HTML%20files/Resources_msd_para.htm
[15] As We Sodomize America, supra, p. 52.
[16] Supra, p. 53.
[17] Where are the Arrests of Thousands of Men that Gave AIDS to
Boys?, by Judith A. Reisman, PhD., p. 3.
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/CALIF%20HEARING5.pdf
[18]
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/pdf_files/PublicSex.pdf
[19]
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431
[20]
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14837; http://www.covenantnews.com/dirkhising.htm
http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/How%20Homosexualists% 20Redefine%20%20Homosexual%20Child%20Molesting.htm
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)