On Thursday, March 4, 1999 at 12:00:00 AM UTC-8, NoOption5L wrote:

In article <7bh26n$puo@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, lx50@*ix.netcom.com (Randy)
writes:

I think it looks like a cross between the Fox and the previous Mustang.

Thats exactly what I've thought since the first time I saw one.
I like it better then the SN95.

It is a SN95 just a little different body panels on it than the 94-98...

A little more horsepower a little more handling a little more money.

A LOT faster, better handling, better ride, better braking, and a little more money.

Patrick

'93 Cobra (track numbers will be posted soon)
'95 Accord EX (faster than a LX...an Accord LX)
'87 5 liter 5 speed LX - SOLD! (14.2 @ 98 stock, 13.8 @ 101 lightly modded)

I think that the new Mustang looks odd. It doesn't look muscular, but then again Mustangs haven't looked Muscular since the 70s. Although I think it will do fine, it looks like a great platform that most will mod to their liking. Who knows, in 2004-05
the Mustangs might look even uglier....and then again in 2014-15....but that's light years away.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

At Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:21:20 -0800, hatakilla916 rearranged some electrons
to write:

I think that the new Mustang looks odd. It doesn't look muscular, but
then again Mustangs haven't looked Muscular since the 70s. Although I
think it will do fine, it looks like a great platform that most will mod
to their liking. Who knows, in 2004-05 the Mustangs might look even uglier....and then again in 2014-15....but that's light years away.

You're replying to a 15 year old post.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)