What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect impressed or disapointed?
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect impressed or disapointed?
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
On 11/21/2022 2:45 AM, RzR wrote:My guess is Wolff gets another shot at it after so many past titles, but it depends on how well he gets along with his superiors at Merc.
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.Laughing at Toto is more like it.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
Only question: Does he get the boot?
On 11/21/2022 2:45 AM, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
Laughing at Toto is more like it.
Only question: Does he get the boot?
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect impressed or disapointed?
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 1:41:05 PM UTC-8, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect impressed or disapointed?
On the up side the F1 poo throwers actually made an aero/tire package that worked. For the first time in many many years the following car can stay close without destroying the front tires of frying it's brakes. Now if they'd just shrink the cars andput them on a diet so two cars can race thru a corner without one or both being forced past the white line.
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect impressed or disapointed?
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 1:41:05 PM UTC-8, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
On the up side the F1 poo throwers actually made an aero/tire package
that worked. For the first time in many many years the following car
can stay close without destroying the front tires of frying it's
brakes. Now if they'd just shrink the cars and put them on a diet so
two cars can race thru a corner without one or both being forced
past the white line.
Changing the weight and size of the cars won't change that at all.
A lighter, and/or narrower car will simply mean the driver goes harder
into the corner to begin with.
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance.
The changes were made to improve wheel-to-wheel racing—to allow the cars
to run closer together for longer—and they succeeded very well.
Some did better making a car to suit the new rules, and some did worse.
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
they won too much, no?
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
The changes were made to improve wheel-to-wheel racing—to allow the
cars to run closer together for longer—and they succeeded very well.
That they did
Some did better making a car to suit the new rules, and some did worse.
Exactly :)
Got it.
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect
impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect >>>>>> impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships. >>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect >>>>>>> impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired.
Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated championships. >>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance. >>>>>
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But
it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
You really
need to wake up...
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams ect >>>>>>>> impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton backfired. >>>>>>> Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their manipulated
championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"?
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in advance. >>>>>>
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But
it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break the
budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You really
need to wake up...
On 2022-11-29 22:10, RzR wrote:
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams >>>>>>>>> ect impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton
backfired. Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their
manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"? >>>>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in
advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because
the money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide.
But it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break the
budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You really
need to wake up...
Let's see the quote...
...and the source.
On 2022-11-29 22:10, RzR wrote:
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams >>>>>>>>> ect impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton
backfired. Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their
manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"? >>>>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in
advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because
the money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide.
But it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break the
budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You really
need to wake up...
Let's see the quote...
...and the source.
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
On 11/30/2022 10:16 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 22:10, RzR wrote:
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams >>>>>>>>>> ect impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton
backfired. Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their
manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"? >>>>>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in
advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they
got caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it
because the money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you
to decide. But it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break the
budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You really
need to wake up...
Let's see the quote...
...and the source.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/breach-financial-rules-lose-your-championship/
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your definition
is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the behaviour
you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying
doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be uncertain.
The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that
what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence
and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
...and the source.https://www.planetf1.com/news/breach-financial-rules-lose-your-championship/
...and the source.https://www.planetf1.com/news/breach-financial-rules-lose-your-championship/
Accounts deciding championships, how is this still racing?
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
On 2022-11-30 02:55, Mark wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got
caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. But it >>>> was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your definition
is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the behaviour
you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying
doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be uncertain.
The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that
what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence
and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW you cannot
actually be certain about...
...that's lying.
On 1/12/2022 8:30 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-30 02:55, Mark wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got >>>>> caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the >>>>> money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide.
But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your definition
is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the behaviour >>> you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying
doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be uncertain.
The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that
what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence
and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW you cannot
actually be certain about...
...that's lying.
No, wrong (yet again).
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW is untrue.
...that's lying.
On 2022-11-30 16:48, geoff wrote:
On 1/12/2022 8:30 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-30 02:55, Mark wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got >>>>>> caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because the >>>>>> money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide.
But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they >>>>> know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your definition >>>> is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the
behaviour
you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying
doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be uncertain. >>>> The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that >>>> what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence >>>> and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW you cannot
actually be certain about...
...that's lying.
No, wrong (yet again).
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW is untrue.
...that's lying.
Wrong.
How can it not be lying if you pretend certainty when you know you
cannot be certain?
On 1/12/2022 2:09 pm, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-30 16:48, geoff wrote:
On 1/12/2022 8:30 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-30 02:55, Mark wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they got >>>>>>> caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it because >>>>>>> the
money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you to decide. >>>>>>> But it
was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they >>>>>> know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your
definition
is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the
behaviour
you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying >>>>> doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be
uncertain.
The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that >>>>> what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence >>>>> and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW you cannot
actually be certain about...
...that's lying.
No, wrong (yet again).
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW is untrue.
...that's lying.
Wrong.
How can it not be lying if you pretend certainty when you know you
cannot be certain?
That is simply 'being wrong'. If anybody should know that, it's you.
On 2022-11-30 01:26, RzR wrote:
On 11/30/2022 10:16 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 22:10, RzR wrote:
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams >>>>>>>>>>> ect impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton
backfired. Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their
manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"? >>>>>>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in >>>>>>>>> advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier
With absolutely no evidence.
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they
got caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it
because the money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you
to decide. But it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which
they know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break the
budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You really
need to wake up...
Let's see the quote...
...and the source.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/breach-financial-rules-lose-your-championship/ >>
And your dishonesty is exposed...
...by the parts you chose to omit:
'So the sanctions for breaching financial regulations will be sporting penalties of some sort, depending on the severity of the breach.'
"DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THE BREACH"
On 11/30/2022 10:29 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-30 01:26, RzR wrote:
On 11/30/2022 10:16 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 22:10, RzR wrote:
On 11/29/2022 9:25 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-29 03:28, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 11:14 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-27 23:40, RzR wrote:
On 11/28/2022 2:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2022-11-20 23:45, RzR wrote:
On 11/21/2022 12:41 AM, XYXPDQ wrote:
What did you think of the season? Which drivers and teams >>>>>>>>>>>> ect impressed or disapointed?
SHIT season. The attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton
backfired. Everyone is laughing at Red Bull and their
manipulated championships.
In what way was there an "attempt to dethrone Mercedes/Hamilton"? >>>>>>>>>>
they won too much, no?
No.
With absolutely no evidence.
There was a set of rule changes that every team knew long in >>>>>>>>>> advance.
I am suspecting, Red Bull knew (paid to know) a little earlier >>>>>>>>
LMAO. I am looking at the end result, and punishments, once they >>>>>>> got caught cheating. They have FIA in their pocket. Now is it
because the money, or dethroning Lewis/Merc, I leave it up to you >>>>>>> to decide. But it was not legit for sure up until now.
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which
they know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Brawn explicitly stated it will cost a championship if you break
the budget. Last I checked, all Red Bull championships stand. You
really need to wake up...
Let's see the quote...
...and the source.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/breach-financial-rules-lose-your-championship/
And your dishonesty is exposed...
...by the parts you chose to omit:
'So the sanctions for breaching financial regulations will be sporting
penalties of some sort, depending on the severity of the breach.'
"DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THE BREACH"
no shit...no wonder they immediately started talking about the catering overspending...not even a 5 year old kids would believe this...
On 2022-11-30 19:31, geoff wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Wrong.
How can it not be lying if you pretend certainty when you know you
cannot be certain?
That is simply 'being wrong'. If anybody should know that, it's you.
Nope.
The lie is in expressing as certain something you KNOW you CANNOT be
certain about.
On 2022-11-30 02:55, Mark wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
I love people who speak with certainty about things about which they
know they actually cannot be certain.
There's another word for it:
Lying.
Without passing any personal judgement on the argument, your definition
is wrong. Lying is not what you describe. Lying may create the behaviour
you describe, but so does overconfidence, confusion or bravado. Lying
doesn't actually need confidence, nor does it need you to be uncertain.
The key characteristic about lying is actual certainty: certainty that
what you are saying is untrue.
You can actually talk completely nonsense with (or without) confidence
and still not be lying. That's just called being "wrong".
(Of course, that doesn't have the emotional impact associated with
calling an individual's behaviour "lying").
I'm sorry, but I disagree.
When you pretend to be certain about something you KNOW you cannot
actually be certain about...
...that's lying.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-30 19:31, geoff wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Wrong.
How can it not be lying if you pretend certainty when you know you
cannot be certain?
That is simply 'being wrong'. If anybody should know that, it's you.
Nope.
The lie is in expressing as certain something you KNOW you CANNOT be
certain about.
OED:
An act or instance of lying; a false statement made with intent
to deceive
To lie, you have to be *intentionally* passing a falsehood. You
therefore need:
- To know what you are saying is false (not that you're simply
uncertain)
- To be saying it with the intent to pass it as true
- To intend to mislead the other person
Being wrong (or uncertain you're right) is not sufficient for it to be
a lie.
This is Usenet, any post that contradicts your own position has to be a
lie :)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 299 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:46:14 |
| Calls: | 6,690 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 12,225 |
| Messages: | 5,344,816 |
| Posted today: | 1 |