• Re: Silly chess - spoiler included!

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to bra on Sun Oct 24 15:06:04 2021
    On 10/24/2021 12:47 PM, bra wrote:
    Christian Horner. “It’s like a game of chess this race"

    Look, I want to watch a race, on the track: face-to-face driver contests in driving and tactical skill

    I do NOT want to watch a strategic "game of chess" with UTTERLY ABSURD tire changes after only 8-to-10 laps.

    Some spoiler included!

    I disagree with you on this Brafield.

    Although the opening game was a thrill,
    and it then changed into a chess match opening,
    and the middle also resembled a chess match,

    that created a fine closing game that was
    indeed a real "race, on the track: face-to-face
    driver contest in driving and tactical skill".
    Great driver against driver race with Verstappen leading
    with older tires trying to hold off the charging
    Hamilton.

    Seemed pretty thrilling and exciting to me.
    Very closely matched.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bra@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 24 15:30:51 2021
    On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 3:06:05 PM UTC-7, a425couple wrote:
    On 10/24/2021 12:47 PM, bra wrote:

    Although the opening game was a thrill,
    and it then changed into a chess match opening,
    and the middle also resembled a chess match,

    that created a fine closing game that was
    indeed a real "race, on the track: face-to-face
    driver contest in driving and tactical skill".
    Great driver against driver race with Verstappen leading
    with older tires trying to hold off the charging
    Hamilton.

    Seemed pretty thrilling and exciting to me.
    Very closely matched.

    But the "closely matched race" was manufactured by the teams, not by the drivers.
    The closely matched race could go on for ever, for hours: the FIA and the teams could just keep adding tyres, but the race is essentially contested and decided in 15 laps.
    I suppose the overriding factor is that an F1 race 'must' last for at least one hour, or preferably two.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ~misfit~@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 25 17:39:04 2021
    On 25/10/2021 11:06 am, a425couple wrote:
    On 10/24/2021 12:47 PM, bra wrote:
    Christian Horner. “It’s like a game of chess this race"

    Look, I want to watch a race, on the track: face-to-face driver contests in driving and tactical
    skill

    I do NOT want to watch a strategic "game of chess" with UTTERLY ABSURD  tire changes after only
    8-to-10 laps.

    Some spoiler included!

    I disagree with you on this Brafield.

    Although the opening game was a thrill,
    and it then changed into a chess match opening,
    and the middle also resembled a chess match,

    that created a fine closing game that was
    indeed a real "race, on the track: face-to-face
    driver contest in driving and tactical skill".
    Great driver against driver race with Verstappen leading
    with older tires trying to hold off the charging
    Hamilton.

    Seemed pretty thrilling and exciting to me.
    Very closely matched.

    Yep. That Honda engine is one of the best on the grid now, equal to or even better than the
    Mercedes by most accounts.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mr Gobrien@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 25 08:34:27 2021
    i don't know where you've been since the 1982 Austrian Grand Prix mate, but that was when all this Pit Stop Strategy malarkey started - genius engineer Gordon Murray at Brabham was trying to figure out ways to win races if you didn't have the best car.

    it was widely reported at the time - commentator James Hunt was a famous initial sceptic - until it started to work ......

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Austrian_Grand_Prix

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bra@21:1/5 to Mr Gobrien on Mon Oct 25 14:52:20 2021
    On Monday, October 25, 2021 at 8:34:28 AM UTC-7, Mr Gobrien wrote:
    i don't know where you've been since the 1982 Austrian Grand Prix mate, but that was when all this Pit Stop Strategy malarkey started - genius engineer Gordon Murray at Brabham was trying to figure out ways to win races if you didn't have the best car.

    I have been quietly snarling to myself in the background, muttering 'It's a question of winning a race against rivals, not about entertaining digital screen addicts."

    Soon, these genuinely marvelous F1 cars will be unable to complete FIVE laps on a set of tires, and the FIA will ---- what?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to bra on Wed Oct 27 11:13:34 2021
    On 10/24/2021 12:47 PM, bra wrote:
    Christian Horner. “It’s like a game of chess this race"

    Look, I want to watch a race, on the track: face-to-face driver contests in driving and tactical skill

    I do NOT want to watch a strategic "game of chess" with UTTERLY ABSURD tire changes after only 8-to-10 laps.


    (Dear Brafield, you may not care for the chess / strategic
    decisions of this championship, but here is one description
    that I found interesting.)

    F1 Armchair Experts
    Mark Danby · t3fp0go7csi6145o2r632h ·
    Austin Post race graphs… The last graph is telling of how the last stint played out.
    It was clear after Lewis took the lead , & Max was on his ass for the
    1st few laps - it was all gonna be uphill for Lewis to win this race. (I
    never believed he had a chance unless he/Merc cld keep track position throughout . Which brings us to the real story of this race. Tyre Deg
    was already gonna be key, but it some ways, this became a race like
    Monaco. Track position was KING! & the main reason for that, given the
    (high) tyre deg - was the 1st sector. The DRS ok the front straight was
    never gonna factor in. What was required was to a tyre over lap of
    1.2-1.5 secs to the car infront, to have any chance of being close all
    the way through to get the DRS out of turn 11. Max knew the key was to
    keep enough tyre life on his last stint, to enable him to have the edge
    through the 1st sector so the Charging Lewis wld never get close enough.
    This was a race that had Merc painted all over it after FP1. Merc had to
    raise their car a tad to counter for the bumps - & this took away their
    rear end adv. On the flip side - we saw why Red Bull are the most
    aggressive team when it comes to strategy! Something they were famous
    for even when they had the fastest car during the Seb years. They knew
    track position was key , & went super aggressive with pitting on lap 10, knowing Max wld come out in traffic . This is something Merc just wld
    never contemplate! So keep an eye on this from RB to do the same - on
    tracks that will suit the Merc, which is still the faster car . It’s now
    the tyres that seem to be playing a role . The Merc disliked the Med’s,
    the Red Bull dislikes the Harder tyres in the range.
    This is proving to be an epic battle btwn 2 drivers that cannot be
    separated! Lewis gave it his all, but Max was just as brilliant saving
    his tyres. Again, it will be the pitwall that can provide a tyre
    adv/strategy on the last stint that will prove the diff in this C’ship.

    (Now, I think the below is too simplistic, and
    ignores the likelyhood of strange things,
    like Bottas rear ending Max, or Perez putting
    a front wing end plate on Hamilton's rear tire.)


    In simple maths - Lewis needs to win 4 of the last 5 to be the Champion
    . For Max, 2 more wins & he’s home. For us the fans - best case scenario
    - wld still be a 12 pt lead for Max after Brazil with 3 to go. (Maybe
    the last sprint race cld be the Joker?) & then we get to the last race &
    it’s 6-7 points btwn them & who ever wins there is the Champ.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From News@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 27 14:48:01 2021
    On 10/27/2021 2:13 PM, a425couple wrote:
    On 10/24/2021 12:47 PM, bra wrote:
    Christian Horner. “It’s like a game of chess this race"

    Look, I want to watch a race, on the track: face-to-face driver
    contests in driving and tactical skill

    I do NOT want to watch a strategic "game of chess" with UTTERLY
    ABSURD  tire changes after only 8-to-10 laps.


    (Dear Brafield, you may not care for the chess / strategic
    decisions of this championship, but here is one description
    that I found interesting.)

    F1 Armchair Experts
    Mark Danby  · t3fp0go7csi6145o2r632h  ·
    Austin Post race graphs… The last graph is telling of how the last stint played out.
    It was clear after Lewis took the lead , & Max was on his ass for the
    1st few laps - it was all gonna be uphill for Lewis to win this race. (I never believed he had a chance unless he/Merc cld keep track position throughout . Which brings us to the real story of this race. Tyre Deg
    was already gonna be key, but it some ways, this became a race like
    Monaco. Track position was KING! & the main reason for that, given the
    (high) tyre deg - was the 1st sector. The DRS ok the front straight was
    never gonna factor in. What was required was to a tyre over lap of
    1.2-1.5 secs to the car infront, to have any chance of being close all
    the way through to get the DRS out of turn 11. Max knew the key was to
    keep enough tyre life on his last stint, to enable him to have the edge through the 1st sector so the Charging Lewis wld never get close enough.
    This was a race that had Merc painted all over it after FP1. Merc had to raise their car a tad to counter for the bumps - & this took away their
    rear end adv. On the flip side - we saw why Red Bull are the most
    aggressive team when it comes to strategy! Something they were famous
    for even when they had the fastest car during the Seb years. They knew
    track position was key , & went super aggressive with pitting on lap 10, knowing Max wld come out in traffic . This is something Merc just wld
    never contemplate! So keep an eye on this from RB to do the same - on
    tracks that will suit the Merc, which is still the faster car . It’s now the tyres that seem to be playing a role . The Merc disliked the Med’s,
    the Red Bull dislikes the Harder tyres in the range.
    This is proving to be an epic battle btwn 2 drivers that cannot be
    separated! Lewis gave it his all, but Max was just as brilliant saving
    his tyres. Again, it will be the pitwall that can provide a tyre
    adv/strategy on the last stint that will prove the diff in this C’ship.

    (Now, I think the below is too simplistic, and
    ignores the likelyhood of strange things,
    like Bottas rear ending Max, or Perez putting
    a front wing end plate on Hamilton's rear tire.)


    In simple maths - Lewis needs to win 4 of the last 5 to be the Champion
    . For Max, 2 more wins & he’s home. For us the fans - best case scenario
    - wld still be a 12 pt lead for Max after Brazil with 3 to go. (Maybe
    the last sprint race cld be the Joker?) & then we get to the last race & it’s 6-7 points btwn them & who ever wins there is the Champ.



    The joker will be Toto arguing for an enhanced points scheme for Mercs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)