Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization
no camera's on it?
Edmund
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
rejected. See the official document:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization no camera's on it?
Mark Jackson wrote:
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
rejected. See the official document:
That's what I said :-)
News wrote:
On 6/1/2022 4:58 PM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
Mark Jackson wrote:
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi
billion organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last
years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in
the Race Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last
year). However they did not breach the current ISC, so the
protest was rejected. See the official document:
That's what I said :-)
Got no traction, as originally stated.
You're confused. I suggest you read fully before you respond.
On 6/1/2022 11:11 AM, Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion organization
no camera's on it?
Edmund
Issue was raised, timely, and never got traction.
On 6/1/2022 4:58 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Mark Jackson wrote:
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi
billion organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last
years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in
the Race Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last
year). However they did not breach the current ISC, so the
protest was rejected. See the official document:
That's what I said :-)
Got no traction, as originally stated.
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
rejected. See the official document:
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
Edmund wrote:
Ver crossing the line or not?
To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
organization no camera's on it?
Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
rejected. See the official document:
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
So their official documents were contradictory. Insert face-palm emoji
here.
Sometimes I get the impression that the FIA couldn't organise a fuck-up
in a brothel.
One question that remains is why there was a need to change that rule in
the ISC? What was so wrong with it that needed to be changed? Who
proposed the change, with what justification, and who signed off on it?
Are they trying to force teams to employ more bookworms and fewer
engineers? Is the aim now the pinacle of language-lawyering rather than
the pinacle of motorsport?
Anyway, looking forward to more jolly hijinx from the ghost of Masi
later in the season. Can we have comic sound effects next time please.
Booioioioioing!
Phil
To some of us, the incompetence and corruption of the FIA (and other
similar organizations) is completely unsurprising.
What's amusing is that there are those who point to actions of the FIA
from time to time...
...AS IF THEY WERE COMPETENT.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 226:58:52 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,318,701 |