On 9/26/2021 8:35 AM, build wrote:
LANDO !
He started on pole, didn't even get a podium out of it,
ignored team orders to pit for wets (which would have
won him the race) and HE'S DOTD? Hilarious! as is
generally the case with the always politicized official
driver of the day.
On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 11:57:33 PM UTC+10, Heron wrote:
On 9/26/2021 8:35 AM, build wrote:
LANDO !
He started on pole, didn't even get a podium out of it,
ignored team orders to pit for wets (which would have
won him the race) and HE'S DOTD? Hilarious! as is
generally the case with the always politicized official
driver of the day.
Did you fail grade 2 again ?
LANDO !
On 9/26/2021 9:03 AM, build wrote:
On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 11:57:33 PM UTC+10, Heron wrote:
On 9/26/2021 8:35 AM, build wrote:
LANDO !
He started on pole, didn't even get a podium out of it,
ignored team orders to pit for wets (which would have
won him the race) and HE'S DOTD? Hilarious! as is
generally the case with the always politicized official
driver of the day.
Did you fail grade 2 again ?What an incredibly well reasoned cogent and convincing
argument, coming as it were straight from the local asylum.
On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 12:13:41 AM UTC+10, Heron wrote:
On 9/26/2021 9:03 AM, build wrote:
On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 11:57:33 PM UTC+10, Heron wrote:What an incredibly well reasoned cogent and convincing
On 9/26/2021 8:35 AM, build wrote:
LANDO !
He started on pole, didn't even get a podium out of it,
ignored team orders to pit for wets (which would have
won him the race) and HE'S DOTD? Hilarious! as is
generally the case with the always politicized official
driver of the day.
Did you fail grade 2 again ?
argument, coming as it were straight from the local asylum.
Sorry to hear you've been certified.
Hamilton, he recovered from a disaster Q3 and a poor start to win.
Norris get the more guts than brains award for staying out a lap to
long. And a major hat tip to Max for going from last to second.
LANDO !
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
Have to go with Verstappen
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in. Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 11:59:22 PM UTC+10, Sir Tim wrote:
Mark Jackson <> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he decided not to come in. Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
Yes, I’d go with Max too.
--On reflection I'd agree.
Sir Tim
build
Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in. Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team
believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
Yes, I’d go with Max too.
Mark Jackson <> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in. Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
Yes, I’d go with Max too.
--
Sir Tim
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was >going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised >Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team >believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was >>> going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on C4.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in
and he said NO!!!!
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in
and he said NO!!!!
Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team
believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
On 2021-09-27 9:59 AM, Sir Tim wrote:
Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain was >>> going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in. Conversely, Hamilton was told to box, did not
do so once, then was told more forcefully to come in because his team
believed heavier rain was imminent.
Have to go with Verstappen
Have to agree.
Yes, I’d go with Max too.
The Red Bull car, unlike the Mercedes, does seem to deal with following
other cars very well. Of course, a bit of talent in the driver's seat
doesn't hurt.
But 20th to 2nd is pretty damned impressive!
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore. Hopefully, a big lesson for him and I'm sure we will see him
at the front agai. BTW, he's fairly putting Ricciardo in the halfpenny
place!
Have to go with Verstappen
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com>
wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the rain
was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so advised >>>> Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more they
thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision – I
thought it was the way to go." https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold, but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren over
the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber. https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance >>>>>> but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the
rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so
advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in >>>> and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more they
thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision – I
thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren
over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his
verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance >>>>>> but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the
rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so
advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he
decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in >>>> and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more they
thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision – I
thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren
over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his
verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more they
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance >>>>>>> but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to
ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the
rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so
advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to come in >>>>> and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on C4. >>>
thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision – I
thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren
over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his
verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
On 10/1/2021 10:54 AM, News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance >>>>>>>> but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to >>>>>>>> ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the >>>>>>> rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so
advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to
come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on
C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more
they thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision
– I thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren
over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his
verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
F1 itself is hardly a farce, although the stewarding
can be and the risible awarding of DOTD certainly is.
On 10/1/2021 1:02 PM, Heron wrote:
On 10/1/2021 10:54 AM, News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding
performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to >>>>>>>>> ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the >>>>>>>> rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so >>>>>>>> advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to
come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights
on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more
they thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my
decision – I thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his
McLaren over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his >>>>> verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
F1 itself is hardly a farce, although the stewarding
can be and the risible awarding of DOTD certainly is.
Likewise, the risible 'primarily responsible' and 'wrong-with-right-to-defend' decisions, which absolutely taint F1.
Anyone check how bookies made out on those decisions?
On Friday, October 1, 2021 at 2:34:31 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2021-10-01 11:10 a.m., News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 1:02 PM, Heron wrote:You get the whole 'wrong-with-right-to-defend' wrong, sunshine.
On 10/1/2021 10:54 AM, News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martin...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjac...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <bui...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding
performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to >>>>>>>>>>> ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the >>>>>>>>>> rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so >>>>>>>>>> advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to >>>>>>>>> come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights >>>>>>>> on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more >>>>>>> they thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my
decision – I thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold, >>>>>>> but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his
McLaren over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his >>>>>>> verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit >>>>>>> lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others, >>>>>>> such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
F1 itself is hardly a farce, although the stewarding
can be and the risible awarding of DOTD certainly is.
Likewise, the risible 'primarily responsible' and
'wrong-with-right-to-defend' decisions, which absolutely taint F1.
Anyone check how bookies made out on those decisions?
You are allowed to be in the wrong place for going through a corner as
fast as possible.
Every driver who has ever moved to the inside to defend has taken the
wrong line for best speed.
The only time you can't do it is when an overtaking driver has
established himself in a position early enough that you're not allowed
to run him off the road.
That's what stewards said about Hamilton in Monza.
ya no passing allowed
you have been spouting this shit for months
single fucking file
nice and safe
dont scratch the paint
you fucking pussy
sunshine.
On 2021-10-01 11:10 a.m., News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 1:02 PM, Heron wrote:
On 10/1/2021 10:54 AM, News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martin...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjac...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <bui...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding
performance
but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to >>>>>>>>> ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the >>>>>>>> rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so >>>>>>>> advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to >>>>>>> come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights >>>>>> on C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more
they thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my
decision – I thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold, >>>>> but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his
McLaren over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his >>>>> verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
F1 itself is hardly a farce, although the stewarding
can be and the risible awarding of DOTD certainly is.
Likewise, the risible 'primarily responsible' and 'wrong-with-right-to-defend' decisions, which absolutely taint F1.You get the whole 'wrong-with-right-to-defend' wrong, sunshine.
Anyone check how bookies made out on those decisions?
You are allowed to be in the wrong place for going through a corner as
fast as possible.
Every driver who has ever moved to the inside to defend has taken the
wrong line for best speed.
The only time you can't do it is when an overtaking driver has
established himself in a position early enough that you're not allowed
to run him off the road.
That's what stewards said about Hamilton in Monza.
On 10/1/2021 10:54 AM, News wrote:
On 10/1/2021 9:51 AM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:43 PM, Heron wrote:
On 9/27/2021 12:26 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:44:35 -0400, Mark Jackson
<mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 9/27/2021 3:17 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:35:44 -0700 (PDT), build <buildy@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
LANDO !
My heart would like to give to him after an outstanding performance >>>>>>>> but fucking up the tyre decision was just too bad a decision to >>>>>>>> ignore.
That's overly harsh - it was a team failure. They believed the >>>>>>> rain was
going to hold steady, not get markedly worse, and apparently so
advised
Norris, and on the basis of "current conditions are manageable" he >>>>>>> decided not to come in.
I must have picked it up wrong, I thought his engineer said to
come in
and he said NO!!!!
That was my impression too, but I only saw the edited highlights on
C4.
"I made a decision just as much as the team. In fact it was more
they thought I should box and I decided to stay out. So, my decision
– I thought it was the way to go."
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.everything-was-under-control-devastated-norris-convinced-win-was-on-without.611kJDmatc36Itxx3nXmRg.html
While those around him stopped for wet tyres, Norris took the bold,
but ultimately misguided, decision to stay out and nurse his McLaren
over the line.
“No,” yelled Norris when race engineer Will Joseph asked for his
verdict over whether to take on the intermediate rubber.
https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/19606690.heartbreaking---lando-norris-devastated-victory-eludes-russia/
Not to mention that he unjustifiably escaped a penalty for a pit
lane infraction; a DOTD farce indeed. Not unlike so many others,
such as Ocon winning a race and his teammate Alonso getting DOT.
https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/why-alfa-believes-that-norris-should-have-been-penalised-in-sochi/6678130/
The sort of 'stewarding' situational logic that makes F1 a farce.
F1 itself is hardly a farce, although the stewarding
can be and the risible awarding of DOTD certainly is.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 74:08:37 |
| Calls: | 6,657 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,203 |
| Messages: | 5,332,501 |
| Posted today: | 1 |