• Re: Benson - what would he know, eh ?

    From texas gate@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Jan 24 12:40:03 2022
    On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 1:29:15 PM UTC-7, geoff wrote:

    Benson - what would he know, eh ?

    Why the stupid fucking title?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 25 09:29:05 2022
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From News@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Jan 24 16:12:55 2022
    On 1/24/2022 3:29 PM, geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff


    Bone saws

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Jan 24 13:17:52 2022
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 24 13:24:42 2022
    On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 2:17:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    Well no useless, stupid, trolling, bullshit, that you always add.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon Jan 24 13:52:42 2022
    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
    you'll stand behind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 24 21:50:06 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 24 14:35:12 2022
    On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 2:52:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
    you'll stand behind.

    lol. fuck are you getting desperate

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Jan 24 18:39:06 2022
    On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 2:52:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.

    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
    you'll stand behind.

    you said you didnt move goal posts
    you fucking faggot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 19:17:35 2022
    On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Jan 24 22:48:52 2022
    On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.

    And yet you won't commit.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 07:27:17 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.

    And yet you won't commit.

    Got it.

    Got what Alan? After all the mealy mouthed, vague, non-committal
    half-claims you have made on this subject... yet another meaningless
    comment.

    Not shocked.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon Jan 24 23:57:25 2022
    On 2022-01-24 11:27 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.

    And yet you won't commit.

    Got it.

    Got what Alan? After all the mealy mouthed, vague, non-committal
    half-claims you have made on this subject... yet another meaningless
    comment.

    Not shocked.


    And yet you've contributed...

    ...what to this thread?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 07:24:22 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
    you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
    adult.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon Jan 24 23:56:57 2022
    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
    you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
    adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to the discussion a second time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 11:58:31 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:27 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.

    And yet you won't commit.

    Got it.

    Got what Alan? After all the mealy mouthed, vague, non-committal half-claims you have made on this subject... yet another meaningless comment.

    Not shocked.


    And yet you've contributed...

    ...what to this thread?

    Exposure.

    :-D

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 12:02:55 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
    adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 07:44:47 2022
    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
    adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to the
    discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 07:55:20 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 8:44:50 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Ducked again.

    you fucking juvenile twat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 09:05:37 2022
    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
    of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
    the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
    for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective") doesn't
    answer the question I asked.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 16:51:33 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
    of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
    the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
    for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 17:06:43 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
    of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
    the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
    for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind works;
    how can someone duck a question they have not previously been asked?

    No need to apologise for your lies, it's clearly an habitual problem.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 17:08:25 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
    was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
    out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
    doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 09:11:37 2022
    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
    was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
    out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
    doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?"

    Your answer to that question implies you have reached conclusions about
    what he had to say.

    So here's another chance:

    What conclusions did you reach?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 09:13:06 2022
    On 2022-01-25 9:06 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
    of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
    ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
    the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
    for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind works;
    how can someone duck a question they have not previously been asked?

    I asked a question:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?"

    That was the entirety of my text in the post, and you replied:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    But now you want to duck on explaining what you meant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 09:21:06 2022
    On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion
    that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
    making a statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
    work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
    you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
    doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.

    Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?

    If not, then you were responding to my question.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 17:22:57 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:06 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
    was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
    out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind
    works; how can someone duck a question they have not previously
    been asked?

    I asked a question:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?"


    Not of me, you lying little cunt.

    That was the entirety of my text in the post, and you replied:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    But now you want to duck on explaining what you meant.

    Liar.

    You haven't asked me to explain anything yet I did anyway.

    If you don't understand someone's reply then you should ask what they
    meant not start a series of lies.

    This habitual lying of yours does not help your cause.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 17:18:22 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion
    that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
    making a statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
    work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
    you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
    doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.

    Your answer to that question implies you have reached conclusions
    about what he had to say.

    So here's another chance:

    What conclusions did you reach?

    See above.

    :-D

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Jan 25 09:28:16 2022
    On 2022-01-25 9:22 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:06 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
    was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
    statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
    here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
    intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
    added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
    out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind
    works; how can someone duck a question they have not previously
    been asked?

    I asked a question:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
    substance?"


    Not of me, you lying little cunt.

    You answered it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 17:25:42 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion
    that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
    making a statement you'll stand behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
    weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of
    an intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
    Benson added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike
    you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
    work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
    you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds
    perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.

    Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?

    If not, then you were responding to my question.

    I responded to your post.

    You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking it
    was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jan 25 09:53:37 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:28:51 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    you fucking goof

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From News@21:1/5 to texas gate on Tue Jan 25 15:22:54 2022
    On 1/25/2022 12:53 PM, texas gate wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:28:51 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    you fucking goof


    Bone saws for the both of them

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 26 10:44:59 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the
    discussion that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you
    are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
    actually making a statement you'll stand
    behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
    weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something
    worthy of an intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
    Benson added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
    unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the
    intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds
    perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of
    any substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.

    Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?

    If not, then you were responding to my question.

    I responded to your post.

    You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking
    it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?


    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    Lol, you truly are a fuckwit.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jan 26 20:02:33 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:28:51 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    send him your book of trolling tips

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Jan 27 13:53:55 2022
    On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 2:44:50 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    I asked a question...

    ...and you answered.

    fuck off stupid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Thu Jan 27 13:44:48 2022
    On 2022-01-26 2:44 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the
    discussion that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded you
    are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
    actually making a statement you'll stand
    behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
    weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something
    worthy of an intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
    Benson added to the discussion a second time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
    unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the
    intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds
    perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds
    perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of
    any substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.

    Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?

    If not, then you were responding to my question.

    I responded to your post.

    You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking
    it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?


    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    Lol, you truly are a fuckwit.


    I asked a question...

    ...and you answered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jan 28 10:08:17 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-26 2:44 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031


    geoff

    What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?

    I guess it depends on how close minded
    you are.


    What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
    actually making a statement you'll stand
    behind.

    Hah!

    Coming from the most mealy mouthed
    non-commital weasel here... ...here have
    your biscuit.

    Here's a challenge for you; say something
    worthy of an intelligent adult.


    I already have.

    But I notice you've ducked stating what you
    think Benson added to the discussion a second
    time.

    You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
    unlike you.

    ...but I'll tell you since you lack the
    intelligence to work it out for yourself. It
    adds perspective; something you lack.

    Ducked again.

    Liar, again.


    Nope.

    A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.

    Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..

    ...when did you ask me any such question?


    Implicitly when you replied with:

    "I guess it depends on how close minded you are."

    to my post asking:

    "What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
    of any substance?"


    Lol, what utter bollocks.

    Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking
    retard.

    Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my
    post?

    If not, then you were responding to my question.

    I responded to your post.

    You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was
    ducking it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?


    Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.

    Lol, you truly are a fuckwit.


    I asked a question...

    ...and you answered.

    QED

    Lol, you should have taken the fifth.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)