1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUTOS.SPORT.F1

  • Max

    From Sir Tim@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 13 12:22:03 2021
    With 131 races and 16 wins under his belt surely no one can now deny that
    Max is already one of the best drivers the sport has ever seen. However, if
    he is to win the WDC on a regular basis he is going to have to remember the
    old adage, “in order to finish first, first you must finish”

    The Silverstone coming-together with Hamilton was probably more Lewis’s
    fault than Max’s, whereas at Monza it was vice versa, but on both occasions Max could have remained in the race had he simply *backed off*. Lack of restraint is his only failing as far as I can see.

    --
    Sir Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edmund@21:1/5 to Sir Tim on Mon Sep 13 18:56:47 2021
    On 9/13/21 2:22 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
    With 131 races and 16 wins under his belt surely no one can now deny that
    Max is already one of the best drivers the sport has ever seen. However, if he is to win the WDC on a regular basis he is going to have to remember the old adage, “in order to finish first, first you must finish”

    The Silverstone coming-together with Hamilton was probably more Lewis’s fault than Max’s, whereas at Monza it was vice versa, but on both occasions Max could have remained in the race had he simply *backed off*. Lack of restraint is his only failing as far as I can see.
    True
    Ham didn't have to cross the track and block a car at racing speed while
    he left the pit lane at a much lower speed either.

    Funny thing : both Ham and max are exactly the same, they don't care and
    rather crash then give way to another.





    --
    “The further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak it”

    George Orwell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to Edmund on Tue Sep 14 10:35:17 2021
    On 14/09/2021 4:56 am, Edmund wrote:
    On 9/13/21 2:22 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
    With 131 races and 16 wins under his belt surely no one can now deny that
    Max is already one of the best drivers the sport has ever seen.
    However, if
    he is to win the WDC on a regular basis he is going to have to
    remember the
    old adage, “in order to finish first, first you must finish”

    The Silverstone coming-together with Hamilton was probably more Lewis’s
    fault than Max’s, whereas at Monza it was vice versa, but on both
    occasions
    Max could have remained in the race had he simply *backed off*. Lack of
    restraint is his only failing as far as I can see.
    True
    Ham didn't have to cross the track and block a car at racing speed while
    he left the pit lane at a much lower speed either.

    Funny thing : both Ham and max are exactly the same, they don't care and rather crash then give way to another.

    Not necessarily.

    Look at the previous incident' that race, when VER drove an almost
    identical defending line . HAM left the track and didn't attempt to
    veer back on. Which is what VER dangerously did in the prang, and was
    punished for.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to Edmund on Mon Sep 13 21:29:59 2021
    On 2021-09-13 9:56 a.m., Edmund wrote:
    On 9/13/21 2:22 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
    With 131 races and 16 wins under his belt surely no one can now deny that
    Max is already one of the best drivers the sport has ever seen.
    However, if
    he is to win the WDC on a regular basis he is going to have to
    remember the
    old adage, “in order to finish first, first you must finish”

    The Silverstone coming-together with Hamilton was probably more Lewis’s
    fault than Max’s, whereas at Monza it was vice versa, but on both
    occasions
    Max could have remained in the race had he simply *backed off*. Lack of
    restraint is his only failing as far as I can see.
    True
    Ham didn't have to cross the track and block a car at racing speed while
    he left the pit lane at a much lower speed either.

    He didn't "block [] a car while he left the pit lane". He very clearly
    didn't move left until after the line he was obliged to follow.

    And when he did move left, he initially left Verstappen room.

    That does argue that he knew Verstappen was there.


    Funny thing : both Ham and max are exactly the same, they don't care and rather crash then give way to another.

    It was close.

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Sep 13 21:32:05 2021
    On 2021-09-13 3:35 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 14/09/2021 4:56 am, Edmund wrote:
    On 9/13/21 2:22 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
    With 131 races and 16 wins under his belt surely no one can now deny
    that
    Max is already one of the best drivers the sport has ever seen.
    However, if
    he is to win the WDC on a regular basis he is going to have to
    remember the
    old adage, “in order to finish first, first you must finish”

    The Silverstone coming-together with Hamilton was probably more Lewis’s >>> fault than Max’s, whereas at Monza it was vice versa, but on both
    occasions
    Max could have remained in the race had he simply *backed off*. Lack of
    restraint is his only failing as far as I can see.
    True
    Ham didn't have to cross the track and block a car at racing speed
    while he left the pit lane at a much lower speed either.

    Funny thing : both Ham and max are exactly the same, they don't care
    and rather crash then give way to another.

    Not necessarily.

    Look at the previous incident' that race, when VER drove an almost
    identical defending line . HAM left the track and didn't attempt to veer
    back on. Which is what VER dangerously did in the prang, and was
    punished for.

    And frankly, it was the first incident that was far more egregious.

    In the lap 1, turn 4 situation, Hamilton had CLEARLY gotten all the way alongside Verstappen, so there is simply no arguing that he should have
    been given room.

    I suspect that Verstappen's penalty when the shoe was on the other foot
    is in part because the stewards didn't penalize him for forcing Hamilton
    off the track in the first incident.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to texas gate on Mon Sep 13 21:52:03 2021
    On 2021-09-13 9:50 p.m., texas gate wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:30:01 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    only just
    like your new boyfriends tiny penis
    entering you huge diseased asshole
    you fucking pig


    Wow.

    You're so very, very dull.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan Baker on Mon Sep 13 22:00:27 2021
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:30:01 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    But you want Mark to accept your cheating picks in the pool?
    But only just?

    You fucking piece of shit
    Trolling cock sucker.

    But only just?
    Like your boyfriend licking your asshole to orgasm?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to texas gate on Mon Sep 13 22:09:37 2021
    On 2021-09-13 10:00 p.m., texas gate wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:30:01 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    But you want Mark to accept your cheating picks in the pool?
    But only just?

    You fucking piece of shit
    Trolling cock sucker.

    But only just?
    Like your boyfriend licking your asshole to orgasm?


    Wow.

    It's hard to believe anyone can be this dull.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan Baker on Mon Sep 13 21:50:25 2021
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:30:01 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    only just
    like your new boyfriends tiny penis
    entering you huge diseased asshole
    you fucking pig

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan Baker on Mon Sep 13 22:12:22 2021
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:30:01 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    I can accept the stewards reasons... ...but only just.

    What about your reasons for
    cheating in the rasf1 pool for 2 weeks?
    But only just?
    You fucking jack ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From texas gate@21:1/5 to Alan Baker on Mon Sep 13 22:14:41 2021
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 11:09:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    It's hard to believe anyone can be this dull.

    believe it. you fucking idiot

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to texas gate on Mon Sep 13 22:22:34 2021
    On 2021-09-13 10:14 p.m., texas gate wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 11:09:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    It's hard to believe anyone can be this dull.

    believe it. you fucking idiot


    We can no add unbelievably dim to your dullness.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sir Tim@21:1/5 to Alan Baker on Tue Sep 14 07:02:31 2021
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2021-09-13 10:14 p.m., texas gate wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 11:09:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    It's hard to believe anyone can be this dull.

    believe it. you fucking idiot


    We can no add unbelievably dim to your dullness.

    Alan, please stop replying to this moron because when you do I get to see
    his rubbish. The only alternative is to block you too, which I don’t want
    to do.

    --
    Sir Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Baker@21:1/5 to Sir Tim on Tue Sep 14 00:19:13 2021
    On 2021-09-14 12:02 a.m., Sir Tim wrote:
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2021-09-13 10:14 p.m., texas gate wrote:
    On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 11:09:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    It's hard to believe anyone can be this dull.

    believe it. you fucking idiot


    We can no add unbelievably dim to your dullness.

    Alan, please stop replying to this moron because when you do I get to see
    his rubbish. The only alternative is to block you too, which I don’t want to do.


    Sorry, Tim.

    I'll try to restrain myself.

    But he makes it so much fun!

    ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)