On Wed Dec 20 00:19:24 2023
mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) wrote:
muzician21 wrote:
Hadn't played a 45 in a long time. It seemed to me they always
sounded
"overloaded", distorted, never as "clean" as an
LP.
Just got a 45 off Ebay - brand new condition. As I do with any
vinyl
before it gets played I hit it with vacuum irrigation using the
Disc
Doctor solution and brushes, distilled water rinse.
Yup, sounds distorted with a buzzy, grainy edge. My turntable is
an
SL1200 MK2 with an Audio Technica catridge in good condition.
While
not a $100k exotic setup it should be up to the task of playing
the
disc. Clean condition Direct To Disc albums sound great on it.
What's the story with 45's?
Does anybody have a good enough memory to understand if when 45s were
new they still had the difference in sound that you might be hearing
today?
This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=181909909#181909909
Sound quality aside, legend has it that when Columbia introduced the "LP" it used 33 1/3 RPM because radio transcriptions used that speed. RCA wanted to counter with a new "single" and required that it be "any speed except 33 1/3 RPM". The "45" was
born. Is it just a coincidence that 45+33=78?
"If you notice the sound, it's wrong" Roy W. Rising
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)