but the simple fact that the court has agreed to hear the challenge shows there may be something to it.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4357873-supreme-court-will-hear-challenge-to-jan-6-obstruction-charge/
On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 5:50:46 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:33 AM, ScottW wrote:
but the simple fact that the court has agreed to hear the challenge shows there may be something to it.Unless the court means to overturn a lower court that thinks there's
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4357873-supreme-court-will-hear-challenge-to-jan-6-obstruction-charge/
something to it.
Pehaps you missed as you often do, the part where an appeals court had already upheld DoJs abuse of power.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:15:25 |
Calls: | 6,707 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,239 |
Messages: | 5,351,615 |