https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other
mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations. Just dumber and dumber.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other
mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.Withholding money is withholding money.
Just dumber and dumber.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Withholding money is withholding money.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations. >>> Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Withholding money is withholding money.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproarWithholding money is withholding money.
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
Yes they are. Their terms of service prohibit it. I posted how this works months ago and yet you remain...stubbornly and intentionally ignorant.
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproarWithholding money is withholding money.
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn >>>>>> President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other
mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's >>>>>> response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing >>>>>> antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
Yes they are. Their terms of service prohibit it. I posted how this works months ago and yet you remain...stubbornly and intentionally ignorant.You've referred to Adsense once and didn't mention exclusivity being a requirement.
The AdSense Program policies pages doesn't mention it nor does the Terms
of Service, which has this to say:
"Other than as set out expressly in the Agreement, neither party will acquire any right, title, or interest in any intellectual property
rights belonging to the other party or to the other party's licensors."
I'm welcome to being shown you did explain that google has an exclusive agreement that sponsored content can't be offered to other websites, aggregators, news media, etc.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:You've referred to Adsense once and didn't mention exclusivity being a
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:Yes they are. Their terms of service prohibit it. I posted how this works >>> months ago and yet you remain...stubbornly and intentionally ignorant.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories. >>
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproarWithholding money is withholding money.
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>>>>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn >>>>>>>> President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>>>>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's >>>>>>>> response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing >>>>>>>> antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>>>>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
requirement.
The AdSense Program policies pages doesn't mention it nor does the Terms
of Service, which has this to say:
I posted a link to an explanation of using web host software that will allow multiple ad providers for the same space in a web page that specifically says Google will not allow it.
"Other than as set out expressly in the Agreement, neither party will
acquire any right, title, or interest in any intellectual property
rights belonging to the other party or to the other party's licensors."
How you find this blah blah relevant is just a gross display of ignorance.
I'm welcome to being shown you did explain that google has an exclusive
agreement that sponsored content can't be offered to other websites,
aggregators, news media, etc.
You seem completely confused between advertising content and other types of content.
Feeling they should be paid despite breaking the rules is entitlement.
mINE109 wrote:
Witless has gotten quite lazy of late. Could be the impending imprisonment
Feeling they should be paid despite breaking the rules is entitlement.
of Dumpster has made them deeply unsettled.
On 10/23/23 12:06 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:requirement.
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproarWithholding money is withholding money.
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1
check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn >>>>>>>> President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other
mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's >>>>>>>> response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing >>>>>>>> antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I
look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
Yes they are. Their terms of service prohibit it. I posted how this works
months ago and yet you remain...stubbornly and intentionally ignorant. >> You've referred to Adsense once and didn't mention exclusivity being a
The AdSense Program policies pages doesn't mention it nor does the Terms >> of Service, which has this to say:
I posted a link to an explanation of using web host software that will allowThat's a different subject, the right to place ads for money.
multiple ad providers for the same space in a web page that specifically says Google will not allow it.
I wonder
if google having broken the agreement, pjmedia could get a different sponsor.
However, if they prefer to take google money in the future,
they have to play by the rules.
"Other than as set out expressly in the Agreement, neither party will
acquire any right, title, or interest in any intellectual property
rights belonging to the other party or to the other party's licensors."
How you find this blah blah relevant is just a gross display of ignorance.Because my point was pjmedia retains the right to sell their piece to syndication or other publishers, "paying pjmedia to run their stories."
I'm welcome to being shown you did explain that google has an exclusive >> agreement that sponsored content can't be offered to other websites,
aggregators, news media, etc.
You seem completely confused between advertising content and other types of content.No, you didn't explain yourself well enough. If pjmedia wants to be paid
to host ads placed by google, they have to play by google's rules of
which they are in violation according to the only ones who count, google.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:57:18 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 12:06 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4,
mINE109 wrote:
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7,
mINE109 wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
That's a different subject, the right to place ads for money.You've referred to Adsense once and didn't mention exclusivityNor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to runWithholding money is withholding money.Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows
withholding money is bad, I look forward to your
condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement
to charitable donations. Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money. He is not
preventing anyone else from donating money
their stories.
Yes they are. Their terms of service prohibit it. I posted
how this works months ago and yet you remain...stubbornly
and intentionally ignorant.
being a requirement.
The AdSense Program policies pages doesn't mention it nor does
the Terms of Service, which has this to say:
I posted a link to an explanation of using web host software
that will allow multiple ad providers for the same space in a web
page that specifically says Google will not allow it.
That IS the subject.
I wonder if google having broken the agreement, pjmedia could get
a different sponsor.
Google is pretty dominant in that service but yes...they could try.
But the time window for the piece they refused to monetize is really
short. So it's probably not worth it....it's why software that will automatically redirect the space to another provider has appeared
but google won't allow it.
However, if they prefer to take google money in the future, they
have to play by the rules.
Hence my complaint....google wants to be a censor. And if you pay
attention you'll see they taken their power way too far.
Because my point was pjmedia retains the right to sell their piece"Other than as set out expressly in the Agreement, neither
party will acquire any right, title, or interest in any
intellectual property rights belonging to the other party or
to the other party's licensors."
How you find this blah blah relevant is just a gross display of
ignorance.
to syndication or other publishers, "paying pjmedia to run their
stories."
That doesn't include the ad space.
At best they could pay to have their site linked in other stories.
Google can't care or even know about that. The more traffic the more Google gets from the
advertisers. You'll see a lot of cross links among townhall media
sites.
No, you didn't explain yourself well enough. If pjmedia wants toI'm welcome to being shown you did explain that google has an
exclusive agreement that sponsored content can't be offered to
other websites, aggregators, news media, etc.
You seem completely confused between advertising content and
other types of content.
be paid to host ads placed by google, they have to play by
google's rules of which they are in violation according to the only
ones who count, google.
You just surrendered all advertiser funded on-line content to google censorship.
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Withholding money is withholding money.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproar
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
Feeling they should be paid despite breaking the rules is entitlement.
On 10/23/23 4:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:57:18 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 12:06 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4,
mINE109 wrote:
Private actions aren't censorship.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:13:34 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 4:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:57:18 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 12:06 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4,
mINE109 wrote:
Private actions aren't censorship.
Remember that while I'm duct taping your mouth.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:13:34 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 4:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:57:18 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 12:06 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 9:33:21 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/23/23 10:28 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:29:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4,
mINE109 wrote:
Private actions aren't censorship.
Remember that while I'm duct taping your mouth.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:29:41 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 10/22/23 1:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 1:51:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Nor is google preventing others from paying pjmedia to run their stories.
On 10/21/23 11:43 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:31:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/university-pennsylvania-grapples-donor-crisis-after-palestine-writes-event-causes-uproarWithholding money is withholding money.
"A prominent University of Pennsylvania donor sent his alma mater a $1 >>>>>> check with an annual pledge for the same amount as long as UPenn
President Liz Magill remains at the school, joining a handful of other >>>>>> mega-donors who continue to withhold donations over the school's
response to the Israel-Hamas conflict and accusations of excusing
antisemitism."
Since the google/PJMedia contretemps shows withholding money is bad, I >>>>>> look forward to your condemnation.
Now you equate manipulating a business arrangement to charitable donations.
Just dumber and dumber.
Not donating money is not donating money.
He is not preventing anyone else from donating money
NO!
Deplatforming is denying OTHER PEOPLE the opportunity to spend or contribute money.
Ceasing donations is an individual's choice as to whether to donate money. Big difference. And too difficult for you to comprehend.
Private actions aren't censorship.
Remember that while I'm duct taping your mouth.Threats of violence would be violations of google's terms of conduct.
mINE109 wrote:
Threats of violence would be violations of google's terms of conduct.Private actions aren't censorship.
Remember that while I'm duct taping your mouth.
Small children throw tantrums and need time-outs. Sometimes
they eavesdrop on grownups and learn fancy words like "censorship".
Next thing you know, they're whining that Mommy and Daddy are
"censoring" them.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 24:04:40 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,352,248 |