1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUDIO.OPINION

  • Google censors protect palestinian protestors

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 19 10:34:53 2023
    Last week, PJ Media columnist J. Christian Adams wrote an article here titled “Meet the Harvard Law Students Defending Hamas.”

    Adams, president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, called on bar associations to thoroughly scrutinize students who signed the letter that “excuses the wholesale slaughter of innocents and literally shifts blame to Israel,” noting that they “
    exhibit a lack of character and fitness to practice law.” He then went on to highlight the public biographies of the leaders of these groups at Harvard Law.

    So what did Google do? It demonetized the article so that we can’t derive any revenue from it. They claim it was “dangerous” and “derogatory” and ensured we would take a financial loss because we still have to pay our writers when they do this
    to us, which is increasingly common.

    Google offers no reasons for its claim that the article was dangerous. They just expect us to shut up and take it — and stop writing about topics that go against The Narrative.

    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Oct 19 14:40:40 2023
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.

    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 20 18:48:48 2023
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic stupidity?

    You know...the flea's a turd. But he's open and honest about his turdlyness. You....you'll hide your scuminess in a cloak of ignorance that's just too ignorant to be real.
    You're a fraud. You have no integrity.
    You're a blind link.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 20 20:05:26 2023
    <growl...> YAPYAYAP! SNARL!

    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.
    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic stupidity?

    You're pretty weak at the analysis part of problem-solving, Witless.

    You know...the flea's a turd. But he's open and honest about his turdlyness.

    [blush]

    I never knew I have your admiration. That's quite surprising.

    You....you'll hide your scuminess in a cloak of ignorance that's just too ignorant to be real.
    You're a fraud. You have no integrity.
    You're a blind link.

    Just to scratch the surface, maybe consider that your ability to comprehend the world is compromised. As one example, you still cling to the Dumpsterian fantasy
    of a "stolen" election. (You just admitted that earlier today.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Oct 21 10:00:00 2023
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic stupidity?

    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These dudes, the
    Public Interest Legal Foundation, aren't hurting for money (over $3m in
    revenue in 2021) or influence (John Eastman is a former director and
    they enjoy funding from the Bradley Foundation among others).

    You know...the flea's a turd. But he's open and honest about his turdlyness.
    You....you'll hide your scuminess in a cloak of ignorance that's just too ignorant to be real.

    Yes, that 'cloak of ignorance' is in fact not real.

    You're a fraud. You have no integrity.
    You're a blind link.

    Who would have guessed that contradicted by facts and logic you would
    devolve into insults?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 21 10:22:45 2023
    On 10/21/23 10:00 AM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

      Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic
    stupidity?

    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These dudes, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, aren't hurting for money (over $3m in revenue in 2021) or influence (John Eastman is a former director and
    they enjoy funding from the Bradley Foundation among others).

    If you meant PJ Media, they have a history of claims against google:

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/aug/29/donald-trump/no-96-google-news-stories-trump-arent-left-wing-ou/

    And their ownership, the Salem Group, wouldn't even notice the missing
    income of a single media post from google.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 21 09:56:09 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:00:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic stupidity?
    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These dudes, the Public Interest Legal Foundation,

    PJMedia is part of the Townhall Group owned by Salem Media which has about 350M$
    annual revenue. I don't know WTF you're babbling about in your misinformation.
    But it doesn't matter squat when a publicly traded media company is being squeezed by google censors.

    What you're claiming is actually even worse in that constitutional rights are only for the rich because they can afford to ignore the censors.

    WTF is wrong with you?

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 21 09:59:21 2023
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:22:49 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/21/23 10:00 AM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your epic
    stupidity?

    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These dudes, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, aren't hurting for money (over $3m in revenue in 2021) or influence (John Eastman is a former director and
    they enjoy funding from the Bradley Foundation among others).
    If you meant PJ Media,

    Why is there an if in you?

    they have a history of claims against google:

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/aug/29/donald-trump/no-96-google-news-stories-trump-arent-left-wing-ou/

    And their ownership, the Salem Group, wouldn't even notice the missing income of a single media post from google.

    OMG....that's so ignorant of what is happening and I've posted multiple times in the subject.

    I see why Joe's dementia is tolerated by you....he's simply functioning at a higher cognitive level than you ever could.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Oct 21 12:53:14 2023
    On 10/21/23 11:56 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:00:07 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your
    epic stupidity?
    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These
    dudes, the Public Interest Legal Foundation,

    PJMedia is part of the Townhall Group owned by Salem Media which has
    about 350M$ annual revenue. I don't know WTF you're babbling about
    in your misinformation. But it doesn't matter squat when a publicly
    traded media company is being squeezed by google censors.

    See my other post.

    What you're claiming is actually even worse in that constitutional
    rights are only for the rich because they can afford to ignore the
    censors.

    Making terms of service complaints isn't censorship.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Oct 21 12:59:41 2023
    On 10/21/23 11:59 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 8:22:49 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/21/23 10:00 AM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 10/20/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 12:41:11 PM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 10/19/23 12:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    Google is a threat to free speech and democracy.
    By not paying? Sounds more like yer dudes feel entitled.

    Are you really this stupid or just trying to annoy me with your
    epic stupidity?

    That is your complaint: Google "demonetized" yer dudes. These
    dudes, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, aren't hurting for
    money (over $3m in revenue in 2021) or influence (John Eastman is
    a former director and they enjoy funding from the Bradley
    Foundation among others).
    If you meant PJ Media,

    Why is there an if in you?

    Sorry?

    they have a history of claims against google:

    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/aug/29/donald-trump/no-96-google-news-stories-trump-arent-left-wing-ou/


    And their ownership, the Salem Group, wouldn't even notice the missing
    income of a single media post from google.

    OMG....that's so ignorant of what is happening and I've posted
    multiple times in the subject.

    The Salem Group's support of RWNJ propaganda websites? If you mean "demonetization" yes, you've mentioned it and its always a question of
    entitled content creators demanding to be paid for uploads.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 21 11:00:09 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    What you're claiming is actually even worse in that constitutional
    rights are only for the rich because they can afford to ignore the censors.
    Making terms of service complaints isn't censorship.

    Shouldn't your analysis allow for the infinite victimhood of the persecuted right-wing mobs and gangs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Sat Oct 21 13:08:13 2023
    On 10/21/23 1:00 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
    mINE109 wrote:

    What you're claiming is actually even worse in that constitutional
    rights are only for the rich because they can afford to ignore the censors. >> Making terms of service complaints isn't censorship.

    Shouldn't your analysis allow for the infinite victimhood of the persecuted right-wing mobs and gangs?

    There's always something!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)