• Rudy loses by default

    From mINE109@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 30 10:42:55 2023
    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720.93.0_2.pdf

    After conceding he made false statements about Georgia election workers.

    https://www.npr.org/2023/07/26/1190173929/rudy-giuliani-georgia-election-workers

    Dunno the strategy involved but he has a lot on his plate these days.
    Too much trouble to defend?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 30 14:02:22 2023
    On 8/30/23 10:42 AM, mINE109 wrote:
    https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720.93.0_2.pdf

    After conceding he made false statements about Georgia election workers.

    https://www.npr.org/2023/07/26/1190173929/rudy-giuliani-georgia-election-workers

    Dunno the strategy involved but he has a lot on his plate these days.
    Too much trouble to defend?

    The judge has commented:

    In this case, however, Giuliani has given only lip service to compliance
    with his discovery obligations and this Court’s orders by failing to
    take reasonable steps to preserve or produce his ESI [electronically
    stored information]. Instead, Giuliani has submitted declarations with concessions turned slippery on scrutiny and excuses designed to shroud
    the insufficiency of his discovery compliance. The bottom line is that
    Giuliani has refused to comply with his discovery obligations and
    thwarted plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and Wandrea’ ArShaye Moss’s procedural rights to obtain any meaningful discovery in this case.

    Rather than simply play by the rules designed to promote a discovery
    process necessary to reach a fair decision on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims, Giuliani has bemoaned plaintiffs’ efforts to secure his
    compliance as “punishment by process.” Donning a cloak of victimization
    may play well on a public stage to certain audiences, but in a court of
    law this performance has served only to subvert the normal process of
    discovery in a straight-forward defamation case, with the concomitant
    necessity of repeated court intervention...

    Giuliani’s preference may be due to the fact, about which he has made no secret, that he faces liability, both civil and criminal, in other investigations and civil lawsuits... Perhaps, he has made the
    calculation that his overall litigation risks are minimized by not
    complying with his discovery obligations in this case. Whatever the
    reason, obligations are case specific and withholding required discovery
    in this case has consequences.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)