Moody's Analytics @Markzandi
finds that the typical US household is spending *$709* more per month than two years ago -- on the same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.
On 8/12/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
Moody's Analytics @Markzandi
finds that the typical US household is spending *$709* more per month than two years ago -- on the same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.Why wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore stuff.
Did they mention how much more the "typical US household" makes compared
to two years ago?
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/16/economy/real-wage-gains-inflation
Not there yet, but improving.
The dilemma is the Fed wants to lower
inflation by raising unemployment which would really hamper purchasing power.
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 5:14:40 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/12/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
Moody's Analytics @Markzandi finds that the typical US householdWhy wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore stuff.
is spending *$709* more per month than two years ago -- on the
same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.
Did they mention how much more the "typical US household" makes
compared to two years ago?
You think the avg household is getting over 700$ more income per
month than 2 years ago?
LoL. Here's the ugly truth on Bidenomics....and it's not the whole
truth as the inflation index doesn't include big hitters in the avg
budget like food and energy.
https://dqydj.com/household-income-by-year/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/16/economy/real-wage-gains-inflation
Not there yet, but improving.
Not this last month....job growth slowed. That inevitably leads to
slower wage growth while inflation stubbornly hangs on. Most are
reporting an expected increase in August.
The dilemma is the Fed wants to lower inflation by raising
unemployment which would really hamper purchasing power.
That's why it was so stupid for Joe to push Inflation reduction act
which he admits the title was a fat lie.
On 8/12/23 10:28 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 5:14:40 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/12/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
Moody's Analytics @Markzandi finds that the typical US householdWhy wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore stuff.
is spending *$709* more per month than two years ago -- on the
same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.
Did they mention how much more the "typical US household" makes
compared to two years ago?
You think the avg household is getting over 700$ more income perJust asking.
month than 2 years ago?
LoL. Here's the ugly truth on Bidenomics....and it's not the whole
truth as the inflation index doesn't include big hitters in the avg
budget like food and energy.
https://dqydj.com/household-income-by-year/Leaves out the lower income levels where it matters. Of course, I've
already shown you the gains for the lowest quintile.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/16/economy/real-wage-gains-inflation
Not there yet, but improving.
Not this last month....job growth slowed. That inevitably leads toIn the context of sustained growth, lowering inflation and low
slower wage growth while inflation stubbornly hangs on. Most are
reporting an expected increase in August.
unemployment. Slowing is still growing.
The dilemma is the Fed wants to lower inflation by raising
unemployment which would really hamper purchasing power.
That's why it was so stupid for Joe to push Inflation reduction actNo, he did not. He said it was a bad name because it does so much more
which he admits the title was a fat lie.
than reduce inflation.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:33:13 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Not there yet, but improving.
On 8/12/23 10:28 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 5:14:40 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Just asking.
On 8/12/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
Moody's Analytics @Markzandi finds that the typical USWhy wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore
household is spending *$709* more per month than two years
ago -- on the same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.
stuff.
Did they mention how much more the "typical US household"
makes compared to two years ago?
You think the avg household is getting over 700$ more income per
month than 2 years ago?
LoL. Here's the ugly truth on Bidenomics....and it's not theLeaves out the lower income levels where it matters. Of course,
whole truth as the inflation index doesn't include big hitters in
the avg budget like food and energy.
https://dqydj.com/household-income-by-year/
I've already shown you the gains for the lowest quintile.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/16/economy/real-wage-gains-inflation
In the context of sustained growth, lowering inflation and low
Not this last month....job growth slowed. That inevitably leads
to slower wage growth while inflation stubbornly hangs on. Most
are reporting an expected increase in August.
unemployment. Slowing is still growing.
No, he did not. He said it was a bad name because it does so muchThe dilemma is the Fed wants to lower inflation by raising
unemployment which would really hamper purchasing power.
That's why it was so stupid for Joe to push Inflation reduction
act which he admits the title was a fat lie.
more than reduce inflation.
Let me quote Joe...
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me,
$368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/08/09/remarks-by-president-biden-at-a-campaign-reception-albuquerque-nm/
"It has nothing to do with inflation;" That's a Whitehouse
transcript of Joe's speech.
You got it? Nothing to do with inflation. Nothing! I repeat one more
time for your pea brain.....
Joe says "It has nothing to do with inflation".
He's actually wrong...it has nothing to do with REDUCING inflation.
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:33:13 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Not there yet, but improving.
On 8/12/23 10:28 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 5:14:40 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Just asking.
On 8/12/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
Moody's Analytics @Markzandi finds that the typical USWhy wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore
household is spending *$709* more per month than two years
ago -- on the same goods & services.
https://twitter.com/MattEganCNN/status/1690104498813886464
and CNN aired the story.
stuff.
Did they mention how much more the "typical US household"
makes compared to two years ago?
You think the avg household is getting over 700$ more income per
month than 2 years ago?
LoL. Here's the ugly truth on Bidenomics....and it's not theLeaves out the lower income levels where it matters. Of course,
whole truth as the inflation index doesn't include big hitters in
the avg budget like food and energy.
https://dqydj.com/household-income-by-year/
I've already shown you the gains for the lowest quintile.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/16/economy/real-wage-gains-inflation
In the context of sustained growth, lowering inflation and low
Not this last month....job growth slowed. That inevitably leads
to slower wage growth while inflation stubbornly hangs on. Most
are reporting an expected increase in August.
unemployment. Slowing is still growing.
No, he did not. He said it was a bad name because it does so muchThe dilemma is the Fed wants to lower inflation by raising
unemployment which would really hamper purchasing power.
That's why it was so stupid for Joe to push Inflation reduction
act which he admits the title was a fat lie.
more than reduce inflation.
Let me quote Joe...
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do withYes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me, $368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most
comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation
Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me, >>> $368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear.
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most
comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation >>> Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me, >>> $368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that." >> Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear.A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something more.
and CNN aired the story.
Why wouldn't they? They're not Fox News, who will ignore stuff.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something more.
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most
comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation >>>>> Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me, >>>>> $368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that." >>>> Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear.
You might have a point if they left out "reduction".
On 8/14/23 6:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something more.
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most >>>>> comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation
Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me,
$368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear.
You might have a point if they left out "reduction".Inflation went down. That's a "reduction."
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:33:46 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 6:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Inflation went down. That's a "reduction."
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most >>>>>>> comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation >>>>>>> Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me,
$368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that." >>>>>> Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear. >>>> A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something more.
You might have a point if they left out "reduction".
Even Joe isn't trying to pull that BS.
Console yourself with your cherry-picked gotcha word.
Console yourself with your cherry-picked gotcha word.
I cherry picked this post
And I cherry picked this article
On 8/14/23 6:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something more.
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased it.
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed the most >>>>> comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s called the “Inflation
Reduction Act.” It’s within that. It has nothing to do with
inflation; it has to do with the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me,
$368 billion, the single-largest investment in climate change
anywhere in the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants to hear.
You might have a point if they left out "reduction".Inflation went down. That's a "reduction."
On 8/15/23 5:09 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Console yourself with your cherry-picked gotcha word.
I cherry picked this postAnd forgot to link it, but don't bother. That'll save me the trouble of reposting the Republican-cities-with-high-crime story I showed the other day.
And I cherry picked this article
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 8:33:46 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/14/23 6:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Inflation went down. That's a "reduction."
On 8/14/23 11:12 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:56:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109A thing that has nothing to do with inflation is also something
wrote:
On 8/14/23 10:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
Let me quote Joe...Yes, that's an example of "so much more" as I paraphrased
"Well, we’ve put ourselves in a position where we passed
the most comprehensive environmental piece of — it’s
called the “Inflation Reduction Act.” It’s within that.
It has nothing to do with inflation; it has to do with
the (inaudible) $4- — $600 — excuse me, $368 billion, the
single-largest investment in climate change anywhere in
the world — anywh- — no one has ever, ever spent that."
it.
LoL...Joe says "nothing".....Stephen hears whatever he wants
to hear.
more.
You might have a point if they left out "reduction".
Inflation means that prices go UP, not down. A reduction would be
when prices go down
A decreased inflation rate is still PRICES GOING UP.
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 6:13:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/15/23 5:09 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
And forgot to link it, but don't bother. That'll save me the trouble of
Console yourself with your cherry-picked gotcha word.
I cherry picked this post
And I cherry picked this article
reposting the Republican-cities-with-high-crime story I showed the other
day.
here it is https://nypost.com/2023/05/27/horrific-footage-shows-devastation-of-philadelphias-tranq-epidemic/
I think your city was JAcksonville'
All you could come up with were some smaller cities
and showing crime rates, not the graphic hell holes
of LA, Philly, SF, Seattle and Portland.
If you can't see the damage that ultra left wing policies have wrought on those cities,
there really is something wrong with you
No cash bail, decriminalizing shoplifting, harm educatio for drug addicts, lack of prosecutions, defunding police.
GIVE ME A BREAK. IT IS NOT WORKING
As we noted in our last report, Republicans do a much better
job blaming others for crime than actually stopping it.
End quote.
mINE109 quoted:
As we noted in our last report, Republicans do a much betterThat could be part of the greater scheme to "own the lib's".
job blaming others for crime than actually stopping it.
End quote.
Have any republigoons started blaming Democrats (or our handmaidens, Hollywood and the MSM) for revealing the "truth" to Dumpster about the
2020 election being "stolen"? Idiot Baby just promised, for the umpteenth time, to post "proof" of massive election fraud during the next week.
The grifting never ends.
Have any republigoons started blaming Democrats (or our handmaidens, Hollywood and the MSM) for revealing the "truth" to Dumpster about theThere was plenty of 'the dems framed him so they could get Hunter out of
2020 election being "stolen"? Idiot Baby just promised, for the umpteenth time, to post "proof" of massive election fraud during the next week.
The grifting never ends.
hot water years later.'
mINE109 wrote:
Wow. No wonder they feel they have to cheat in elections - our side
Have any republigoons started blaming Democrats (or ourThere was plenty of 'the dems framed him so they could get Hunter
handmaidens, Hollywood and the MSM) for revealing the "truth" to
Dumpster about the 2020 election being "stolen"? Idiot Baby just
promised, for the umpteenth time, to post "proof" of massive
election fraud during the next week. The grifting never ends.
out of hot water years later.'
has Nostradamus, Sybil, and Zoltar in our stable.
Froomkin: “contemptuous liberals are coming for you” is the driving principle of the right-wing movement, according to the authors.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 18:21:04 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,351,543 |