1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUDIO.OPINION

  • Will Stephen condemn our lying media?

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 7 09:24:27 2023
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling
    @RonDeSantis
    that "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until" birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion access in recent yrs


    And don't forget Pelosi pushing a no restrictions abortion law in congress.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Aug 7 12:10:26 2023
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until"
    birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion
    access in recent yrs

    That's not "pushing abortion."

    And don't forget Pelosi pushing a no restrictions abortion law in
    congress.

    Again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 7 10:32:11 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."
    And don't forget Pelosi pushing a no restrictions abortion law in
    congress.
    Again.

    This specific solecism is not unique to Witlessmoron. Many of the loudest LRW nutjobs have equated "right to abortion" with "demanding" or "requiring" it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 7 10:41:33 2023
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until" birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.


    And don't forget Pelosi pushing a no restrictions abortion law in congress.
    Again.

    https://rollcall.com/2021/09/24/house-passes-abortion-rights-legislation/

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Aug 7 13:06:39 2023
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until"
    birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion
    access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.

    No, it's different in several ways. For one, "smack," to use the
    outdated slang, is a product while abortion is a service.

    And don't forget Pelosi pushing a no restrictions abortion law in
    congress.
    Again.

    https://rollcall.com/2021/09/24/house-passes-abortion-rights-legislation/

    No, the disagreement is whether a "no restrictions" law is "pushing
    abortion." The word you search for is "allowing."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 7 11:22:09 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways. For one, "smack," to use the
    outdated slang, is a product while abortion is a service.

    Which of these are in current use?

    Common general slang terms for heroin itself include:
    Dope
    Smack
    H
    Junk
    Skag
    Snow
    Horse
    China white
    Brown
    Beast
    Hero

    The only one that's new to me is Beast, although I've
    only heard of Snow as the stuff from South America.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Mon Aug 7 12:13:31 2023
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:22:11 PM UTC-4, Fascist Flea wrote:
    mINE109 wrote:

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways. For one, "smack," to use the
    outdated slang, is a product while abortion is a service.

    Which of these are in current use?

    Common general slang terms for heroin itself include:
    Dope
    Smack
    H
    Junk
    Skag
    Snow
    Horse
    China white
    Brown
    Beast
    Hero



    I will yield to the expert and experienced user.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 8 18:40:41 2023
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until" >>> birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion >>> access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 8 20:30:51 2023
    Witlessborg wants the humans to guess what their "point" might be.

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.
    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".

    This is a longstanding pattern with you, dippy. You get so wrapped around your axle that you become completely unable to express your "point".

    Babble babble, yap-yap-yap, grievance train, class envy, gross inferiority - your "point" is teeny-tiny and undetectable to humans. Of course you
    refuse to even try putting your "point" into a cogent statement. That would
    be an abandonment of your fealty to the "debating trade".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Aug 9 09:42:15 2023
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until" >>>>> birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion >>>>> access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".

    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect. "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the "partial
    birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term procedures are rare and due
    to medical concerns.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 9 10:17:01 2023
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 7:42:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907

    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions up until" >>>>> birth & "there's no indication" they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have expanded abortion >>>>> access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".
    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect.

    Yes it is.....it's your semantic argument over the actual abortion legislation.

    "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the "partial
    birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term procedures are rare and due
    to medical concerns.

    BS. H.R. 8296 passed by house dems only had allowances for what state could restrict but
    no limits on what states could allow.

    You should be glad it was never taken up in the senate.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 9 12:01:30 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    There's no legislation "pushing" abortion. The semantics are yours.

    The way the MAGA-turds "think" is so predictable. If you're not against
    all abortions all the time, you're in favor of as many abortions as possible. The entire concept of choice scares them to death.

    Same phenom with the "grooming" and drag queens. Some (most?) professional
    drag performers are Gay. Also, once upon a time, there was a rumor that a Gay adult
    may have tried to seduce a non-Gay minor. Therefore, every drag queen is a potential "groomer".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Aug 9 13:42:41 2023
    On 8/9/23 12:17 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 7:42:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907


    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions
    up until" birth & "there's no indication" they are
    "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have
    expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while
    ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".
    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect.

    Yes it is.....it's your semantic argument over the actual abortion legislation.

    There's no legislation "pushing" abortion. The semantics are yours.

    "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying
    media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the "partial
    birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term procedures are rare
    and due to medical concerns.

    BS. H.R. 8296 passed by house dems only had allowances for what
    state could restrict but no limits on what states could allow.

    That has nothing to do with it.

    You should be glad it was never taken up in the senate.

    The voters are deciding.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 9 14:34:46 2023
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:42:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/9/23 12:17 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 7:42:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907


    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for abortions
    up until" birth & "there's no indication" they are
    "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have
    expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial while
    ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".
    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect.

    Yes it is.....it's your semantic argument over the actual abortion legislation.
    There's no legislation "pushing" abortion. The semantics are yours.
    "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying
    media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the "partial
    birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term procedures are rare
    and due to medical concerns.

    BS. H.R. 8296 passed by house dems only had allowances for what
    state could restrict but no limits on what states could allow.
    That has nothing to do with it.

    It has everything to do with it. It's my thread and that is exactly what I was talking about.
    You have no say in what my thread has to do with.

    You should be glad it was never taken up in the senate.
    The voters are deciding.

    yes they are.

    A total of 21 states have moved to ban or restrict abortion following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and end all federal protections for abortion.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Aug 10 07:55:32 2023
    On 8/9/23 4:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:42:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/9/23 12:17 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 7:42:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907





    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for
    abortions up until" birth & "there's no indication"
    they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have
    expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial
    while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".
    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect.

    Yes it is.....it's your semantic argument over the actual
    abortion legislation.
    There's no legislation "pushing" abortion. The semantics are
    yours.
    "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying
    media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the
    "partial birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term
    procedures are rare and due to medical concerns.

    BS. H.R. 8296 passed by house dems only had allowances for what
    state could restrict but no limits on what states could allow.
    That has nothing to do with it.

    It has everything to do with it.

    It's not a response to the issue of late term abortion procedures.

    It's my thread and that is exactly what I was talking about. You have
    no say in what my thread has to do with.

    The thread subject is "Will Stephen condemn our lying media?" Your claim
    is that a House bill that didn't pass the Senate is evidence of
    Democrats "pushing" abortion. Even if passed, it would not do that as it
    would have removed certain limitations and requirements including many
    recently enacted by states.

    You should be glad it was never taken up in the senate.
    The voters are deciding.

    yes they are.

    A total of 21 states have moved to ban or restrict abortion
    following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and
    end all federal protections for abortion.

    Those are legislators. Voters supported abortion rights in state
    propositions in California, Vermont, Michigan and Kentucky in 2022
    elections.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 09:45:50 2023
    On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:55:37 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/9/23 4:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:42:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/9/23 12:17 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 7:42:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/8/23 8:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:06:42 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 12:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 10:10:28 AM UTC-7, mINE109
    wrote:
    On 8/7/23 11:24 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1688567767329275907 >>>>>>>>>




    NBC's Dasha Burns, pants on fire, telling @RonDeSantis that
    "[t]here’s no evidence of Democrats pushing for
    abortions up until" birth & "there's no indication"
    they are "pushing for that."

    Let's start with states. Colorado, Maine, & NY have
    expanded abortion access in recent yrs
    That's not "pushing abortion."

    Like selling smack isn't pushing. You argue the trivial
    while ignoring the truth.
    No, it's different in several ways.

    If that doesn't prove my point re "trivial".
    It's not trivial that your choice of words is incorrect.

    Yes it is.....it's your semantic argument over the actual
    abortion legislation.
    There's no legislation "pushing" abortion. The semantics are
    yours.
    "Allowing" is
    not "pushing" nor is quoting Dasha Burns evidence of "our lying
    media."

    The words "up until birth" are also inapt, an echo of the
    "partial birth" moral panic some years ago. Late term
    procedures are rare and due to medical concerns.

    BS. H.R. 8296 passed by house dems only had allowances for what
    state could restrict but no limits on what states could allow.
    That has nothing to do with it.

    It has everything to do with it.
    It's not a response to the issue of late term abortion procedures.

    Stop pimping your partial birth abortion advocacy in my thread.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 10:30:41 2023
    Super Shitty Idiot Ideologue throws a hissy-fit.

    It's not a response to the issue of late term abortion procedures.
    Stop pimping your partial birth abortion advocacy in my thread.

    Why did your parental units decide against aborting you? In retrospect,
    we can all see they made a terrible choice.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)