• Conspiracy theories and those who espouse them

    From mINE109@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 29 12:25:02 2023
    Canada is on it:

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-pseudoscience/who-likely-believe-conspiracy-theories

    Hed: Who Is Likely to Believe in Conspiracy Theories?

    Subhed: After nearly 30 years of research, we finally have a portrait of
    the typical conspiracy theorist, although many of the details are still
    fuzzy

    A massive metastudy inspired by recent events.

    "So, who believes these large conspiracy theories, often built on
    surprising allegations with little evidence behind them? A team of
    researchers from Emory University, the Massachusetts Institute of
    Technology, and the University of Regina undertook a colossal effort
    recently. They grabbed every English-language study ever conducted to
    look at belief in conspiracy theories and its potential link to
    personality and motivation in order to conduct a meta-analysis of this
    data. In total, there were 170 studies involving over 158,000 research participants.

    They crunched the numbers to see what was strongly associated with
    believing conspiracy theories and what wasn’t. Many of their results
    were to be expected, but some were quite surprising.

    Three tendencies were strongly correlated with conspiracy ideation,
    which is the inclination to endorse conspiracy theories. They were:
    perceiving threat and danger; relying on intuition and having odd
    beliefs and experiences; and being antagonistic and feeling superior.
    You can think of each as a pillar that supports conspiracy ideation
    and/or is nurtured by it, and each pillar can be looked at in more detail."

    Do tell more about "being antagonistic and feeling superior."

    "Being antagonistic and feeling superior

    This association with abnormal personality traits also brings forward
    two traits that tend to be associated with conspiracy ideation:
    antagonism and a feeling of superiority.

    Conspiracy theorists often think very highly of their in-group. People
    who are not like them are held accountable for the ills of the world,
    while their own community of like-minded conspiracy theorists is seen as blameless and exceptional.

    This feeling of superiority touches upon the only normal personality
    trait that has been strongly linked to conspiracy ideation: reduced
    humility. There is an unwarranted assurance that often comes with
    believing in all-powerful cabals. It leads adherents of the theory to
    believe in the moral supremacy of their own group of rebels.

    As for antagonism, the authors define it as having an exaggerated sense
    of self, a callous disregard for the feelings and needs of others, being manipulative and aggressive."

    Look! A new acronym: "Belief in conspiracy theories also suffers from
    having been studied mostly in what are known as WEIRD populations. This
    is not to say that conspiracy theorists are weird, but that their
    beliefs have been examined mostly in Westernized, Educated,
    Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic populations."

    That's the McGill University article. The study is here:

    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 29 12:06:29 2023
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-pseudoscience/who-likely-believe-conspiracy-theories

    Hed: Who Is Likely to Believe in Conspiracy Theories?

    Subhed: After nearly 30 years of research, we finally have a portrait of
    the typical conspiracy theorist, although many of the details are still fuzzy

    A massive metastudy inspired by recent events.

    "So, who believes these large conspiracy theories, often built on
    surprising allegations with little evidence behind them? A team of researchers from Emory University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Regina undertook a colossal effort recently. They grabbed every English-language study ever conducted to
    look at belief in conspiracy theories and its potential link to
    personality and motivation in order to conduct a meta-analysis of this
    data. In total, there were 170 studies involving over 158,000 research participants.

    They crunched the numbers to see what was strongly associated with
    believing conspiracy theories and what wasn’t. Many of their results
    were to be expected, but some were quite surprising.

    Three tendencies were strongly correlated with conspiracy ideation,
    which is the inclination to endorse conspiracy theories. They were: perceiving threat and danger; relying on intuition and having odd
    beliefs and experiences; and being antagonistic and feeling superior.
    You can think of each as a pillar that supports conspiracy ideation
    and/or is nurtured by it, and each pillar can be looked at in more detail."

    Do tell more about "being antagonistic and feeling superior."

    "Being antagonistic and feeling superior

    This association with abnormal personality traits also brings forward
    two traits that tend to be associated with conspiracy ideation:
    antagonism and a feeling of superiority.

    Conspiracy theorists often think very highly of their in-group. People
    who are not like them are held accountable for the ills of the world,
    while their own community of like-minded conspiracy theorists is seen as blameless and exceptional.

    This feeling of superiority touches upon the only normal personality
    trait that has been strongly linked to conspiracy ideation: reduced humility. There is an unwarranted assurance that often comes with
    believing in all-powerful cabals. It leads adherents of the theory to believe in the moral supremacy of their own group of rebels.

    As for antagonism, the authors define it as having an exaggerated sense
    of self, a callous disregard for the feelings and needs of others, being manipulative and aggressive."

    Look! A new acronym: "Belief in conspiracy theories also suffers from
    having been studied mostly in what are known as WEIRD populations. This
    is not to say that conspiracy theorists are weird, but that their
    beliefs have been examined mostly in Westernized, Educated,
    Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic populations."

    That's the McGill University article. The study is here:

    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sat Jul 29 15:55:18 2023
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:

    https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-pseudoscience/who-likely-believe-conspiracy-theories

    Hed: Who Is Likely to Believe in Conspiracy Theories?

    Subhed: After nearly 30 years of research, we finally have a portrait of
    the typical conspiracy theorist, although many of the details are still
    fuzzy

    A massive metastudy inspired by recent events.

    Do tell more about "being antagonistic and feeling superior."

    "Being antagonistic and feeling superior

    This association with abnormal personality traits also brings forward
    two traits that tend to be associated with conspiracy ideation:
    antagonism and a feeling of superiority.

    As for antagonism, the authors define it as having an exaggerated sense
    of self, a callous disregard for the feelings and needs of others, being
    manipulative and aggressive."

    That's the McGill University article. The study is here:

    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf

    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.

    IKYABWAI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sat Jul 29 16:38:28 2023
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:

    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.

    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance
    on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and
    maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views.
    Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the
    cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically."

    That is a possibility.

    "To address this possibility, scholars have directed attention toward
    the relation between intelligence and conspiratorial ideation. Across
    studies and measures of intelligence, there appears to be a consistent
    negative relation between conspiratorial ideation and general cognitive ability, although the magnitude of these relations ranges from small to
    large. Thus, it seems that conspiratorial ideation may be related to
    reduced tendencies and motivations to pursue complexity and a reduced
    ability to make sense of complex information."

    Then why are there still monkeys?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 29 16:28:31 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    "To address this possibility, scholars have directed attention toward
    the relation between intelligence and conspiratorial ideation. Across
    studies and measures of intelligence, there appears to be a consistent negative relation between conspiratorial ideation and general cognitive ability, although the magnitude of these relations ranges from small to large. Thus, it seems that conspiratorial ideation may be related to
    reduced tendencies and motivations to pursue complexity and a reduced
    ability to make sense of complex information."

    Then why are there still monkeys?

    Bill Bradley - a Democrat, note - played pro basketball.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 30 08:57:58 2023
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance
    on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views. Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically."

    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their beloved god party and the true demons within.

    I need to start saving this stuff for my thesis and phd.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun Jul 30 12:05:09 2023
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance
    on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and
    maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views.
    Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the
    cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically."

    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their beloved god party and the true demons within.

    "An overreliance on intuition coupled with a drive to find meaning can contribute to identifying patterns where none exist or identifying
    agency where none exists (i.e., hypersensitive agency detection). People
    prone to conspiratorial ideation are presumably also prone to such patternicity; after all, conspiracy theories entail identifying secret
    plotting by nefarious individuals. Bearing out this possibility,
    illusory pattern perception tends to manifest large, positive
    correlations with conspiratorial ideation

    Since conspiracy theories sometimes have the façade of being
    evidence-based and can be supported by a variety of misleading arguments
    , they may be particularly appealing to those who are prone to maintain
    their worldviews in the face of new evidence and tend to not think
    effortfully. In support of these suppositions, conspiratorial ideation
    is weakly-to-moderately and positively linked with dogmatism (e.g., and moderately and negatively linked with actively open-minded thinking."

    I need to start saving this stuff for my thesis and phd.

    You'll find IKYABWAI is not a recognized thesis defense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 30 11:11:32 2023
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:05:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance >> on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and
    maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views. >> Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the
    cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition coupled with a drive to find meaning can contribute to identifying patterns where none exist or identifying
    agency where none exists (i.e., hypersensitive agency detection). People prone to conspiratorial ideation are presumably also prone to such patternicity; after all, conspiracy theories entail identifying secret plotting by nefarious individuals. Bearing out this possibility,
    illusory pattern perception tends to manifest large, positive
    correlations with conspiratorial ideation

    Since conspiracy theories sometimes have the façade of being evidence-based and can be supported by a variety of misleading arguments
    , they may be particularly appealing to those who are prone to maintain their worldviews in the face of new evidence and tend to not think effortfully. In support of these suppositions, conspiratorial ideation
    is weakly-to-moderately and positively linked with dogmatism (e.g., and moderately and negatively linked with actively open-minded thinking."
    I need to start saving this stuff for my thesis and phd.
    You'll find IKYABWAI is not a recognized thesis defense.

    I searched. Nobody has ever done a thesis on iKYABWAIs
    The academic record is thin
    The potential is great.
    Somebody in Academia needs to get on this right now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sun Jul 30 14:35:15 2023
    On 7/30/23 1:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:05:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf

    I need to start saving this stuff for my thesis and phd.
    You'll find IKYABWAI is not a recognized thesis defense.

    I searched. Nobody has ever done a thesis on iKYABWAIs

    Indeed.

    The academic record is thin
    The potential is great.
    Somebody in Academia needs to get on this right now.

    However, there's plenty of scholarly action on defense mechanisms,
    including projection and displacement.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 30 15:11:05 2023
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance >> on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and
    maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views. >> Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the
    cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition

    Nah, tons of documented direct evidence right here in the archives.
    You'll be Subject A as leader of the rejection of truth as conspiracy.
    Refusal to adapt to changing generally accepted knowledge while clinging to claims of conspiracy.

    How many topics can we assign to you?
    - Surveillance of Trump campaign
    - Russia collusion
    -Covid origins
    - Lockdowns
    - Mask mandates
    - Vaccine efficacy
    - Vaccine side effects
    - Hunter Influence peddling
    - Joe's dementia

    Wow....and that's in 30 seconds off the top of my head. A group search is gonna be....
    well....embarrassing.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jul 31 07:41:58 2023
    On 7/30/23 5:11 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation
    appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance >>>> on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and
    maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views. >>>> Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the
    cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>>>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition

    Nah, tons of documented direct evidence right here in the archives.
    You'll be Subject A as leader of the rejection of truth as conspiracy. Refusal to adapt to changing generally accepted knowledge while clinging to claims of conspiracy.

    Declaring your conspiracies to be generally accepted knowledge shows
    dogmatism.

    How many topics can we assign to you?
    - Surveillance of Trump campaign
    - Russia collusion
    -Covid origins
    - Lockdowns
    - Mask mandates
    - Vaccine efficacy
    - Vaccine side effects
    - Hunter Influence peddling
    - Joe's dementia

    These are examples of you insisting on patterns in the face of credible contrary evidence. Several of them are topics I don't comment on, so
    that speaks to you making stuff up. Others I cite authorities while you
    cite crackpots. Most importantly, these are *not* generally accepted
    knowledge except in your cohort group.

    Wow....and that's in 30 seconds off the top of my head. A group search is gonna be....
    well....embarrassing.

    I don't mind as a group search will show me citing credible sources and
    you spewing insults and tautologies.

    You score high in "antagonism and a feeling of superiority."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 31 08:26:01 2023
    On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 8:42:00 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 5:11 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation >>>> appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance
    on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and >>>> maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views.
    Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the >>>> cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>>>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition

    Nah, tons of documented direct evidence right here in the archives.
    You'll be Subject A as leader of the rejection of truth as conspiracy. Refusal to adapt to changing generally accepted knowledge while clinging to
    claims of conspiracy.
    Declaring your conspiracies to be generally accepted knowledge shows dogmatism.
    How many topics can we assign to you?
    - Surveillance of Trump campaign
    - Russia collusion
    -Covid origins
    - Lockdowns
    - Mask mandates
    - Vaccine efficacy
    - Vaccine side effects
    - Hunter Influence peddling
    - Joe's dementia
    These are examples of you insisting on patterns in the face of credible contrary evidence. Several of them are topics I don't comment on, so
    that speaks to you making stuff up. Others I cite authorities while you
    cite crackpots. Most importantly, these are *not* generally accepted knowledge except in your cohort group.
    Wow....and that's in 30 seconds off the top of my head. A group search is gonna be....
    well....embarrassing.
    I don't mind as a group search will show me citing credible sources and
    you spewing insults and tautologies.

    You score high in "antagonism and a feeling of superiority."

    I would be greatly alarmed if Scott didn't feel superior to you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 31 08:29:01 2023
    On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 5:42:00 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 5:11 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation >>>> appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance
    on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and >>>> maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views.
    Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the >>>> cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>>>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition

    Nah, tons of documented direct evidence right here in the archives.
    You'll be Subject A as leader of the rejection of truth as conspiracy. Refusal to adapt to changing generally accepted knowledge while clinging to
    claims of conspiracy.
    Declaring your conspiracies to be generally accepted knowledge shows dogmatism.

    Says the guy who admits to considering them all...."conspiracies".

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jul 31 12:44:24 2023
    On 7/31/23 10:29 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 5:42:00 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 5:11 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 10:05:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/30/23 10:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 2:38:31 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/29/23 2:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 1:25:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>>> Canada is on it:
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000392.pdf


    you provided a very perceptive analysis of yourself.
    That's harsh:

    "To summarize across all epistemic motives, conspiratorial ideation >>>>>> appears to be related to inflexible cognitive styles, including reliance >>>>>> on intuition, identifying patterns and agency in their absence, and >>>>>> maintaining one’s views while being close minded to alternative views. >>>>>> Still, individuals prone to conspiratorial ideation may also lack the >>>>>> cognitive abilities to evaluate information accurately and critically." >>>>>>
    That is a possibility.

    and then there's the conspirators of conspiracy theorists.....
    The creators of obfuscations and misdirection to deflect attention from their
    beloved god party and the true demons within.
    "An overreliance on intuition

    Nah, tons of documented direct evidence right here in the archives.
    You'll be Subject A as leader of the rejection of truth as conspiracy.
    Refusal to adapt to changing generally accepted knowledge while clinging to >>> claims of conspiracy.
    Declaring your conspiracies to be generally accepted knowledge shows
    dogmatism.

    Says the guy who admits to considering them all...."conspiracies".

    You just posted a nice list of right-wing conspiracy theories.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 31 11:02:25 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    Says the guy who admits to considering them all...."conspiracies".
    You just posted a nice list of right-wing conspiracy theories.

    Super Shitty actually believes that once they hear and repeat a bit of gossip, it becomes "real". Attempts by humans to contextualize, rebut, or even
    narrow the ravings are seen as "manipulations" of "facts". We can all remember the earlier generation of "debating trade" warriors frequently resorting to spontaneous factuation in order to insulate themselves from reality.
    The more shit changes, the more it repeats itself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)