• The Whacko left has gone all in for a concept rejected long ago

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 25 16:52:12 2023
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Tue Jul 25 20:25:06 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?

    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Jul 25 20:18:39 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW


    WTF are you talking about?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Jul 26 09:58:22 2023
    On 7/25/23 10:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?

    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    Isn't that one of your posting goals? Those debating trade points don't
    award themselves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Jul 26 09:48:48 2023
    On 7/25/23 6:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    Is this some bizarre inversion of the recent trial balloons about
    revoking or repealing birthright citizenship?

    Trump and Gaetz made their proposals in public so no weaseling out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 26 10:27:02 2023
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 7:58:25 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/25/23 10:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?

    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease
    Isn't that one of your posting goals?

    It's actually getting you to think. I admit to failing.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Jul 26 14:11:32 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW

    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Wed Jul 26 22:28:32 2023
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,

    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 27 09:03:31 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW

    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    you make references with absolutely no
    context, you offer short blurbs without the links to the larger story.

    Like just recently you offered us "birthrights" with no context.
    A normal person would associate that with the current issue
    of birthright citizenship. But that's not what you were talking about.
    When pressed, you said you were referring to reparations.
    Now, everybody understands reparations. So why didn't you
    just say the common term reparations instead of the more confusing term birthrights.

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 27 11:19:55 2023
    On 7/27/23 11:16 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?

    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    Scott scores proprietary gotcha points if he knows something others
    don't even if it's a secret known only to himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 27 09:16:39 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are

    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com


    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?

    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 27 10:09:26 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?

    Scott scores proprietary gotcha points if he knows something others
    don't even if it's a secret known only to himself.

    How very "debating trade".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 27 14:18:22 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com

    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.



    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?


    Hmmm...one can only hope.


    I am losing hope. I try to correct you for your own good,
    some constructive criticism,
    but you are stubbornly resistive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 27 14:38:22 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.

    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."


    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?


    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    I am losing hope. I try to correct you for your own good,

    Thanks, but I'm good.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 27 20:23:02 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat. On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?


    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    I am losing hope. I try to correct you for your own good,
    Thanks, but I'm good.

    until your next obfuscation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 27 21:18:05 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 8:23:04 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat. On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?


    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    I am losing hope. I try to correct you for your own good,
    Thanks, but I'm good.

    until your next obfuscation.

    I'm obfuscating my own thread....now that's a hoot.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 28 10:03:52 2023
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 12:18:06 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 8:23:04 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."

    I mean, you do want other people to understand you, don't you?


    Hmmm...one can only hope.

    I am losing hope. I try to correct you for your own good,
    Thanks, but I'm good.

    until your next obfuscation.
    I'm obfuscating my own thread....now that's a hoot.

    ScottW


    Yes,
    If others can't understand it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 28 10:09:55 2023
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat. On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."

    ok, so, back to the beginning of this thread:
    '
    The Whacko left has gone all in for a concept rejected long ago

    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW

    What the fuck does that mean, in the context of your offered Google definition of birthright??
    "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    Are you saying that birthrights, as defined by Google, have somehow been voided?
    And that Dems want to restore them?
    and that somehow that is creepY?
    how is it creepy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 28 10:50:20 2023
    It was never even a faint facsimile of paradise, but Shmootown is erupting
    in vicious internecine bitching.

    The Whacko[sic] left has gone all in for a concept rejected long ago
    They want to restore "birthrights".
    It's kind of creepy.

    What the fuck does that mean, in the context of your offered Google definition of birthright??
    "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    Are you saying that birthrights, as defined by Google, have somehow been voided?
    And that Dems want to restore them?
    and that somehow that is creepY?
    how is it creepy?

    I think Super Shitty is yapping about insects. They are born, and most of them creep.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Fri Jul 28 14:40:31 2023
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:09:57 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat. On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."

    like ancestry upon which reparations are based.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 28 22:04:34 2023
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:40:33 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:09:57 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    like ancestry upon which reparations are based.

    ScottW

    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post.
    There are ABSOLUTELY NO CLUES OR CONTEXT to lead me to that conclusion.
    Learn how to write.
    Learn how to communicate.
    Learn how to make yourself clearly understood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 29 09:33:04 2023
    <sigh>
    It's back to square one for Shmoo the Dumber.

    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post.
    There are ABSOLUTELY NO CLUES OR CONTEXT to lead me to that conclusion.
    Learn how to write.
    Learn how to communicate.
    Learn how to make yourself clearly understood.

    Really, you're just embarrassing yourself here, Sackplop.

    If Witlesstoad wanted to be "clearly understood", they would have changed tactics years ago. What you're perceiving, in your dim, half-awake manner,
    is Supey's version of the feeble "debating trade". The Krooborg learned a lesson
    from many, many frustrating episodes, and Witlesspunk eventually learned it also.
    That lesson being that in order not to be "wrong", a "debating trade" warrior must never, ever make a clear and definitive statement.

    Your scurrilous leader doesn't WANT to be understood. What they want is to provoke, to annoy, and to find any opportunity to giggle silently as their "opponent" expends effort in refuting, disproving, and undercutting whatever pile of crap was just deposited.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sat Jul 29 09:50:23 2023
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:04:36 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:40:33 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:09:57 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    like ancestry upon which reparations are based.

    ScottW
    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post.

    You could try....or maybe not.

    There are ABSOLUTELY NO CLUES OR CONTEXT to lead me to that conclusion. Learn how to write.
    Learn how to communicate.
    Learn how to make yourself clearly understood.

    You asked, I answered in my second post, and still ...

    ScottW





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Sat Jul 29 09:58:38 2023
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 9:33:05 AM UTC-7, Fascist Flea wrote:
    <sigh>
    It's back to square one for Shmoo the Dumber.

    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post. There are ABSOLUTELY NO CLUES OR CONTEXT to lead me to that conclusion. Learn how to write.
    Learn how to communicate.
    Learn how to make yourself clearly understood.

    Really, you're just embarrassing yourself here, Sackplop.

    If Witlesstoad wanted to be "clearly understood", they would have changed tactics years ago. What you're perceiving, in your dim, half-awake manner, is Supey's version of the feeble "debating trade". The Krooborg learned a lesson
    from many, many frustrating episodes, and Witlesspunk eventually learned it also.
    That lesson being that in order not to be "wrong", a "debating trade" warrior
    must never, ever make a clear and definitive statement.

    Your scurrilous leader doesn't WANT to be understood. What they want is to provoke, to annoy, and to find any opportunity to giggle silently as their "opponent" expends effort in refuting, disproving, and undercutting whatever pile of crap was just deposited.

    There's a grain of truth here. You'll have to guess where :)

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Jul 29 11:56:30 2023
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 12:50:24 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:04:36 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:40:33 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:09:57 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis.
    You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    like ancestry upon which reparations are based.

    ScottW
    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post.
    You could try....or maybe not.

    I shouldn't have to try. You should
    make yourself clearly understood.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sat Jul 29 16:15:43 2023
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 11:56:31 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 12:50:24 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:04:36 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:40:33 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:09:57 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 5:38:23 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 2:18:24 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 12:16:40 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 9:03:33 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 1:28:34 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:18:40 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:52:14 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    They want to restore "birthrights".

    It's kind of creepy.

    ScottW
    WTF are you talking about?
    Reparations.

    I've discovered a new syndrome.
    CERD, Chronic Explanation Required Disease

    ScottW
    There is no cure for you
    you incessantly use obscure acronyms and codenames and expect others to know what you are talking about,
    Guilty on the first count....not so much on the second.

    ScottW
    It's not happened once or twice, it's on a regular basis. You use obscure acronyms, you mention names of obscure people
    without telling us who they are
    Silly me.... let me help you.

    www.google.com
    two problems there
    first, good communications demands that you make your points very cleat.
    On e should not have to continually google your obsure uses of language

    second, the google search for "birthrights" offers no discernable references
    to your later stated intention of meaning "reparations"
    Google Birthrights and you see NO references to reparatins.
    True....if nothing else google can spell.

    But do you really expect google to list for you everything that can
    fall under their definition "The meaning of BIRTHRIGHT is a right, privilege, or possession to which a person is entitled by birth."
    like ancestry upon which reparations are based.

    ScottW
    So I am supposed to GUESS that's what you meant in your original post.
    You could try....or maybe not.
    I shouldn't have to try. You should
    make yourself clearly understood.

    Hmmm, a whole realm of possibilities just opened up....

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 29 16:48:21 2023

    Hmmm, a whole realm of possibilities just opened up....
    \

    a whole new level of obfuscation has been reached.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)