That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry, climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting for, and running political interference for a foreignnatural gas producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when he was Obama's VP?????????
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:natural gas producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when he was Obama's VP?????????
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry, climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting for, and running political interference for a foreign
Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change his
mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all those
carbon dollars.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:natural gas producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when he was Obama's VP?????????
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry, climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting for, and running political interference for a foreign
Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change hisWOW!!!
mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all those carbon dollars.
So you excuse
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
so You still support Biden after acknowledging that he raked in
?millions in foreign payments, including payments from a foreign
natural gas company.
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second termUp until recently,
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second termUp until recently, the carbon industry was accepted even subsidized for
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
its contributions to the economy. That has changed with the recognition
of global warming.
Another change of mind, Biden went from a banking bill that disallowed including student loans in bankruptcies to forgiving student loans.
And he went from draconian support of the police state to moderate
support of the police.
so You still support Biden after acknowledging that he raked inYes, I do, although I'm taking you at your word as I don't see any
?millions in foreign payments, including payments from a foreign
natural gas company.
record of him serving on business boards, let alone foreign ones or any record of foreign payments.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
What was the exact date of your enlightenment?WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second termUp until recently,
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
Just curious how slow your mind works.
ScottW
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 4:05:36 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently, the carbon industry was accepted even subsidized for
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
its contributions to the economy. That has changed with the recognition
of global warming.
Another change of mind, Biden went from a banking bill that disallowed
including student loans in bankruptcies to forgiving student loans.
And he went from draconian support of the police state to moderate
support of the police.
so You still support Biden after acknowledging that he raked inYes, I do, although I'm taking you at your word as I don't see any
?millions in foreign payments, including payments from a foreign
natural gas company.
record of him serving on business boards, let alone foreign ones or any
record of foreign payments.
HUH????
So you are saying that seven years ago we didn't know what global warming was, and
that Obama didn't have a green agenda.
I don't think so!!!!
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently,
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting
for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas
producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all
those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
What was the exact date of your enlightenment?
Just curious how slow your mind works.
On 7/25/23 4:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently,
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting >>>>> for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas >>>>> producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all >>>> those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
What was the exact date of your enlightenment?That the carbon sector was heavily supported by government spending?
I've known that for decades.
Just curious how slow your mind works.This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 7:24:54 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Correction....Venezuela
On 7/25/23 4:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently,
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he >>>>> raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting >>>>> for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas >>>>> producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when >>>>> he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change >>>> his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all >>>> those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term >>> as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were >>> telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your >>> tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
You're confused. It's only the US oil and gas (the cleanest in the world) that he's crushing.What was the exact date of your enlightenment?That the carbon sector was heavily supported by government spending?
I've known that for decades.
Just curious how slow your mind works.This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
Argentina....another story.
ScottW
On 7/25/23 5:56 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 4:05:36 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently, the carbon industry was accepted even subsidized for >> its contributions to the economy. That has changed with the recognition >> of global warming.
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting >>>>> for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas >>>>> producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all >>>> those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
Another change of mind, Biden went from a banking bill that disallowed
including student loans in bankruptcies to forgiving student loans.
And he went from draconian support of the police state to moderate
support of the police.
so You still support Biden after acknowledging that he raked inYes, I do, although I'm taking you at your word as I don't see any
?millions in foreign payments, including payments from a foreign
natural gas company.
record of him serving on business boards, let alone foreign ones or any >> record of foreign payments.
HUH????
So you are saying that seven years ago we didn't know what global warming was, and
that Obama didn't have a green agenda.
I don't think so!!!!I don't think so either. The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day
Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
On 7/25/23 4:34 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:54 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:08:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Up until recently,
On 7/25/23 12:05 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
That Joe Biden, the destroyer of the US natural gas industry,Stop. Take a breath. Consider punctuation.
climate change activist, and anti-fossil fuel proponent, that he
raked in $millions being on the board of, working for, consulting >>>>> for, and running political interference for a foreign natural gas >>>>> producing, exploiting, and marketing company that is in direct
opposition to his agenda, and to the agenda of Pres Obama, when
he was Obama's VP?????????
If I read you correctly, I'm more impressed an old guy can change
his mind about an important subject even if it means passing up all >>>> those carbon dollars.
WOW!!! So you excuse his natural gas shilling during the second term
as being VP of Obama! I remember that about two months ago you were
telling me of Biden's stellar 32 year career of working for the
public interest. You said that's why you implicitly trusted him
against the corruption allegations. Seem like you have changed your
tune! It also appears that you accept that he has received these
foreign payments.
What was the exact date of your enlightenment?That the carbon sector was heavily supported by government spending?
I've known that for decades.
Just curious how slow your mind works.This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 7:24:54 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
You're confused. It's only the US oil and gas (the cleanest in the world) that he's crushing.
Argentina....another story.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:36:06 AM UTC-7, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 7:24:54 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
Correction....VenezuelaThis was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climateYou're confused. It's only the US oil and gas (the cleanest in the world) that he's crushing.
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
Argentina....another story.
Correction....VenezuelaThe corner gas station used to be Valero. Still don't know what you're
on about.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day
Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUS
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:24:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
.....and raked in $millions from them
On 7/26/23 1:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:24:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
.....and raked in $millions from themIf the Bushes, whose family did likewise, came out against carbon, I
would support that view.
Instead, this happened:
https://www.the-republican-reversal.com/uploads/1/2/0/2/120201024/luntzresearch.memo2.pdf
"The scientific debate is closing against us] ... but not yet closed.
There is still a window of opportunity to challenge the science. ...
Voters believe that there is no consensus about global warming within
the scientific community. Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will
change accordingly. Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate, and defer
to scientists and other experts in the field."
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:47:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 1:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:24:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:If the Bushes, whose family did likewise, came out against carbon, I
This was a hypothetical: would I support Biden's present day climate
change agenda if it were shown he had enjoyed oil and gas company
support in the past.
.....and raked in $millions from them
would support that view.
Instead, this happened:
https://www.the-republican-reversal.com/uploads/1/2/0/2/120201024/luntzresearch.memo2.pdf
"The scientific debate is closing against us] ... but not yet closed.
There is still a window of opportunity to challenge the science. ...
Voters believe that there is no consensus about global warming within
the scientific community. Should the public come to believe that the
scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will
change accordingly. Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of
scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate, and defer
to scientists and other experts in the field."
whatever else they can be criticized for, they were not hypocritical global warming
grifters
your "whatabout" failed miserably
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day
Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
an oil company on his wiki bio.
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s?
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
hypocritical global warming grifters
On 7/26/23 11:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for >> an oil company on his wiki bio.
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day >>>> Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s?
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.Transitions generally include lengthy periods of time living and
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
identifying as the identified gender, months or even years.
Get to it.
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 11:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Transitions generally include lengthy periods of time living and
On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for >>>> an oil company on his wiki bio.
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day >>>>>> Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s?
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
identifying as the identified gender, months or even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than ten
years
On 7/28/23 12:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 11:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Transitions generally include lengthy periods of time living and
On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for >>>> an oil company on his wiki bio.
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day >>>>>> Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s?
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
identifying as the identified gender, months or even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than tenNope.
years
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:37:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 12:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Nope.
On 7/26/23 11:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Transitions generally include lengthy periods of time living and
On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for >>>>>> an oil company on his wiki bio.
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day >>>>>>>> Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s?
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
identifying as the identified gender, months or even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than ten
years
You can't have it both ways.
either one's identity sticks as soon as a claim is made, or when
one has accumulated experience living that identity.
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:37:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 12:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Nope.
On 7/26/23 11:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:43:57 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/26/23 1:10 PM, Art Sackman wrote:Transitions generally include lengthy periods of time living and
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70's black street radical.On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:42:42 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>Yes, that position is one of support. I missed Biden's time working for
The effort of decoding the word salad above was
too great, so answered a hypothetical: would I support a present-day
Biden if had taken a position I disagree with in the past?
So, nice try, but if you bring nonsense, you get nonsense.
Working for a fossil fuel resource extractor goes a hell of a lot more beyond 'taking a position'
an oil company on his wiki bio.
And your homey was, as VPOTUS, going diametrically opposed to the position of POTUSHomey? Are Eshkanazim (sic) entitled to black slang from the 70s? >>>>>
and Elizabeth Warren can identify as a native American.
identifying as the identified gender, months or even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than ten
years
You can't have it both ways.It's not a binary thing.
either one's identity sticks as soon as a claim is made, or when
one has accumulated experience living that identity.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
It's not a binary thing.Nope.I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70'sTransitions generally include lengthy periods of time
black street radical. and Elizabeth Warren can identify
as a native American.
living and identifying as the identified gender, months or
even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than
ten years
You can't have it both ways. either one's identity sticks as soon
as a claim is made, or when one has accumulated experience living
that identity.
obviously not. You profess that you can make one set of standards for
those who agree with you, and an opposite set if standards for those
who disagree with you.
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
It's not a binary thing.Nope.I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify as a 70'sTransitions generally include lengthy periods of time
black street radical. and Elizabeth Warren can identify
as a native American.
living and identifying as the identified gender, months or
even years.
Get to it.
GOOD POINT!!!!!! That means female transgenders of less than
ten years
You can't have it both ways. either one's identity sticks as soon
as a claim is made, or when one has accumulated experience living
that identity.
obviously not. You profess that you can make one set of standards for those who agree with you, and an opposite set if standards for thoseNo, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
who disagree with you.
you have little experience with.
The journey begins with the first step but that doesn't make the first
step the finish line.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
you have little experience with.
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarations
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
you have little experience with.
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarationsThis isn't a deflection.
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people,
I've met transgendered people,I'm sure they love being lost in your past tense.
Is this another instance of Super Shitty Super Stupid deliberately concealing their true meaning behind a dense thicket of garbled thoughts?
I've met transgendered people,I'm sure they love being lost in your past tense.
Are you really this stupid? That's a past participle.
Is this another instance of Super Shitty Super Stupid deliberately concealing their true meaning behind a dense thicket of garbled thoughts?
I've met transgendered people,I'm sure they love being lost in your past tense.
Are you really this stupid? That's a past participle.Ask a transgender if they're past it
dumbass.
"duh?" croaks Simple Shitty Stupidhead.
Is this another instance of Super Shitty Super Stupid deliberately concealing their true meaning behind a dense thicket of garbled thoughts?
I've met transgendered people,I'm sure they love being lost in your past tense.
Are you really this stupid? That's a past participle.Ask a transgender if they're past it
The answer, apparently, is "Yes, Super Shitty Scottie really is that stupid."
Do you feel the rage mounting, O Greatly Stupid Numbskull? Are you fantasizing about shooting up a shopping mall? Are you going to
organize a Libtard™ hunt with bounties paid by Curse America Now?
(That's Dumpster's super-pac, in case you didn't know.)
dumbass.
Oopsie....
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
you have little experience with.
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarationsThis isn't a deflection.
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people, but more importantly, I'm not trying to override the decisions they've made with their families and doctors.
I'm especially not holding them up to ridicule or violence or trying to
take away their right to exist in public.
Manifestation of your castration anxiety snipped. Oh, the irony.
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 3:36:25 PM UTC-7, Fascist Flea wrote:
Is this another instance of Super Shitty Super Stupid deliberately concealing their true meaning behind a dense thicket of garbled thoughts?
I've met transgendered people,I'm sure they love being lost in your past tense.
Are you really this stupid? That's a past participle.Ask a transgender if they're past it dumbass.
BTW....only 11.5% of gay men are willing to date transmen so
odds are...you're a transphobic bigot.
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:This isn't a deflection.
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something >>>> you have little experience with.
On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarations
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people, but more importantly, I'm not trying to
override the decisions they've made with their families and doctors.
I'm especially not holding them up to ridicule or violence or trying to
take away their right to exist in public.
Manifestation of your castration anxiety snipped. Oh, the irony.
Why would I be anxious about you losing your dick?
I would be overcome with Schadenfreude.
On 7/30/23 7:30 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:This isn't a deflection.
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something >>>> you have little experience with.
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarations
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people, but more importantly, I'm not trying to
override the decisions they've made with their families and doctors.
I'm especially not holding them up to ridicule or violence or trying to >> take away their right to exist in public.
Manifestation of your castration anxiety snipped. Oh, the irony.
Why would I be anxious about you losing your dick?Projection.
I would be overcome with Schadenfreude.I'm not going to kink-shame although I will mock your politics.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 9:06:36 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/30/23 7:30 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:This isn't a deflection.
On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
you have little experience with.
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarations
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people, but more importantly, I'm not trying to >> override the decisions they've made with their families and doctors.
I'm especially not holding them up to ridicule or violence or trying to >> take away their right to exist in public.
Manifestation of your castration anxiety snipped. Oh, the irony.
My politics result in youth who are adequately educated and can support a career.Why would I be anxious about you losing your dick?Projection.
I would be overcome with Schadenfreude.I'm not going to kink-shame although I will mock your politics.
Your politics result in unemployable drug addicted zombies who need protection from other harms
while they lay dying from fentanyl addiction.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 8:48:24 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 9:06:36 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/30/23 7:30 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 1:15:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/29/23 6:22 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 4:52:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 7/29/23 2:04 PM, Art Sackman wrote:This isn't a deflection.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:29:23 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/28/23 11:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:No, I'm replying to your deeply unserious declarations about something
I f you can identify as a woman, I can identify...
you have little experience with.
Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout your declarations
regarding transgenders, and your lack of experience.
I've met transgendered people, but more importantly, I'm not trying to
override the decisions they've made with their families and doctors. >>
I'm especially not holding them up to ridicule or violence or trying to
take away their right to exist in public.
Manifestation of your castration anxiety snipped. Oh, the irony.
Stephen's all is well world.My politics result in youth who are adequately educated and can support a career.Why would I be anxious about you losing your dick?Projection.
I would be overcome with Schadenfreude.I'm not going to kink-shame although I will mock your politics.
Your politics result in unemployable drug addicted zombies who need protection from other harms
while they lay dying from fentanyl addiction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRj3Sa-Q41A
ScottW
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 22:04:54 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,351,987 |