https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I encourage
anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendantI forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in
there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant
of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in
there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:09:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I encourage
anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
It is one sentence in 261 pages of curriculum.
She IS lying in saying that the curriculum teaches that slavery was a benefit, because she
removes the massive amount of opposite teachings. She didn't just say its 'in there'.
she says it is the underlying principle. That is the BIG LIE.
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant
of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
On 7/24/23 1:01 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:09:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I encourage >>> anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
It is one sentence in 261 pages of curriculum.That's why I believe it's valid to discuss context.
She IS lying in saying that the curriculum teaches that slavery was a benefit, because sheSS.68.AA.2.3:
removes the massive amount of opposite teachings. She didn't just say its 'in there'.
she says it is the underlying principle. That is the BIG LIE.
“Examine the various duties and trades performed by slaves (e.g., agricultural work, painting, carpentry, tailoring, domestic service, blacksmithing, transportation).
Benchmark Clarifications:
Instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some
instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.”
Examining context, one senses a dilution of the the problems of American chattel slavery
SS.912.AA.1.1
"Examine the condition of slavery as it existed in Africa, Asia, the Americas and Europe prior to 1619."
SS.912.AA.1.2
"Analyze the development of labor systems using indentured servitude contracts with English settlers and Africans early in Jamestown, Virginia."
As you say, there's a lot more. The other problematic statement is here:
SS.912.AA.3.6
"Describe the emergence, growth, destruction and rebuilding of black communities during Reconstruction and beyond.
Clarification 2: Instruction includes acts of violence perpetrated
against and by African Americans but is not limited to 1906 Atlanta Race Riot, 1919 Washington, D.C. Race Riot, 1920 Ocoee Massacre, 1921 Tulsa Massacre and the 1923 Rosewood Massacre."
"[A]gainst and by"?
And:
SS.912.AA.4.10
"Identify key legislation and the politicians and political figures who advanced American equality and representative democracy.
Clarification 1: Instruction includes political figures who shaped the modern Civil Rights efforts (e.g., Arthur Allen Fletcher, President
Dwight D. Eisenhower, President John F. Kennedy, President Lyndon B. Johnson, President Richard Nixon, Senator Everett Dirksen, Mary McLeod Bethune, Shelby Steele, Thomas Sowell, Representative John Lewis)."
Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell wrote on civil rights issues but can
hardly be said to have "shaped modern Civil Rights efforts."
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:28 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:01 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell wrote on civil rights issues but can
hardly be said to have "shaped modern Civil Rights efforts."
I'll respond to your incessant picayune chety picking.
My only problem with those two in the list is that they are not politicians or political figures.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it
https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you
say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant
of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of Benin
decent negates Scott's point?
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa,
according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592 >>>>>>>
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it >>>>>>> https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you >>>>>> say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of BeninScott didn't make a point.
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of
that discussion.
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa, according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking aboutNo, that standard is all yours.
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592 >>>>>>>
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it >>>>>>> https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you >>>>>> say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of BeninScott didn't make a point.
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of
that discussion.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa,No, that standard is all yours.
according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign, if you go back long enough.
Your ancestry is foreign.
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa,No, that standard is all yours.
according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the
Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
That's not an example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been as
low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign, if you go back long enough.
Your ancestry is foreign.
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa,No, that standard is all yours.
according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the
Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
That's not an example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been as
low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign, if you go back long enough.
Your ancestry is foreign.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:51:26 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries fromNo, that standard is all yours.
Africa, according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be
talking about slaves at all, when talking about US
slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.
name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or
the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?" That's not an
example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been
as low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign,
if you go back long enough. Your ancestry is foreign.
Hmmm....begs the question....should American descendants of foreign
slaves receive reparations? If not....how xenophobic are you?
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:51:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa,No, that standard is all yours.
according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about
slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.
name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the
Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
That's not an example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been as
low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign, if you go back long enough.
Your ancestry is foreign.
You most certainly questioned ancestry of one American.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:44:10 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 6:00 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Really? Who? Is this a Trumpian Obama birth certificate thing?I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry isWhy do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
foreign, except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry
is foreign, if you go back long enough. Your ancestry is
foreign.
You most certainly questioned ancestry of one American.
You fucking IDIOT, MORON, IMBECILE, LYING ASSHOLE
The person who Scott mentioned and who's you qlegutimacy you
questooned based on his ancestry
MA, you are one fucking SCUMBAG LYING PILE OF SHIT you keep getting
even worse, day by day. I have absolutely NO respect for you . None
at all. I used to, but not anymore.
On 7/25/23 6:00 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:51:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries from Africa, >>>>> according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be talking about >>>>> slaves at all, when talking about US slavery!!!!No, that standard is all yours.
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.
name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the
Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
That's not an example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been as
low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign, if you go back long enough.
Your ancestry is foreign.
You most certainly questioned ancestry of one American.Really? Who? Is this a Trumpian Obama birth certificate thing?
MA, you are one fucking SCUMBAG LYING PILE OF SHIT you keep gettingIf telling the truth leads to the loss of your respect, I can live with
even worse, day by day. I have absolutely NO respect for you . None
at all. I used to, but not anymore.
that.
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592 >>>>>>>
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it >>>>>>> https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you >>>>>> say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of BeninScott didn't make a point.
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of
that discussion.
On 7/26/23 3:57 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:44:10 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 6:00 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Really? Who? Is this a Trumpian Obama birth certificate thing?I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry isWhy do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
foreign, except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry
is foreign, if you go back long enough. Your ancestry is
foreign.
You most certainly questioned ancestry of one American.
You fucking IDIOT, MORON, IMBECILE, LYING ASSHOLE
The person who Scott mentioned and who's you qlegutimacy youScott didn't mention anyone. Do I have to quote again?
questooned based on his ancestry
MA, you are one fucking SCUMBAG LYING PILE OF SHIT you keep gettingIf telling the truth leads to the loss of your respect, I can live with that.
even worse, day by day. I have absolutely NO respect for you . None
at all. I used to, but not anymore.
On 7/25/23 4:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:51:26 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 12:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:04:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Again, that's your standard, not mine and your argument is mere
On 7/25/23 11:59 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
Benin is an ancestry. As slaves had their ancestries fromNo, that standard is all yours.
Africa, according to your looney standards, we shouldn't be
talking about slaves at all, when talking about US
slavery!!!!
Then your standard is blatant hypocrisy and complete nonsense.
name-calling.
Scott's example was of foreign ancestry"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or
the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?" That's not an
example of anything.
US slaves' ancestries were foreign.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716878/
"The true number of slaves born in the United States may have been
as low as 8.4 million or as high as 10.3 million."
I need to remind you that EVERY American's ancestry is foreign,Why do you need to do that? None of that has been questioned.
except for Native Americans, and even their ancestry is foreign,
if you go back long enough. Your ancestry is foreign.
Hmmm....begs the question....should American descendants of foreignXenophobia = not demanding reparations from foreign countries?
slaves receive reparations? If not....how xenophobic are you?
Never mind "begging the question," a phrase often used incorrectly in an effort to sound smart.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:57:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Scott, explain yourself.Scott didn't make a point.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of Benin decent
negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is
outside of that discussion.
Totally off point He wasn't discussing Benin. Just mentioned that
someone might have had an ancestor from there
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 7:29:10 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 4:40 PM, ScottW wrote:
Hmmm....begs the question....should American descendants of foreignXenophobia = not demanding reparations from foreign countries?
slaves receive reparations? If not....how xenophobic are you?
More like Xenophobia = not providing reparations to descendants of slaves from foreign countries.
Never mind "begging the question," a phrase often used incorrectly in an
effort to sound smart.
I've long found that "sounding smart" is not helpful in communicating with you.
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:09:16 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
On 7/23/23 10:49 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1683142566508654592 >>>>>>>
The analysis I referenced was done by @charlescwcooke and I
encourage anyone who wants the truth of this story to read it >>>>>>> https://nationalreview.com/corner/kamala-harris-is-brazenly-lying-about-floridas-slavery-curriculum/
No, she's not. The 'slavery benefiting slaves' thing is literally in there. And there are other problems.
You can discuss the curriculum in context but you're wrong if you >>>>>> say she's lying.
Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of BeninScott didn't make a point.
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of
that discussion.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:57:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
Scott didn't make a point.Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of Benin
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of
that discussion.
He was not talking about' Benin. He only remarked that a person's ancestors were from Benin.
You are being completely ridiculous.
On 7/28/23 11:56 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 9:57:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 4:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 1:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:25:01 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/24/23 12:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
Scott didn't make a point.Try this context. Would you rather be the Black American descendant >>>>>>> of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?I forget: when was Benin admitted to the Union?
What difference does that make?
Exactly.
Not nearly
Scott, explain yourself.
explain your comment. why do you imply that being of Benin
decent negates Scott's point?
We're discussing part of the history of US slavery. Benin is outside of >> that discussion.
He was not talking about' Benin. He only remarked that a person's ancestors were from Benin.I've quoted him twice and you can see it above. He did not do that. He
You are being completely ridiculous.
has not identified a person or their ancestry or related it to the
Florida educational curriculum.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:37:28 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:56 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
He was not talking about' Benin. He only remarked that a person's ancestors were from Benin.I've quoted him twice and you can see it above. He did not do that. He
You are being completely ridiculous.
has not identified a person or their ancestry or related it to the
Florida educational curriculum.
In which one of the 31 previous posts have you quoted him twice??
I will quote him once.
"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
You haven't answered his question.
On 7/28/23 11:55 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:37:28 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:56 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
He was not talking about' Benin. He only remarked that a person's ancestors were from Benin.I've quoted him twice and you can see it above. He did not do that. He
You are being completely ridiculous.
has not identified a person or their ancestry or related it to the
Florida educational curriculum.
In which one of the 31 previous posts have you quoted him twice??Well-played!
I will quote him once.
"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"That's the quote. It was not a remark, it doesn't identify a person and
has nothing to do with your other replies.
You haven't answered his question.I replied.
You reply to everything..............and say absolutely nothing.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 8:28:41 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 11:55 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:37:28 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Well-played!
On 7/28/23 11:56 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
He was not talking about' Benin. He only remarked that a person's ancestors were from Benin.I've quoted him twice and you can see it above. He did not do that. He >>>> has not identified a person or their ancestry or related it to the
You are being completely ridiculous.
Florida educational curriculum.
In which one of the 31 previous posts have you quoted him twice??
I will quote him once.That's the quote. It was not a remark, it doesn't identify a person and
"Would you rather be the Black American descendant of a slave or the Black Benin descendant of a slave trader?"
has nothing to do with your other replies.
You haven't answered his question.I replied.
You reply to everything..............and say absolutely nothing.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 30:57:24 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,353,038 |