• Did you know>

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 10:32:08 2023
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 20 13:16:45 2023
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 11:26:29 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it. Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.
    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.

    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 20 12:13:52 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 1:32:10 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?

    ScottW

    RFK Jr. is no puppet of the Rep party.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 20 14:16:49 2023
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some
    higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.

    I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is
    too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate
    recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.

    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.

    Jim Jordan calling.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 17:01:34 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some >> higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment >> about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes >> Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says." >>
    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign >>
    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.
    I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is
    too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.


    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.

    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.

    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.
    Jim Jordan calling.

    Prove he lied.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 21 09:41:29 2023
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some >>>> higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment >>>> about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes >>>> Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says." >>>>
    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign >>>>
    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.
    I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is
    too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate
    recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.

    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.

    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.

    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that
    don't identify themselves.

    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.
    Jim Jordan calling.

    Prove he lied.

    Google brings up a ton of MSNBC content so I'll pass. He's not
    intellectually honest, though.




    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 21 08:06:04 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 7:41:31 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some
    higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says." >>>>
    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign >>>>
    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.
    I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is
    too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate
    recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.
    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.

    Neither is Kennedy. He's pro "safe" vax. But now you're just obfuscating.

    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.
    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that
    don't identify themselves.

    Actually they do. But as usual you miss the real point completely.
    Neither ad endorses or promotes a candidate.
    I am stunned that the simple word "Too" is going right over your head.

    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.
    Jim Jordan calling.

    Prove he lied.
    Google brings up a ton of MSNBC content so I'll pass. He's not intellectually honest, though.

    LoL. Are you "intellectually honest"?
    I'd call that an opinion or a perception rather than an objective state.
    I don't find you intellectually honest at all. The school choice discussion is a great example.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 21 09:05:04 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 11:06:06 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 7:41:31 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some
    higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win >>>> candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference. >> I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is >> too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate
    recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.
    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.
    Neither is Kennedy. He's pro "safe" vax. But now you're just obfuscating.
    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.
    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that don't identify themselves.
    Actually they do. But as usual you miss the real point completely.
    Neither ad endorses or promotes a candidate.
    I am stunned that the simple word "Too" is going right over your head.
    I want party meddling and lying exposed but not censored.
    The censors always run afoul.
    Once upon a time a liar exposed political career was over.
    Now dems promote them and give them key committee assignments.
    Jim Jordan calling.

    Prove he lied.
    Google brings up a ton of MSNBC content so I'll pass. He's not intellectually honest, though.
    LoL. Are you "intellectually honest"?
    I'd call that an opinion or a perception rather than an objective state.
    I don't find you intellectually honest at all. The school choice discussion is a great example.

    ScottW

    Not to mention Marxist Steve's shunning of blind links

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 21 12:12:49 2023
    On 7/21/23 10:06 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 7:41:31 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some >>>>>> higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just
    interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment >>>>>> about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024
    Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says." >>>>>>
    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign >>>>>>
    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too
    conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win
    candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference.
    I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is >>>> too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate
    recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.
    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.

    Neither is Kennedy. He's pro "safe" vax. But now you're just obfuscating.

    No, he's anti-vax but playing word games for cover. Someone interested
    in safe vax doesn't repeat misinformation about mercury that hasn't been present in decades.

    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.
    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that
    don't identify themselves.

    Actually they do. But as usual you miss the real point completely.
    Neither ad endorses or promotes a candidate.
    I am stunned that the simple word "Too" is going right over your head.

    You missed my point: these are the kinds of ads the Democrats run. To
    complain about being "too conservative" is heard as favorable to MAGA.

    But this is so obvious you can't possibly misunderstand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 21 14:04:05 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 1:12:52 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/21/23 10:06 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 7:41:31 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some
    higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just >>>>>> interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024 >>>>>> Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too >>>>>> conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win >>>>>> candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference. >>>> I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is >>>> too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate >>>> recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.
    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.

    Neither is Kennedy. He's pro "safe" vax. But now you're just obfuscating.
    No, he's anti-vax but playing word games for cover. Someone interested
    in safe vax doesn't repeat misinformation about mercury that hasn't been present in decades.
    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.
    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that
    don't identify themselves.

    Actually they do. But as usual you miss the real point completely.
    Neither ad endorses or promotes a candidate.
    I am stunned that the simple word "Too" is going right over your head.
    You missed my point: these are the kinds of ads the Democrats run. To complain about being "too conservative" is heard as favorable to MAGA.

    But this is so obvious you can't possibly misunderstand.

    He's an old man he can't hear your high pitched dog whistle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 22 18:43:55 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:12:52 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/21/23 10:06 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 7:41:31 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 7:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 12:16:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 1:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 11:16:48 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/23 12:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
    That RFK Jrs. entire campaign is a right-wing orchestrated false flag operation?

    Seriously....

    WTF is wrong with your party?
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/rfk-kennedy-trump-maga-biden-2024-election-1234777035/

    "At Fox News, three staffers and a producer tell Rolling Stone that some
    higher-ups have privately discussed how much they value not just >>>>>> interviewing Kennedy on the network, but featuring segment after segment
    about his candidacy and his unexpected poll numbers in the 2024 >>>>>> Democratic field. “Management loves RFK [Jr.] coverage because it makes
    Biden look weak. You can expect a lot of it,” the Fox producer says."

    https://www.axios.com/2023/06/08/robert-f-kennedy-jr-tech-2024-campaign

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/15/rfk-fundraising-republicans-00106481

    Remember how bent out of shape you were when Democrats ran "too >>>>>> conservative for your district" ads to push too-right-wing-to-win >>>>>> candidates in Republican primaries?

    You're slightly confused, if dems want to run too conservative ads, go for it.
    Honest opinion. But they ran false flag support ads. Big difference. >>>> I only saw examples of the former but your "false flag" distinction is >>>> too cute by far, especially in the context of a Democratic candidate >>>> recruited and promoted by Steve Bannon.

    I've no doubt Steve Bannon is willing to replicate your party's scumbag crap.
    Replicate? The Democratic party isn't anti-vax.

    Neither is Kennedy. He's pro "safe" vax. But now you're just obfuscating.
    No, he's anti-vax

    That's your opinion of what's in his head. He denies it.

    I think it's pretty shitty of you to declare you know more of a persons beliefs than the person themselves.

    but playing word games for cover. Someone interested
    in safe vax doesn't repeat misinformation about mercury that hasn't been present in decades.
    In any case , private or non party media not funded by campaign dollars can do whatever.
    Isn't the same as party hacks paying for slime ads.
    Pelosi:

    https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2022/06/03/629a9b0ce4b07aa93899ef25.mp4

    Blind link soup ad from a PAC.
    Colorado PAC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sV9YZpkZ2A&t=22s

    Ron Hanks: too conservative for Colorado

    One of each?

    One of each what? I don't see your problem with either.
    Those are both "too conservative" ads from Democratic supporters that
    don't identify themselves.

    Actually they do. But as usual you miss the real point completely.
    Neither ad endorses or promotes a candidate.
    I am stunned that the simple word "Too" is going right over your head.
    You missed my point: these are the kinds of ads the Democrats run.

    They aren't the kind I was complaining about. You're off the rails again.

    To
    complain about being "too conservative" is heard as favorable to MAGA.

    Oh brother...... I guess you can quit bitching about being called too stupid. It's favorable to progressive groomers.

    But this is so obvious you can't possibly misunderstand.

    It's too cute by 3x and not at all on subject.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 22 22:52:10 2023
    Super Shitty tries to conjure up a unicorn. But it's
    not a magical, pot-of-gold internet startup.

    progressive groomers.

    The RWNJ trophy case is still empty, but the dream ever lurks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)