What you won't hear is that everyone, including Joe knew this. It
was all a ploy to influence an election. And it worked. After the
stupid gullible young college debtors get the rug yanked out from
under them, Joe will just blame those damn republican appointed
justices for adhering to the constitution when it comes to
appropriations.
On 6/30/23 10:51 PM, ScottW wrote:
What you won't hear is that everyone, including Joe knew this. ItThe decision relies on tortured logic in applying an excluded middle
was all a ploy to influence an election. And it worked. After the
stupid gullible young college debtors get the rug yanked out from
under them, Joe will just blame those damn republican appointed
justices for adhering to the constitution when it comes to
appropriations.
reading of "modify or waive."
Fortunately for student loan holders, as seen in the NYT, the Higher Education Act gives the secretary of education the power to “compromise, waive or release any right, title, claim, lien or demand, however
acquired, including any equity or any right of redemption.”
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:42:29 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/30/23 10:51 PM, ScottW wrote:
What you won't hear is that everyone, including Joe knew this. ItThe decision relies on tortured logic in applying an excluded middle
was all a ploy to influence an election. And it worked. After the
stupid gullible young college debtors get the rug yanked out from
under them, Joe will just blame those damn republican appointed
justices for adhering to the constitution when it comes to
appropriations.
reading of "modify or waive."
It's not even clear congress can grant that in their poorly written law without going through the constitutional amendment process.
Fortunately for student loan holders, as seen in the NYT, the Higher
Education Act gives the secretary of education the power to “compromise, >> waive or release any right, title, claim, lien or demand, however
acquired, including any equity or any right of redemption.”
Meaningless gibberish without congressional appropriation of the funding
as required by the constitution.
On 7/1/23 10:01 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:42:29 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/30/23 10:51 PM, ScottW wrote:
What you won't hear is that everyone, including Joe knew this. ItThe decision relies on tortured logic in applying an excluded middle
was all a ploy to influence an election. And it worked. After the
stupid gullible young college debtors get the rug yanked out from
under them, Joe will just blame those damn republican appointed
justices for adhering to the constitution when it comes to
appropriations.
reading of "modify or waive."
It's not even clear congress can grant that in their poorly written law without going through the constitutional amendment process."Modify or waive" (or "amend or waive") is standard language for laws
and there's nothing unConstitutional about the executive choosing how to perform legislatively authorized tasks:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5141
Any Federal agency charged with the administration of a Federal
assistance program may, if so requested by the applicant State or local authorities, modify or waive, for a major disaster, such administrative conditions for assistance as would otherwise prevent the giving of assistance under such programs if the inability to meet such conditions
is a result of the major disaster.
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/1/23 10:01 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:42:29 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:"Modify or waive" (or "amend or waive") is standard language for
On 6/30/23 10:51 PM, ScottW wrote:
What you won't hear is that everyone, including Joe knewThe decision relies on tortured logic in applying an excluded
this. It was all a ploy to influence an election. And it
worked. After the stupid gullible young college debtors get
the rug yanked out from under them, Joe will just blame those
damn republican appointed justices for adhering to the
constitution when it comes to appropriations.
middle reading of "modify or waive."
It's not even clear congress can grant that in their poorly
written law without going through the constitutional amendment
process.
laws and there's nothing unConstitutional about the executive
choosing how to perform legislatively authorized tasks:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5141
Any Federal agency charged with the administration of a Federal
assistance program may, if so requested by the applicant State or
local authorities, modify or waive, for a major disaster, such
administrative conditions for assistance as would otherwise prevent
the giving of assistance under such programs if the inability to
meet such conditions is a result of the major disaster.
and you complain about my gibberish.....
This sounds like their talking about gov'ts ability to grant
loans....not the responsibility of the recipients to pay them.
Are you still paying off your student loans? That explains your
desperation.
ScottW
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:19:10 |
Calls: | 6,707 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,239 |
Messages: | 5,351,619 |