The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No Labels from
ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
On 4/2/23 9:13 PM, ScottW wrote:
The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No Labels fromJill Stein says 'hi!'
ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
If the non-profit corp No Labels wants to be on the ballot, they have to follow the same rules as the real parties. Remember how 501c
organizations can't support political campaigns?
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 10:40:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/2/23 9:13 PM, ScottW wrote:
The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No LabelsJill Stein says 'hi!'
from ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
If the non-profit corp No Labels wants to be on the ballot, they
have to follow the same rules as the real parties. Remember how
501c organizations can't support political campaigns?
Wiki:
"No Labels is an American political organization supporting centrist, bi-partisan policies and politics.[2][3][4][5] It was established in
2010. It is a registered 501(c)(4) and does not disclose its donors.
As of March 2023, it is a registered political party in Arizona,
Colorado, and Oregon.[6]"
BTW, glad to see that you support voter suppression of non
Democrats.
On 4/3/23 11:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 10:40:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/2/23 9:13 PM, ScottW wrote:
The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No LabelsJill Stein says 'hi!'
from ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
If the non-profit corp No Labels wants to be on the ballot, they
have to follow the same rules as the real parties. Remember how
501c organizations can't support political campaigns?
Wiki:
"No Labels is an American political organization supporting centrist, bi-partisan policies and politics.[2][3][4][5] It was established inMarch, 2023. That's what, last week?
2010. It is a registered 501(c)(4) and does not disclose its donors.
As of March 2023, it is a registered political party in Arizona,
Colorado, and Oregon.[6]"
BTW, glad to see that you support voter suppression of nonCheck that party registration against the Arizona filing deadline and
Democrats.
get back to me.''
Check that party registration against the Arizona filing deadline and
get back to me.''
No matter the date, you are opposed to open and fair elections
offering a number of choices.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:28:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/3/23 11:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 10:40:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:March, 2023. That's what, last week?
On 4/2/23 9:13 PM, ScottW wrote:
The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No LabelsJill Stein says 'hi!'
from ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
If the non-profit corp No Labels wants to be on the ballot, they
have to follow the same rules as the real parties. Remember how
501c organizations can't support political campaigns?
Wiki:
"No Labels is an American political organization supporting centrist,
bi-partisan policies and politics.[2][3][4][5] It was established in
2010. It is a registered 501(c)(4) and does not disclose its donors.
As of March 2023, it is a registered political party in Arizona,
Colorado, and Oregon.[6]"
BTW, glad to see that you support voter suppression of nonCheck that party registration against the Arizona filing deadline and
Democrats.
get back to me.''
No matter the date, you are opposed to open and fair elections
offering a number of choices.
Show me the date of No Labels registering as a political party then show
the filing date for Arizona's election in question. If No Labels was a legitimate party at the time of filing, I would expect and support a
judge's ruling in their favor.
On 4/4/23 10:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:28:47 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/3/23 11:15 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 10:40:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:March, 2023. That's what, last week?
On 4/2/23 9:13 PM, ScottW wrote:
The Arizona Democratic Party has filed suit to block No LabelsJill Stein says 'hi!'
from ballot access in that state on procedural grounds.
If the non-profit corp No Labels wants to be on the ballot, they
have to follow the same rules as the real parties. Remember how
501c organizations can't support political campaigns?
Wiki:
"No Labels is an American political organization supporting centrist, >>> bi-partisan policies and politics.[2][3][4][5] It was established in
2010. It is a registered 501(c)(4) and does not disclose its donors.
As of March 2023, it is a registered political party in Arizona,
Colorado, and Oregon.[6]"
BTW, glad to see that you support voter suppression of nonCheck that party registration against the Arizona filing deadline and
Democrats.
get back to me.''
No matter the date, you are opposed to open and fair electionsNo, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for
offering a number of choices.
what a political party is.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 10:48:17 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
No, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for
what a political party is.
Only when it benefits your agenda.
On 4/6/23 9:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 10:48:17 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
No, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for >> what a political party is.
Only when it benefits your agenda.Republicans have a history of supporting third parties in hope of
splitting the opposing vote.
I do not favor unlawful suppression of legal political parties.
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 7:58:04 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/6/23 9:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 10:48:17 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Republicans have a history of supporting third parties in hope of
No, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for >>>> what a political party is.
Only when it benefits your agenda.
splitting the opposing vote.
and dems like meddling in republican primaries or even
rigging the primaries as in Ca.
I do not favor unlawful suppression of legal political parties.
Moral holes you could drive a truck through.
On 4/7/23 5:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 7:58:04 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/6/23 9:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 10:48:17 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Republicans have a history of supporting third parties in hope of
No, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for >>>> what a political party is.
Only when it benefits your agenda.
splitting the opposing vote.
and dems like meddling in republican primaries or evenDunno about those primaries but "too conservative for your region" ads
rigging the primaries as in Ca.
are a thing.
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 7:58:41 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 4/7/23 5:21 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 7:58:04 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Dunno about those primaries but "too conservative for your region" ads
On 4/6/23 9:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 10:48:17 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Republicans have a history of supporting third parties in hope of
No, I'm in favor of following election laws with clear requirements for >>>>>> what a political party is.
Only when it benefits your agenda.
splitting the opposing vote.
and dems like meddling in republican primaries or even
rigging the primaries as in Ca.
are a thing.
Too many buts and things to follow your obfuscation anymore.
Facts remain, the dems aren't leaving it to the officially sanction regulatory body to
determine if the party has met legal requirements or not.
They've chosen to file suit and probably hope to at least drain their financial
resources on legal fees. All because they think that party is a threat to them.
They don't trust you to make the right choice.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 27:47:18 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,352,697 |