• Still Lithium but actually works

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 6 19:44:01 2023
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1347

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Feb 7 09:44:43 2023
    On 2/6/23 9:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1347

    Progress! Does that density mean smaller batteries as one might think?
    With extraction and desalination at the Salton Sea California might be
    energy independent.

    I also assume it could be years before a practical application but those present three thousand pound batteries aren't ideal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 7 08:32:15 2023
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7:44:46 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
    On 2/6/23 9:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1347

    Progress! Does that density mean smaller batteries as one might think?
    With extraction and desalination at the Salton Sea California might be
    energy independent.

    Batteries aren't an energy source and it's really hard to imagine what a doubling
    of battery use in our transportation energy system would do.
    A set of batteries in the car.
    A set of batteries in the grid to store it so it's available to charge our car batteries at night.
    Salton sea has some mountains nearby. I'd be more inclined to look for a hydroelectric storage
    solution or even a hydrogen system
    that lasts over doubling the battery demand which still need frequent replacement.
    Since the source is limitless and free (solar), efficiency at that point of the system isn't that great a concern.
    Consider solar panels are 25% at best.

    I also assume it could be years before a practical application but those present three thousand pound batteries aren't ideal.

    Of course new battery tech on the horizon always makes current e-car buyers
    a bit foolish as their car becomes relatively worthless.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Feb 7 14:18:10 2023
    On 2/7/23 10:32 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7:44:46 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
    On 2/6/23 9:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1347

    Progress! Does that density mean smaller batteries as one might
    think? With extraction and desalination at the Salton Sea
    California might be energy independent.

    Batteries aren't an energy source

    Yes, I misspoke: the "independence" would be from better storage of
    energy sources. The implication in the article was that a lithium
    battery could have the same energy as the same sized gas tank.

    it's really hard to imagine what a doubling of battery use in our transportation energy system would do. A set of batteries in the car.
    A set of batteries in the grid to store it so it's available to
    charge our car batteries at night.

    That would do.

    Salton sea has some mountains nearby. I'd be more inclined to look
    for a hydroelectric storage solution or even a hydrogen system

    It's full of lithium and has geothermal resources.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/04/the-salton-sea-could-produce-the-worlds-greenest-lithium.html

    https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2021/08/12/salton-sea-restoration-efforts-could-fail-without-science

    "Recent legislation mandates that all of the state’s electrical power
    come from renewable sources by 2045. Besides lithium, our new report
    discusses using electrolytic hydrogen and pumped water as methods for
    storing electrical power, which could help the state meet its goals.

    Hydrogen gas produced by electrolysis of water, using electricity
    supplied by geothermal energy, can be stored or transported to provide electrical power. Pumped water can also be stored in raised reservoirs
    and released to generate hydroelectric power during peak demand hours."

    that lasts over doubling the battery demand which still need
    frequent replacement. Since the source is limitless and free
    (solar), efficiency at that point of the system isn't that great a
    concern. Consider solar panels are 25% at best.

    I also assume it could be years before a practical application but
    those present three thousand pound batteries aren't ideal.

    Of course new battery tech on the horizon always makes current e-car
    buyers a bit foolish as their car becomes relatively worthless.

    One could argue buying any new car is foolish given the instant
    depreciation. I buy used and drive them forever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)