• A different path forward

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 31 10:04:26 2022
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Dec 31 14:10:50 2022
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun Jan 1 07:54:10 2023
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    * The THEORETICAL efficiency of a non-Diesel ICE vehicle 35%. The figure
    is always lower. Often (when starting, cold weather, etc) that figure is
    more like 15%.

    * The REAL-WORLD efficiency of an EV is around 90%. Frequently, it is
    higher. Combined with regenerative braking systems, that efficiency is
    bumped up a few more points.

    * ICE torque is generated at several thousand RPM.

    * EV torque is generated at anything over zero RPM. If real-world
    driving conditions (ie: city), this is ideal.

    * Electric motors are simpler and require far less maintenance than ICE.

    Since H2 fuel cell and H2 ICE vehicles require the same H2 storage
    systems, it makes far more sense to use a system which uses that fuel
    more efficiently.

    H2 will, almost certainly, be a significant part of transport mix in
    coming years. It will, almost certainly, NOT involve ICE technology,
    except for a handful of niche applications.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sun Jan 1 08:35:49 2023
    On 1/01/2023 8:17 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 3:54:12 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    * The THEORETICAL efficiency of a non-Diesel ICE vehicle 35%. The figure
    is always lower. Often (when starting, cold weather, etc) that figure is
    more like 15%.

    * The REAL-WORLD efficiency of an EV is around 90%. Frequently, it is
    higher. Combined with regenerative braking systems, that efficiency is
    bumped up a few more points.

    * ICE torque is generated at several thousand RPM.

    * EV torque is generated at anything over zero RPM. If real-world
    driving conditions (ie: city), this is ideal.

    * Electric motors are simpler and require far less maintenance than ICE.

    Since H2 fuel cell and H2 ICE vehicles require the same H2 storage
    systems, it makes far more sense to use a system which uses that fuel
    more efficiently.

    H2 will, almost certainly, be a significant part of transport mix in
    coming years. It will, almost certainly, NOT involve ICE technology,
    except for a handful of niche applications.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
    www.avast.com

    Did you recover from swallowing that man o war?

    https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/bluebottle-bondi-beach/




    **Urk. As a typical Aussie teenager, who spent way too much time at the
    beach, I've been stung dozens of times by bluebottles. The worst was
    when I was paddling my board out past the breakers, when I dug deep and
    the tentacles of a bluebottle wrapped around my wrist. It took way too
    long to remove the damned thing. Hurt like Hell.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sat Dec 31 13:17:27 2022
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 3:54:12 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    * The THEORETICAL efficiency of a non-Diesel ICE vehicle 35%. The figure
    is always lower. Often (when starting, cold weather, etc) that figure is
    more like 15%.

    * The REAL-WORLD efficiency of an EV is around 90%. Frequently, it is
    higher. Combined with regenerative braking systems, that efficiency is
    bumped up a few more points.

    * ICE torque is generated at several thousand RPM.

    * EV torque is generated at anything over zero RPM. If real-world
    driving conditions (ie: city), this is ideal.

    * Electric motors are simpler and require far less maintenance than ICE.

    Since H2 fuel cell and H2 ICE vehicles require the same H2 storage
    systems, it makes far more sense to use a system which uses that fuel
    more efficiently.

    H2 will, almost certainly, be a significant part of transport mix in
    coming years. It will, almost certainly, NOT involve ICE technology,
    except for a handful of niche applications.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    Did you recover from swallowing that man o war?

    https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/bluebottle-bondi-beach/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sat Dec 31 21:55:17 2022
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 9:20:47 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 4:15 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they do to GVW.
    **Fuel cells show great promise. So much so, that vast swathes of the Japanese auto industry are converting to fuel cell EVs.
    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.

    **Uh-huh. And what power source do the motors in a fuel cell operate from?

    A: Hydrogen

    I fixed it. You're simply confusing people by implying the electricity
    grid plays a role.
    No one says locomotives are powered by electricity.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sat Dec 31 21:15:42 2022
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they
    do to GVW.
    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sat Dec 31 21:52:58 2022
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 9:20:47 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 4:15 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they do to GVW.
    **Fuel cells show great promise. So much so, that vast swathes of the Japanese auto industry are converting to fuel cell EVs.
    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.

    **Uh-huh. And what power source do the motors in a fuel cell operate from?

    A: ELECTRICITY.

    That makes an H2 fuel cell vehicle an EV. The fuel cell is merely a
    different kind of battery.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun Jan 1 16:20:45 2023
    On 1/01/2023 4:15 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is
    with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why:

    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they
    do to GVW.

    **Fuel cells show great promise. So much so, that vast swathes of the
    Japanese auto industry are converting to fuel cell EVs.

    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.


    **Uh-huh. And what power source do the motors in a fuel cell operate from?

    A: ELECTRICITY.

    That makes an H2 fuel cell vehicle an EV. The fuel cell is merely a
    different kind of battery.




    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jan 2 13:38:06 2023
    On 1/01/2023 4:55 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 9:20:47 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 4:15 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is >>>> with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why: >>>
    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that
    batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they >>> do to GVW.
    **Fuel cells show great promise. So much so, that vast swathes of the
    Japanese auto industry are converting to fuel cell EVs.
    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.

    **Uh-huh. And what power source do the motors in a fuel cell operate from? >>
    A: Hydrogen

    I fixed it. You're simply confusing people by implying the electricity
    grid plays a role.

    **I never implied such a thing, though it is obvious that H2 will be
    made via the use of electricity.

    No one says locomotives are powered by electricity.

    **Yeah, they do. It's in the name:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel%E2%80%93electric_transmission


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sun Jan 1 23:13:05 2023
    On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 6:38:11 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 4:55 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 9:20:47 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 1/01/2023 4:15 pm, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 12:54:12 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/01/2023 5:04 am, ScottW wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/toyota-s-upcoming-hydrogen-powered-5-0-v-8-engine-has-the-potential-to-bury-evs/ar-AA15Q9mq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=b018bd7ba2834a66d86d0ee38ce1ef53


    ScottW

    **It'll never happen. Toyota are just show-boating. The real action is >>>> with EVs and, particularly, H2 fuel cell EVs. Here are the reasons why: >>>
    I guess you didn't watch the video embedded in the link comparing hydrogen storage capacity
    and range. It clearly showed the issues. Then again it also showed that >>> batteries aren't that great as space eaters and we already know what they >>> do to GVW.
    **Fuel cells show great promise. So much so, that vast swathes of the
    Japanese auto industry are converting to fuel cell EVs.
    Anyway, I don't really consider a hydrogen fuel fuel cell car an EV.
    It's not fueled with electricity.

    **Uh-huh. And what power source do the motors in a fuel cell operate from? >>
    A: Hydrogen

    I fixed it. You're simply confusing people by implying the electricity
    grid plays a role.
    **I never implied such a thing, though it is obvious that H2 will be
    made via the use of electricity.

    Is it? I've seen reports of bio production of hydrogen in development.

    No one says locomotives are powered by electricity.
    **Yeah, they do. It's in the name:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel%E2%80%93electric_transmission

    Only Trevor thinks diesel locomotives aren't run on diesel fuel.
    But he's crazy.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 2 07:19:48 2023
    Q: Where does the sun never rise?
    A: In the scottw dimension, where Trump is a patriot and a victim.

    Only Trevor thinks diesel locomotives aren't run on diesel fuel.

    Technically, he is correct. The trains are powered by electric motors.
    The electric motors are powered by diesel engines.

    But he's crazy.

    Great "information" there, Shmoo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jan 2 09:48:35 2023
    On 1/2/23 1:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel%E2%80%93electric_transmission

    Only Trevor thinks diesel locomotives aren't run on diesel fuel.
    But he's crazy.
    Then so is the rail industry:

    https://www.up.com/aboutup/special_trains/diesel-electric/

    Although commonly called "diesels," the locomotives actually are
    electrically driven. The diesel engine drives an alternator, which
    produces electricity to run electric motors mounted on the locomotive's
    axles. The internal combustion engine was a dramatic improvement in
    efficiency over the steam locomotive, making substantial savings
    possible in maintenance and the elimination of widespread facilities.
    Extra units could be coupled together and run by one engineer from the
    lead unit, creating very powerful combinations.

    Many railroads, including Union Pacific, were unable to take quick
    advantage of the new technology due to material shortages caused by
    World War II. Union Pacific's fleet of modern steam locomotives and
    plentiful on-line coal reserves in Wyoming were another factor in UP's
    late entry into the dieselization race. After the war however, railroads
    began sweeping the rails clear of the classic steamers. Union Pacific
    began its sweep in the late 1940s on the line running through the
    southwestern deserts, where water was difficult to obtain for steam engines.

    By the end of the 1950s the steam era was over and increasingly powerful diesels ruled the rails.

    End quote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 2 09:16:34 2023
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 7:48:38 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
    On 1/2/23 1:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel%E2%80%93electric_transmission

    Only Trevor thinks diesel locomotives aren't run on diesel fuel.
    But he's crazy.
    Then so is the rail industry:

    https://www.up.com/aboutup/special_trains/diesel-electric/

    Although commonly called "diesels," the locomotives actually are
    electrically driven. The diesel engine drives an alternator, which
    produces electricity to run electric motors mounted on the locomotive's axles.

    So their source of power is diesel fuel.
    In reality electricity isn't a power source, just a means of transporting it. When we harness the earth's magnetic field as source of power...I'll reconsider.
    Until then...it's just a means of transport and/or storage.
    But never a source. Now if you want to knitpik that carbon fuels are also just a
    means of transport and storage....you'd be technically correct, but not practically.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jan 2 11:45:55 2023
    On 1/2/23 11:16 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 7:48:38 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
    On 1/2/23 1:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel%E2%80%93electric_transmission

    Only Trevor thinks diesel locomotives aren't run on diesel fuel.
    But he's crazy.
    Then so is the rail industry:

    https://www.up.com/aboutup/special_trains/diesel-electric/

    Although commonly called "diesels," the locomotives actually are
    electrically driven. The diesel engine drives an alternator, which
    produces electricity to run electric motors mounted on the locomotive's
    axles.

    So their source of power is diesel fuel.

    In reality electricity isn't a power source, just a means of transporting it. When we harness the earth's magnetic field as source of power...I'll reconsider.
    Until then...it's just a means of transport and/or storage.
    But never a source. Now if you want to knitpik that carbon fuels are also just a
    means of transport and storage....you'd be technically correct, but not practically.

    Indeed. Diesel is solar power if you go back far enough.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)