• Election Denial is a leadership requirement

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 21 16:19:48 2022
    for dems.

    The more we learn about 2016 election the more ILLEGITIMATE it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a FAKE President in the Oval Office #RussianInterference,” Jeffries said on social media in 2018.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Nov 22 10:13:56 2022
    On 11/21/22 6:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
    for dems.

    The more we learn about 2016 election the more ILLEGITIMATE it
    becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a FAKE President in
    the Oval Office #RussianInterference,” Jeffries said on social media
    in 2018.

    He's referring to legitimacy, not denying the outcome of the election.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 22 12:19:56 2022
    On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 11:13:58 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On 11/21/22 6:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
    for dems.

    The more we learn about 2016 election the more ILLEGITIMATE it
    becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a FAKE President in
    the Oval Office #RussianInterference,” Jeffries said on social media
    in 2018.
    He's referring to legitimacy, not denying the outcome of the election.

    Denying the legitimacy IS denying the outcome

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to hootervil...@yahoo.com on Tue Nov 22 13:47:14 2022
    On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:19:57 PM UTC-8, hootervil...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 11:13:58 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On 11/21/22 6:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
    for dems.

    The more we learn about 2016 election the more ILLEGITIMATE it
    becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a FAKE President in the Oval Office #RussianInterference,” Jeffries said on social media in 2018.
    He's referring to legitimacy, not denying the outcome of the election.
    Denying the legitimacy IS denying the outcome

    He wanted Obama to remain....no election legitimately required that year.
    I know it's crazy....but that's our piano loon.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Nov 23 10:02:30 2022
    On 11/22/22 3:47 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 12:19:57 PM UTC-8, hootervil...@yahoo.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 11:13:58 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On 11/21/22 6:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
    for dems.

    The more we learn about 2016 election the more ILLEGITIMATE it
    becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a FAKE President in
    the Oval Office #RussianInterference,” Jeffries said on social media >>>> in 2018.
    He's referring to legitimacy, not denying the outcome of the election.
    Denying the legitimacy IS denying the outcome

    He wanted Obama to remain....no election legitimately required that year.
    I know it's crazy....but that's our piano loon.

    Y'all are nuts. The 22nd Amendment remains in place and no one denied
    the vote count in 2016. No, legitimacy and outcome are not the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)