Hi all,be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may in fact
Hi all,be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may in fact
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may in
One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may in
One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?
That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:37:38 PM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:in fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may
One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?
Because we have neutrino detectors, looking everywhere, even through the planets.. They are not very sensitive, but they might just pick up a source crossing the sky.That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
https://www.colorado.edu/today/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/article-image/sun_neutrinos_0.jpg?itok=4mqzCeB6
https://www.wired.com/story/neutrino-detectors-could-be-used-to-spot-nuclear-rogues/
Then again, if you have negative mass and wormholes, you probably have some tinfoil that neutrinos cant penetrate.
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 6:46:00 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:in fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual plausible
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:37:38 PM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay, may
One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?
Because we have neutrino detectors, looking everywhere, even through the planets.. They are not very sensitive, but they might just pick up a source crossing the sky.That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
https://www.colorado.edu/today/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/article-image/sun_neutrinos_0.jpg?itok=4mqzCeB6
https://www.wired.com/story/neutrino-detectors-could-be-used-to-spot-nuclear-rogues/
Then again, if you have negative mass and wormholes, you probably have some tinfoil that neutrinos cant penetrate.Sorry, I phrased the question badly. I meant what would be producing neutrinos enough to be noticed above the background noise on the ship?
On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 9:51:18 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:may in fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 6:46:00 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:37:38 PM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay,
Alright. You mentioned covering Mercury in sensors, do you think quantity of sensors could help the problem?One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?
Because we have neutrino detectors, looking everywhere, even through the planets.. They are not very sensitive, but they might just pick up a source crossing the sky.That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
https://www.colorado.edu/today/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/article-image/sun_neutrinos_0.jpg?itok=4mqzCeB6
https://www.wired.com/story/neutrino-detectors-could-be-used-to-spot-nuclear-rogues/
A nuclear reactor. I don't know the detection range...Then again, if you have negative mass and wormholes, you probably have some tinfoil that neutrinos cant penetrate.Sorry, I phrased the question badly. I meant what would be producing neutrinos enough to be noticed above the background noise on the ship?
On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 1:47:06 AM UTC-7, eripe wrote:may in fact be stealthy. It uses a Negative Matter Drive (see here on the Atomic Rockets website for details http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/antigravity.php#id--Paragravity--Carrot_On_A_Stick--Negative_Matter_Drive) which is an actual
On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 9:51:18 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 6:46:00 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:37:38 PM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
On Friday, March 26, 2021 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-7, eripe wrote:
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:47:05 AM UTC+7, Will Oestreich wrote:
Hi all,
I know the stealth in space argument has been done to death and conclusively has come down on the side of "there is no stealth in space." However, I was designing a spacecraft for a short story and it struck me that this ship, to my dismay,
One wonders what kind of machinations is needed to open and maintain a wormhole, and if that would not be like waving, singing and dancing for anyone able to peak inside wormspace?
Because we have neutrino detectors, looking everywhere, even through the planets.. They are not very sensitive, but they might just pick up a source crossing the sky.That said, particle impact on a magnetic field will give of a little radiation as the change direction. It should correlate to an increase in temperature for the whole magnetic field which must be large, but I dont know how much.Why would someone notice a neutrino source?
The other thing is to look at how 13,4 factor is derived, probably its the size of the detector, so maybe cover Mercury in sensors?
Or a network of satellites spread throughout the solar system, able to detect magnetic fields.
Someone might notice a neutrino source.
Last thing is star occlusion. If anyone happens to be looking that way when the ship passes.
https://www.colorado.edu/today/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/article-image/sun_neutrinos_0.jpg?itok=4mqzCeB6
https://www.wired.com/story/neutrino-detectors-could-be-used-to-spot-nuclear-rogues/
Alright. You mentioned covering Mercury in sensors, do you think quantity of sensors could help the problem?A nuclear reactor. I don't know the detection range...Then again, if you have negative mass and wormholes, you probably have some tinfoil that neutrinos cant penetrate.Sorry, I phrased the question badly. I meant what would be producing neutrinos enough to be noticed above the background noise on the ship?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 21:15:27 |
Calls: | 6,646 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,190 |
Messages: | 5,327,493 |