• Hellblazer 105: I just don't quite get it

    From joshuawestonhopkins@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Scott David Frank on Wed Jul 12 04:13:32 2017
    On Friday, August 9, 1996 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Scott David Frank wrote:
    Okay, Hellblazer 105 was a pretty good comic (though I've preferred the
    last few issues to this one), and I dug seeing J.C.'s ancestor (though I agree that the probability of him having the exact same personality as our J.C. is slim - I mean, why doesn't Johanna, then? Whatever - "it's a kind
    of magic"). ANYWAY...I find the whole thing about angels influencing Coleridge (who I love dearly) to be a bit goofy.

    I mean, 1)"Xanadu" was supposed to be the latest addition to the bible?
    Then why have him start it out describing heaven as a work of Kublai Kahn, pagan of tremendous proportions?

    2)Okay, even if somehow Coleridge came out of his stupor and said "hey
    look, I've got a new gospel here" who'd belive him? A well-known
    carouser, na'er do well, and - particularly damning to his credibility, especially in his times but probably equally in ours - an opium addict.

    I liked how the angels showed roughly the same competance as the Watergate burglers, though.


    Peace,
    Scott

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)