XPost: rec.arts.sf.written
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:56:15 -0000 (UTC), Magewolf
<
Magewolf@nc.rr.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:14:13 +0000, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <snm2as$lmn$1@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Dilbert: 90 Minute Meeting
https://dilbert.com/strip/2021-11-24
Wow, is that ever true. Meetings with remote attendees fit this book >>>perfectly.
However, I think you only ever get "15 minutes of quality" time
regardless of any A/V issues.
It has always been my experience that the longer a meeting runs the less
gets done during it.
We used to do a daily stand-up that worked really well--typically
they'd be around 15 minutes unless somebody had something that needed
more. Then executive management started requiring us to address more
and more and more _crap_ that was unrelated to the work we were doing
and they went to Hell.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)