• The Revolving Door of Amazon and Government: Corruption?

    From weary flake@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 29 17:35:51 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    This close connection between government and Amazon should bring
    up suspicions of corruption in government and Amazon. Is Amazon
    being illegally subsidized by the state? When Amazon bans books
    are they working jointly with the government as part of Big Media?
    And about the intelligence agencies, they are the ones who have
    presided over attacks on the national security of the United States,
    for example, the espionage of shipping the 15 million federal
    workers and ex-workers personnel records to China about 5 years
    ago, and who knows what else that has gone unreported. Are our
    intelligence agencies compromised? Are they, and Amazon, working
    to dismantle the United States by way of corruption?

    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/03/amazon-has-become-a-prime-revolving-door-destination-in-washington/

    March 2, 2021

    Amazon Has Become a Prime Revolving-Door Destination in Washington

    “Its interests probably transverse the US government more than
    any other company.”

    Everything about Amazon is big. It’s the second-biggest retailer
    in the world. Its founder, Jeff Bezos, possesses the biggest
    fortune in the world. And the company has developed a big
    revolving door in Washington through which government officials
    and employees whisk and land in well-paying jobs at Amazon, which
    has a big list of interests it seeks to protect and advance in
    the nation’s capital.

    A Mother Jones investigation has identified at least 247 US
    government officials and employees—with about 150 hailing from
    the intelligence, cybersecurity, law enforcement, and military
    fields—who were hired by Amazon in the past 10 years or so. About
    200 of them have been retained by the fast-growing company since
    the start of 2017. This list is not comprehensive and represents
    what is likely only a portion of federal employees who left
    government service for Amazon. It was compiled by searching
    LinkedIn and locating people who, according to their profiles,
    had worked in the federal government directly before moving to
    Amazon; it relies on information provided by the platform’s
    users. There are no public records that track all the US
    officials and employees hired by Amazon or other firms.

    It is not uncommon for prominent firms to vacuum up government
    officials who can lobby their former agencies, win and manage
    lucrative government contracts, offer strategic or legal advice,
    or perform other services. Boeing, Raytheon, and other military
    contractors hire loads of people from the Defense Department and
    the armed services. (Most of the senior military
    officials—generals, admirals, and others—who leave the Pentagon
    for the private sector do become lobbyists for military firms.)
    Consulting firms, including McKinsey & Company, frequently
    recruit former US officials.

    Given that Amazon hired over 400,000 employees to increase its
    workforce to more than 1.2 million in the first 10 months of last
    year, the recruitment of hundreds of former federal officials and
    employees is a small slice of its workforce expansion. Many of
    these Amazon hires were undoubtedly brought aboard for their
    technical know-how and work in positions in which they do not
    interact with the government. And there is nothing illegal about
    any of this (though there are limited restrictions on the sort of
    lobbying activities certain senior government officials can
    conduct after they land in a corporate suite). But good
    government groups have long complained about the ever-spinning
    revolving door between public service and private companies and
    the possible impacts on government regulatory decision making and
    contracting. Not only can corporations use such hires to navigate
    and influence government actions; if a government official has
    the possibility of obtaining a lucrative position at a
    corporation, this may effect how he or she handles matters
    related to that company.

    “If you combine the quantity and breadth of their hires, Amazon
    may have more of a revolving door than any other American company
    now,” says Jeff Hauser, director of the Revolving Door Project at
    the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “There is almost no
    department of the US government Amazon is not interested in.”
    Timothy LaPira, a professor of political science and
    revolving-door expert at James Madison University, points out
    that Amazon wants people with government experience who can help
    the company understand the regulatory landscape and how to adapt
    to it: “Amazon is probably not buying access so much as they’re
    buying the expertise of what happens behind closed doors.”

    Amazon declined to comment for this story.

    The roster of Amazon hires spans the US government. The list
    includes an undersecretary for the Transportation Department, a
    Pentagon deputy general counsel, a US Treasury economist, a
    Federal Trade Commission associate general counsel, a Food and
    Drug Administration cybersecurity operations director, a US Trade Representative senior director, a National Economic Council
    senior director for trade policy, a former US ambassador to the
    World Trade Organization, a Justice Department senior counsel in
    the computer crime and intellectual property section, a National
    Transportation Safety Board public affairs director, a General
    Services Administration acting assistant commissioner, a Veterans Administration senior program manager, a Center for Medicaid and
    Medicare Services senior adviser for information technology, and
    an Office of Management and Budget chief acquisition officer.

    There are many from the military and national security agencies:
    a State Department internet policy adviser, a Department of
    Homeland Security cyberthreat intelligence analyst, a National
    Security Council director for space policy, a US Air Force deputy
    chief of staff for operations, an FBI assistant director, a
    National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency talent acquisition
    manager, a National Security Agency network analysis chief, a US
    Navy cryptologic warfare officer, a Defense Intelligence Agency
    operations officer, a senior official at the Cybersecurity and
    Infrastructure Security Agency, a Defense Contract Audit Agency
    auditor, an Office of the Director of National Intelligence
    senior plans officer, and a CIA East Africa Branch chief.
    (According to the Intercept, Amazon has in recent years hired
    more than 20 former FBI agents for its global security center in
    Arizona.)

    “Amazon is so vast and vaster in its ambitions,” says Hauser.
    “Its interests probably transverse the US government more than
    any other company.” Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the
    Center for Responsive Politics, notes, “There have been
    multinational corporations that have wielded clout in DC—AT&T,
    Boeing—but they are hardly comparable to the tech giants,
    including Amazon.”

    Not surprisingly, Amazon has snapped up Capitol Hill veterans.
    Its payroll in recent years has expanded with staffers for many
    past and present lawmakers: Sens. Patty Murray, Dianne Feinstein,
    Cory Booker, Jeanne Shaheen, Jon Kyl, Thom Tillis, Tom Cotton,
    Tim Scott, John Kerry, David Vitter, Fritz Hollings, George
    Allen, and Orrin Hatch; and Reps. Jimmy Duncan, Darrell Issa,
    Todd Rokita, John Shadegg, Peter Welch, Mario Díaz-Balart, Suzan
    DelBene, Lloyd Doggett, Will Hurd, Vernon Ehlers, and G.K.
    Butterfield. The megacompany has also grabbed staff members of
    various congressional committees, including the Senate Homeland
    Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the Senate Finance
    Committee, the House Appropriations Committee, the House
    Judiciary Committee, the House Rules Committee, and the Committee
    on Transportation and Infrastructure.

    “If you combine the quantity and breadth of their hires, Amazon
    may have more of a revolving door than any other American company
    now. There is almost no department of the US government Amazon is
    not interested in.”

    One prominent example: In 2018, Lartease Tiffith, a senior
    counsel for then-Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), jumped to Amazon
    to become an in-house lobbyist and senior manager for privacy,
    security, and consumer protection. Previously, Tiffith had worked
    for Feinstein and the Justice Department.

    In 2020, Amazon spent $18.7 million on Washington lobbying—about
    a $2 million increase from the previous year—and assembled an influence-swaying army of 20 different lobbying firms and 118
    individual lobbyists, which included 41 in-house lobbyists. One
    member of this force was veteran lobbyist Jeff Ricchetti, the
    brother of Steve Ricchetti, a counselor to President Joe Biden.
    Amazon signed a contract with Jeff Ricchetti a week after Biden
    was declared the winner of the 2020 election.

    Perhaps the most noticed move from DC politics to Amazon came in
    2015 when Jay Carney, a onetime journalist who had been President
    Barack Obama’s press secretary, joined the firm as its senior
    vice president of global corporate affairs—Amazon’s top person in Washington. (Before working for Obama, Carney was communications
    director for then–Vice President Biden.) As Business Insider
    reported, Carney “oversees public policy and communications and
    is a member of Amazon’s elite ‘S-team,’ a group of 23 of the
    company’s most senior employees that helps shape culture and
    policy at Amazon.” He reports directly to Bezos.

    Amazon has grown substantially in recent years to become a
    company like no other in the United States. It has a wide array
    of interests that stretch across the entire landscape of the US
    government and that mostly fall within two fundamental areas:
    regulation and contracts. The firm, the second-largest employer
    in the United States (after Walmart), has long been criticized
    for its workplace conditions and is battling a much-watched union
    organizing effort in Alabama. (So it would deeply care about the
    Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration, and the National Labor Relations Board.) It owns
    Whole Foods. (Cue the US Department of Agriculture and the Food
    and Drug Administration.) It faces international regulatory
    challenges. (Keep an eye on the USTR, the State Department, and
    the Commerce Department.) It has developed one of the largest
    trucking and delivery systems in the nation. (Watch the
    Department of Transportation.) Cyber-commerce and cybersecurity
    are top concerns. (Track the National Security Agency, the
    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the FBI.)
    And with its Prime streaming service, there’s telecommunications,
    net neutrality, and broadband issues. (That means the Federal
    Communications Commission.) Intellectual property, privacy,
    Section 230, tax regulations, trade policy, mail delivery,
    infrastructure, energy, and sustainability—so many matters
    critical to Amazon are overseen by one or multiple government
    entities.

    And then there’s antitrust. As one of the biggest companies on
    the planet, Amazon needs to fret about regulators and officials
    at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission who
    could be concerned about its dominance in multiple markets and
    its possible use of monopolistic predatory pricing. Scott
    Fitzgerald, who worked for a dozen years in the Justice
    Department’s antitrust division, became a corporate counsel for
    the company last year. Two years earlier, Bryson Bachman, a
    senior attorney in the antitrust division, was hired as a senior
    corporate counsel. Before working at the Justice Department,
    Bachman served as chief counsel to Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on the
    Senate’s Antitrust Subcommittee. In recent years, Amazon has
    hired at least three other veterans of the Justice Department’s
    antitrust division and five FTC officials.

    “Amazon especially needs people these days who bring technical
    expertise the company needs in its battles with the government
    over antitrust and privacy, as Washington looks at tech
    regulation,” Krumholz says, “and money is hardly an issue for
    Amazon.”

    Simultaneously, the US government has become an important source
    of revenue for Amazon, primarily though Amazon Web Services,
    which sells cloud-based services. AWS pitches itself on its
    website as a crucial supplier for the government: “The AWS Cloud
    provides secure, scalable, and cost-efficient solutions to
    support the unique requirements and missions of the US federal
    government. Our cloud services can be employed to meet mandates,
    reduce costs, drive efficiencies, and increase innovation across
    civilian agencies, intelligence community, and the Department of
    Defense.” That site lists contracts with the FAA, the IRS, the
    Census, the Army, DHS, GSA, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory
    Commission, the Social Security Administration, the Department of
    the Interior, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and
    other government agencies. In 2014, AWS developed a computing
    cloud for the CIA designed to be used by all 17 agencies of the
    intelligence community. The price tag: $600 million. In November,

    US immigration and Customs Enforcement noted its intent to pay
    $100 million to AWS and Microsoft for cloud services. AWS sought
    a $10 billion megacloud computing contract with the Defense
    Department that was eventually awarded to Microsoft. But that
    contract has been impeded by a lawsuit filed in 2019 by Amazon,
    which accused then-President Donald Trump of intervening against
    AWS due to his animosity toward Bezos, who owns the Washington
    Post. (Bezos also owns Blue Origin, a rocket company, which has
    plans to compete for US government contracts.)

    Amazon’s net sales in 2020 were $386 billion—up 38 percent over
    the previous year—with AWS accounting for $45 billion of that.
    AWS was responsible for about 60 percent of the company’s
    operating profits last year. The head of AWS, Andy Jassy, has
    been tapped by Bezos to succeed him as CEO later this year. With
    the federal government a major customer, AWS could use former
    government officials to sell its wares to government agencies.
    And with Washington so central to Amazon, the company is building
    its HQ2—its second headquarters—in Arlington, Virginia, across
    the Potomac from the nation’s capital. In 2016, Bezos bought a
    swanky, 27,000-square-foot mansion in Washington.

    Amazon’s expanding revolving door is a sign of how the firm has
    grown and how it has become more involved with decisions and
    policies made across the US government. As Krumholz observes,
    “There is a lack of scrutiny and transparency in this area. And
    there is nothing more MEGO—my eyes glaze over—than, say, cloud
    services. There is far more outcry over where Amazon puts their
    headquarters or what their delivery times are. But this is big,
    big money, and inside baseball. The government agencies know how
    important it is. Amazon knows how important it is. Everyday
    Americans don’t.”

    LaPira notes that government experience is increasingly valuable
    for Amazon as it has become a corporate behemoth and the target
    of regulatory and antitrust concerns. The company, he says, is
    likely willing to pay a premium for it: “From a survival
    perspective, we would expect Amazon to pull out all the stops...
    They have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to
    hire every former government official they can find.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From thinbluemime2@21:1/5 to weary flake on Mon Mar 29 20:49:17 2021
    XPost: rec.arts.tv

    On 2021-03-29 8:35 PM, weary flake wrote:
    This close connection between government and Amazon should bring
    up suspicions of corruption in government and Amazon. Is Amazon
    being illegally subsidized by the state?



    "For the United States to effectively compete against China, the USA
    must increasingly adopt many of the authoritarian methods employed by
    China" - mime with the crystal balls https://groups.google.com/g/rec.arts.tv/c/jCyA2yFZJrg/m/QXRj7pPtCAAJ




    Is Alibaba bigger than Amazon? https://www.google.com/search?q=Is+Alibaba+bigger+than+Amazon

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)