Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've seen
her in... it looked to be the start of a promising storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and bring
back Graham!!!
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book and
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've seen
her in... it looked to be the start of a promising storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and bring
back Graham!!!
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series to be replaced by >discrimination hire Varada Sethu to tick more woke check boxes. It's
Gatwa and the show's woke bigotry that's the problem, not Gibson. Who do
they think is going to watch this crap which doesn't represent or
inspire the majority of the population?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12986171/Millie-Gibson-said-Doctor-role-goes-wrong-Ive-tried-gambling-steady-Corrie-job-Ncuti-Gatwa-breaks-silence-dropped-one-series.html
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've seen
her in... it looked to be the start of a promising storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and bring
back Graham!!!
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've seen
her in... it looked to be the start of a promising storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and bring
back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank? No! Cancel Doctor Whoke >instead.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book and
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so now >when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss poor prizes and >corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, >not the reality of the show.
Hosts:
Terry Wogan
Les Dawson
Paul O’Grady (as Lily Savage)
Bradley Walsh
If you don’t know those names, Google them. Blankety Blank has ALWAYS been >a joke. An inside joke between the host, the audience, the celebrities and >the contestants. Why else do you think the contestants say they’d like to >win a sports car when they know the best they can hope for is an inflatable >hot tub?
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've seen
her in... it looked to be the start of a promising storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and bring
back Graham!!!
With every post Aggie reveals himself to be an even bigger idiot. It’s very >clear that RTD has a specific character arc in mind for Ruby Sunday. He’ll >tell that story, then she moves on. Nothing to do with woke agendas, except >insofar as RTD is about as woke as they come.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
With every post Aggie reveals himself to be an even bigger idiot.
It’s very clear that RTD has a specific character arc in mind for
Ruby Sunday. He’ll tell that story, then she moves on. Nothing to
do with woke agendas, except insofar as RTD is about as woke as
they come.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book
and pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so
now when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss
poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The
game show is the format, not the reality of the show.
In article <nnd$201a098b$7a936ab6@4ef99544d33409c1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:e.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
Yeah! Yeah! How are the Gladiators?
The Last Doctor wrote:
With every post Aggie reveals himself to be an even bigger idiot.
It’s very clear that RTD has a specific character arc in mind for
Ruby Sunday. He’ll tell that story, then she moves on. Nothing to
do with woke agendas, except insofar as RTD is about as woke as
they come.
Thinking about it, Martha and Donna were companions for one full
season, with some additional guest appearances afterwards. So it
wouldn't be out of character for RTD to do the same thing with Ruby.
One full season and some episodes after, possibly to tidy up loose
ends. The unfortunate thing for Millie Gibson is that one season of
Doctor Who is shorter now than it was back in 2007. Whilst for us the
viewer, we are in the strange position of hearing [rumours] about a
companion leaving when we have only seen Ruby Sunday in one episode
of Doctor Who.
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book
and pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so
now when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss
poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The
game show is the format, not the reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe size from
what I've seen...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$201a098b$7a936ab6@4ef99544d33409c1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:e.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
Yeah! Yeah! How are the Gladiators?
A lot better than the Blankety Blank cheque book and pen anyway!
In article <nnd$217c45fd$06875d42@3d4180d6b7486cc0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book
and pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so >>> now when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss
poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The
game show is the format, not the reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe size from
what I've seen...
Benn on game show BS?
In article <uoh8s6$3qc4q$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've
seen her in... it looked to be the start of a promising
storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank? No! Cancel Doctor
Whoke instead.
Doctor Who needs to retcon the Timeless child!
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$217c45fd$06875d42@3d4180d6b7486cc0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Piss poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of
Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, not the
reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe
size from what I've seen...
Benn on game show BS?
Who’s Benn?
The Doctor wrote on 21/1/24 12:26 pm:
In article <nnd$217c45fd$06875d42@3d4180d6b7486cc0>,Oh!! Please! PLEASE don't say that YOU'VE been on one, clown!! Any one
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book
and pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so >>>> now when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss
poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The
game show is the format, not the reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe size from
what I've seen...
Benn on game show BS?
of them!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$217c45fd$06875d42@3d4180d6b7486cc0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Piss poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of
Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, not the
reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe
size from what I've seen...
Benn on game show BS?
Who’s Benn?
--
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote on 21/1/24 9:11 am:
In article <uoh8s6$3qc4q$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Whoke Disaster! Gibson gone after less than one series
To be honest I thought Millie did okay in the one episode we've
seen her in... it looked to be the start of a promising
storyline.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank? No! Cancel Doctor
Whoke instead.
Doctor Who needs to retcon the Timeless child!
It's been and gone, clown!!
Can someone, anyone, please change the Record!!
--
Daniel
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <nnd$217c45fd$06875d42@3d4180d6b7486cc0>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
Piss poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of
Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, not the
reality of the show.
Corny and contestants with an IQ the same as their shoe
size from what I've seen...
Benn on game show BS?
Who’s Benn?
As if by magic, Bradley Walsh appeared.
“Could I keep this cheque book and pen, as a memento of my adventure?” >asked Mr Benn.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
In article <uoiv1a$5ivp$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Who’s Benn?
Blueshirt.
In article <nnd$56479535$2a4da6ae@e099b08a19891604>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$201a098b$7a936ab6@4ef99544d33409c1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:e.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
Yeah! Yeah! How are the Gladiators?
A lot better than the Blankety Blank cheque book and pen anyway!
So B and B Walsh are doing a good job of hosting then.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book and
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so now when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss poor prizes and corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, not the reality of the show.
Hosts:
Terry Wogan
Les Dawson
Paul O’Grady (as Lily Savage)
Bradley Walsh
If you don’t know those names, Google them. Blankety Blank has ALWAYS been a joke. An inside joke between the host, the audience, the celebrities and the contestants. Why else do you think the contestants say they’d like to win a sports car when they know the best they can hope for is an inflatable hot tub?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book and
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
The Cheque Book and Pen went to the losers. The winners got better
prizes. Haven't you ever heard of the wooden spoon? Didn't Cheggers
Plays Pop give those away? Crackerjack gave away cabbages.
The True Doctor wrote:
The Cheque Book and Pen went to the losers. The winners got better
prizes. Haven't you ever heard of the wooden spoon? Didn't Cheggers
Plays Pop give those away? Crackerjack gave away cabbages.
What are you raving about now man, they were kids TV shows... i.e FOR CHILDREN. They were not going to give out sports cars or holidays in
Ibiza were they? The brats were lucky to get a Cabbage.
On "The Chase" most contestants get nothing at all
or only a couple of thousand pounds, even though Bradley
Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money is
on "Pointless".
Your Name wrote:
On "The Chase" most contestants get nothing at all
or only a couple of thousand pounds, even though Bradley
Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money is
on "Pointless".
Blueshirt's Irrelevant Off-Topic Trivia #274:
I have actually met Mark Labbett (The Beast). In Wales.
And he is a big fella!
On 21/01/2024 01:28, The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$56479535$2a4da6ae@e099b08a19891604>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$201a098b$7a936ab6@4ef99544d33409c1>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:e.
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
Yeah! Yeah! How are the Gladiators?
A lot better than the Blankety Blank cheque book and pen anyway!
So B and B Walsh are doing a good job of hosting then.
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 20/01/2024 22:04, The Last Doctor wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a fucking cheque book and
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
Of course it’s a joke. It was a joke in the 1970s, and even more so now
when cheque books are a thing of the past in the U.K. Piss poor prizes and >> corny humour are the POINT of Blankety Blank. The game show is the format, >> not the reality of the show.
Blankety Blank was not about the prizes, it was about camp double
entendres and having fun, something that autistic woke retards don't >understand or appreciate.
Hosts:
Terry Wogan
Les Dawson
Paul O’Grady (as Lily Savage)
Bradley Walsh
If you don’t know those names, Google them. Blankety Blank has ALWAYS been >> a joke. An inside joke between the host, the audience, the celebrities and >> the contestants. Why else do you think the contestants say they’d like to >> win a sports car when they know the best they can hope for is an inflatable >> hot tub?
They contestants couldn't even afford to run a hut tub let alone as
sports car.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 20/01/2024 21:25, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/01/2024 19:28, Blueshirt wrote:
I say cancel the various TV shows that Bradley Walsh is in and
bring back Graham!!!
You mean cancel Gladiators and Blankety Blank?
If you watch Blankety Blank there's definitely no hope for you!
Even Bradley can't save that lame show... a f*king cheque book and
The show has been a huge success for 6 decades.
pen? Forget whoke, that's a joke!!!
The Cheque Book and Pen went to the losers. The winners got better
prizes. Haven't you ever heard of the wooden spoon? Didn't Cheggers
Plays Pop give those away? Crackerjack gave away cabbages.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV at
the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the biggest
show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show with thickos
as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a laugh... is it no
wonder most of the population are turning to Netflix, Prime Video and
Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment.
The True Doctor wrote:
The Cheque Book and Pen went to the losers. The winners got better
prizes. Haven't you ever heard of the wooden spoon? Didn't Cheggers
Plays Pop give those away? Crackerjack gave away cabbages.
What are you raving about now man, they were kids TV shows... i.e FOR >CHILDREN. They were not going to give out sports cars or holidays in
Ibiza were they? The brats were lucky to get a Cabbage.
Your Name wrote:
On "The Chase" most contestants get nothing at all
or only a couple of thousand pounds, even though Bradley
Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money is
on "Pointless".
Blueshirt's Irrelevant Off-Topic Trivia #274:
I have actually met Mark Labbett (The Beast). In Wales.
And he is a big fella!
On 2024-01-21 21:53:13 +0000, Blueshirt said:^^^^^^^
The True Doctor wrote:
The Cheque Book and Pen went to the losers. The winners got better
prizes. Haven't you ever heard of the wooden spoon? Didn't Cheggers
Plays Pop give those away? Crackerjack gave away cabbages.
What are you raving about now man, they were kids TV shows... i.e FOR
CHILDREN. They were not going to give out sports cars or holidays in
Ibiza were they? The brats were lucky to get a Cabbage.
In "Blankety Blank", every contestant gets a chequebook and pen trophy,
even if they also win the bigger prizes ... "bigger" is relative
though. The various hosts of the show over the years have even made the >prizes a joke point.
"Pointless" is another quiz show with relatively minor prizes. Bradley
Walsh often joke about that show in his own quiz shows.
The relaity is that very few TV quiz show actually have big prizes,
especailly in the more budget limited UK. On "The Chase" most
contestants get nothing at all or only a couple of thousand pounds,
even though Bradley Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money
is on "Pointless".
They contestants couldn't even afford to run a hut tub let alone as
sports car.
In article <uok7s2$dc39$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
"Pointless" is another quiz show with relatively minor prizes. Bradley^^^^^^^
Walsh often joke about that show in his own quiz shows.
The relaity is that very few TV quiz show actually have big prizes,
especailly in the more budget limited UK. On "The Chase" most
contestants get nothing at all or only a couple of thousand pounds,
even though Bradley Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money
is on "Pointless".
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your spelling
error!! ;-)
The Doctor wrote on 22/1/24 12:15 pm:
In article <uok7s2$dc39$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"Pointless" is another quiz show with relatively minor prizes. Bradley^^^^^^^
Walsh often joke about that show in his own quiz shows.
The relaity is that very few TV quiz show actually have big prizes,
especailly in the more budget limited UK. On "The Chase" most
contestants get nothing at all or only a couple of thousand pounds,
even though Bradley Walsh often jokes about how small the prize money
is on "Pointless".
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your spelling
error!! ;-)
--
Daniel
Daniel65 wrote:
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your spelling
error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV at
the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the biggest
show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show with thickos
as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a laugh... is it no
wonder most of the population are turning to Netflix, Prime Video and
Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment.
Daniel65 wrote:
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your spelling
error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
Blueshirt wrote on 23/1/24 1:25 am:
Daniel65 wrote:
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your
spelling error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
Blueshirt wrote on 23/1/24 1:25 am:
Daniel65 wrote:No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your spelling
error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
--
Daniel
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum for
the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way in to >oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and reality TV
shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they could,
they wouldn't!
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 23/1/24 1:25 am:
Daniel65 wrote:No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your
spelling error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:and then you should hide his toys and yours
Blueshirt wrote on 23/1/24 1:25 am:
Daniel65 wrote:No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
Look out, Your Name, the clown is picking on you for your
spelling error!! ;-)
That's YOUR job!
So if he's doing that you'll just have to steal his thunder and do
some bible quotes and IYIO's... :-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
In article <nnd$69b6b821$4f00e341@ae57051669fc9363>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Are you TTD in disguise?
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$69b6b821$4f00e341@ae57051669fc9363>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Are you TTD in disguise?
More than two people watched "Reacher" Dave, a heck of a lot more.
It was very good. If you were too busy typing gobbledygook on Usenet
to watch it, that's your problem. You missed out on a good show.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in my
big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
So carry on with your inane replies to everyone and pat yourself on
the back for still being the King Spammer of RADW... nobody wants
your crown. 'The Clown Crown'! As the award for being top poster here
will henceforth be named.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum for
the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and reality TV
shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they could,
they wouldn't!
On 23/01/2024 14:14, Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
I already have a streaming subscription.
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum for
the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way in to
oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and reality TV
shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
Which I watched with my subscription.
The shit made to pander to SJW activists and brainwashed the audience
with far left propaganda isn't even worth torrenting.
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they could,
they wouldn't!
Because all terrestrial broadcasters are only aiming at one demographic, >women between the ages of 35 to 44 of extremely low intelligence who
fall into the C2, D and E demographic groups which consist of the most
stupid and gullible individuals who question nothing the see or hear and
will buy any old crap that is advertised to them, even if they don't
need it. These ignorant morons can't understand anything except
contemporary kitchen sink drama and that is why everything has been
dumbed down for them. On top of that the exclusion and discrimination
agendas practised by these degenerate broadcasters has resulted in shit >writers, shit producers, shit directors, and shit actors, being hired
based on their gender, sexuality and skin colour alone, most if not all
of whom are autistic, and that is why they write and behave like 6 year
old children.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in my
big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
So carry on with your inane replies to everyone and pat yourself onDaniel
the back for still being the King Spammer of RADW... nobody wants
your crown. 'The Clown Crown'! As the award for being top poster here
will henceforth be named.
--
Idlehands wrote:
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum for
the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and reality TV
shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they could,
they wouldn't!
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 1:14 am:
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Is that Tom Cruise, ex-Military Policeman, 'Reacher' that you refer
to?? I've seen three or four of the Movie-length episodes .... and
liked them.
On 23/01/2024 14:14, Blueshirt wrote:
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum
for the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way
in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and
reality TV shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never
heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
Which I watched with my subscription.
The shit made to pander to SJW activists and brainwashed the
audience with far left propaganda isn't even worth torrenting.
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Because all terrestrial broadcasters are only aiming at one
demographic, women between the ages of 35 to 44 of extremely low
intelligence who fall into the C2, D and E demographic groups which
consist of the most stupid and gullible individuals who question
nothing the see or hear and will buy any old crap that is
advertised to them, even if they don't need it. These ignorant
morons can't understand anything except contemporary kitchen sink
drama and that is why everything has been dumbed down for them. On
top of that the exclusion and discrimination agendas practised by
these degenerate broadcasters has resulted in shit writers, shit
producers, shit directors, and shit actors, being hired based on
their gender, sexuality and skin colour alone, most if not all of
whom are autistic, and that is why they write and behave like 6
year old children.
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
As I don't wee in my big-boy pants when I see how
many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats, go
for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top poster...
that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in my
big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy pants??
So carry on with your inane replies to everyone and pat yourself onDaniel
the back for still being the King Spammer of RADW... nobody wants
your crown. 'The Clown Crown'! As the award for being top poster here
will henceforth be named.
--
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 1:14 am:
Idlehands wrote:Is that Tom Cruise, ex-Military Policeman, 'Reacher' that you refer to??
On 2024-01-21 2:48 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Biggest show on Saturday evening, thanks to the lack of wokery.
Thanks to Bradley Walsh I'd say... one of the biggest names on TV
at the moment.
What does it say about the current state of television if the
biggest show on a Saturday evening is a forty year old game show
with thickos as contestants coming up with stupid phrases for a
laugh... is it no wonder most of the population are turning to
Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ (etc.) for their entertainment?
Considering Aggy seems to be a big fan, it shows that TV is reduced
to pandering to the lowest of the lowest denominator in the hopes
of stopping them from saving their pennies up to pay for a
streaming subscription.
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum for
the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way in to
oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and reality TV
shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they could,
they wouldn't!
I've seen three or four of the Movie-length episodes .... and liked them.
--
Daniel
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 1:14 am:
Is that Tom Cruise, ex-Military Policeman, 'Reacher' that you refer
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
to?? I've seen three or four of the Movie-length episodes .... and
liked them.
Tom Cruise? Most definitely not! Same character though, just played
by a man that actually fits the description of the Jack Reacher in
the novels... i.e. a big fella! Tom Cruise was too small for the role
really. His two Jack Reacher movies were okay, but the Amazon Prime
"Reacher" series is way better.
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
As I don't wee in my big-boy pants when I see how
many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
Well, if he's got bugs in his pants then the stains at the front
would be the least of his problems! ;-)
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/01/2024 14:14, Blueshirt wrote:
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum
for the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way
in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and
reality TV shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never
heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
Which I watched with my subscription.
The shit made to pander to SJW activists and brainwashed the
audience with far left propaganda isn't even worth torrenting.
No need for torrenting when you are on Usenet...
But I think a lot of modern TV programmes are just shit because they
are shit. Bad writing and dumbed down. I don't think too much thought
has been put in to them at all. The big studios just churn them out >by-the-numbers. All US cop-type shows have the same formula and you
know within five minutes of watching an episode who did it.
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Because all terrestrial broadcasters are only aiming at one
demographic, women between the ages of 35 to 44 of extremely low
intelligence who fall into the C2, D and E demographic groups which
consist of the most stupid and gullible individuals who question
nothing the see or hear and will buy any old crap that is
advertised to them, even if they don't need it. These ignorant
morons can't understand anything except contemporary kitchen sink
drama and that is why everything has been dumbed down for them. On
top of that the exclusion and discrimination agendas practised by
these degenerate broadcasters has resulted in shit writers, shit
producers, shit directors, and shit actors, being hired based on
their gender, sexuality and skin colour alone, most if not all of
whom are autistic, and that is why they write and behave like 6
year old children.
You give them too much credit. The broadcasters just want cheap TV.
And as the old saying goes; pay peanuts, get monkeys.
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor writers
without an original idea in their head. That's why all the old shows
are just re-hashed for a modern audience. I don't mind the lack of >originality if it's entertaining, but a lot of the time it isn't!
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats,
go for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top
poster... that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in
my big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
Daniel65 wrote on 24/1/24 5:21 pm:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats,
go for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top
poster... that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in
my big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
s/bug-boy/big-boy
--
Daniel
Daniel65 wrote:
Daniel65 wrote on 24/1/24 5:21 pm:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oh68hig4gp000@news.eternal-september.org>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
No!! No! No, I want to do the STATS posts!! ;-)
If your newsreader has the ability to provide newsgroups stats,
go for it! Filter Dave out first though so he's not the top
poster... that would really piss him off!!!
LOL!
mesnews vs XanaNews!
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in
my big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
s/bug-boy/big-boy
good thing you added that to the chat
In article <qdadnccXAcvVHC_4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel65 wrote:
Daniel65 wrote on 24/1/24 5:21 pm:
Blueshirt wrote on 24/01/2024 4:29 am:
Yes Dave, I am well able to create a group stats post with my
newsreader, but I don't see the need to do so. As I don't wee in
my big-boy pants when I see how many posts I have posted to RADW.
Are you sure 'wee' is what stains the front of the clown's bug-boy
pants??
s/bug-boy/big-boy
good thing you added that to the chat
WEll sed.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/01/2024 14:14, Blueshirt wrote:
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum
for the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way
in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and
reality TV shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never
heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
Which I watched with my subscription.
The shit made to pander to SJW activists and brainwashed the
audience with far left propaganda isn't even worth torrenting.
No need for torrenting when you are on Usenet...
But I think a lot of modern TV programmes are just shit because they
are shit. Bad writing and dumbed down. I don't think too much thought
has been put in to them at all. The big studios just churn them out by-the-numbers. All US cop-type shows have the same formula and you
know within five minutes of watching an episode who did it.
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Because all terrestrial broadcasters are only aiming at one
demographic, women between the ages of 35 to 44 of extremely low
intelligence who fall into the C2, D and E demographic groups which
consist of the most stupid and gullible individuals who question
nothing the see or hear and will buy any old crap that is
advertised to them, even if they don't need it. These ignorant
morons can't understand anything except contemporary kitchen sink
drama and that is why everything has been dumbed down for them. On
top of that the exclusion and discrimination agendas practised by
these degenerate broadcasters has resulted in shit writers, shit
producers, shit directors, and shit actors, being hired based on
their gender, sexuality and skin colour alone, most if not all of
whom are autistic, and that is why they write and behave like 6
year old children.
You give them too much credit. The broadcasters just want cheap TV.
And as the old saying goes; pay peanuts, get monkeys.
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor writers
without an original idea in their head. That's why all the old shows
are just re-hashed for a modern audience. I don't mind the lack of originality if it's entertaining, but a lot of the time it isn't!
On 24/01/2024 10:41, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/01/2024 14:14, Blueshirt wrote:
Television today is dumbed-down and nothing more than bubblegum
for the brain. That's why the masses are sleep-walking their way
in to oblivion... stupid game shows, cookery programmes and
reality TV shows featuring 'celebrities' that people have never
heard of.
The best thing I've watched recently is "Reacher" (S2) on Prime
Video. The terrestrial television stations like RTE/BBC/ITV (etc.)
Which I watched with my subscription.
The shit made to pander to SJW activists and brainwashed the
audience with far left propaganda isn't even worth torrenting.
No need for torrenting when you are on Usenet...
But I think a lot of modern TV programmes are just shit because they
are shit. Bad writing and dumbed down. I don't think too much thought
has been put in to them at all. The big studios just churn them out
by-the-numbers. All US cop-type shows have the same formula and you
know within five minutes of watching an episode who did it.
could never make a programme like that in 2023... and if they
could, they wouldn't!
Because all terrestrial broadcasters are only aiming at one
demographic, women between the ages of 35 to 44 of extremely low
intelligence who fall into the C2, D and E demographic groups which
consist of the most stupid and gullible individuals who question
nothing the see or hear and will buy any old crap that is
advertised to them, even if they don't need it. These ignorant
morons can't understand anything except contemporary kitchen sink
drama and that is why everything has been dumbed down for them. On
top of that the exclusion and discrimination agendas practised by
these degenerate broadcasters has resulted in shit writers, shit
producers, shit directors, and shit actors, being hired based on
their gender, sexuality and skin colour alone, most if not all of
whom are autistic, and that is why they write and behave like 6
year old children.
You give them too much credit. The broadcasters just want cheap TV.
And as the old saying goes; pay peanuts, get monkeys.
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor writers
without an original idea in their head. That's why all the old shows
That's what you get for hiring degenerate soap opera hacks based on a
woke discrimination and exclusion agenda carried out using chauvinistic
fake diversity hires of talentless individuals based on their gender,
race, and sexual orientation, instead of hiring competent writers based
on merit alone.
are just re-hashed for a modern audience. I don't mind the lack of
originality if it's entertaining, but a lot of the time it isn't!
By re-hashed do you mean filled with vile woke race, gender, and
identity politics which is racist, sexist, and bigoted by design,
insulting to the audience, and which was never in the originals and
totally anachronistic to the period the shows are set.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 24/01/2024 10:41, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor
writers without an original idea in their head. That's why all
the old shows are just re-hashed for a modern audience.
I don't mind the lack of originality if it's entertaining,
but a lot of the time it isn't!
By re-hashed do you mean filled with vile woke race, gender, and
identity politics which is racist, sexist, and bigoted by design,
insulting to the audience, and which was never in the originals and
totally anachronistic to the period the shows are set.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/01/2024 10:41, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor
writers without an original idea in their head. That's why all
the old shows are just re-hashed for a modern audience.
I don't mind the lack of originality if it's entertaining,
but a lot of the time it isn't!
By re-hashed do you mean filled with vile woke race, gender, and
identity politics which is racist, sexist, and bigoted by design,
insulting to the audience, and which was never in the originals and
totally anachronistic to the period the shows are set.
No, I mean the same ideas done over and over again like your forty
year old games shows. We mentioned "Blankety Blank" and "Gladiators"
but they are not new or original. No talent is required to revive
something just to fill a TV schedule. That's what you get with the >terrestrial TV channels these days, bubblegum for the brain!
A black person in a costume drama doesn't bother me, if the said
drama is enjoyable to watch. If a TV show is boring it doesn't matter
who is in it.
I didn't like Lenny Henry in "Rings of Power", not because Lenny
Henry is black but I don't find him funny and never did, plus his
character "Sadoc Burrows" - and the whole series in fact - was mind
numbingly boring. Black or White Harfoot's are irrelevant when the
whole show was a turgid mess to sit through.
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
Checked out Coronation Street lately?
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and even
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/01/2024 10:41, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor
writers without an original idea in their head. That's why all
the old shows are just re-hashed for a modern audience.
I don't mind the lack of originality if it's entertaining,
but a lot of the time it isn't!
By re-hashed do you mean filled with vile woke race, gender, and
identity politics which is racist, sexist, and bigoted by design,
insulting to the audience, and which was never in the originals and
totally anachronistic to the period the shows are set.
No, I mean the same ideas done over and over again like your forty
year old games shows. We mentioned "Blankety Blank" and "Gladiators"
but they are not new or original. No talent is required to revive
something just to fill a TV schedule. That's what you get with the terrestrial TV channels these days, bubblegum for the brain!
A black person in a costume drama doesn't bother me, if the said
drama is enjoyable to watch. If a TV show is boring it doesn't matter
who is in it.
I didn't like Lenny Henry in "Rings of Power", not because Lenny
Henry is black but I don't find him funny and never did, plus his
character "Sadoc Burrows" - and the whole series in fact - was mind
numbingly boring. Black or White Harfoot's are irrelevant when the
whole show was a turgid mess to sit through.
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
On 29/01/2024 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:
A black person in a costume drama doesn't bother me, if the said
drama is enjoyable to watch. If a TV show is boring it doesn't
matter who is in it.
Wrong.
You lose all suspension of disbelief when a black or Asian
person is chosen to play a white historical figure like Isaac
Newton,
Anne Boleyn, Cleopatra, or Achilles. Race swapping
The Doctor wrote:
Checked out Coronation Street lately?
Not deliberately!
The fact that the last few Doctor Who episodes got more viewers than >Coronation Street tells you all you need to know about the standard
of Coronation Street these days.
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have "woke" >agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who also have
"woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of today's writers
can't write to save their lives...but by golly they're going to push
that agenda even if the story and the writing sucks (and they really
don't know that their writing sucks...as long as the producer is getting
what they want, the writers are safe). The bad writing leads to a show
that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you think
about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST: TNG, ST:
DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first and foremost,
and in many cases the individual stories also had egalitarian messages >intertwined with a good story. A large number of today's writers can't
do that...as long as the agenda is being pushed, they think they're
doing a good job.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and even
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
On 29/01/2024 16:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and even
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
The writers who are chosen are the ones who are lazy and lacking in
talent because they are chosen over far better writers because they push
the same vile woke agenda advocated by the executive producers, show
runners, and broadcasters. You're not going to get good writing until
wokery is excised from the entertainment industry completely and hiring
is based on merit rather than political leaning, skin colour, gender,
and sexuality.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 29/01/2024 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/01/2024 10:41, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the TV shows produced these days are written by poor
writers without an original idea in their head. That's why all
the old shows are just re-hashed for a modern audience.
I don't mind the lack of originality if it's entertaining,
but a lot of the time it isn't!
By re-hashed do you mean filled with vile woke race, gender, and
identity politics which is racist, sexist, and bigoted by design,
insulting to the audience, and which was never in the originals and
totally anachronistic to the period the shows are set.
No, I mean the same ideas done over and over again like your forty
year old games shows. We mentioned "Blankety Blank" and "Gladiators"
but they are not new or original. No talent is required to revive
something just to fill a TV schedule. That's what you get with the
terrestrial TV channels these days, bubblegum for the brain!
There's nothing wrong with Blankety Blank or Gladiators. They are
classics. Being new doesn't necessarily make something better. 99% of
new ideas today are complete s*t, because woke retards thing they can
write better than the classics such as those written by Shakespeare,
Dumas, Dickens, Doyle, Verne, and Wells, and get away with it by filling >everything with woke excrement.
A black person in a costume drama doesn't bother me, if the said
drama is enjoyable to watch. If a TV show is boring it doesn't matter
who is in it.
Wrong. You lose all suspension of disbelief when a black or Asian person
is chosen to play a white historical figure like Isaac Newton, Anne
Boleyn, Cleopatra, or Achilles. Race swapping historical characters,
real or not real is fundamentally racist and intolerable. Race swapping >Nelson Mandela would be unacceptable, so why was Isaac Newton race
swapped by Retard T. Davies?
I didn't like Lenny Henry in "Rings of Power", not because Lenny
Henry is black but I don't find him funny and never did, plus his
character "Sadoc Burrows" - and the whole series in fact - was mind
numbingly boring. Black or White Harfoot's are irrelevant when the
whole show was a turgid mess to sit through.
The fact that Lenny Henry was in it was an instant warning that it was
going to be crap, because you knew by that that the bigoted and racist
woke agenda was put before good writing. The writers were so bad and
totally incompetent that the only way they could sell the show was
through woke virtue signalling.
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
Woke writers can't write, period! Forcing someone to insert unchallenged
woke ideology into what they write, and forbidding them to write strong
male characters, or include a heroic journey, or heterosexual romance
and feminine female characters, in order to appease far-left
lesbian-feminist bigots who despise everything masculine or feminine
makes them write like 6 year old children with autism.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/01/2024 15:00, Blueshirt wrote:
A black person in a costume drama doesn't bother me, if the said
drama is enjoyable to watch. If a TV show is boring it doesn't
matter who is in it.
Wrong.
Well I'm not wrong if it doesn't bother ME!!! Which it rarely does.
I've told you before, I watch TV to be entertained... I can go down
the pub and put money in to a cap/bucket if I want to do politics.
You lose all suspension of disbelief when a black or Asian
person is chosen to play a white historical figure like Isaac
Newton,
If "mavity" is being used I'm still going with 'alternate universe'
on that one!
People not knowing the word "gravity" kind of foreshadows something
like that...
Anne Boleyn, Cleopatra, or Achilles. Race swapping
At a guess I'd say the real Cleopatra wasn't as white as Elizabeth
Taylor!!!
I haven't seen anyone play a black Achilles as I hate all that Greek
shit. (Sorry!) I even used play as the "Norse" in "Age of Mythology"
just so I could defeat Artemis, Hades & Co.
But I'll take your word for it that Achilles wasn't an oily skinned
Greek that liked to spit and smash plates...
In article <up8lq3$hqjh$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 29/01/2024 16:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and even
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
The writers who are chosen are the ones who are lazy and lacking in
talent because they are chosen over far better writers because they push
the same vile woke agenda advocated by the executive producers, show
runners, and broadcasters. You're not going to get good writing until
wokery is excised from the entertainment industry completely and hiring
is based on merit rather than political leaning, skin colour, gender,
and sexuality.
Would you have have chosen someone from the JN-T Era
over RTD?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner
On 29/01/2024 22:22, The Doctor wrote:
In article <up8lq3$hqjh$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 29/01/2024 16:47, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/29/2024 09:00, Blueshirt wrote:
So I focus more on the writers. Some of them might have "woke"
agendas but they should still be capable of writing something
entertaining, which for me should be their job!
And right there is the problem. I would say most writers have
"woke" agendas, and they get hired by show-runners/producers who
also have "woke" agendas that they want pushed. However many of
today's writers can't write to save their lives...but by golly
they're going to push that agenda even if the story and the writing
sucks (and they really don't know that their writing sucks...as
long as the producer is getting what they want, the writers are
safe). The bad writing leads to a show that isn't entertaining.
I once heard Gary Burghoff (Radar O'Reilly in "MASH") say, "The
entertainment comes first...the 'message' comes second." If you
think about it, that's why shows like MASH, All in the Family, ST:
TNG, ST: DS9, et al. were so popular: they were WELL written first
and foremost, and in many cases the individual stories also had
egalitarian messages intertwined with a good story. A large number
of today's writers can't do that...as long as the agenda is being
pushed, they think they're doing a good job.
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and even
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
The writers who are chosen are the ones who are lazy and lacking in
talent because they are chosen over far better writers because they push >>> the same vile woke agenda advocated by the executive producers, show
runners, and broadcasters. You're not going to get good writing until
wokery is excised from the entertainment industry completely and hiring
is based on merit rather than political leaning, skin colour, gender,
and sexuality.
Would you have have chosen someone from the JN-T Era
over RTD?
Pip and Jane Baker were far better writers than Chibnall and RTD.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." -William Shatner
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and evenDaniel
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
-
Blueshirt wrote on 30/1/24 3:47 am:
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the
stories.
THE KISS!
Blueshirt wrote on 30/1/24 3:47 am:
<Snip>
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the stories.
THE KISS!
However, the episodes were still [generally] entertaining and evenDaniel
after all these years, still enjoyable to watch. I doubt anyone will
be watching "Rings of Power" in 2073 and calling it a classic TV
series!!!
Writers today are just lazy and they think that if they push a cause
or agenda that's all they have to do, the producers then give them a
pat on the back... and the writers forget about writing.
-
Daniel65 wrote:
Blueshirt wrote on 30/1/24 3:47 am:
Yes! There has always been agendas and box ticking... the original
"Star Trek" from the 1960's had a pretty much 'one of everything
cast' and there were plenty of moral issues depicted in the
stories.
THE KISS!
Ahead of its time.
On-screen kisses are controversial.... look at how upset some of the
anoraks got in 1996 with the TVM!
Carry on going through the RADW archive and you will read all about
it in a year or two! ;-)
In article <nnd$258891de$720e570a@3c252bfcae6d09c3>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
On-screen kisses are controversial.... look at how upset some of
the anoraks got in 1996 with the TVM!
Carry on going through the RADW archive and you will read all
about it in a year or two! ;-)
I like that scene.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <nnd$258891de$720e570a@3c252bfcae6d09c3>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
On-screen kisses are controversial.... look at how upset some of
the anoraks got in 1996 with the TVM!
Carry on going through the RADW archive and you will read all
about it in a year or two! ;-)
I like that scene.
I didn't have a problem with it either...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 113:40:31 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,235 |
| Messages: | 5,348,928 |