On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
James, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_
from Carnell? I have a copy of 1965's _The Best of New Worlds_
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_ >anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from >1958-1965).
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
In article <kp58vpFoof8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
James, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_ >>from Carnell? I have a copy of 1965's _The Best of New Worlds_
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_
anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from
1958-1965).
I don't know. Sorry.
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdni...@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazinesJames, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_ from Carnell? I have a copy of 1965's _The Best of New Worlds_
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_ anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from 1958-1965).
In article <kp58vpFoof8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
James, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_ >>from Carnell? I have a copy of 1965's _The Best of New Worlds_
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_ >>anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from >>1958-1965).
I don't know. Sorry.
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
Campbell offered SF-curious readers an amazing ^H astonishing ^H
astounding 583 pages of material drawn from the pages of
Astounding, all for a mere four dollars (about $30 USD today; still a
good deal).
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
In article <kp58vpFoof8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF MagazinesJames, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_ >>>from Carnell? I have a copy of 1965's _The Best of New Worlds_
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines >>>
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_ >>>anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from >>>1958-1965).
I don't know. Sorry.
Oh well, thanks. I was just wondering whether it was a sign of complete >antagonism between the two, or complete cooperation! It's probably
one or the other...
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in the
foreground and a very dim view of your column in the background.
Quite annoying.
On 2023-10-16, James Nicoll <jdni...@panix.com> wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazinesJames, was there a controversy about Moorcock's taking over _New Worlds_ from Carnell?
edited by Moorcock, and it seems strange that there were both
that and 1964's _Lambda I_ (that you reviewed) as major _New Worlds_ anthologies after so long a lack of anthologies.
Or was this just a sneaky way of publishing a much bigger anthology
over two volumes? (Moorcock included only non-american authors from 1958-1965).
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in the
foreground and a very dim view of your column in the background.
Quite annoying.
On 16 Oct 2023 20:03:19 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in the
foreground and a very dim view of your column in the background.
Quite annoying.
I click "no style" and the pop-up becomes a couple of lines above
a clear view of large print.
On 2023-10-17, Joy Beeson <jbe...@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:
On 16 Oct 2023 20:03:19 GMT, Chris Buckley <al...@sabir.com> wrote:
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in the
foreground and a very dim view of your column in the background.
Quite annoying.
I click "no style" and the pop-up becomes a couple of lines aboveThanks, I'll try that next time (I'm minimizing my accesses to Tor in
a clear view of large print.
the undoubtedly vain hope of negatively affecting their page statistics while they are doing their data collection.)
On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:37:21 AM UTC-4, Chris Buckley wrote:
On 2023-10-17, Joy Beeson <jbe...@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:
On 16 Oct 2023 20:03:19 GMT, Chris Buckley <al...@sabir.com> wrote:Thanks, I'll try that next time (I'm minimizing my accesses to Tor in
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in the
foreground and a very dim view of your column in the background.
Quite annoying.
I click "no style" and the pop-up becomes a couple of lines above
a clear view of large print.
the undoubtedly vain hope of negatively affecting their page statistics
while they are doing their data collection.)
When a website or sales droid asks an impertinent question without
explaining why, I lie. They don't deserve the truth, and poisoning their
data is a good thing.
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question?
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
James Nicoll wrote:want to say a big book shelved ahead of Analog 1 was _The Astounding-Analog Reader_, it was edited by Brian W. Aldiss and Harry Harrison, and I can't picture them ignoring shelving by author to go with series. Maybe some other fan kept moving it. My
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazinesThe Galaxy Reader was "Sorted by increasing implausibility," ha! Brilliant! I don't suppose that was carried on in the later, shorter books of The Galaxy Reader series, not that I read the stories in any volume in order.
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books about literature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled Analog and a number were in the sf section. I
I wonder about the lesser-known magazines, and any lesser-known bests they generated. Galileo advertised _The Starry Messenger_, the best from I guess their first year or so. Looking it up, I'm sorry I didn't clip out the order form to get it, it lookslike the only place to read most of the stories from authors who weren't already names. Wait, is that a selling point?
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
James Nicoll wrote:Brilliant! I don't suppose that was carried on in the later, shorter
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines >> The Galaxy Reader was "Sorted by increasing implausibility," ha!
books of The Galaxy Reader series, not that I read the stories in any
volume in order.
literature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF >series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books about
Analog and a number were in the sf section. I want to say a big book
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:looks like the only place to read most of the stories from authors who weren't already names. Wait, is that a selling point?
James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
I wonder about the lesser-known magazines, and any lesser-known bests they generated. Galileo advertised _The Starry Messenger_, the best from I guess their first year or so. Looking it up, I'm sorry I didn't clip out the order form to get it, it
I suppose you know that Galileo the Italian dude published <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereus_Nuncius>
which, as noted, was translated as "Starry Messenger"
but, by this account, was intended as "news about recent
developments in astronomy" as of 1610, chiefly I think
developments achieved by himself.
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF >series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books about >literature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled >Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where
I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or
Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too,
maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sf
section?
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07 AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
As a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I
read Niven, Delaney,
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke,
Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It had
long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than >our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew
nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
William Hyde
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07 AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazinesAs a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I read Niven, Delaney,
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It had long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than
our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
William Hyde
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07 AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
As a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I
read Niven, Delaney,
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke,
Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It
had long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than >our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew
nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07?AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest? Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazine
s
As a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I read Niven, Delaney,
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It had long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
On Wednesday, 18 October 2023 at 20:58:22 UTC+1, William Hyde wrote:
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07 AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF MagazinesAs a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I read Niven, Delaney,
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It had long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than
our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
William Hyde
Some un-neutral things are said about it here.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_in_Time_and_Space>
Some confusion is recorded here.
<https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?438841> ><https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?245825>
The top, but apparently newer ISFDB record represents
the 1946 first edition with a cover stating both that
36 stories are collected, and 34 are. This is stated to be
replaced with a cover correctly announcing 35 stories,
and no other difference. Actually, from ISFDB, I count
an introduction labelled as an essay, two other essays -
"V-2: Rocket Cargo Ship" (hmm) and "Time-Travel Happens!"
apparently based on this claimed event at Versailles
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moberly–Jourdain_incident> -
and 33 texts identified as fiction.
In 1953 (ISFDB) or 1946 (Wikipedia) - I'll bet on ISFDB,
but each cites a source - an edition which cut the last
5 stories for some reason, was published. For editions
after that, ISFDB may know better than I do.
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SFseries were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books about
literature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled
Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where
I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual
authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too, maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sf section?
On 18/10/2023 07.37, Jack Bohn wrote:I remember going into my Grammar School's library and being pleased to see a large section labelled SF. Alas, it turned out that SF meant Senior Fiction.
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF >>> series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books aboutliterature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled >>> Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where
I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual >> authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too, maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sf section?In my case, the school libraries had their fiction arranged in alphabetical order by authors' last names. To find a particular genre, one needed to use the card catalog.
On the other hand, the public library *did* have an SF section, in which I spent many happy hours.
--
Michael F. Stemper
Isaiah 58:6-7
In article <2e88dec3-130a-496a...@googlegroups.com>,
William Hyde <wthyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:16:07 AM UTC-4, James Nicoll wrote:
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
https://www.tor.com/2023/10/16/five-anthologies-based-on-classic-sf-magazines
As a teenager I thought I was pretty familiar with the field of SF. I
read Niven, Delaney,
Ellison, Silverberg, Shaw, and of course older writers like Clarke, >Asimov, Heinlein et al.
Then I stumbled on an old, grey hardback in our school library. It had >long lost its
dust cover and who knows how it had arrived there, as the book was older than
our school, twice the age of any other book in the library.
It was "Adventures in Time and Space", and I realized that I knew
nothing. Nothing!
It was also a fabulous read.
William Hyde
The *Ur* tome!
On 2023-10-17, Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:
On 16 Oct 2023 20:03:19 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On a separate note, have you found out what's up with the Tor
"Are you between 13 and 15?" question? I refuse to answer and
as a consequence have to read your column with the question in
the foreground and a very dim view of your column in the
background. Quite annoying.
I click "no style" and the pop-up becomes a couple of lines above
a clear view of large print.
Thanks, I'll try that next time (I'm minimizing my accesses to Tor in
the undoubtedly vain hope of negatively affecting their page
statistics while they are doing their data collection.)
On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 7:06:48 PM UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 18/10/2023 07.37, Jack Bohn wrote:
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF >>> series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books aboutliterature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled >>> Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where >> I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual >> authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too, maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sf section?In my case, the school libraries had their fiction arranged in alphabetical
order by authors' last names. To find a particular genre, one needed to use
the card catalog.
On the other hand, the public library *did* have an SF section, in which I spent many happy hours.
I remember going into my Grammar School's library and being pleased to see a large section labelled SF. Alas, it turned out that SF meant Senior Fiction.
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"
Andrew McDowell wrote:
On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 7:06:48 PM UTC+1, Michael F.Stemper wrote:
maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sfOn 18/10/2023 07.37, Jack Bohn wrote:
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SF >> > >>> series were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books aboutliterature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled >> > >>> Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where >> > >> I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual >> > >> authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or >Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too,
section?
In my case, the school libraries had their fiction arranged in alphabetical
order by authors' last names. To find a particular genre, one needed to use
the card catalog.
On the other hand, the public library *did* have an SF section, in which I >> > spent many happy hours.
I remember going into my Grammar School's library and being pleased tosee a large section labelled SF. Alas, it turned out that SF meant
Senior Fiction.
Senior fiction? Oh, not 65+, but 18+. The kind your more worldly-wise >friend would hand you and say, "Here, read the underlined parts." And
you realized he did have respect for book learnin'.
Come to think of it, our school library and the childrens' section of
the public library had all fiction in one section. Not that it was too
bad reading their non-scientific fiction. (Perhaps something Chesterton >wrote about only needing "He opened a door and saw a dragon" after
children have forgotten the excitement of "He opened a door".) I guess
I got so used to being genred off that in my adulthood when video
rentals became a thing I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place
that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last
name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The
Empire Strikes Back,"
--
-Jack
Andrew McDowell wrote:door and saw a dragon" after children have forgotten the excitement of "He opened a door".) I guess I got so used to being genred off that in my adulthood when video rentals became a thing I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them
On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 7:06:48?PM UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 18/10/2023 07.37, Jack Bohn wrote:
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:In my case, the school libraries had their fiction arranged in alphabetical
In article <d2b5be99-2e0e-4160...@googlegroups.com>,
On Tuesday, 17 October 2023 at 17:33:56 UTC+1, Jack Bohn wrote:
What books my library had of The Galaxy Reader and The Best from F&SFseries were shelved in non-fiction, in the area for books about
literature, for some reason. The Campbell series of books just titled >> > >>> Analog and a number were in the sf section.
In our library, SF anthologies were generaly under 803.3. That's where >> > >> I would go first whenever I walked in as it was a pure vein. Individual
authors were all over the place.
Now that you mention it, there were also anthologies of Best or Award-Winning general fiction short stories of bygone years there, too, maybe even volumes of mysteries. Did you not have a dedicated sf section?
order by authors' last names. To find a particular genre, one needed to use
the card catalog.
On the other hand, the public library *did* have an SF section, in which I
spent many happy hours.
I remember going into my Grammar School's library and being pleased to see a large section labelled SF. Alas, it turned out that SF meant Senior Fiction.
Senior fiction? Oh, not 65+, but 18+. The kind your more worldly-wise friend would hand you and say, "Here, read the underlined parts." And you realized he did have respect for book learnin'.
Come to think of it, our school library and the childrens' section of the public library had all fiction in one section. Not that it was too bad reading their non-scientific fiction. (Perhaps something Chesterton wrote about only needing "He opened a
On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it
together, and it blew me away.
I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something by
Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.
On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it
together, and it blew me away.
I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something by
Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.
On Friday, 20 October 2023 at 14:52:50 UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it together, and it blew me away.
I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something byWikipedia says "it is essentially fiction but draws
Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.
extensively on Ballard's experiences in World War II",
specifically that he was a British teenager in
Shanghai when Japan overran it, and then he
was interned.
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 6:41:24 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2023 at 14:52:50 UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:Wikipedia says "it is essentially fiction but draws
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it
together, and it blew me away.
I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something by
Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.
extensively on Ballard's experiences in World War II",
specifically that he was a British teenager in
Shanghai when Japan overran it, and then he
was interned.
It draws on his novel of the same title.
Which does draw on his experiences but is far from identical (in real life Ballard was
not separated from his parents, for example).
Fine novel. I must see the film some time.
Five Anthologies Based on Classic SF Magazines
Worried that magazines are too ephemeral to hold reader interest?
Anthologies may be the answer.
I once tried to find Moroder's /Metropolis/ on DVD in a store that
sorted by "genre". I checked all the obvious places ("foreign",
"science fiction" perhaps others) but had to ask the clerk to find it
after verifying that it was in there somewhere.
I forget what wierd "genre" we finally found it in. The problem, of
course, was that neither she nor I could imagine what "genre" whoever
shelved it chose to put it in. And the computer that told her it was
in stock did not say what "genre" it was in either.
But that's always the problem: so many ways to sort things, and all of
them has a context in which it makes sense.
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 6:41:24 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2023 at 14:52:50 UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it together, and it blew me away.
It draws on his novel of the same title.I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something by Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.Wikipedia says "it is essentially fiction but draws
extensively on Ballard's experiences in World War II",
specifically that he was a British teenager in
Shanghai when Japan overran it, and then he
was interned.
Which does draw on his experiences but is far from identical (in real life Ballard was
not separated from his parents, for example).
Fine novel. I must see the film some time.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT), Jack Bohn
<jack....@gmail.com> wrote:
because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"I guess I got so used to being genred off that in my adulthood when video rentals became a thing I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun"
I once tried to find Moroder's /Metropolis/ on DVD in a store that
sorted by "genre". I checked all the obvious places ("foreign",
"science fiction" perhaps others) but had to ask the clerk to find it
after verifying that it was in there somewhere.
I forget what wierd "genre" we finally found it in. The problem, of
course, was that neither she nor I could imagine what "genre" whoever shelved it chose to put it in. And the computer that told her it was
in stock did not say what "genre" it was in either.
But that's always the problem: so many ways to sort things, and all of
them has a context in which it makes sense.
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 8:42:21?PM UTC-4, William Hyde wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 6:41:24?PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2023 at 14:52:50 UTC+1, Michael F. Stemper wrote: >> > > On 20/10/2023 08.29, Jack Bohn wrote:It draws on his novel of the same title.
Wikipedia says "it is essentially fiction but draws
I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun" because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"What did you think of it? Knowing nothing about it, I bought it for
my son, on the basis of it being a Spielberg flick. We watched it
together, and it blew me away.
I didn't realize until just now that it was based on something by
Ballard, which does make it SF-adjacent as somebody else said.
extensively on Ballard's experiences in World War II",
specifically that he was a British teenager in
Shanghai when Japan overran it, and then he
was interned.
Which does draw on his experiences but is far from identical (in real life Ballard was
not separated from his parents, for example).
Fine novel. I must see the film some time.
Another film with child's-eye view of the War, but on the (British) homefront was Hope and Glory, written and directed by sf-adjacent John Boorman (writer and director of Zardoz and Excalibur) based on his experiences.
On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 11:16:49?AM UTC-4, Paul S Person wrote:because its box was next to "The Empire Strikes Back,"
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT), Jack Bohn[deep into thread drift]
<jack....@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess I got so used to being genred off that in my adulthood when video rentals became a thing I was quite taken with a local mom & pop place that ordered them all alphabetically (by title, not by director's last name). Watched "Empire of the Sun"
ditch guess, Art Films or Indies (which also means Art) if they thought it wasn't meant to be understood.I once tried to find Moroder's /Metropolis/ on DVD in a store that
sorted by "genre". I checked all the obvious places ("foreign",
"science fiction" perhaps others) but had to ask the clerk to find it
after verifying that it was in there somewhere.
I wonder if they had a section for "Classic Films" -- that is old, particularly black & white. Or even a section for silents. But Moroder colorized it as well as adding a soundtrack, so, the section on Music Videos, Concert Films,,, Musicals? Last
Coast, or Ridley Scott on Legend?I forget what wierd "genre" we finally found it in. The problem, of
course, was that neither she nor I could imagine what "genre" whoever
shelved it chose to put it in. And the computer that told her it was
in stock did not say what "genre" it was in either.
But that's always the problem: so many ways to sort things, and all of
them has a context in which it makes sense.
It's said genre is marketing categories, so the clerk faces a dilemma: in the eyes of the customer, is Star Wars more like Grease than like Blade Runner? After watching Blade Runner, is the customer more likely to look for Harrison Ford in The Mosquito
Advice some 35 years late, but, be like Usenet, only split up if there is very little crossover interest between the two new groupings, and if there is enough traffic to support the new group and to have been a hindrance in the old group: someone willlikely know to cross an aisle to find the Musicals with titles beginning W-Z on the top shelf of the Mystery section; they may not realize Rock Operas are on the shelf above Romance.
After that I went to the public library to look for more Asimov. I
ended up getting Best from F&SF anthologies. Things developed from
there.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 303 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 253:11:20 |
Calls: | 6,793 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,314 |
Messages: | 5,392,467 |