Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices.
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural
outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't
deplorable... it's the opposite.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural
outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn'tHackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural >>>> outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices. >>>
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the meaning of thr word.
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn'tHackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural >>>>> outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices. >>>>
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn'tOn Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural >>>>>>> outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices. >>>>>>
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good >>>>> with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the >>>> meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
Grate, i bet?
In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn'tHackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the natural >>>>>> outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what she practices. >>>>>
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good >>>> with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the >>> meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good >>>>>> with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the >>>>> meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there
were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >checker coming?
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>>That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good >>>>>>> with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the >>>>>> meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there
were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar
checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you!
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it
with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using
their imagination.
On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:32:48 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-16 09:00:01 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and >>>>>>>>>>>>> printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>>>That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't
deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good >>>>>>>> with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how >>>> your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there
were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar
checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you!
I can't believe I have to explain this.
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it
with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using
their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because
it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer.
(I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >though.)
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:make.
On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails andThat's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>>>>
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how >>>>> your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there
were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >>>> checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you!
I can't believe I have to explain this.
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it
with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using
their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because
it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer.
(I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails andThat's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public >>>>>>>>>>>>> statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how >>>>>> your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >>>>> checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you!
I can't believe I have to explain this.
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using
their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because
it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for
misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer.
(I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones,
though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:make.
On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails andThat's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embarrassed by anything you say.
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates?
"Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how >>>>>>> your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >>>>>> checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you!
I can't believe I have to explain this.
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because >>>> it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for
misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:44:13 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
I can't believe I have to explain this."Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates? >>>>>>>>>
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how >>>>>>>> your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >>>>>>> checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you! >>>>>
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because >>>>> it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>>>> misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
FPP, the immature child types more nonsense.
In article <00o4ubhgmp8k8no9f7ej49epidgles53gh@4ax.com>,
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:44:13 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
I can't believe I have to explain this."Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what
she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates? >>>>>>>>>>
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar >>>>>>>> checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you! >>>>>>
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>>>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a
stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because >>>>>> it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>>>>> misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine
pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
FPP, the immature child types more nonsense.
I think that was meant as a moment of self-reflection on FPPsky's part.
:-D
On 2016-09-21 18:33:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <00o4ubhgmp8k8no9f7ej49epidgles53gh@4ax.com>,
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:44:13 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
I can't believe I have to explain this."Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the
natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what
she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates? >>>>>>>>>>>
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>>>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar
checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you! >>>>>>>
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>>>>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a >>>>>>>> stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because >>>>>>> it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>>>>>> misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>>>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine >>>>>>> pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>>>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
FPP, the immature child types more nonsense.
I think that was meant as a moment of self-reflection on FPPsky's part.
:-D
At this point, I'll just let the conversation continue in your head(s).
On 2016-09-21 18:33:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <00o4ubhgmp8k8no9f7ej49epidgles53gh@4ax.com>,
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:44:13 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
I can't believe I have to explain this."Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the
natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what
she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates? >>>>>>>>>>>
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there >>>>>>>>> were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar
checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you! >>>>>>>
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it >>>>>>>> with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a >>>>>>>> stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because >>>>>>> it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>>>>>> misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>>>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine >>>>>>> pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>>>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
FPP, the immature child types more nonsense.
I think that was meant as a moment of self-reflection on FPPsky's part.
:-D
At this point, I'll just let the conversation continue in your head(s).
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:04:50 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-21 18:33:31 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
In article <00o4ubhgmp8k8no9f7ej49epidgles53gh@4ax.com>,
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:44:13 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-20 06:24:00 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 07:21:03 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>> NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 22:19:03 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:31:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <nrnf49$24t$1@dont-email.me>, fredp151@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-19 01:50:55 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:36:40 -0400, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2016-09-17 14:22:00 +0000, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
NoBody@nowhere.com wrote:
FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> said:
I can't believe I have to explain this."Spelling" "flame" noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.Hackers have embarrassed General Powell by hacking his emails and
printing them so everybody can see his private correspondence.
That's the nice thing about being Donald Trump... you never get
embarrassed by anything you say.
For that, you'd need a sense of shame.
One could easily say the same about Hillary, as her recent public
statements have shown.
One could describe her behavior as "deplorable", but that's the
natural outcome Crooked Hillary gets for accusing others of what
she practices.
Deplorable for stating the truth? Calling out racism isn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deplorable... it's the opposite.
Calling out racism where it doesn't exist is lying. Guess FPP is good
with that.
There is the possibility that he, unlike most of his ilk, don't know the
meaning of the word.
How's the search for that spellchecker coming? Any updates? >>>>>>>>>>>>
I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word... I just asked how
your search for a spellchecker was coming.
The "..." was unneeded. It should have been a single "." since there
were clearly two different sentences. How is the search for a grammar
checker coming?
You better be nice to him or he'll sic his other sockpuppets on you! >>>>>>>>
The part of a sentence or an event that is left out by substituting it
with ellipses is often used to either save time or use it as a >>>>>>>>> stylistic element by allowing the reader to fill in the gaps by using >>>>>>>>> their imagination.
I wrote "I didn't flame you for misspelling a 3 letter word..." because
it was a lot shorter than constantly writing "I didn't flame you for >>>>>>>> misspelling a 3 letter word, you dimwitted clown."
It was unnecessary as both sentences stand on their own. Your
squirming to explain it is typical of you.
You may substitute any equally appropriate description, if you prefer. >>>>>>>> (I would rather you substituted "you ignorant fuck", "you asinine >>>>>>>> pussy" or "you fucking coward" over some of the less descriptive ones, >>>>>>>> though.)
FPP again demonstrates his immaturity.
Like I said, he's a sore loser.
Dickwad's OK, too...
FPP, the immature child types more nonsense.
I think that was meant as a moment of self-reflection on FPPsky's part.
:-D
At this point, I'll just let the conversation continue in your head(s).
And more of FPP's inaccurate obsession with sockpuppets.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 42:40:53 |
| Calls: | 6,648 |
| Files: | 12,193 |
| Messages: | 5,329,574 |