• Saw "The Batman" last night. Umm...

    From Ted Nolan @21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 6 19:05:39 2022
    Man, there might be a good movie in there somehwere, but this one was just barely OK!

    Saw "The Batman" last night. It's not a terrible movie...,
    but it's not a particularly good one either.

    First of all, it's at least an hour too long. At least. We're
    talking three hours here.

    Second, they just can't resist throwing in some deconstruction of
    the Batman lore. I won't say how, but it's something you would
    think the custodians of an iconic IP would have better sense than
    to put on the screen.

    Third, they can't resist throwing in some gratituous anti-white
    jabs. I mean, nobody cares if Gordon is black as long as he has a
    mustache, that's fine, but they just couldn't leave it there, both
    with the setup and putting words in a positive character's mouth.


    Fourth, that's just not The Riddler. Yes, everybody remembers the
    cornball Gorshin characterization, and the comics sometime struggle
    to make him a credible threat, but they really went to left field
    this time.

    Fifth, the only part of the Gotham power structure not in on the
    corruption is the media. Really!?

    Add in a convoluted plot with lots of time for emo brooding between
    action sequences, and the whole thing is kind of a missed opportunity
    to tell a tale of The Batman's early years.

    Well, enough. OK, I'm not sorry I saw it I guess, but I have no
    desire to see it again.
    --
    columbiaclosings.com
    What's not in Columbia anymore..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JG Rove@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 6 12:59:31 2022
    On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:05:43 PM UTC-6, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
    Man, there might be a good movie in there somehwere, but this one was just barely OK!

    Saw "The Batman" last night. It's not a terrible movie...,
    but it's not a particularly good one either.

    First of all, it's at least an hour too long. At least. We're
    talking three hours here.

    Second, they just can't resist throwing in some deconstruction of
    the Batman lore. I won't say how, but it's something you would
    think the custodians of an iconic IP would have better sense than
    to put on the screen.

    Third, they can't resist throwing in some gratituous anti-white
    jabs. I mean, nobody cares if Gordon is black as long as he has a
    mustache, that's fine, but they just couldn't leave it there, both
    with the setup and putting words in a positive character's mouth.


    Fourth, that's just not The Riddler. Yes, everybody remembers the
    cornball Gorshin characterization, and the comics sometime struggle
    to make him a credible threat, but they really went to left field
    this time.

    Fifth, the only part of the Gotham power structure not in on the
    corruption is the media. Really!?

    Add in a convoluted plot with lots of time for emo brooding between
    action sequences, and the whole thing is kind of a missed opportunity
    to tell a tale of The Batman's early years.

    Well, enough. OK, I'm not sorry I saw it I guess, but I have no
    desire to see it again.
    --
    columbiaclosings.com
    What's not in Columbia anymore..

    I'm planning for 6 sittings to watch the DVD.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)