• Re: BEING THE RICARDOS (film review by Mark R. Leeper)

    From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Mark Leeper on Wed Dec 15 17:10:06 2021
    Mark Leeper <mleeper@optonline.net> wrote:

    . . .

    There are a few criticisms one can make of the film. One that has
    been made by many is that they cast a Spaniard (Javier Bardem) as
    Arnaz, rather than someone from Cuba, or at least from Latin
    America. (Similar casting, such as Antonio Banderas as a Cuban in
    THE MAMBO KINGS PLAY SONGS OF LOVE in 1992, attracted less
    attention. Indeed, the fact that they chose someone Hispanic for
    MAMBO KINGS was considered a big step forward by some.) On the
    other hand, Javier Bardem does get a chance to show off his singing
    voice with Latin (American) songs.

    Don't tell the critics: Cuba had been a Spanish colony, and they have
    Spanish ancestry.

    I once saw a movie featuring two women: A Spaniard and a Mexican. Well,
    a Spanish actress played the Mexican and a Mexican actress played the
    Spaniard.

    If Bardem can actually sing, gosh, that's perfectly legitimate casting.

    There seems to have been less of a commitment to have the
    characters in the film look like their real-life counterparts than
    there often is in films of this sort. Perhaps that's a good thing;
    the actors are actors, not impersonators, and covering actors in
    lots of make-up to achieve an artificial resemblance is often >counter-productive.

    Thank goodness.

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Leeper@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 15 08:57:19 2021
    BEING THE RICARDOS is a fictional telling of three crises that
    affected Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz during the early 1950s: Ball
    was declared a Communist by Walter Winchell, there was a front-page
    tabloid scandal about Arnaz and another woman, and Ball was
    pregnant. (The latter may not seem like much of a crisis, but in
    the early 1950s, television had never shown a pregnant woman, and
    had certainly never used the word "pregnant".) The film has a lot
    of flashbacks, but there seems to be a change of film stock that
    helps us know what is 1950s and what is earlier. In a tribute to
    the show, the first line (after the "documentary" opening--see
    below) is, "Lucy, I'm home!"

    In addition to all this, there is reasonable coverage of the
    technical aspects of rehearsing and filming an episode at that
    time.

    There are a few criticisms one can make of the film. One that has
    been made by many is that they cast a Spaniard (Javier Bardem) as
    Arnaz, rather than someone from Cuba, or at least from Latin
    America. (Similar casting, such as Antonio Banderas as a Cuban in
    THE MAMBO KINGS PLAY SONGS OF LOVE in 1992, attracted less
    attention. Indeed, the fact that they chose someone Hispanic for
    MAMBO KINGS was considered a big step forward by some.) On the
    other hand, Javier Bardem does get a chance to show off his singing
    voice with Latin (American) songs.

    There seems to have been less of a commitment to have the
    characters in the film look like their real-life counterparts than
    there often is in films of this sort. Perhaps that's a good thing;
    the actors are actors, not impersonators, and covering actors in
    lots of make-up to achieve an artificial resemblance is often counter-productive. (They did do accurate hairstyles, though.) On
    the other hand, it took me quite a while to realize that J. K.
    Simmons was playing William Frawley (as Fred Mertz)--he was just
    too recognizable as Simmons.

    The film also does some major time compression, showing all these
    crises as happening in one week, while in fact Ball was pregnant in
    1951 and brought before HUAC--and event happening *before*
    Winchell's accusation--in 1953. And unlike in REDS, the
    "witnesses" (the people labeled as people who worked with Ball and
    Arnaz in what is filmed in a documentary style) are not the real
    people, but actors. (Quite possibly they are delivering things
    that the real people actually said.) As in many biopics, the
    viewer has a choice what there is to believe.

    One suspects this will have more appeal for those who remember the
    original "I Love Lucy" show, but its continuing popularity will
    extend the audience for this.

    Released theatrically 12/10/21. Rating: high +2 (-4 to +4), or
    8/10.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4995540/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/being_the_ricardos>

    --
    Mark R. Leeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 21 14:39:46 2021
    I could have sworn there has been a previous -- probably made-for-TV -- dramatization of Lucy's life but I could find no mention of it on her
    Wiki page. One scene I remember in particular was her having an
    indifferent reaction as she watched one of her comedy skits. I do
    remember watching her made-for-TV movie Stone Pillow about an elderly
    homeless woman.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kelown@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 16 18:52:07 2022
    I could have sworn there has been a previous -- probably made-for-TV -- dramatization of Lucy's life but I could find no mention of it on her
    Wiki page.

    Lucy & Desi: Before the Laughter (TV Movie 1991) - Frances Fisher,
    Maurice Benard

    Lucy (TV Movie 2003) - Rachel York, Danny Pino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)