• CANDYMAN (no spoilers)

    From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 5 11:23:14 2021
    In 1992, CANDYMAN managed to smuggle some surprisingly scary horror past audience defenses on the back of a harmless kids' game: saying
    "Candyman" into a mirror. (10 years later, THE RING would pull the same
    sort of trick.) Today, 30 years later, the trick is probably too old,
    so this new outing elects to saddle light-fingered community myth with heavy-handed social archetype. The new production is, in virtually
    every respect, quite handsome, but its scary edge is, well, dull. Only minimally recommended.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From trotsky@21:1/5 to moviePig on Fri Dec 17 03:48:34 2021
    On 12/5/2021 10:23 AM, moviePig wrote:

    In 1992, CANDYMAN managed to smuggle some surprisingly scary horror past audience defenses on the back of a harmless kids' game: saying
    "Candyman" into a mirror.  (10 years later, THE RING would pull the same sort of trick.)  Today, 30 years later, the trick is probably too old,
    so this new outing elects to saddle light-fingered community myth with heavy-handed social archetype.  The new production is, in virtually
    every respect, quite handsome, but its scary edge is, well, dull.  Only minimally recommended.

    Bernard Rose directed some great movies, "Candyman" either being the
    best or second best. They only thing I had against the original is that
    having grown up in Chicago it would have been better off it was actually
    filmed there but that's a minor quibble. I haven't seen a need to see
    the new one, as it just seems it's part of a trend to rehash old horror
    movies for Gen Z or whatever it is they're on now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to trotsky on Fri Dec 17 09:10:51 2021
    On 12/17/2021 4:48 AM, trotsky wrote:
    On 12/5/2021 10:23 AM, moviePig wrote:

    In 1992, CANDYMAN managed to smuggle some surprisingly scary horror
    past audience defenses on the back of a harmless kids' game: saying
    "Candyman" into a mirror.  (10 years later, THE RING would pull the
    same sort of trick.)  Today, 30 years later, the trick is probably too
    old, so this new outing elects to saddle light-fingered community myth
    with heavy-handed social archetype.  The new production is, in
    virtually every respect, quite handsome, but its scary edge is, well,
    dull.  Only minimally recommended.

    Bernard Rose directed some great movies, "Candyman" either being the
    best or second best.  They only thing I had against the original is that having grown up in Chicago it would have been better off it was actually filmed there but that's a minor quibble.  I haven't seen a need to see
    the new one, as it just seems it's part of a trend to rehash old horror movies for Gen Z or whatever it is they're on now.

    This sequel got enough buzz to make me risk the 90 minutes-- in this
    genre anyway. The movie wasn't awful, but imo the buzz was misplaced.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to pwal...@moviepig.com on Tue Dec 21 01:16:16 2021
    On Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 11:23:18 UTC-5, pwal...@moviepig.com wrote:
    In 1992, CANDYMAN managed to smuggle some surprisingly scary horror past audience defenses on the back of a harmless kids' game: saying
    "Candyman" into a mirror. (10 years later, THE RING would pull the same
    sort of trick.) Today, 30 years later, the trick is probably too old,
    so this new outing elects to saddle light-fingered community myth with heavy-handed social archetype. The new production is, in virtually
    every respect, quite handsome, but its scary edge is, well, dull. Only minimally recommended.

    The ominousness of Cabrini-Green, the idea of the near vacantness mixed with the presence of unfriendlies added to the feeling of the whole movie.
    It played into the theory that public housing has a very finite lifespan before crime, neglect and dilapidation sentence it to the wrecking ball.
    The sexuality of a white blond with a dominating black man (ghost or otherwise) is a Hollywood porn trope, but it worked to good effect in that movie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Dec 21 09:58:45 2021
    On 12/21/2021 4:16 AM, RichA wrote:
    On Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 11:23:18 UTC-5, pwal...@moviepig.com wrote:
    In 1992, CANDYMAN managed to smuggle some surprisingly scary horror past
    audience defenses on the back of a harmless kids' game: saying
    "Candyman" into a mirror. (10 years later, THE RING would pull the same
    sort of trick.) Today, 30 years later, the trick is probably too old,
    so this new outing elects to saddle light-fingered community myth with
    heavy-handed social archetype. The new production is, in virtually
    every respect, quite handsome, but its scary edge is, well, dull. Only
    minimally recommended.

    The ominousness of Cabrini-Green, the idea of the near vacantness mixed with the presence of unfriendlies added to the feeling of the whole movie.
    It played into the theory that public housing has a very finite lifespan before crime, neglect and dilapidation sentence it to the wrecking ball.
    The sexuality of a white blond with a dominating black man (ghost or otherwise) is a Hollywood porn trope, but it worked to good effect in that movie.

    A fair recap.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)