https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
On 2021-10-11 23:10:29 +0000, RichA said:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
The "two-bit Luke Skywalker" would be Rey in the supposed Star Wars
Sequel Trilogy by the talentless hack JarJar Abrams ... which in
reality was just a lazy gender-swapped remake of the originals.
The Dune novels (some of them anyway) were of course written before
Star Wars and were some influence on George Lucas, but the Hollyweird adaptations have always been simply an attempt to jump on the Star Wars
band wagon, just like Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers were.
On Monday, 11 October 2021 at 19:59:15 UTC-4, Your Name wrote:
On 2021-10-11 23:10:29 +0000, RichA said:
The "two-bit Luke Skywalker" would be Rey in the supposed Star Wars
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649 >>
Sequel Trilogy by the talentless hack JarJar Abrams ... which in
reality was just a lazy gender-swapped remake of the originals.
The Dune novels (some of them anyway) were of course written before
Star Wars and were some influence on George Lucas, but the Hollyweird
adaptations have always been simply an attempt to jump on the Star Wars
band wagon, just like Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers were.
I never liked Herbert's stuff, it bored me. But the original "Dune"
was at least weird enough to come off as a scifi/fantasy, even if using
Sting in the one role was nearly as bad as Travolta in "Battlefield
Earth."
On 2021-10-12 03:59:13 +0000, RichA said:
On Monday, 11 October 2021 at 19:59:15 UTC-4, Your Name wrote:
On 2021-10-11 23:10:29 +0000, RichA said:
The "two-bit Luke Skywalker" would be Rey in the supposed Star Wars
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649 >>>
Sequel Trilogy by the talentless hack JarJar Abrams ... which in
reality was just a lazy gender-swapped remake of the originals.
The Dune novels (some of them anyway) were of course written before
Star Wars and were some influence on George Lucas, but the Hollyweird
adaptations have always been simply an attempt to jump on the Star Wars
band wagon, just like Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers were.
I never liked Herbert's stuff, it bored me. But the original "Dune"
was at least weird enough to come off as a scifi/fantasy, even if using
Sting in the one role was nearly as bad as Travolta in "Battlefield
Earth."
Dune in all it's guises is boring rubbish.
I chose one of the original novels as a school prizegiving award (the
options were extremely limited and it was the only sci-fi book). I gave
up attempting to read before the end of the first chapter, after pages
and pages of desciptions of sand on a sand planet. Unfortunately people >thought because it's sci-fi and I had one, they kept buying me more
books in the series as gifts - I've never bothered to even open those
books and it's not a complete set.
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:10:29 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
Personally, I'd rather wait until seeing something until forming any judgement.
Although I can declare that I'll miss the baroque furnishings & fittings
from the David Lynch version.
On Tuesday, 12 October 2021 at 04:07:55 UTC-4, alvey wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:10:29 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649 >>Personally, I'd rather wait until seeing something until forming any
judgement.
Although I can declare that I'll miss the baroque furnishings & fittings
from the David Lynch version.
Maybe there is some kind of profound metaphor in it, but riding giant worms like horses...
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
You have things a bit backwards: Tatooine is a bit of a two-bit Arrakis, considering that Frank Herbert's book came out in 1965, twelve years
before the first Star Wars film.
I actually just yesterday saw Villeneuve's Dune (part one) film, and it
was pretty much as good an adaptation of around half of this thick book
as can be expected. Hopefully it'll achieve similar cult following as Jackson's LoTR movies - I'm looking forward to seeing a continuation.
Not a snowball's chance on the Sun that Dune will ever get close to
being as popular as Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc.
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
Not a snowball's chance on the Sun that Dune will ever get close to
being as popular as Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc.
Lynch's Dune already has a certain cult reputation in spite of its flaws.
On 2021-10-13 16:04:46 +0000, Otto J. Makela said:
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649 >>>
You have things a bit backwards: Tatooine is a bit of a two-bit Arrakis,
considering that Frank Herbert's book came out in 1965, twelve years
before the first Star Wars film.
I actually just yesterday saw Villeneuve's Dune (part one) film, and it
was pretty much as good an adaptation of around half of this thick book
as can be expected. Hopefully it'll achieve similar cult following as
Jackson's LoTR movies - I'm looking forward to seeing a continuation.
Not a snowball's chance on the Sun that Dune will ever get close to
being as popular as Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc.
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
On Monday, 11 October 2021 at 19:10:31 UTC-4, RichA wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
Good movie, not boring, BETTER than the 1980's version but it ends abruptly Probably going to make a sequel.
On Monday, 11 October 2021 at 19:10:31 UTC-4, RichA wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
They're A-RABS!
On Monday, 11 October 2021 at 19:10:31 UTC-4, RichA wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi3986080537?ref_=hm_hp_i_1&listId=ls053181649
Good movie, not boring, BETTER than the 1980's version but it ends abruptly Probably going to make a sequel.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 68:23:02 |
Calls: | 6,655 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,332,032 |
Posted today: | 1 |