• NBC TV's Debris, episode 1 comment

    From Winston@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 5 14:58:46 2021
    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on the show
    with actual science knowledge appears in the story eventually.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the effects
    caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly untrue. While they
    do exhibit some sort of short distance near-field levitation ability, if
    it were anti-gravity, they wouldn't have fallen to Earth like
    meteorites. They also wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd
    fly off into space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    Now, there's several known ways of levitating something, such as
    magnetic (like maglev trains) and electro-static, and, for story
    purposes, I wouldn't object to psychokinesis, force fields, repulsor
    rays, etc. But when an object remains fixed over a spot on a spinning
    Earth, it's not acting like anti-gravity (unless they also postulate
    some attractive force that coincidentally happens to be of the same
    magnitude as gravity).

    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that don't
    know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged scientists
    don't, it's going to look dumb.

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's a TV show, but it's easily fixable. I'll give
    it a few episodes and hope that the writers did better in later episodes
    than in this one, but I won't hold my breath. :-)
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Winston on Fri Mar 5 14:17:24 2021
    On 3/5/2021 11:58 AM, Winston wrote:
    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on the show
    with actual science knowledge appears in the story eventually.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the effects
    caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly untrue. While they
    do exhibit some sort of short distance near-field levitation ability, if
    it were anti-gravity, they wouldn't have fallen to Earth like
    meteorites. They also wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd
    fly off into space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    Now, there's several known ways of levitating something, such as
    magnetic (like maglev trains) and electro-static, and, for story
    purposes, I wouldn't object to psychokinesis, force fields, repulsor
    rays, etc. But when an object remains fixed over a spot on a spinning
    Earth, it's not acting like anti-gravity (unless they also postulate
    some attractive force that coincidentally happens to be of the same
    magnitude as gravity).

    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that don't
    know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged scientists
    don't, it's going to look dumb.

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's a TV show, but it's easily fixable. I'll give
    it a few episodes and hope that the writers did better in later episodes
    than in this one, but I won't hold my breath. :-)
    -WBE

    You appear to be under the incorrect impressions that 1) the writers
    know any better; and 2) the writers care.

    --
    I like living in the suburbs of Sanity. I can commute there when I need
    to be serious or mature but otherwise I can do as I please.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Fri Mar 5 14:41:21 2021
    Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote in news:s1uali$k1j$1@dont-email.me:

    On 3/5/2021 11:58 AM, Winston wrote:
    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on
    the show with actual science knowledge appears in the story
    eventually.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the
    effects caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly
    untrue. While they do exhibit some sort of short distance
    near-field levitation ability, if it were anti-gravity, they
    wouldn't have fallen to Earth like meteorites. They also
    wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd fly off into
    space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    Now, there's several known ways of levitating something, such
    as magnetic (like maglev trains) and electro-static, and, for
    story purposes, I wouldn't object to psychokinesis, force
    fields, repulsor rays, etc. But when an object remains fixed
    over a spot on a spinning Earth, it's not acting like
    anti-gravity (unless they also postulate some attractive force
    that coincidentally happens to be of the same magnitude as
    gravity).

    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that
    don't know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged
    scientists don't, it's going to look dumb.

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's a TV show, but it's easily fixable.
    I'll give it a few episodes and hope that the writers did
    better in later episodes than in this one, but I won't hold my
    breath. :-)
    -WBE

    You appear to be under the incorrect impressions that 1) the
    writers know any better; and 2) the writers care.

    And 3) the majority of audience knows or cares.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration
    (May 2019 total for people arrested for entering the United States
    illegally is over 132,000 for just the southwest border.)

    Vacation photos from Iceland:
    https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doc O'Leary@21:1/5 to Winston on Mon Mar 8 00:51:13 2021
    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on the show
    with actual science knowledge appears in the story eventually.

    Haven’t seen it yet, but it’s on my list. Just going based on your
    comment for now.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the effects
    caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly untrue. While they
    do exhibit some sort of short distance near-field levitation ability, if
    it were anti-gravity, they wouldn't have fallen to Earth like
    meteorites. They also wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd
    fly off into space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    What? What could generally be call “anti-gravity” can represent a whole range of behaviors. Consider, for example, an object that acts like a “gravitational superconductor”, such that it will fall into any gravity well until the repulsive effect equally balances the attractive effect.
    That makes the most sense, too, because the ability to “fly off” asserts some power source that provides acceleration up out of the gravity well.

    But when an object remains fixed over a spot on a spinning
    Earth, it's not acting like anti-gravity (unless they also postulate
    some attractive force that coincidentally happens to be of the same
    magnitude as gravity).

    Yeah, I don’t know how or why the *surface* of the planet would make that much of a difference when it comes to gravitational forces. There could
    be some kind of repulsive force, I suppose, like a medium range nuclear-
    esque force that keeps objects from occupying the same space. It’d have
    to be a pretty exotic material for that to be the behavior exhibited by
    debris from a wreckage, though.

    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that don't
    know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged scientists
    don't, it's going to look dumb.

    If the debris floats away from the ground but not from the people
    grabbing for it, that’ll be a red flag for me. Whatever it’s doing, the mechanism that explains the behavior needs to be consistent. Of course,
    it seldom is with shows like this, so I also don’t expect to last the
    full season.

    --
    "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."
    River Tam, Trash, Firefly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. Clarke@21:1/5 to droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com on Sun Mar 7 21:44:23 2021
    On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:51:13 -0000 (UTC), Doc O'Leary <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on the show
    with actual science knowledge appears in the story eventually.

    Haven’t seen it yet, but it’s on my list. Just going based on your >comment for now.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the effects
    caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly untrue. While they
    do exhibit some sort of short distance near-field levitation ability, if
    it were anti-gravity, they wouldn't have fallen to Earth like
    meteorites. They also wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd
    fly off into space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    What? What could generally be call “anti-gravity” can represent a whole >range of behaviors. Consider, for example, an object that acts like a >“gravitational superconductor”, such that it will fall into any gravity >well until the repulsive effect equally balances the attractive effect.
    That makes the most sense, too, because the ability to “fly off” asserts >some power source that provides acceleration up out of the gravity well.

    But when an object remains fixed over a spot on a spinning
    Earth, it's not acting like anti-gravity (unless they also postulate
    some attractive force that coincidentally happens to be of the same
    magnitude as gravity).

    Yeah, I don’t know how or why the *surface* of the planet would make that >much of a difference when it comes to gravitational forces. There could
    be some kind of repulsive force, I suppose, like a medium range nuclear- >esque force that keeps objects from occupying the same space. It’d have
    to be a pretty exotic material for that to be the behavior exhibited by >debris from a wreckage, though.

    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that don't
    know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged scientists
    don't, it's going to look dumb.

    If the debris floats away from the ground but not from the people
    grabbing for it, that’ll be a red flag for me. Whatever it’s doing, the >mechanism that explains the behavior needs to be consistent. Of course,
    it seldom is with shows like this, so I also don’t expect to last the
    full season.

    They're pieces of an ET starship, so I'm fine with them having poorly understood properties. Anyone who says they _must_ do this or _must_
    do that or _must_ do the other I would challenge to produce the
    starship on which he arrived that he is so expert in the properties of
    the materials used on ET starships that he can speak with such
    authority.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Winston@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Mon Mar 8 05:32:11 2021
    I previously posted:
    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character on
    the show with actual science knowledge appears in the story
    eventually.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the
    effects caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly
    untrue. While they do exhibit some sort of short distance
    near-field levitation ability, if it were anti-gravity, they
    wouldn't have fallen to Earth like meteorites. They also
    wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd fly off into
    space along a tangent line to the Earth.
    ...
    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces that
    don't know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the alleged
    scientists don't, it's going to look dumb.

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's a TV show, but it's easily fixable.
    I'll give it a few episodes and hope that the writers did
    better in later episodes than in this one, but I won't hold my
    breath. :-)

    Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> replied:
    You appear to be under the incorrect impressions that 1) the
    writers know any better;

    As my last paragraph tried to indicate, I'm really not. :)

    and 2) the writers care.

    Once in a great while they do. If it's easily fixable,
    AND they somehow learn of it,
    AND if they haven't already written and filmed the future episodes
    where it matters (unlikely),
    AND on and on, then perhaps.
    Otherwise, or if it breaks the story line, obviously they won't.

    Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> replied:
    And 3) the majority of audience knows or cares.

    The readers here on rec.arts.sf.tv might, but we're not a majority of
    the audience (AFAIK). We aren't even a Twitter mob. :)
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Winston@21:1/5 to droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com on Mon Mar 8 05:17:21 2021
    I previously posted:
    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the effects
    caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly untrue. While they
    do exhibit some sort of short distance near-field levitation ability,

    [and since Doc O'Leary brought it up, I'll add: sometimes it's a few
    feet over the ground and sometimes it's a couple of feet over a bed or
    other object.]

    .. if it were anti-gravity, they wouldn't have fallen to Earth like
    meteorites. They also wouldn't float a few feet above a surface,
    they'd fly off into space along a tangent line to the Earth.

    to which Doc O'Leary <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> replied:
    What? What could generally be call anti-gravity can represent a whole range of behaviors. Consider, for example, an object that acts like a gravitational superconductor, such that it will fall into any gravity well until the repulsive effect equally balances the attractive effect.

    If one postulates the debris pieces having a fancy sensor and control
    system and individually having adjustable degrees of anti-gravity
    capability, then, OK, I could imagine them having the capability of
    selectively adjusting the strength of the anti-gravity effect depending
    on how close the object is to something underneath it. If the writers
    do that, I guess that would address my objection. :)

    ... the ability to fly off asserts some power source that provides acceleration up out of the gravity well.

    Nope. The Earth is spinning. Things remain on the surface because
    gravity is constantly accelerating them toward the center. If the
    acceleration from gravity suddenly ceased, and if not otherwise held
    down, the now unaccelerated object would move in straight line, mostly
    tangent to the surface of the spinning Earth. (Well, OK, that ignores
    the momentum of the object resulting from the Earth orbiting the Sun,
    which (I think) would cause it to depart at a lower angle during the day
    than at night, but you get the point.) From the standpoint of an
    observer still experiencing gravity and thus remaining on the surface,
    the object would appear to fly away at a low angle (and curve upward, I
    think). Also keep in mind that to an object with full anti-gravity,
    there is no gravity well. :)
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha@21:1/5 to Winston on Mon Mar 8 11:00:53 2021
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote in news:ydy2ey3phw.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com:

    I previously posted:
    It's probably not going to happen, but I hope some character
    on the show with actual science knowledge appears in the
    story eventually.

    Some of the characters say some of the debris pieces (and the
    effects caused by them) are defying gravity. That's clearly
    untrue. While they do exhibit some sort of short distance
    near-field levitation ability, if it were anti-gravity, they
    wouldn't have fallen to Earth like meteorites. They also
    wouldn't float a few feet above a surface, they'd fly off
    into space along a tangent line to the Earth.
    ...
    If it's only the people out in the field retrieving pieces
    that don't know the difference, it's not so bad, but if the
    alleged scientists don't, it's going to look dumb.

    Yeah, yeah, I know it's a TV show, but it's easily fixable.
    I'll give it a few episodes and hope that the writers did
    better in later episodes than in this one, but I won't hold
    my breath. :-)

    Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> replied:
    You appear to be under the incorrect impressions that 1) the
    writers know any better;

    As my last paragraph tried to indicate, I'm really not. :)

    and 2) the writers care.

    Once in a great while they do. If it's easily fixable,
    AND they somehow learn of it,
    AND if they haven't already written and filmed the future
    episodes where it matters (unlikely),
    AND on and on, then perhaps.
    Otherwise, or if it breaks the story line, obviously they won't.

    It generally takes at least 10-15 episodes for fan feedback to work
    its way through the script writing process and show up on the air.
    Often, more.

    Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> replied:
    And 3) the majority of audience knows or cares.

    The readers here on rec.arts.sf.tv might, but we're not a
    majority of the audience (AFAIK). We aren't even a Twitter mob.
    :)
    -WBE

    By and large, anybody here is so far outside the mainstream
    audience as to be an indicator of what *not* to do. We are, to be
    blunt, freaks.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration
    (May 2019 total for people arrested for entering the United States
    illegally is over 132,000 for just the southwest border.)

    Vacation photos from Iceland:
    https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doc O'Leary@21:1/5 to Winston on Wed Mar 10 17:27:12 2021
    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If one postulates the debris pieces having a fancy sensor and control
    system and individually having adjustable degrees of anti-gravity
    capability, then, OK, I could imagine them having the capability of selectively adjusting the strength of the anti-gravity effect depending
    on how close the object is to something underneath it. If the writers
    do that, I guess that would address my objection. :)

    I, too, would agree that stretches the suspension of disbelief for the
    behavior of “debris”. In reality, I could see opposing forces in balance, like we see with gravity and nuclear every day. But there are serious implications to introducing a new force that works on a roughly meter
    scale. Still haven’t watched the show, but I should be able to get to it
    by the weekend.

    ... the ability to ¡°fly off¡± asserts some power source that provides acceleration up out of the gravity well.

    Nope. The Earth is spinning.

    That’s not a factor that impacts gravity. All spin gets you (assuming you come in contact with the surface) is some small amount (sub-orbital) of “horizontal” velocity.

    If the
    acceleration from gravity suddenly ceased,

    But, again, that’s not what anti-gravity technology necessarily means.
    In fact, it pretty much *can’t* mean that, because that would set up the possibility for a perpetual motion machine that allows you extract work
    from gravitational potential energy.

    and if not otherwise held
    down, the now unaccelerated object would move in straight line, mostly tangent to the surface of the spinning Earth. (Well, OK, that ignores
    the momentum of the object resulting from the Earth orbiting the Sun,
    which (I think) would cause it to depart at a lower angle during the day
    than at night, but you get the point.)

    This is a factor I use in some time travel stories I’m working on. It
    can take a *large* amount of energy to synchronize inertial frames
    between two locations in time-space.

    Regardless, I’m not necessarily going to come down hard on a writer just because they imagine a technology that works in a way that differs from
    how I might envision it working. It can even be “magical” if that’s how to best tell a compelling story. One of the things I liked about Firefly
    is that they mentioned anti-gravity technology as a throwaway line, and
    one of the things I dislike about The Expanse is how they do a poor job
    of dealing with a lack of anti-gravity technology.

    --
    "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."
    River Tam, Trash, Firefly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Winston@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 17 12:05:06 2021
    Now that I've seen episodes 2 and 3, it reminds me a little bit of
    Friday the 13th: The Series that had a different cursed object each
    week. Debris has different near-magical phenomena each week, several of
    which have been *way* odder than levitation. Unlike F13:TS, Debris has
    a continuing background story that presumably will develop.

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's levitation
    or anti-gravity just don't matter.
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doc O'Leary@21:1/5 to Winston on Thu Mar 18 04:55:04 2021
    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's levitation
    or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was
    phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the
    floating corpses seem downright reasonable! I normally like to give
    shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too
    many red flags for me.

    --
    "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."
    River Tam, Trash, Firefly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anonymous@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 24 12:29:48 2021
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    I've seen all of them to date. So that's three or four episodes.

    IMO it's "Lost" with overtly sf aspects.

    There are special effects to wow the viewers and distract from
    issues with the stories, and there are promises on top of promises
    to keep people coming back in the hope that there will be real
    revelations and that something will tie it all together and make
    sense.

    I'm still watching it, but I have no real hpes that it'll go
    anywhere good.



    Adamastor Glace Mortimer

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: N/A

    iEYEAREKAAYFAmBbGToACgkQ1vVH2r/FDv1/hgCdEPh4GpkuBWYH6SLXdjsnnHxI Wh8AoJD8bTU586B4sG3n4EWLs14FgaC7
    =FIWV
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jerry Brown@21:1/5 to nobody@remailer.paranoici.org on Wed Mar 24 18:03:29 2021
    On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:29:48 +0100 (CET), Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512

    I've seen all of them to date. So that's three or four episodes.

    IMO it's "Lost" with overtly sf aspects.

    There are special effects to wow the viewers and distract from
    issues with the stories, and there are promises on top of promises
    to keep people coming back in the hope that there will be real
    revelations and that something will tie it all together and make
    sense.

    I'm still watching it, but I have no real hpes that it'll go
    anywhere good.

    It feels like Warehouse 13 played straight, using Arrival and
    Annihilation for the general style and mood.

    --
    Jerry Brown

    A cat may look at a king
    (but probably won't bother)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Neill Massello@21:1/5 to droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com on Wed Mar 24 22:06:05 2021
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary"
    <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's levitation
    or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was
    phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the
    floating corpses seem downright reasonable! I normally like to give
    shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too
    many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As somebody else
    has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a man-woman team chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about a sinister conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Neill Massello on Wed Mar 24 15:55:30 2021
    On 3/24/2021 3:06 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary" <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's levitation >>> or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was
    phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the
    floating corpses seem downright reasonable! I normally like to give
    shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too
    many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As somebody else has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a man-woman team chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about a sinister
    conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    Its a Rancid Onion Blowing Soap Bubbles of Flaming Stupidity.


    --
    Troll, troll, troll your post gently down the thread
    Angrily, angrily, angrily, the net's a nut's scream.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From suzeeq@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Wed Mar 24 17:50:59 2021
    On 3/24/2021 03:55 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 3:06 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary"
    <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's
    levitation
    or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was
    phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the
    floating corpses seem downright reasonable! I normally like to give
    shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too
    many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As somebody
    else
    has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a man-woman
    team
    chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about a
    sinister
    conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    Its a Rancid Onion Blowing Soap Bubbles of Flaming Stupidity.

    There's no soap in it though.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to suzeeq on Wed Mar 24 19:22:08 2021
    On 3/24/2021 5:50 PM, suzeeq wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 03:55 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 3:06 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary"
    <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

      If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's
    levitation
      or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was
    phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the
    floating corpses seem downright reasonable!  I normally like to give
    shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too
    many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As
    somebody else
    has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a
    man-woman team
    chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about a
    sinister
    conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    Its a Rancid Onion Blowing Soap Bubbles of Flaming Stupidity.

    There's no soap in it though.

    Oh goody, its a _DEFECTIVE_ Rancid Onion.

    :=P

    (Though I suspect the soap is coming. It just takes a little time work
    up a good froth of bubbles.)

    --
    Troll, troll, troll your post gently down the thread
    Angrily, angrily, angrily, the net's a nut's scream.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From suzeeq@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Thu Mar 25 13:37:24 2021
    On 3/24/2021 07:22 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 5:50 PM, suzeeq wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 03:55 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 3:06 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary"
    <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

    If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's
    levitation
    or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was >>>>> phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the >>>>> floating corpses seem downright reasonable! I normally like to give >>>>> shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too >>>>> many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As
    somebody else
    has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a
    man-woman team
    chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about
    a sinister
    conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    Its a Rancid Onion Blowing Soap Bubbles of Flaming Stupidity.

    There's no soap in it though.

    Oh goody, its a _DEFECTIVE_ Rancid Onion.

    :=P

    (Though I suspect the soap is coming. It just takes a little time work
    up a good froth of bubbles.)

    Soap needs two or more characters interested in each other. I don't see
    that happening.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to suzeeq on Thu Mar 25 17:29:45 2021
    On 3/25/2021 1:37 PM, suzeeq wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 07:22 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 5:50 PM, suzeeq wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 03:55 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 3/24/2021 3:06 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
    On 2021-03-17 at 22:55:04 MDT, "Doc O'Leary"
    <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> wrote:

    For your reference, records indicate that
    Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

      If they're going that extreme, small things like whether it's >>>>>>> levitation
      or anti-gravity just don't matter.

    Yeah, I finally watched the first episode and even in that there was >>>>>> phasing through matter and manifesting memories that almost made the >>>>>> floating corpses seem downright reasonable!  I normally like to give >>>>>> shows a few episodes to explain themselves, but this one just has too >>>>>> many red flags for me.

    It didn't get any better in the succeeding three episodes. As
    somebody else
    has suggested, it's essentially a bad copy of The X-Files: a
    man-woman team
    chasing down the Weirdness of the Week, with periodic teasing about
    a sinister
    conspiracy.

    Debris is junk.

    Its a Rancid Onion Blowing Soap Bubbles of Flaming Stupidity.

    There's no soap in it though.

    Oh goody, its a _DEFECTIVE_ Rancid Onion.

    :=P

    (Though I suspect the soap is coming.  It just takes a little time
    work up a good froth of bubbles.)

    Soap needs two or more characters interested in each other. I don't see
    that happening.

    Or the writers changing the characters' personalities because ... PLOT!

    --
    Troll, troll, troll your post gently down the thread
    Angrily, angrily, angrily, the net's a nut's scream.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Doc O'Leary@21:1/5 to suzeeq on Sat Mar 27 15:27:07 2021
    For your reference, records indicate that
    suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:

    Soap needs two or more characters interested in each other. I don't see
    that happening.

    But . . . magical debris! It probably has the power to create a full blown orgy, if only it weren’t constrained by a more powerful force in the universe: broadcast TV network censors.

    --
    "Also . . . I can kill you with my brain."
    River Tam, Trash, Firefly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Winston@21:1/5 to reportedly on Sat Mar 27 13:37:17 2021
    suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> reportedly wrote:
    Soap needs two or more characters interested in each other. I don't
    see that happening.

    to which Doc O'Leary <droleary@2017usenet1.subsume.com> replied:
    But . . . magical debris! It probably has the power to create a full
    blown orgy, if only it werent constrained by a more powerful force in
    the universe: broadcast TV network censors.

    Oh, it definitely could, and doing so would raise a really hard
    question: if two characters on the show are in a committed relationship,
    and the debris (episode 2 or 3, I forget which) creates multiple clones
    of both partners, and they all get together in an orgy, threesomes,
    foursomes, etc., would they be being unfaithful? Is it polygamy /
    polyandry for someone to have >1 copy of their partner? It could be
    good for getting household chores done, but does raise the food budget.

    Who would have guessed this show would raise important societal
    questions like this? :-)
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)