• Re: There Is No Insurrection Case against Trump

    From Jake@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 21 23:02:56 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years’
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- case-against-trump/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 08:09:49 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- case-against-trump/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Baxter@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Mon Jan 22 15:49:30 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    While insurrectionists were plotting to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6,
    2021, they took time to write and send a letter to an institution two
    blocks from their target: the Folger Shakespeare Library, the world’s
    largest collection of material related to the English playwright.

    “We will be blocking access to your building … to prevent our persons of grievance from using you as a loophole,” read the insurrectionists’
    letter, which circulated on a pro-Trump message board called TheDonald
    before the insurrection and was published this month in the Folger’s
    online archive.

    The letter explained that the insurrectionists would create a 2.4-mile
    blockade “surrounding all buildings to which the U.S. Capitol has
    underground tunnels to” — including the John Adams Building of the
    Library of Congress, with which the Folger shares a block — presumably to prevent those inside the Capitol from escaping through the buildings.

    “This is nothing personal to the library itself,” the letter continued.
    “We have no intention of damaging, trespassing, or otherwise altering
    your facility in any way...We sincerely apologize in advance to any inconvenience this may cause you … we are simply citizens practicing our
    1st amendment rights and are only involving you by happenstance.”

    Read more : [link:https://wapo.st/3SsDGRd|

    At the very least this letter PROVES that 6Jan was not "spontaneous".
    Well planned in fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Baxter on Mon Jan 22 15:56:30 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 14:34:49 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    Here's the same thing I told your fellow right-wingnut knuckle-dragging fuckwit Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, scooter. Suppose your house is burglarized and thousands of dollars of goods and money are stolen. The police investigate, but they never do apprehend, *charge* and prosecute a suspect. Does
    that mean the burglary never occurred, scooter? Are you so fucking stupid you're
    going to claim a criminal event didn't happen until and unless a person is prosecuted for a specific statutory crime? You are that stupid, scooter. And wrong.

    The violent attack on the Capitol was an insurrection, regardless of whether or not anyone is charged with that statutory crime. Insurrection is not just a statutory crime, but also a description of a type of event, and the violent assault on the Capitol of 01/06/2021 meets all the criteria of being an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 17:18:45 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
    says...

    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ??
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    Here's the same thing I told your fellow right-wingnut knuckle-dragging fuckwit
    Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, scooter. Suppose your house is burglarized and thousands of dollars of goods and money are stolen. The police
    investigate, but they never do apprehend, *charge* and prosecute a suspect. Does
    that mean the burglary never occurred, scooter? Are you so fucking stupid you're
    going to claim a criminal event didn't happen until and unless a person is prosecuted for a specific statutory crime? You are that stupid, scooter. And wrong.

    The violent attack on the Capitol was an insurrection, regardless of whether or
    not anyone is charged with that statutory crime. Insurrection is not just a statutory crime, but also a description of a type of event, and the violent assault on the Capitol of 01/06/2021 meets all the criteria of being an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter.

    Protest gone bad. Unarmed girl murdered. No charges of insurrection. No
    one but you is calling it that. Remember when you screamed the
    Rittenhouse was guilty and got slapped down? Well it's happening again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Tue Jan 23 16:37:43 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" wrote in message news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...

    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It
    was.


    Because all the loony leftists say so.



    Here's the same thing I told your fellow right-wingnut knuckle-dragging >fuckwit Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, scooter.

    That kind of sick vomit destroys your credibility every time. You have zero.



    Suppose your house is burglarized and thousands of dollars of goods and
    money are stolen. The police investigate, but they never do apprehend, >*charge* and prosecute a suspect. Does that mean the burglary never
    occurred, scooter?

    Trump is not a burglary suspect. He wasn't at the capitol.



    Are you so fucking stupid you're going to claim a criminal event didn't >happen until and unless a person is prosecuted for a specific statutory >crime? You are that stupid, scooter. And wrong.


    You are stupid to think you can jail an ex president just because you think
    he somehow "incited insurrection".



    The violent attack on the Capitol was an insurrection, regardless of
    whether or not anyone is charged with that statutory crime.

    The Dems cheated. The crowd was angry. There was no pre-planned or organised entering of the capitol.



    Insurrection is not just a statutory crime, but also a description of a
    type of event, and the violent assault on the Capitol of 01/06/2021 meets
    all the criteria of being an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter.


    You are just regurgitating what the rest of the left spews, Rudy. You can't think for yourself.
    And the reason you post under many names is to make yourself look legion.
    But it's not working.


    --
    Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
    the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

    http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 23:12:01 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/22/2024 9:37 PM, Andrea W, stupid lying Nazi troll whore, lied:

    "Wilson Woods"  wrote in message news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...

    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library >>>
    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.


    Because all the loony leftists

    No, Andrea, you Nazi troll whore.



    Here's the same thing I told your fellow right-wingnut knuckle-dragging
    fuckwit Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, scooter.

    That kind of

    No, Andrea, you Nazi troll whore.



    Suppose your house is burglarized and thousands of dollars of goods and money
    are stolen. The police investigate, but they never do apprehend, *charge* and
    prosecute a suspect. Does that mean the burglary never occurred, scooter?

    Trump is not a burglary suspect.

    The point went right over your head, Andrea, you Nazi troll whore.


    Are you so fucking stupid you're going to claim a criminal event didn't happen
    until and unless a person is prosecuted for a specific statutory crime? You >> are that stupid, scooter. And wrong.


    You are stupid to think you can jail an ex president just because you think he
    somehow "incited insurrection".

    We're not talking about jail in this thread, Andrea, you Nazi troll whore. We're
    talking about disqualification.


    The violent attack on the Capitol was an insurrection, regardless of whether >> or not anyone is charged with that statutory crime.

    The Dems cheated.

    They didn't. Trump cheated.



    Insurrection is not just a statutory crime, but also a description of a type >> of event, and the violent assault on the Capitol of 01/06/2021 meets all the >> criteria of being an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter.


    You are

    I am right. That's what I am.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Tue Jan 23 08:32:26 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It
    was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge... then you turn around and do so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to Scout on Tue Jan 23 08:58:03 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library >>>
    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter, regardless of what crimes people are charged with. Here's an example, scooter. *Former* county commissioner Couy Griffin in New Mexico — "former" because he was disqualified and removed in a civil trial — was only charged with and convicted for misdemeanor trespassing during the insurrection. But it was an insurrection regardless of the charge, scooter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 23 10:18:46 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
    says...

    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ??
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library >>>
    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone for the
    statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was an insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter, regardless of what crimes people
    are charged with. Here's an example, scooter. *Former* county commissioner Couy
    Griffin in New Mexico ? "former" because he was disqualified and removed in a civil trial ? was only charged with and convicted for misdemeanor trespassing during the insurrection. But it was an insurrection regardless of the charge, scooter.

    Not until someone has been charged with it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael A Terrell@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 23 09:21:12 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/23/2024 9:18 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

    In article <mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
    says...

    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ?? >>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library >>>>>
    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone for the
    statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was an
    insurrection. It was an insurrection, scooter, regardless of what crimes people
    are charged with. Here's an example, scooter. *Former* county commissioner Couy
    Griffin in New Mexico ? "former" because he was disqualified and removed in a
    civil trial ? was only charged with and convicted for misdemeanor trespassing
    during the insurrection. But it was an insurrection regardless of the charge,
    scooter.

    Not until someone has been charged with it.

    That's false.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Tue Jan 23 13:17:04 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare
    Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It >>> was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone
    for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion... and we know what opinions are like..

    Meanwhile back to the subject we are speaking of the law, were personal options, particularly considering whether a crime occurred isn't a matter of opinion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 23 12:29:14 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library >>>>>
    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone for >> the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was an
    insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Wed Jan 24 09:02:02 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the >>>>>>>>> laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, >>>>>>>>> 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. >>>>> It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone
    for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the
    *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual is just another opinion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 24 07:12:56 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws >>>>>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021, >>>>>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone for
    the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event* was >>>> an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't, scooter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Wed Jan 24 12:05:54 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, >>>>>>>>>>> a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the >>>>>>>>>>> laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department >>>>>>>>>>> of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, >>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection,
    scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict
    anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that >>>>> the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits his claims are lies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to Scout on Wed Jan 24 12:15:20 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
    remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a >>>>>>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of >>>>>>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It
    was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone >>>>>> for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event*
    was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet opponent —
    your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're lying. Your Usenet
    opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what you claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 24 13:56:10 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com says...

    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ?? >>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It
    was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone
    for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event*
    was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet opponent ?
    your better in every dimension ? "admits" something, you're lying. Your Usenet
    opponent ? your better ? has never "admitted" what you claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    You lost credibility when you started editing and snipping. You are just
    a kick toy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael A Terrell@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 24 13:06:50 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/24/2024 12:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

    In article <deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com says...

    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter. It
    was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone
    for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the *event*
    was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet opponent ?
    your better in every dimension ? "admits" something, you're lying. Your Usenet
    opponent ? your better ? has never "admitted" what you claim he has. You're >> always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    You lost credibility

    No.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Thu Jan 25 11:04:11 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when >>>>>>>>>>>>> > it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have >>>>>>>>>>>>> brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal >>>>>>>>>>>>> code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the >>>>>>>>>>>>> laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection >>>>>>>>>>>>> charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge >>>>>>> that the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No

    Then why did you admit it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 10:25:33 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
    news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:

    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds when > it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years� >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, scooter.
    It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict anyone
    for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that the >>>>>>>> *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet opponent —
    your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're lying. Your Usenet
    opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what you claim he has. You're
    always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    Then why did you admit it?

    Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
    *Every* time you say your opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits"
    something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scout@21:1/5 to Wilson Woods on Thu Jan 25 14:01:52 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > when > it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6, 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shakespeare Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge >>>>>>>>> that the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet
    opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're >>> lying. Your Usenet opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what >>> you claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction,
    scooter.

    Then why did you admit it?

    Why

    Only you can answer why you lie all the time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 12:15:44 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
    it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
    the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet
    opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're >>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what you
    claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter. >>>
    Then why did you admit it?

    Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
    *Every* time you say your opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits"
    something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?

    Only you can answer why

    No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why you do it.

    To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never "admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.

    "Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 15:50:05 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <LkzsN.36872$Wbff.4220@fx37.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com says...

    On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
    it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ??
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6,
    2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare
    Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection? >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
    the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet >>>> opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits" something, you're >>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent ? your better ? has never "admitted" what you
    claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    Then why did you admit it?

    Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
    *Every* time you say your opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits"
    something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?

    Only you can answer why

    No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why
    you do it.

    To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never "admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.

    "Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

    You said I admitted a lot of things without posting proof. Hypocrite.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilson Woods@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 08:01:30 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
    it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?

    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
    the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet
    opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're >>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what you
    claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter. >>>
    Then why did you admit it?

    Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
    *Every* time you say your opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits"
    something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?

    Only you can answer why

    No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why you do it.

    To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never "admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.

    "Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 15:47:01 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

    In article <SHQsN.385962$83n7.234407@fx18.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
    says...

    On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
    On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
    On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
    On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:


    "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
    On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:



    "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
    Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
    news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...

    In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>

    I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
    it
    shits.

    If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
    charges against him.
    You know insurrection is a crime, right?

    So is rape and yet.

    Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
    person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ??
    imprisonment, if he

    incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
    insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
    thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.

    And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
    Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6,
    2021,
    Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
    have ever been brought against Trump ...

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
    case-against-trump/



    ===============

    Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare
    Library

    Which of these have been convicted of insurrection? >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection, >>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.

    You say it's not necessary to judge

    I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict >>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
    the *event* was an insurrection.

    No, that's merely an opinion

    No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.

    Claiming your assertions are factual

    I didn't,

    Rudy admits

    No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet >>>> opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits" something, you're >>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent ? your better ? has never "admitted" what you
    claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.

    Then why did you admit it?

    Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
    *Every* time you say your opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits"
    something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?

    Only you can answer why

    No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why
    you do it.

    To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never "admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.

    "Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

    Why do you ignore me when I ask about how you say I "admitted" to
    spending time in jail. You said I "admitted" I was a child molester like
    you say in your stupid opening. Yet you can't show us where I
    "admitted" anything. Why do you call out people for the same shit you
    do? You're a fake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)