"Baxter" wrote in message news:uogoti$3nidm$5@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in >>news:MPG.40157039e01cae24990def@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <44GqN.151257$yEgf.67680@fx09.iad>, "because_\\shitbag
\\_was_taken"@gmail.com says...
On 1/19/2024 1:54 PM, Andrea W, stupid lying Nazi troll whore,
lied:
"Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in message
news:uoeb0q$37p4b$2@dont-email.me...
On 1/19/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes:
{snip}
He doesn't have to be charged and convicted in order to be
disqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I would interpret
as mere accusation being sufficient.
-WBE [IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.]
Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere accusation.
There was a trial in Colorado and Maine's secretary of state's
decision is subject to judicial review.
There has been no criminal trail held to evaluate those
charges. A civil court can not determine if someone committed a
crime.
14.3 disqualification isn't a criminal punishment.
Shouldn't the voters decide who should be disqualified and who
they want to vote for?
No, just as the voters don't get to elect a naturalized citizen or
someone age 26 to the presidency, Andrea, you stupid lying Nazi
whore.
You are way over the line. If you are qualified then the voters
should decide. Trump is qualified.
That's your "opinion", other more knowledgable people think otherwise.
Like other radical Dem voting leftists?
On 21 Jan 2024, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> posted some news:uokl4v$iqbq$1@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" wrote in message news:uogoti$3nidm$5@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in >>>news:MPG.40157039e01cae24990def@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <44GqN.151257$yEgf.67680@fx09.iad>, "because_\\shitbag
\\_was_taken"@gmail.com says...
On 1/19/2024 1:54 PM, Andrea W, stupid lying Nazi troll whore,
lied:
"Josh Rosenbluth" wrote in message
news:uoeb0q$37p4b$2@dont-email.me...
On 1/19/2024 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes:
{snip}
He doesn't have to be charged and convicted in order to be
disqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I would interpret
as mere accusation being sufficient.
-WBE [IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.]
Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere accusation.
There was a trial in Colorado and Maine's secretary of state's
decision is subject to judicial review.
There has been no criminal trail held to evaluate those
charges. A civil court can not determine if someone committed a
crime.
14.3 disqualification isn't a criminal punishment.
Shouldn't the voters decide who should be disqualified and who
they want to vote for?
No, just as the voters don't get to elect a naturalized citizen or
someone age 26 to the presidency, Andrea, you stupid lying Nazi
whore.
You are way over the line. If you are qualified then the voters
should decide. Trump is qualified.
That's your "opinion", other more knowledgable people think otherwise.
Like other radical Dem voting leftists?
If the Republicans were smart they'd run election commercials of
destroyed businesses in San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis,
St Louis, DC, and Atlanta 24 hours a day. Buy some ad time on YouTube
like the Dem nuts are doing.
On 1/22/2024 7:53 AM, Winston wrote:indicted?
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uojin6$8j9n$1@dont-email.me...
Where in 14.3 does it say anything about convicted or even
Paulsen veryShow us the exact quote.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> writes:
5th Amendment.
We don't restrict your liberties without a criminal trial.
Technically, since the 14th was passed after the 5th, its wording
prevails, just like the 21st repealed the 18th (prohibition).
I don't know about superseding the fifth amendment, but Baude and
much make the point that the 14th supersedes the first on thispoint.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 01:09:08 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Bigfoot does not
roam the northern forests
But he does hang out in Oklahoma and Florida as a skunk ape.
On 1/23/2024 10:00 AM, Scout wrote:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dfSrN.44068$SyNd.13328@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:03 AM, Scout wrote:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p4CrN.221406$Ama9.13528@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:47 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9zwrN.295260$xHn7.235573@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 4:27 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5eTqN.116701$q3F7.94114@fx45.iad...
On 1/20/2024 4:50 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f6HqN.211867$Ama9.108404@fx12.iad...
On 1/18/2024 8:50 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes:
{snip}
He doesn't have to be charged and convicted in order to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be disqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpret as mere accusation being sufficient.
-WBE [IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.]
Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere
accusation. There was a trial in Colorado and Maine's >>>>>>>>>>>>> secretary of state's decision is subject to judicial >>>>>>>>>>>>> review.
Trump was tried in Colorado for an insurrection that
happened in DC?
No, idiot. Trump was not tried. A civil suit, pursuant to >>>>>>>>>>> Colorado law, was filed in Colorado to keep him off the
ballot in that state, pursuant to 14.3. The Colorado court >>>>>>>>>>> meticulously reviewed what constitutes insurrection and
engagement in one, and concluded that the event of
01/06/2021 was an insurrection and that Trump engaged in it. >>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not on trial.
Further I would note that NO INDIVIDUAL has EVER been charged >>>>>>>>>> with Insurrection for the events on Jan 6th.
People have been tried and convicted for a more serious charge >>>>>>>>> than insurrection.
Maybe it was more serious, maybe it wasn't.
There is no "maybe" about it. Seditious conspiracy carries a
maximum prison term of 20 years;
Great. Now all you have to do is show were Trump was convicted.
I don't have to show that, scooter. Conviction is not required for
14.3 disqualification, scooter.
You assert he committed a crime
No, scooter. In fact, he *did* engage in many crimes, not all of
them connected to the insurrection. These are the crimes addressed
in the four federal indictments for election interference. For
example, coordinating the submission of slates of *fake* electors is
a crime, but not connected to the insurrection. Directing the DoJ to
send a letter to states falsely saying that DoJ had found massive
"fraud" also is a crime not connected to the insurrection.
Cite the convictions for these alleged crimes.
They're still to come, scooter. His trial is on hold pending the
appellate court chucking out his absurd "immunity" claim. He'll be
convicted on some of the counts, too.
On 1/23/2024 9:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:to be
In article <dfSrN.44068$SyNd.13328@fx33.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
says...
On 1/23/2024 5:03 AM, Scout wrote:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p4CrN.221406$Ama9.13528@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:47 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9zwrN.295260$xHn7.235573@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 4:27 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5eTqN.116701$q3F7.94114@fx45.iad...
On 1/20/2024 4:50 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f6HqN.211867$Ama9.108404@fx12.iad...
On 1/18/2024 8:50 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes:
{snip}
He doesn't have to be charged and convicted in order
interpret as meredisqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I would
accusation. There was aaccusation being sufficient.
  -WBE IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.
Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere
decision is subjecttrial in Colorado and Maine's secretary of state's
happened in DC?to judicial review.
Trump was tried in Colorado for an insurrection that
to Colorado law,
No, idiot. Trump was not tried. A civil suit, pursuant
state, pursuantwas filed in Colorado to keep him off the ballot in that
constitutesto 14.3. The Colorado court meticulously reviewed what
the event ofinsurrection and engagement in one, and concluded that
it. Trump was01/06/2021 was an insurrection and that Trump engaged in
charged withnot on trial.
Further I would note that NO INDIVIDUAL has EVER been
charge thanInsurrection for the events on Jan 6th.
People have been tried and convicted for a more serious
maximum prisoninsurrection.
Maybe it was more serious, maybe it wasn't.
There is no "maybe" about it. Seditious conspiracy carries a
convicted.term of 20 years;
Great. Now all you have to do is show were Trump was
for 14.3
I don't have to show that, scooter. Conviction is not required
them connecteddisqualification, scooter.
You assert he committed a crime
No, scooter. In fact, he *did* engage in many crimes, not all of
federalto the insurrection. These are the crimes addressed in the four
the submissionindictments for election interference. For example, coordinating
the insurrection.of slates of *fake* electors is a crime, but not connected to
DoJ had foundDirecting the DoJ to send a letter to states falsely saying that
insurrection.massive "fraud" also is a crime not connected to the
turn over the
Indeed,
Another scooterism ? empty wheeze.
Fani and her boyfriend are going down.
No. Neither will be charged with any crime. Willis may have to
prosecution of the RICO criminals to someone else. The worst thatcould happen
to Wade is he is removed as the special prosecutor.
On 1/23/2024 1:35 PM, Francis Mark Hansen <fmhlaw@comcast.net>,sleazy rent-skip
chaser, possible polygamist and irrational gun nut, lied:support/preserve/
On 1/23/2024 1:28 PM, Wilson Woods wrote:
14.3 applies to anyone who, having taken an oath toÂ
insurrection.protect/defend the Constitution, subsequently engages in
Congress,I'm not going to get into a pissing match about
whether Trump engaged in insurrection,
He did, Francis.
14.3 only applies to people who take an oath "as a member of
or as an officer of the United States,
That's Trump.
couldor as a member of any State
legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State,
to support the Constitution of the United States."
So, for example, officers of county and municipal governments
becausetake an oath to support the Constitution and afterwards engage in
blatant insurrection, and still be eligible to run for POTUS
be disqualifiedthey are not prohibited persons.
County commissioner Couy Griffen of Otero County, NM was held to
by a state judge and was removed. He is still removed, Francis.the
Some legal scholars have theorized that POTUS is not "an officer
of the United States" so 14.3 doesn't even apply to POTUS.
The vast majority of legal scholars, and all of the good ones, say
presidency is a covered office, Francis.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
In <zXWrN.118351$q3F7.74367@fx45.iad> Rudy Canoza <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote:>
The vast majority of legal scholars, and all of the good ones, saythe
presidency is a covered office, Francis.
"legal scholars" in this case are just left-wing activist assholes
trying to subvert a national election.
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
Of course but that's not what is questionable which is the patterns of voting when compared to all
the data that has been collected from previous elections.
Of course demographics change, patterns change but it's usually only slightly and happens to all
candidates pretty much equally.
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election which is why only 62% believe the
election was fair.
Phat Phani <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote in news:20240123.221406.fafc9014@erienetworks.net:
In <zXWrN.118351$q3F7.74367@fx45.iad> Rudy Canoza
<mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> wrote:>
Oh! The Federalist Society is "left-wing activist assholes"?!!The vast majority of legal scholars, and all of the good ones, saythe
presidency is a covered office, Francis.
"legal scholars" in this case are just left-wing activist assholes
trying to subvert a national election.
all 4 of tRump's SCOTUS judges are Federalist Society.
Quit sucking tRump's arsehole.
============
Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6
Two law professors active in the Federalist Society wrote that the
original meaning of the 14th Amendment makes Donald Trump ineligible to
hold government office.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/trump-jan-6-insurrection- conservatives.html
=============
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 electionThere were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over to the gullible.
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
Of course but that's not what is questionable which is the patterns of voting when compared to all
the data that has been collected from previous elections.
Of course demographics change, patterns change but it's usually only slightly and happens to all
candidates pretty much equally.
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election which is why only 62% believe the
election was fair.
Because Trump has spread lies that far too many of his supporters have swallowed. As Bill Barr said, it's all bullshit.
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election. There are only
extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there are, but there's nothing real.
You are lying about "questionable items." You've been fed lies, and now you're
spewing them. They are lies.
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that important.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 electionThere were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over to the
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can not assert a secure election?
In article <uord6u$1s83t$3@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
Of course but that's not what is questionable which is the patterns of voting when compared to all
the data that has been collected from previous elections.
Of course demographics change, patterns change but it's usually only slightly and happens to all
candidates pretty much equally.
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election which is why only 62% believe the
election was fair.
Because Trump has spread lies that far too many of his supporters have
swallowed. As Bill Barr said, it's all bullshit.
LOL
In article <9RasN.235664$7sbb.222766@fx16.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's
what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election. There are only
extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there are, but there's nothing real.https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/why-stock-market-is-not-economy
You are lying about "questionable items." You've been fed lies, and now you're
spewing them. They are lies.
Like how great our economy is doing?
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uord6u$1s83t$3@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's >> >>> what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
Of course but that's not what is questionable which is the patterns of voting when compared to all
the data that has been collected from previous elections.
Of course demographics change, patterns change but it's usually only slightly and happens to all
candidates pretty much equally.
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election which is why only 62% believe the
election was fair.
Because Trump has spread lies that far too many of his supporters have
swallowed. As Bill Barr said, it's all bullshit.
LOL
Seeing as the left wing was telling lies for years about the Tump Russia collusion, the Hunter
Biden laptop and so forth, it's ironic that they accuse Trump and his supporters of doing the same.
And they continue the same:
Trump convicted of Rape..
Trump claims he is going to be a dictator, it was for one day to undo Biden's damage and was a joke.
Comparing Trump to Hitler.
etc.
It's all they have.
Every other story on the left wing channels is something related to "a threat to our democracy"
which seems to be the new mantra of the left.
Well the chickens are coming home to roost and it will all be out in the open soon.
Hopefully it doesn't trigger a civil war.
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem >> > to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it doesn't usually affect anything because
it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the battleground states where the odd
happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water leak, but yet some people
did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
In article <9RasN.235664$7sbb.222766@fx16.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche
<gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops.
That's what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting
stops when all legally cast votes have been counted. If that
means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late reporting
precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election.
There are only extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there are,
but there's nothing real. You are lying about "questionable items."
You've been fed lies, and now you're spewing them. They are lies.
Like how great our economy is doing?
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 electionThere were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over to the >>> gullible.
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can not assert a >> secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning under suspicious circumstances,
the DNC would have mobilized and attacked demanding an audit.
They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html>
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401b073b6699c5ed991026@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <9RasN.235664$7sbb.222766@fx16.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche
<gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops.
That's what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting
stops when all legally cast votes have been counted. If that
means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late reporting
precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election.
There are only extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there are,
but there's nothing real. You are lying about "questionable items."
You've been fed lies, and now you're spewing them. They are lies.
Like how great our economy is doing?
Our economy is doing great - better that any Western economy - better
than Russia, better than China.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401b0fd1e38156d3991028 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem >> > to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
And they do - every election, they have proceedures in place to verify
every election and they use them. Repukes, however, think collecting
ballots in paper bags and popcorn buckets is election "security".
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 electionThere were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over to
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
the gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can not
assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/ the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem >> >> > to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it doesn't usually affect anything because
it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the battleground states where the odd
happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water leak, but yet some people
did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uors1v$1uqrq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020 electionThere were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over to
which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
the gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can not
assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/ the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html
They did audits, and tRump lost - but then he lied and said he won, again
and again.
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes /
counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that
important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it doesn't usually affect anything because
it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the battleground states where the odd
happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water leak, but yet some people
did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
Yep.
The cheating hasn't yet begun.
In article <uos3te$200q2$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...are,
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b073b6699c5ed991026@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <9RasN.235664$7sbb.222766@fx16.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche
<gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops.
That's what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting
stops when all legally cast votes have been counted. If that
means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late reporting
precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election.
There are only extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there
but there's nothing real. You are lying about "questionable items."
You've been fed lies, and now you're spewing them. They are lies.
Like how great our economy is doing?
Our economy is doing great - better that any Western economy - better
than Russia, better than China.
That doesn't say much.
In article <uos430$200q2$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b0fd1e38156d3991028 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these
anomalies seem to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes
/ counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't
that important.
All of them should be looked at.
And they do - every election, they have proceedures in place to
verify every election and they use them. Repukes, however, think
collecting ballots in paper bags and popcorn buckets is election
"security".
What a flip around. It's us that want voter ID. Damn you are twisted.
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com
says...
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these
anomalies seem to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes
/ counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't
that important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it doesn't
usually affect anything because it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the
battleground states where the odd happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water
leak, but yet some people did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
Yep.
The cheating hasn't yet begun.
In article <uos4bb$200q2$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uors1v$1uqrq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020There were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over
election which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
to the gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can
not assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.h
tml
They did audits, and tRump lost - but then he lied and said he won,
again and again.
What news channel told you they did a full audit?
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning under suspicious circumstances,
the DNC would have mobilized and attacked demanding an audit.
They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/ >the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake Americans' faith in the system
to previous party competition over election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be rigged. When he won he
complained the election was rigged. When he lost he complained the election was rigged.
Remember the boy who cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it up. The annoyance of
Republicans dodging policy to continually harp on your failings and fearmonger can only
cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on policy if you dare.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:42:11 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche <gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops. That's >>>what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats >>>continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting stops when all legally
cast votes have been counted. If that means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late
reporting precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
Of course but that's not what is questionable which is the patterns of voting when compared to all
the data that has been collected from previous elections.
Of course demographics change, patterns change but it's usually only slightly and happens to all
candidates pretty much equally.
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election which is why only 62% believe the
election was fair.
The real reason is that they're sore losers. I've watched races flip all my life. "Red
is leading by a percent and a half but there are several blue precincts that haven't been
counted yet." It's been like that forever and is especially notable given our current
urban/rural political divide.
<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/02/poll-biden-2020-election-illegitimate>
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem to occur only in key
battleground states?
They didn't. Trump losing margins increased across the board. His popular vote loss
margin increased from 3M in 2016 to 7M in 2020.
And why did it seem that Biden was always the candidate benefiting from the above?
And lastly, the democrat's reactions and the way the media exploded with the Biden won fairly
mantra while barely covering items that seemed odd.
If it was the other way around you can bet the DNC and the media would be all over this in order to
defend Biden.
All of that aside, it was the suppression of conservatives, the Hunter Biden laptop in particular,
by the media that gave Biden the win. Coupled of course with the 24x7 demonizing Trump while hiding
Biden.
Republicans don't demonize Democrats? When did this start? Rightist media was hiding the
laptop story?
The October surprise of Hillary's additional investigation in 2016 helped cost her that
election, why didn't the October surprise of the laptop do the same to Biden? It was well
reported.
That is election interference.
That is whining by a sore loser.
Swill
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:12:27 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says... >>>
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these anomalies seem
to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes / >>> >> counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't that >>> >> important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it doesn't usually affect anything because
it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the battleground states where the odd
happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water leak, but yet some people
did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
Yep.
The cheating hasn't yet begun.
Trump is leading in the Republican Party primaries? What a SHOCK!
Stupid comments like those are why Skeeter is killfiled delete.
Swill
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401b4218de56c9c599104a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uos3te$200q2$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...are,
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b073b6699c5ed991026@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <9RasN.235664$7sbb.222766@fx16.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 21:42:53 -0000 (UTC), George Busche
<gbusche@trump.com> wrote:
When an election is closed, it's over. Vote counting stops.
That's what they do with military personnel.
That is not what happened. Using COVID as an excuse, Democrats
continued counting votes until Biden/Harris "won".
Vote counting does NOT stop when the polls close. Vote counting
stops when all legally cast votes have been counted. If that
means Wednesday morning counting of remote, late reporting
precincts, so be it.
Swill
--
There are so many questionable items during the 2020 election
There are no legitimately questionable things about the election.
There are only extremist lying Trumpswabs like you saying there
but there's nothing real. You are lying about "questionable items."
You've been fed lies, and now you're spewing them. They are lies.
Like how great our economy is doing?
Our economy is doing great - better that any Western economy - better
than Russia, better than China.
That doesn't say much.
Stock Market thinks it's more than great - they just hit record high.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401b42adeeade93999104d@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uos430$200q2$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b0fd1e38156d3991028 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these
anomalies seem to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud / mistakes
/ counting errors that are too small to affect the outcome aren't
that important.
All of them should be looked at.
And they do - every election, they have proceedures in place to
verify every election and they use them. Repukes, however, think
collecting ballots in paper bags and popcorn buckets is election
"security".
What a flip around. It's us that want voter ID. Damn you are twisted.
VoterID has nothing to do with ballot counting.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401b46287a302a1099104f@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uos4bb$200q2$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uors1v$1uqrq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020There were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over
election which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
to the gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can
not assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.h
tml
They did audits, and tRump lost - but then he lied and said he won,
again and again.
What news channel told you they did a full audit?
Did you forget about Arizona?
But they do audits all the time withoug telling people. Standared
proceedure is to do hand counts of batches of ballots after they went
through the machine to make sure the counts agree. (that's an "audit")
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.ht
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When he
lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy who
cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it
up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to continually harp
on your failings and fearmonger can only cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
In article <uosk44$25pob$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uos5gq$209nc$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com
says...
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these
anomalies seem to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud /
mistakes / counting errors that are too small to affect the
outcome aren't that important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it
doesn't usually affect anything because it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the
battleground states where the odd happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water
leak, but yet some people did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
Yep.
The cheating hasn't yet begun.
Biden got more votes in New Hampshire not being on the ballot than
tRump who was on the ballot.
Who cares?
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.ht
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When he
lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy who
cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it
up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to continually harp
on your failings and fearmonger can only cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
In article <uosk27$25pob$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b46287a302a1099104f@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uos4bb$200q2$6@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uors1v$1uqrq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020There were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and
election which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
over to the gullible.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can
not assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump
winning under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have
mobilized and attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at
doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_60591
0.h tml
They did audits, and tRump lost - but then he lied and said he
won, again and again.
What news channel told you they did a full audit?
Did you forget about Arizona?
But they do audits all the time withoug telling people. Standared
proceedure is to do hand counts of batches of ballots after they went
through the machine to make sure the counts agree. (that's an
"audit")
You didn't answer the question.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401be2a2a89290f991061@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uosk44$25pob$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uos5gq$209nc$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <uorsrh$1uqrq$6@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com
says...
On 2024-01-24, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
In article <yd1qa6tz2c.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>,
wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> writes:
Then of course there are the questions of why did these
anomalies seem to occur only in key battleground states?
That part's easy: they didn't occur just there. Fraud /
mistakes / counting errors that are too small to affect the
outcome aren't that important.
All of them should be looked at.
Indeed.
And yes fraud occurs everywhere so does miscounting but it
doesn't usually affect anything because it's minor.
However, this time the numbers just don't add up and it's the
battleground states where the odd happenings occurred.
Like Ga where the counting location was evacuated for a water
leak, but yet some people did stay behind.
The water leak was a ruse.
Doesn't that sound odd?
Amazing how Trump is now leading the polls in GA.
Yep.
The cheating hasn't yet begun.
Biden got more votes in New Hampshire not being on the ballot than
tRump who was on the ballot.
Who cares?
The people who voted for him, obviously - the MAJORITY of voters.
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>, governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning under suspicious circumstances,
the DNC would have mobilized and attacked demanding an audit.
They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples [sic] choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake Americans' faith in the system
to previous party competition over election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be rigged. When he won he
complained the election was rigged. When he lost he complained the election was rigged.
Remember the boy who cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it up. The annoyance of
Republicans dodging policy to continually harp on your failings and fearmonger can only
cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on policy if you dare.
In article <uosk27$25pob$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401b46287a302a1099104f@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uos4bb$200q2$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uors1v$1uqrq$3@dont-email.me:
On 2024-01-24, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uorbdf$1rsah$6@dont-email.me...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:uor43j$1qtjj$1@dont-email.me:
... There are so many questionable items during the 2020There were not "questions" there were lies repeated over and over >>>>>>> to the gullible.
election which is why only 62% believe the election was fair.
So you're claiming our elections are NOT secure?
That dominion voting machines, mail-in ballots and the rest can
not assert a secure election?
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.h >>>>> tml
They did audits, and tRump lost - but then he lied and said he won,
again and again.
What news channel told you they did a full audit?
Did you forget about Arizona?
But they do audits all the time withoug telling people. Standared
proceedure is to do hand counts of batches of ballots after they went
through the machine to make sure the counts agree. (that's an "audit")
You didn't answer the question.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>,No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.ht
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When he
lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy who
cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it
up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to continually harp
on your failings and fearmonger can only cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
On 1/25/2024 7:35 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>,No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.ht >>>> ml>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When he
lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy who
cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it
up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to continually harp
on your failings and fearmonger can only cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
On 1/25/2024 7:35 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>,No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump
winning under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have
mobilized and attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at
doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_60591
0.ht ml>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus
electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was
fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When
he lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy
who cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep
it up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to
continually harp on your failings and fearmonger can only cost
you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
On 1/25/2024 7:35 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>,No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
When Trump won.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump winning
under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have mobilized and
attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.ht >>>>>> ml>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was fake? >>>>
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When he >>>>> lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy who
cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep it
up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to continually harp >>>>> on your failings and fearmonger can only cost you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
That's not what the polls say.
On 1/25/2024 8:01 AM, scooter lied:
On 1/24/2024 12:15 PM, Wilson Woods wrote:
On 1/24/2024 9:01 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mO9sN.53937$5Hnd.2547@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:44 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5lVrN.44875$Iswd.18255@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:01 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cfSrN.44067$SyNd.40200@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:04 AM, scooter lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:uonang$143g0$2@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.4018af88e690af5a990f8a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <p4CrN.221406$Ama9.13528@fx12.iad>,
banmilk@hotmail.com says...
On 1/22/2024 12:47 PM, scooter lied:
interpret
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> > news:9zwrN.295260$xHn7.235573@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 4:27 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> news:5eTqN.116701$q3F7.94114@fx45.iad...
On 1/20/2024 4:50 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:f6HqN.211867$Ama9.108404@fx12.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/18/2024 8:50 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh
Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes:
{snip}
He doesn't have to be charged and convicted in >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> order to be
disqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>
accusation.as mere accusation being sufficient.Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
-WBE [IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
happenedThere was a trial in Colorado and Maine's
secretary of state's decision is subject to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> judicial review.
Trump was tried in Colorado for an insurrection >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>
ballotin DC?
No, idiot. Trump was not tried. A civil suit, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> pursuant to Colorado law, was filed in Colorado to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> keep him off the >>>>>>
01/06/2021in that state, pursuant to 14.3. The Colorado court >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> meticulously reviewed what constitutes insurrection >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> and engagement in one, and concluded that the event >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> of >>>>>>
chargedwas an insurrection and that Trump engaged in it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Trump was not on trial.
Further I would note that NO INDIVIDUAL has EVER >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> been >>>>>
with Insurrection for the events on Jan 6th.
People have been tried and convicted for a more >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> serious >>>> charge than insurrection.
Maybe it was more serious, maybe it wasn't.
There is no "maybe" about it. Seditious conspiracy >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> carries a maximum prison term of 20 years;
Great. Now all you have to do is show were Trump was >>>>>>>>>>>>> > convicted.
I don't have to show that, scooter. Conviction is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> required for 14.3 disqualification, scooter.
insurrection carries a maximum penalty of only 10 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> years.
Great.
Yes.
Seditious conspiracy is more serious than insurrection >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> by definition.
Post the definition.
It's implied by the penalty disparity, scooter. A crime >>>>>>>>>>>>> with a harsher penalty is more serious than one with a >>>>>>>>>>>>> less harsh penalty by definition, scooter. That's why it >>>>>>>>>>>>> has the harsher penalty, scooter.
Meanwhile, that means it wasn't insurrection.
There was an insurrection on 01/06/2021, scooter,
regardless of whether or not anyone was charged with that >>>>>>>>>>>>> statutory crime. Insurrection doesn't only mean a
statutory crime, scooter. It's a description of an event, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and that event meets all the criteria for being an
insurrection.
If so people would be charged with it.
False. They *might* be charged with it,
When they are, then 14.3 would apply
It applies regardless of whether or not they're charged with
statutory insurrection, scooter.
Rudy: He's guilty because I SAID SO
That's not what I'm saying, scooter.
That is exactly what you are saying.
That's not what I'm saying, scooter.
He's guilty because you say so....
No, scooter.
otherwise you would agree he can run for President.
That's a total non sequitur, scooter.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not trying to have anything "both ways," scooter.
14.3 is a civil issue only, scooter. You are just wrong in insisting
that a criminal conviction is required in order to invoke
disqualification. You're just wrong. I've offered links to multiple
papers by legal scholars that would elaborate on *why* you're wrong,
but you're too stupid and stubborn to read them. So, in the end, it
comes down to: you are wrong, because I say you are wrong. Sorry,
but you're just wrong (and stupid and illiterate and a drunken
Virginia camper, but those are not what's important here at the
moment).
But you have no proof.
No, I have the opinions of dozens of legal scholars, scooter.
On 1/25/2024 7:38 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JdesN.68800$GX69.34926@fx46.iad...
On 1/24/2024 8:58 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nO9sN.53938$5Hnd.28147@fx03.iad...
On 1/24/2024 5:42 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GkVrN.44860$Iswd.8200@fx05.iad...
On 1/23/2024 10:00 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dfSrN.44068$SyNd.13328@fx33.iad...
On 1/23/2024 5:03 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p4CrN.221406$Ama9.13528@fx12.iad...
On 1/22/2024 12:47 PM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9zwrN.295260$xHn7.235573@fx14.iad...
On 1/22/2024 4:27 AM, scooter lied:
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:5eTqN.116701$q3F7.94114@fx45.iad...
On 1/20/2024 4:50 AM, scooter lied:
People have been tried and convicted for a more serious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charge than insurrection.
"Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:f6HqN.211867$Ama9.108404@fx12.iad...
On 1/18/2024 8:50 PM, Governor Swill wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:09:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2024 9:39 AM, Winston wrote:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>{snip}
Trump has not been disqualified based on a mere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accusation. There was aHe doesn't have to be charged and convicted in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order to be disqualified under 14.3.
Oh? How so?
I read 14.3. I saw nothing in there that I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpret as mere
accusation being sufficient.
-WBE [IANAL, nor do I play one on TV.] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
trial in Colorado and Maine's secretary of state's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision is subject
to judicial review.
Trump was tried in Colorado for an insurrection that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened in DC?
No, idiot. Trump was not tried. A civil suit, pursuant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Colorado law, was filed in Colorado to keep him off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ballot in that state, pursuant to 14.3. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado court meticulously reviewed what constitutes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection and engagement in one,
and concluded that the event of 01/06/2021 was an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection and that Trump engaged in it. Trump was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not on trial.
Further I would note that NO INDIVIDUAL has EVER been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charged with Insurrection for the events on Jan 6th. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Maybe it was more serious, maybe it wasn't.
There is no "maybe" about it. Seditious conspiracy carries >>>>>>>>>>>>> a maximum prison term of 20 years;
Great. Now all you have to do is show were Trump was
convicted.
I don't have to show that, scooter. Conviction is not
required for 14.3 disqualification, scooter.
You assert he committed a crime
No, scooter. In fact, he *did* engage in many crimes, not all >>>>>>>>> of them connected to the insurrection. These are the crimes
addressed in the four federal indictments for election
interference. For example, coordinating the submission of
slates of *fake* electors is a crime, but not connected to the >>>>>>>>> insurrection. Directing the DoJ to send a letter to
states falsely saying that DoJ had found massive "fraud" also >>>>>>>>> is a crime not connected to the insurrection.
Cite the convictions for these alleged crimes.
They're still to come, scooter. His trial is on hold pending the >>>>>>> appellate court chucking out his absurd "immunity" claim. He'll
be convicted on some of the counts, too.
We've been hearing that for about 8 years now
You've been hearing it for less than six months
Is that the length of your memory?
That's the amount of time since Trump was indicted for numerous
election-related crimes, scooter.
And given the number of unsupported indictments
There are no unsupported indictments, scooter.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.401c606c94cd5329910b2@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
On 1/25/2024 7:35 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.401be161758fef0d99105a@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <63g3ri1dctgv3r5gguka5fepdnnb2d93a5@4ax.com>,No, he's not - tRump NEVER won the popular vote. Not once. NEVER,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:30:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
You can bet if things were the other way around, ie:Trump
winning under suspicious circumstances, the DNC would have
mobilized and attacked demanding an audit. They are very good at
doing that.
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/
the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_60591
0.ht ml>
When did Democrats last make up multiple slates of bogus
electors?
When did Democrats protest for three years that an election was
fake?
When Trump won.
Trump is the peoples choice.
You can't compare what Trump and the GOP have done to shake
Americans' faith in the system to previous party competition over
election results.
As far back as 2015 Trump was complaining the election would be
rigged. When he won he complained the election was rigged. When
he lost he complained the election was rigged. Remember the boy
who cried wolf!
Your incessant whining is nothing more than sour grapes but keep
it up. The annoyance of Republicans dodging policy to
continually harp on your failings and fearmonger can only cost
you more votes.
Stop throwing mud on America and the American system and run on
policy if you dare.
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
Ah, yes, the old "polls" bullshit - "must have been fraud because of the polls", Really easy for an ultra rich conservaturd to comission a
"poll" that will say anything they want. Counting actual votes is
different. The political campaigns are really just now getting started -
and Biden got more total votes than tRump - even though Biden's name
wasn't on the ballot.
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> replied:
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
(I probably should get the actual numbers before posting this, but going
from memory...)
IIRC (and my memory could be wrong), the, what I'll call consensus of
polls, forecast I saw yesterday said something like
Trump 38%, Biden 32%, RFK Jr. 19+%.
So "fewer than 50%" is true, but "Trump is ahead of Biden" (including in Georgia) is also true.
On 1/25/2024 11:00 PM, Winston wrote:
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> replied:
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
(I probably should get the actual numbers before posting this, but going from memory...)
IIRC (and my memory could be wrong), the, what I'll call consensus of polls, forecast I saw yesterday said something like
Trump 38%, Biden 32%, RFK Jr. 19+%.
So "fewer than 50%" is true, but "Trump is ahead of Biden" (including in Georgia) is also true.
Not disputing that, but when Skeeter-Shit says Trump is "the choice" of the American people, and *less* than 50% of the public supports him, then Skeeter-Shit is lying.
In article <PSIsN.284619$c3Ea.91233@fx10.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
On 1/25/2024 11:00 PM, Winston wrote:
In article <ifxsN.16695$mMj7.1057@fx01.iad>, air@vatican_.con says...
And he is the "choice" of fewer than 50% of people now.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> replied:
That's not what the polls say. He's even ahead of Biden in Georgia.
(I probably should get the actual numbers before posting this, but going >>> from memory...)
IIRC (and my memory could be wrong), the, what I'll call consensus of
polls, forecast I saw yesterday said something like
Trump 38%, Biden 32%, RFK Jr. 19+%.
So "fewer than 50%" is true, but "Trump is ahead of Biden" (including in >>> Georgia) is also true.
Not disputing that, but when Skeeter-Shit says Trump is "the choice" of the >> American people, and *less* than 50% of the public supports him, then
Skeeter-Shit is lying.
He is and
On 1/26/2024 9:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:says...
In article <wf0tN.248202$Ama9.194988@fx12.iad>, bondrock@att.net
email.me...
On 1/26/2024 7:58 PM, Andrea W, lying Nazi troll whore, lied:
"Baxter"Â wrote in message news:up0jvf$2tuh1$2@dont-
lied:
OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> wrote in
news:J6IsN.52435$6ePe.48256@fx42.iad:
On 1/25/2024 7:51 PM, Andrea W, lying Nazi troll whore, lied:
"OrigInfoJunkie" wrote in message
news:MnDsN.64604$IfLe.25787@fx36.iad...
On 1/25/2024 4:28 PM, Andrea W, lying Nazi troll whore,
Braincell,"Michael A Terrell" wrote in message
news:y9ErN.156074$yEgf.33744@fx09.iad...
On 1/22/2024 4:00 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-
lied:convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing,
"leftist"
No emails, no phone calls, nothing. No proof at all.
There is indisputable proof that it was an insurrection.
You leftists
No.
Ah another leftist
No.
tRumpanzees say anyone who doesn't suck tRump's asshole is a
you Nazi whore.
No one actually says that.
All right-wingnuts figuratively say it. Trump says it, Andrea W,
it. All Nazi
No one says it.
You say it. Andrea W (HIV+ troll Nazi whore) says it. Trump says
right-wingnut shitbags, like you, say it.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.4021965338d4dd5899124d@usnews.blocknews.net:*without*
In article <TTQtN.131456$q3F7.128823@fx45.iad>,
another.loser@terrells.pals says...
No, but in the U.S. at least, people in prison are there after
conviction following due process of law. Trump intends to seize
millions of people and slam them into concentration camps
WANTSMeantime, tRump does NOT want the border probem to be fixed - hedue process, scooter.
No he doesn't. He plans on deporting them.
hordes of "illegal" immigrants to enter the country.
Why is that?
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.40244b2665f4478c991332@usnews.blocknews.net:bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
In article <updvbu$1k3g7$1@dont-email.me>,
pick asays...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.4024217175d327a4991327 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <updpra$1j1dp$2@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Put your money where your mouth is - If tRump gets elected,
untilcharity, give an excalating donation every 6 months (+10%)
crossBorder is completely closed.
Why? The liberals don't do that. They just spend our money on
whatever they want. Shut it down and don't allow anyone to
aboutillegally.
Right here YOU are admitting that tRump will NOT do anything
trollingimmigration that he promises - else you'd agree to the bet.
I never said that. Show me where I said that. You are just
to saylike Rudy. You have no agenda.
You are really stupid, aren't you? You (generic "you") don't have
the exact words in order to have admitted something. If youreally
thought that tRump would close the border, you'd have had noproblem
agreeing to the bet.You
Again - put your money where your mouth is. Start with $100 and
increase it by 10% each 6 months until the border is closed.
thewon't do it because you know damn well that tRump is a liar, and
Tellwhole border issue is a fraud.
Fraud? I used to live on the border. It was never like it is now.
jumpersthe "sanctuary" cities who are now crying about all the fence
Howbeing sent there. Tell the tent cities all over the country that.
killedabout the guy that was deported 5 times and still came back and
Chinasomeone. Trump wants it done legally. When people from Syria and
withare crossing the Mexican border you don't ask questions?
Biden is not the cause of increased migration, and he his working
other governments to stem the tide, and doing everything he canwithin
the law.
nothingSays the guy who wants to complain about the border but want's
You are brainwashed.
actually done - who supports the Repugs blocking the bipartisanborder
bill that Biden says he will immediatly sign and use.
Obama pro-immigration activists and Obama pro-immigration retreads
in the Biden administration are actively encouraging a "peaceful
invasion"
hosebeast@fani.willis <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote in news:20240131.182331.7e09533d@erienetworks.net:
Obama pro-immigration activists and Obama pro-immigration retreads
in the Biden administration are actively encouraging a "peaceful
invasion"
Nope. In fact, Biden asked congress for authority to close the border and Micke Johnson & tRump say "no way"/"Dead on Arrival".
In article <upgtu4$275ha$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
hosebeast@fani.willis <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote in
news:20240131.182331.7e09533d@erienetworks.net:
Nope. In fact, Biden asked congress for authority to close the
Obama pro-immigration activists and Obama pro-immigration retreads
in the Biden administration are actively encouraging a "peaceful
invasion"
border and Micke Johnson & tRump say "no way"/"Dead on Arrival".
Bullshit.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.4025e5b5c02c6d1b9913eb@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upgtu4$275ha$5@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
hosebeast@fani.willis <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote in
news:20240131.182331.7e09533d@erienetworks.net:
Nope. In fact, Biden asked congress for authority to close the
Obama pro-immigration activists and Obama pro-immigration retreads
in the Biden administration are actively encouraging a "peaceful
invasion"
border and Micke Johnson & tRump say "no way"/"Dead on Arrival".
Bullshit.
Bullshit yourself!
You run around with you hair on fire yelling "open borders" and "border over-run" and people in other countries hear "open border" and "over-
run" has the same impact as 'big crowds at X Department store' on Black Friday, YOU'RE the one's assisting what you call invasion. You want to
shut down migreation? Then let people in other countries hear that
Congress passed funding for increased border security, let them hear that Congress passed new tough laws limiting immigration. Let them hear Dems complain that the border is too tight.
otherwise, fuck off.
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.40260c13d04efd24991432 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <uphmau$2arpf$5@dont-email.me>,_spamblock@baxcode.com
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.4025ea1f12efade9913ef@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upgtqm$275ha$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
yousays...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.40247f3af850c8e899137c@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upeh5k$1n34p$4@dont-email.me>,Perhaps
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
I specified he had a fence, something happend to break it
down.
you think once you put a fence it nothing can effect it? Yeah,
--probably do - you thought tRump's fence would close the border
down.gotI
news for you, some of that fence he built has already fallen
Mose was taken down. By the Biden team.
Liar, they didn't take down ANY of the fence, in fact they
repaired sections that fell down.
Yes they did.
Go ahead, post a referenc.
You lost an e.
IOW, you got nothing.
hosebeast@fani.willis <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote in news:20240131.182331.7e09533d@erienetworks.net:
Nope. In fact, Biden asked congress for authority to close the border and Micke Johnson & tRump say "no way"/"Dead on Arrival".
Obama pro-immigration activists and Obama pro-immigration retreads
in the Biden administration are actively encouraging a "peaceful
invasion"
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in news:MPG.402ada15ef582d299916eb@usnews.blocknews.net:all
In article <upqpc8$ahe9$11@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:upmu51$3chc5$4@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.402845bbb6e7a31b99159d@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upkbl2$2vrqk$3@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:upk782$2reg3$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-02-03, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
Because it still allows them to entry illegally. So nothing
changes.
The text of the bill is supposed to be posted shortly so we
sham?can see what a sham it is.So you're saying Republicans in the Senate are party to a
opposedMeanwhile, you're admitting that tRump and the House are
it.without ever seeing the text of the bill.
I never said any of that moron. Trump has nothing to do with
Either you are a liar or totally ignorant. tRump absolutely
demanded his cult in the House kill any and all border fixes.
Cite. Provide the quote, date and source.
Trump never did that and the way he spells Trump shows his
frustration.
Yes he did, it's been all over the real news.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:31:18 -0500, hosebeast@fani.willis <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote:
In <uprcjq$e218$2@dont-email.me> Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:>
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote inall
news:MPG.402ada15ef582d299916eb@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upqpc8$ahe9$11@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:upmu51$3chc5$4@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
news:MPG.402845bbb6e7a31b99159d@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <upkbl2$2vrqk$3@dont-email.me>,
bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:upk782$2reg3$1@dont-email.me:
On 2024-02-03, Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote:
Because it still allows them to entry illegally. So nothing >>>>>>>>> changes.
The text of the bill is supposed to be posted shortly so we
sham?can see what a sham it is.So you're saying Republicans in the Senate are party to a
opposedMeanwhile, you're admitting that tRump and the House are
it.without ever seeing the text of the bill.
I never said any of that moron. Trump has nothing to do with
Either you are a liar or totally ignorant. tRump absolutely
demanded his cult in the House kill any and all border fixes.
Cite. Provide the quote, date and source.
Trump never did that and the way he spells Trump shows his
frustration.
Yes he did, it's been all over the real news.
MSNBC is not "real" news.
Fox is not "real" news.
There! Fixed your spelling mistake for you!
Swill
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 109:09:49 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,487 |