• Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's N

    From Mark Leeper@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 9 08:25:11 2022
    Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Novel (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)

    [Originally published in Argentus, Number 3, Summer 2003]

    Imagine a land so isolated from the world that it was beyond the
    reach even of the forces of evolution. On one plateau deep in the
    remote Amazon rain forest there is a land that has withstood the
    ravages of time. Here dinosaurs and prehistoric ancestors of man
    still live.

    In 1960 I remember being enthralled with the publicity for the
    upcoming film THE LOST WORLD. I was nine years old and anything
    that had to do with dinosaurs was okay with me. I had only
    recently seen the 1959 version of JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE
    EARTH and loved it. But only three sequences in the film had
    dinosaurs. (Okay, to be literal, there are no dinosaurs in that
    film, but at nine I was not ready to make zoological distinctions.)
    The Sunday comics had ads telling a little teasing bit of the
    story of an expedition to a plateau with dinosaurs. I was hooked.
    I guess I still am.

    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author of the Sherlock Holmes series of
    stories, also had a science fiction and fantasy series featuring
    short, wide, and blustery Professor George Edward Challenger. The
    stocky scientist was first introduced in his 1912 novel THE LOST
    WORLD. For this tale Doyle saw the dramatic possibilities of
    humans interacting with live dinosaurs. He told an irresistible
    story of an Amazon plateau so isolated that evolution had passed it
    by and where the dragons of the past still reigned supreme. There
    are two more novels with the same set of adventurers, though they
    are not nearly as interesting or famous. THE POISON BELT is about
    the earth traveling through a field of poisonous ether gas. THE
    LAND OF MIST is a plea for tolerance for a spiritualist church.
    Two shorter stories have Challenger opposing an inventor who has
    created a terrible weapon in "The Disintegration Machine," and
    discovering the Earth is a living organism in "When the Earth
    Screamed." Doyle is said to have preferred writing Challenger
    stories to stories about Sherlock Holmes, though the latter
    undeniably had greater popularity and perhaps were better written.

    The publicity I was seeing in 1960 was for the second of what at
    this writing are six screen adaptations of the novel. In this
    article I will review each of the six adaptations of Doyle's novel
    to the screen. In doing so I face certain problems. First, the
    earliest version is incomplete. I will have to review what is
    available, a restored version of 92 minutes. A more widespread
    problem is that is in my opinion none of the adaptations has been satisfactorily accurate to the novel. Every one of them takes at
    least one woman along and Doyle did not have a woman on the plateau
    in the novel. Each adaptation does a lot of inventing as if there
    was something wrong with Doyle's story. There really is not. If I
    like a version, it really is mostly in comparison to the other
    renditions that may not be as good.

    THE LOST WORLD (1925)

    The 1925 version had the much of the story more faithful to the
    novel than any of the later film versions, though some incidents
    occur out of order. One revision is that in the book Challenger
    brought back only a pterodactyl, and it escapes before it is seen
    by more than a roomful of people. The 1925 silent film version
    apparently thought it would be more dramatic to have the animal
    brought back be a brontosaurus and it does quite a bit of damage
    when it escapes. This would show off imaginatively the stop-motion
    animation.

    The 1925 film version was the first feature-length film to use
    stop-motion animation to any great degree. The technician who
    created the effects was a young Willis O'Brien, who would later be
    in charge of the effects of KING KONG (1933). In fact, though
    O'Brien did not contribute the plot to KING KONG, it has strong
    similarities to THE LOST WORLD, with the animal brought back to
    civilization being a very large ape.

    This first and arguably the best version of Doyle's classic was the
    first version, a silent film. However, for years it has been
    nearly impossible to tell with any assurance much about the 1925
    version of THE LOST WORLD. There are four or five different
    versions of this film. Until relatively recently only an edited
    version a little over an hour has been available. This was much
    chopped down from the original film. Recently a 93-minute version
    has become available to the general public on DVD. Reportedly the
    original release was 104 minutes so only about 11 minutes of the
    original theatrical release are still missing. However, that is
    the released version.

    Sadly, it is impossible to see at this point what the released film
    was really like. Production stills shown on the Turner Classic
    Movie cable channel seem to indicate that there was a great deal
    more of Doyle's plot that was shot than could possibly fit into the
    missing eleven minutes. Some sequences that look like they would
    have not only lengthened the film but made it more faithful to the
    published story. The stills include the "stool of penance" scene
    from the novel in which Challenger used as a most politically
    incorrect way to punish his wife. Also there is indication that as
    with the original novel Challenger was not chosen as one of the
    members of the expedition and he uses trickery to join the party
    after they are on their way. This plot was in the Doyle and was
    apparently filmed for the silent version and then probably edited
    out. (Of the adaptations covered in this article only the 1992
    television version and the "Alien Voices" audio versions are
    faithful to the book in this regard.) So while even the 93-minute
    version indicates large liberties taken from the novel, there was
    probably sequences shot that could have made for a fairly accurate
    version that perhaps never came together.

    I personally recommend this 93-minute version as being more
    entertaining than the 63-minute version that has been available.
    The shorter version has just the minimal story needed to connect up
    the special effects shots. The longer editing makes the expedition
    seems less slapdash and makes the film feel more like a ripping
    adventure story. The shorter editing has the background story be
    little more than a frame for the dinosaur sequences. That
    audiences would settle for that is a testament to the popularity
    that the Willis O'Brien's dinosaur sequences had with audiences.

    It is hard to gage the impact that these sequences must have had
    since so little like them had been seen on the screen before. Many
    of the viewers assumed that the dinosaurs were full-scale
    mechanical creations, and a few were naive enough to believe they
    were seeing real live dinosaurs. It is hard to believe from the
    jerky effects, the best possible at the time, that people took them
    for real. But in fact there were some who did. While the film was
    in production Marion Fairfax, who wrote the screenplay, thought she
    would reassure special effects technician O'Brien and told him that
    if the effects did not work out, the dinosaurs could easily be
    removed from her screenplay. It is hard to imagine how popular a
    film they could a made without the attraction of the dinosaur
    effects.

    The variations in plot from the novel are relatively small changes
    of little consequence until the travelers arrive at the plateau.
    Perhaps the biggest change was the addition of a love interest for
    Malone to go with him on the expedition. This is Paula White,
    daughter of plateau discoverer Maple White, played by Bessie Love.
    After the crew gets to the plateau the story diverges somewhat
    more. The novel talks of two tribes of humans. One are half-human
    Neanderthal sorts, the others are like modern Indians. Doyle
    spends much of the plateau story of how the modern Indians beat the
    half-men, proving the superiority of modern man. Frankly, for me
    this plot is not as interesting as the dinosaur-related plotting.
    In this 1925 version of the film the two tribes are reduced to one
    ape man, played by a man with the unlikely name Bull Montana.
    Montana specialized in playing apes and half-men in the movies.
    Without particularly good looks he had found his niche playing
    ape-men. The filmmakers had only one half-man actor so the story
    more concentrates on dinosaurs. Probably that is not a bad thing.
    Even at the time the dinosaurs were more intriguing to audiences
    than a man in an ape costume, however lurid.

    Some additional liberties are taken. The zoological meeting takes
    place before Malone visits Challenger's home. The escape route
    from the plateau is destroyed by a dinosaur rather than by Gomez.
    The most memorable variation, and one that would inspire other
    films, is that instead of bringing back a pterodactyl, Challenger
    returns with a brontosaurus who then escapes and wreaks havoc in
    London. This popular sequence probably inspired films like KING
    KONG; THE BEAST FROM 20,000 FATHOMS; and BEHEMOTH, THE SEA MONSTER
    (a.k.a. THE GIANT BEHEMOTH).

    I have read a review that said that Willis O'Brien's special
    effects have still rarely been matched. That comment was
    well-intended but I think that Willis O'Brien would be among the
    first to deny it himself. While these effects were a big step
    forward from O'Brien's previous work, he would do better work for
    KING KONG in 1933. O'Brien's protege Ray Harryhausen furthered the
    art a great deal more. O'Brien would probably have been ecstatic
    to see the JURASSIC PARK films, and perhaps none more than THE LOST
    WORLD: JURASSIC PARK II, which I see as in part a tribute to him
    and his contributions. Some of the sequences, like a stampede of
    dinosaurs, are not technically perfect but are ambitious beyond
    belief for a film this early.

    O'Brien was, at the time he made THE LOST WORLD, still having some
    problems with the smooth fluid movement of the figures he is
    animating. He also has a tendency to make the creatures of too
    large a scale. An example is the pterodactyl that seems much too
    massive in comparison to the spur of the plateau. O'Brien would
    similarly exaggerate the size of his stegosaurus in KING KONG.
    Some of his matte scenes, static and traveling, combining images of
    actors and dinosaurs are well ahead of their time. While O'Brien
    never let the humans get too close to the dinosaurs, they
    impressively give scale to the giant beasts. There is one scene in
    which the humans throw a flaming piece of wood in a dinosaur's
    mouth. This could not use stop-motion since there is no effective
    way to animate a flame frame-by-frame. For this effect a
    hand-puppet seems to have been used.

    The acting is sufficient but spotty. Wallace Beery makes the best
    Challenger of any of the screen versions. He is sufficiently gruff
    and pushy. Bessie Love as Paula is not so good and her main talent
    seems to be that she can look frightened well. Arthur Hoyt's
    Summerlee is almost unnoticeable. One barely remembers scenes he
    was in. Lloyd Hughes is bland as Edward Malone and reminds the
    viewer of Harold Lloyd. Lord John Roxton is played by Lewis Stone,
    who later would play dignified roles like Captain Smollet in the
    1934 TREASURE ISLAND and Judge Hardy in the Andy Hardy series.
    Stone makes an imposing Roxton if not a very interesting one. He
    seems almost too dignified to be the great hunter.

    Unless one counts films like KING KONG, UNKNOWN ISLAND, THE LAND
    UNKNOWN, or TWO LOST WORLDS, all of which arguably took some
    inspiration from the Doyle, the next real film version of THE LOST
    WORLD was released in summer of 1960 with Claude Rains as
    Challenger.

    THE LOST WORLD (1960)

    The 1960 version of THE LOST WORLD was the first version I ever
    saw, not too surprising for anyone of the Baby Boomer generation.
    Most critics think that it is a totally ugly dog. I can sympathize
    with that point of view, but do not agree. It certainly is a giant
    step down from the 1925 version. But in the context of a 1960
    film, it comes off a bit better. The 1950s had several gaudy
    adventure films of much the same style, films like RUN FOR THE SUN.
    In years to come the same sort of film would be a special effects
    extravaganza, but in the 1950s filmmakers would use real settings.

    Infusing a little bit of science fiction into that formula is a
    welcome variation. One can almost reconcile oneself to the film in
    that context but then one remembers how badly the "dinosaur"
    effects are created. And there is Frosty the Poodle. The film
    just has its good and more than its share of bad moments.

    The 1960 version of THE LOST WORLD, directed by Irwin Allen (who
    also produced and co-wrote the screenplay with Charles Bennett),
    boasted the name of Willis O'Brien as "effects technician." Sadly
    the dinosaur effects were created by the later illegal practice of
    using live lizards, perhaps enhancing their looks by pasting horns
    or plates on them, and then having them fight other such lizards.
    It was cruel to the animals and only the least discerning audiences
    could suspend disbelief and think of these things as dinosaurs.
    Part of what makes dinosaurs dinosaurs is that they stand straight
    upon their legs the way an elephant does. Lizards have legs that
    go out to the side. Dinosaur bodies can support more weight
    because their legs are like columns under them for support. The
    previous year lizards were used to good effect in JOURNEY TO THE
    CENTER OF THE EARTH to simulate Dimetrodons. However, Dimetrodons
    were not lizards and not dinosaurs.

    This version is not a very good rendering of the story, in spite of
    introducing color to the adaptations. It nonetheless was my
    introduction to Doyle's story and as such it has fond memories for
    me. Rains is too thin to play the barrel-chested discoverer, but
    otherwise he is not too bad at playing Challenger. He has the
    personality approximately right. His acting is the best thing
    about this adaptation. On the other hand, choosing comic actor
    Richard Hayden as Summerlee was a fiasco. His performance grates
    on one's nerves whenever he is on the screen. He acts as if he is
    in some other movie. Michael Rennie makes a decent Roxton. He has
    the self-assured quality that Doyle would have appreciated. David
    Hedison is a little old to play Edward Malone and have the sort of
    boyish enthusiasm and insecurities that Doyle gave that character.

    Irwin Allen updates the story to roughly 1960. The film opens with
    Challenger returning from the Amazon to report his discoveries of
    live dinosaurs on a plateau of South America. With Challenger's
    traditional hatred of reporters he clouts Ed Malone trying to
    interview him. Malone is pulled from the ground by Jennifer Holmes
    (Jill St. John), the daughter of his publisher.

    At the geographic society Challenger reports having seen dinosaurs.
    The skeptical audience suggests a return visit to verify his
    findings. In return for funding, Challenger is saddled with a
    reporter on the expedition, Malone. He also gets Professor
    Summerlee and big game hunter Lord John Roxton. At a stop in South
    America the expedition picks up two local guides, pilot Manuel
    Gomez (Fernando Lamas) and lackey Costa (Jay Novello). (Manuel and
    Gomez are two different characters in the novel.) Also joining the
    expedition more or less by blackmail are Jennifer and her brother
    David (Ray Stricklyn) as well as a poodle named Frosty. The
    siblings are no invention of Doyle, but the choice of the name
    Holmes is likely an allusion to Doyle.

    The expedition takes helicopter to plateau, getting magnificent
    views from overhead. They land the plateau but see no sign of
    dinosaurs. That night they hear a large beast in their vicinity,
    terrorizing them. They soon find their helicopter was crushed and
    kicked over the side of the cliff. We get a glimpse of a large
    lizard with a neck frill. Challenger identifies it as a
    brontosaurus, but what we saw did not look anything like a
    brontosaurus. In any case the explorers find they are now stranded
    on the plateau. The next day they are menaced by man-eating plants
    and more dinosaurs. One of the latter splits up the group and
    Malone and Challenger as one subgroup finds a native girl. Malone
    follows her and finds her, even at the cost of running through the
    web of a four-foot-wide tarantula spider.

    Malone brings her to camp where only Roxton recognizes that
    capturing her could mean trouble from the rest of her tribe.
    Relations are about to degenerate into a fistfight when Roxton
    finds a strange diary. It was kept by Burton (not Maple) White who
    discovered the plateau in partnership with Roxton. White's diary
    says he is waiting for Roxton to rescue him and that he is looking
    for legendary diamonds. Roxton was part of that team, but let the
    others down. He never came to them. Now he has come again with
    Challenger, but with of motive of looking for the diamonds.
    Jennifer is deeply disappointed in the man she was hoping to catch.

    David tries to comfort the native girl and in the process discovers
    that she knows how to use a rifle. He is about to tell the others
    when the group is attacked. The native girl escapes and Malone
    follows. He loses her and Malone returning through the forest
    finds Jennifer. The two are returning to camp when they find
    themselves in the paths of two fighting dinosaurs. They must hide
    as the two titans fight. This is a rather sadistic piece of
    footage when one sees that these are live lizards pitted against
    each other. Eventually they fall over the side of the plateau.

    Jennifer and Mallone return to camp finding it empty. They realize
    that the others have been captured. In moments they find that they
    are also prisoners of the natives. Taken to the native city they
    find drum-beating ceremonies in progress. They are reunited with
    their fellow explorers.

    Just when they realize they are to be eaten the native girl comes
    along to rescue David. With a little effort she is convinced to
    help the whole group escape. He takes them to find a blind Burton
    White (Ian Wolfe). White tells them there is a path thought the
    plateau to the base. How it got there in a volcanic plateau is
    hard to understand. Why would lava take such a path? But the
    expedition takes this path past deadly people-grabbing tendrils and
    a graveyard of dead dinosaurs.

    The entire plateau is starting to erupt and explode. They
    expedition uses fire to keep back the pursuing natives. They find
    the diamonds, but also more trouble and another dinosaur. As they
    leave the plateau blows itself to pieces.

    This version invents its own subplots, but which version does not?
    The script is not great, but it would have made for at least a good
    adventure film had the dinosaurs looked like dinosaurs.

    For those in the audience who would recognize Willis O'Brien's
    name, in the credits as "effect technician." He was reportedly
    asked his opinion of the possibility of lizard special effects and
    told the producers how bad those effects were. They paid him for
    his opinion, ignored it, and put his name in the credits. That
    probably was the plan from the beginning. The film had moments,
    but overall was not very good. The plot is confused with a
    previous expedition that was bungled, a treasure hunt for diamonds,
    and a revenge plot. Perhaps the capper of mistakes was to have the
    woman expedition member bring a poodle. There is no adventure film
    so exciting that it cannot be ruined by the presence of a poodle.
    The Disney film THE ISLAND AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD made the same
    grievous error. Perhaps it was supposed to be a counterpoint of
    Gertrude the Duck of the previous year's far superior JOURNEY TO
    THE CENTER OF THE EARTH, also from Fox. However, while the duck
    worked well, Frosty the poodle served only to demonstrate how silly
    this expedition was. With the exception of the dog, the writing is
    not really bad--it just fails to be very interesting. It might be
    best appreciated if one just does not look at the screen once the
    expedition reaches the plateau.

    With all its faults, at least this film does not talk down to its
    audience and does not have the juvenile feel of the 1992 and 1999
    versions. It has a sort of empty, Technicolor, wide-screen, 1950s
    feel. The plateau never looked so good as seen from above at a
    distance.

    This was a bad and disappointing version of the Doyle, but it would
    neither be the last such, nor would it be the worst. Irwin Allen
    was aiming for an adult audience while relying on a teenage crowd
    (not unlike the soon to begin Bond series). The next version would
    wait thirty-two years, just three years short of the interval
    between the silent and first sound version. And the new version
    was definitely made with a younger audience in mind.

    THE LOST WORLD (1992)

    The 1992 version of THE LOST WORLD, a Canadian production directed
    by Timothy Bond (who previously directed episodes for the
    television series "Star Trek: The Next Generation" and "War of the
    Worlds") and written and co-produced by Harry Alan Towers. The
    film is shot in Zimbabwe and apparently was made together or in
    tandem with a sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. To accommodate
    this location the plateau is moved from South America to Africa.
    The transplant gives the story a sort of H. Rider Haggard feel that
    would be okay, but it is not Doyle.

    Towers's script starts reasonably faithful to the Doyle but quickly
    shows its loyalties are more to sending (condescending) politically
    correct messages than to the text by Doyle. Male chauvinists
    everywhere are given a come-uppance by a strong female on the
    expedition. Because the script is already being written on a
    juvenile level, a boy is added to the expedition to give children
    someone to identify with.

    As in the book, Malone (Edward McCormack) passes himself off to
    Challenger (John Rhys-Davies) as a scientist, but he does not have
    the knowledge to maintain the ruse. Malone is, incidentally, made
    a Canadian to give the Canadian audience a one of their own to care
    about. Challenger attacks Malone, the police intervene, and Malone
    endears himself to Challenger by choosing not to press charges.
    The forming of the expedition is pretty much like in the manner of
    the novel though they end up with woman reporter Jenny Nielson
    (Tamara Gorksu) and a twelve-ish boy Jim (Darren Peter Mercer).
    The character of Roxton has been eliminated and there is no
    equivalent. As in the book but few film versions it is decided
    that it is Summerlee (David Warner) who will lead the expedition
    and Challenger will remain behind. Not to worry, Rhys-Davies is
    too big a star to not be included in the expedition.

    More invented characters come along. On the way the expedition is
    joined by a female Noble Savage in a revealing two-piece outfit.
    She is Malu (Nathania Stanford) and can be counted on to have
    politically correct thinking as everybody raised in the bush would
    have. Also along is the nasty Gomez (Geza Kovacs). One more piece
    that harks from the book--in the end the expedition brings back to
    London a pterodactyl, though the story of the pterodactyl is
    somewhat different from Doyle's tale.

    The reporter Jenny Nielson appears inspired by the real person
    Nellie Bly. She is a slightly aggressive feminist. On the other
    hand John Rhys-Davies makes a passable Challenger in stature and
    temperament. He is, after his earliest scenes and though he feuds
    with Summerlee, less strident and more boyishly likable than in the
    Doyle.

    The choice to do the film in a didactic and juvenile fashion that
    makes it a very bad disappointment after a start that is at least
    decent. The dinosaurs were rubbery and cute with rough edges
    rounded off and so was the writing. The script looks for every
    politically correct lesson that can be wrung from the plot. Doyle,
    of course, had no women on the expedition. The first two film
    versions each had one woman along. This version has two attractive
    women and a plucky youngster. Things are going downhill.

    I will not say much about the sequel, RETURN TO THE LOST WORLD. It
    is not an adaptation of the Doyle, but only inspired by it. The
    story involves European entrepreneurs who want to exploit the
    petroleum in the no longer lost world and the team returns to the
    plateau to protect it. It is not the most original or engaging
    story and did not really need this particular prehistoric land to
    tell its story. The sequel certainly underscored that Maple White
    Land was a noble and wondrous world that needed to be preserved.
    The 1998 version had a very different attitude toward Maple White's
    mysterious land.

    THE LOST WORLD (1998)
    a.k.a. SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD

    Six years after the Canadian production of THE LOST WORLD, the
    story was again adapted in the United States with some unusual
    variations. Even the title was modified. Following the films BRAM
    STOKER'S DRACULA and MARY SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN, it became popular
    to include the original author's name in the title of films based
    on classics. It somehow promised that the content fidelity to the
    original work. BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA added a love interest for
    Dracula that Bram Stoker would not have recognized, and MARY
    SHELLEY'S FRANKENSTEIN had Victor bringing his bride back from the
    dead in precisely the way that the character in the book did not.
    Still, it was popular for a while to put the author's name in the
    title. Hence in two years we have two different films titled SIR
    ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD. This is the first. To make
    things even more confusing the two versions each has the same actor
    playing Summerlee. It must take a lot of explanation on his resume
    that these really are different films. This film proves its
    loyalty (or lack thereof) to the original text by starting in
    Mongolia, of all places.

    The 1998 film opens with Maple White finding a pterodactyl egg and
    paying for it with his life. He lives long enough to pass his
    notebook and other interesting evidence to his traveling companion
    and partner G. E. Challenger (Patrick Bergin, who does not look
    anything like Doyle's Challenger). When Challenger returns to
    London with his claims that dinosaurs exist, showing notebooks as
    his evidence, as usual in adaptations he is met with skepticism and
    is offered the means for an expedition. Amanda White (Jayne
    Heitmeyer) recognizes her father's notebooks and insists on being
    part of the expedition. Mr. Summerlee is ambivalent about being
    asked to go on the expedition, but after a moment agrees. Unique
    in this version, Summerlee is actually a fairly decent and
    interesting character and one the audience cares for. Michael
    Sinelnikoff makes a very acceptable if not highly memorable
    Summerlee. He does such a good job that in the unrelated
    production the following year he repeated the role, though that
    part was not as well written. He is, I believe, the only actor to
    repeat a role in two unconnected productions of THE LOST WORLD. He
    also plays the role in the "Lost World" television series, of which
    I will say more later. John Roxton (David Nerman) is demoted from
    being the book's English lord to being an obnoxious American hunter
    who later proves to be of villainous intent. Arthur (!) Malone the
    reporter also joins the expedition played by an unmemorable Julian
    Casey. Bergin's Challenger gets along neither with Summerlee nor
    Roxton, though the audience likes Roxton considerably less.

    Using several conveyances of the period, which seems to be the
    1930s or so, the crew makes its way to Mongolia and the plateau out
    of time. The final step involves a helium balloon to ascend the
    plateau as a sort of getaway after the team has just rescued Ms.
    White. In the best traditions of KING KONG she had been kidnapped
    by natives and stretched out on a rack. Having just been rescued
    and ascending to a land of vicious dinosaurs, Amanda White
    literally found herself between a rack and a hard place. And a
    hard place, the plateau is. The travelers find their land of dinosaurs--particularly vicious dinosaurs--and two warring tribes.
    One of the tribes are Neanderthals one more modern. In the end of
    an uncomfortable stay only Challenger and White make it out alive,
    though Malone is left behind on plateau like an Edgar Rice
    Burroughs hero.

    We initially see a "brontosaurus" with some features that are wrong
    for the animal. Perhaps some effect artist tried to get creative.
    However, it turns out that the inaccuracy is a feature, not a bug.
    With hundreds of millions of years of evolution. it appears
    dinosaurs have diverged from those in the fossil record. Other
    adaptations have implied that once you got to know this plateau it
    was a groovy place to be. Perhaps one of the best touches of this
    version is that definitely is NOT the case in this adaptation.
    This is probably the goriest adaptation, and the plateau is a
    painful and dangerous place to be. Perhaps inspired by JURASSIC
    PARK this film has the meanest and most nasty dinosaurs of any
    version. The dinosaur effects seem to be in large part digital,
    though perhaps some mechanical effects were used also.

    Making up a little for deficiencies in the writing the film has a
    terrific look. The art direction by Sylvain Gingras has an antique
    Indiana Jones tone. Several interesting vehicles are used to bring
    the explorers to Maple White land, especially a sort of half-track
    bus. While the transplantation from a South American jungle to
    snowy Mongolia seems all wrong, it is not a bad setting for an
    adventure story. It is reminiscent RKO setting their SHE (1935) in
    Tibet rather than Africa.

    In the end, with Malone marooned in Maple White Land as a sort of
    Robinson Crusoe with dinosaurs, it is expected his adventures might
    continue. No sequel was made. However, someone in Canada had a
    very similar idea. Why not have a TV series set on the plateau?
    So nearly at the same time Canadian producers made their own
    version of the story, but handled it as a TV pilot and sold an
    entire TV series on the premise.

    THE LOST WORLD (1999)
    a.k.a. SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE'S THE LOST WORLD

    Richard Franklin directed the 1999 version of THE LOST WORLD as a
    two-hour (minus commercials) pilot for the Canadian TV series of
    the same name. In fact the series sold and apparently ran in
    Canada and the United States. I was less than pleased with the
    pilot, which was very much of a television quality.

    The setup is only vaguely correct and the people never do get off
    the plateau because then we would not have a continuing television
    series, would we? The focus is not even on the characters that
    Doyle created. They are lessened in importance compared to new
    strong (female) characters.

    After an action prolog in which we see a man attacked by something
    big in a jungle, presumably a dinosaur. He finds tall, handsome
    explorer Challenger (Peter McCauley, very unlike Doyle's version).
    He dies in his camp, but not before he leaves Challenger his
    journal and photo negatives of pterodactyls. Challenger returns to
    London with tales of this lost world that he has not visited. He
    tells the geographic society of his discovery. They are skeptical,
    but suggest a special expedition. There are the usual three
    volunteers: Ned Malone (William deVry), Lord John Roxton (William
    Snow, a Pierce Brosnan look-alike), and Dr. Summerlee (Michael
    Sinelnikoff). Michael Sinelnikoff, as I said, also played
    Summerlee in the American version the previous year. In that he
    was a major character. Here, though he plays the same role, he has
    a lot less acting to do.

    In one more variance from the book, Challenger seems to have no
    enmity toward Malone. When the question of who will fund the
    expedition arises a mysterious and beautiful woman steps forward,
    Marguerite Krux (played by Rachel Blakely) and volunteers on the
    proviso that she can come on the expedition. Krux irritatingly has
    attitudes of 1999 and not at all of 1912. She complains about

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to mleeper@optonline.net on Sun Oct 9 09:29:20 2022
    On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 08:25:11 -0700 (PDT), Mark Leeper
    <mleeper@optonline.net> wrote:

    Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Novel (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)

    [Originally published in Argentus, Number 3, Summer 2003]

    <snippo; I have a few remarks on the first two>

    The silent 1925 version is, indeed, much closer to the book than the
    1960 version, including the outer wrapper: the protagonist's going on
    the expedition to impress his sweetie, only to find on his return that
    she has married a bank clerk and her desire for a man of adventure was
    merely a "girlish whim". And in other ways as well, as you noted.

    It is marred by the dialog it assigns to Zambo, the comic relief, an African-American from the Deep South who is heavily stereotyped and,
    for unexplained reasons, is somehow working in the Amazon.

    But the stop-motion is, for its time, fantastic.

    The 1960 version has a few problems. Unlike the 1925 version, where
    the obligatory (in a movie) female member of the expedition is a
    trained explorer herself, the female /here/ is very much a fluff-head.
    The dinosaur action is, however, first-rate -- because (as you noted)
    they are not stop-motion dinosaurs but lizards wearing costumes. I
    don't recall if the film was monitored by an SPCA. Had they ditched
    the costumes and modified the script to talk about "giant lizards"
    instead of "dinosaurs", they would have avoided a lot of the
    criticism. (I have read a suggestion that this happened because CB
    DeMille was sucking all the special effects money out of the studio to
    make /Cleopatra/, leaving O'Brien with few options.)

    OTOH, the comic relief here is the storekeeper, and he is just a
    greedy, grubby opportunist.

    Incidentally, the DVD I purchased for /The Lost World/ contains both
    versions. The 1925 version is 75 minutes long and claims to have been
    restored from the original 35mm negative. In addition to telling you
    this when the disc starts up, starting the movie tells it to you in
    more detail before the actual film starts. The people who did this are
    clearly proud of their work. This leaves it, what, 18 minutes short
    (Maltin gives 93 minutes)? The disk also has 9 minutes of "Outtakes".
    --
    "In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant
    development was the disintegration, under Christian
    influence, of classical conceptions of the family and
    of family right."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sun Mar 3 21:43:56 2024
    Paul S Person wrote:

    On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 08:25:11 -0700 (PDT), Mark Leeper wrote:

    Six Lost Worlds: The Dramatic Adaptations of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Novel (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)

    [Originally published in Argentus, Number 3, Summer 2003]

    <snippo; I have a few remarks on the first two>



    The silent 1925 version is, indeed, much closer to the book than the
    1960 version, including the outer wrapper: the protagonist's going on
    the expedition to impress his sweetie, only to find on his return that
    she has married a bank clerk and her desire for a man of adventure was
    merely a "girlish whim". And in other ways as well, as you noted. ................
    But the stop-motion is, for its time, fantastic.


    The dinosaur action is, however, first-rate -- because (as you noted)
    they are not stop-motion dinosaurs but lizards wearing costumes. ...........




    "In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant
    development was the disintegration, under Christian
    influence, of classical conceptions of the family and of family right."

    ---------------- an interesting quote.




    Wow. both of you guys know what you're talking about!!!


    i think .... Most younger folks today (say, under 40 y.o.) have trouble
    being interested in the Older Sci.Fi. films


    i remember watching Disney's original 1954 [20000 Leagues Under the Sea]
    and was blown-away by the quality not found in the recent Sci.Fi. films


    _________________20000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954 film) https://en.wikipedia.org

    It stars Kirk Douglas, James Mason, Paul Lukas, and Peter Lorre. Photographed in Technicolor, the film was one of the first feature-length motion pictures to be ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)